Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Associative growth behavior of dahi and yoghurt starter cultures with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus in buffalo skim milk

Abstract

We report here for the first time variations in the viability and biochemical activity of dahi and yoghurt cultures, when grown together with therapeutic cultures, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus I and Bifidobacterium bifidum R, in buffalo skim milk. Nearly one log reduction in mesophilic lactic count was observed in dahi supplemented with probiotic cultures after 18 h of incubation at 30 °C. Associative growth increased the titratable acidity (TA) of dahi marginally (from 0.93 to 1.18 % lactic acid) but reduced the TA in yoghurt (from 1.68 to 1.44 % lactic acid). Probiotic culture supplementation reduced volatile acidity (VA) (from 36.0 to 15.8 ml) and diacetyl (from 4.05 to 2.80 ppm) and tyrosine (from 0.46 to 0.36 μg tyrosine/g curd ) content in dahi, whereas it increased VA (from 8.2 to 8.6 ml of 0.01 % NaoH/50 g) and acetaldehyde (from 28.4 to 34.6 ppm) production in yoghurt. Based on these results, the associative growth had no effect on proteolytic activity of probiotic yoghurt.

Introduction

Selected intestinal therapeutic cultures, such as bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus acidophilus, which are capable of growth and acid production in milk, are being used in the manufacture of various fermented milks (Leroy and De Vuyst 2004), with stress being placed on the potential beneficial role of these fermented milks in the human gut (Goldin and Gorbach 1984). The use of such cultures, which can synthesize bacteriocins, vitamins and essential amino acids and establish a stable normal flora in the intestines has been advocated to enhance the therapeutic value and dietary qualities of the fermented milk products and infant formulae (Gilliland 1989; Santosa et al. 2006; Shah 2007; Shamekhi et al. 2011; Tham et al. 2011; Vijayendra and Gupta 2011). Many reviews on functional dairy products describing the beneficial role of these organisms are available (Marshall and Tamime 1997; Ooi and Liong 2010; Özer and Kirmaci 2010; Shah 2007; Sarkar 2008).

A wide variety of fermented milk products containing bifidobacteria and/or acidophilus bacteria along with either mesophilic or thermophilic starters have been developed in the past few years. Different strains of bifidobacteria and L. acidophilus have been used together with the mesophilic lactic starters to prepare the progurt and acidophilus buttermilk products (Kurmann and Rasic 1988). Klupsch (1984) reported a fermented milk drink that was fermented by lactic mesophilic bacteria (Lactococcus lactis, L. cremoris, L. lactis ssp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis) along with a mixed culture of L. acidophilus and bifidobacteria (in a ratio of 1:3) ). Yadav et al. (2007) reported the preparation of probiotic dahi using L. acidophilus and L. casei as adjunct cultures along with mesophilic lactic cultures. In order to improve the nutritive and therapeutic value of yoghurt, attempts have been made to supplement Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus to yoghurt cultures (Tamime and Robinson 1988; Vijayendra and Gupta 2011).

Numerous instances of associative inter-relationships among microorganisms are found in nature. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in particular have the ability to enter into associative relationships with other microbes (Ramachandran and Shah 2010). Yet the associative and especially symbiotic relationships of LAB with probiotic populations remain very poorly explored (Oliveira et al. 2011, 2012a, b), although the strong influence of co-cultures on fermented milk quality has been reported (Oliveira et al. 2012a). The chemical nature of the associative action in terms of its effect on acidity development, flavor production and proteolytic activity, which in turn determines the technological quality of the fermented milk products, is not known. Likewise, reports dealing with the effect of associative growth between dahi cultures with bifidobacteria and L. acidophilus are not available. However, the fermentation characteristics of individual probiotic cultures have been studied in soymilk (Li et al. 2012). Although the biological, biochemical, technological and therapeutical properties of these cultures in terms of their relevance to dairy products have been reviewed (Gomes and Xavier 1999; Roy 2005; Dewan and Tamang 2007), information is still lacking on the associative growth pattern between therapeutic cultures and dahi and yoghurt. Such information is necessary in order to increase our knowledge of the quality of dahi and yoghurt when therapeutic cultures are used along with the conventional cultures of the respective products. With this background, the aim of our study was to investigate the associative growth pattern of dahi and yoghurt cultures in the presence of bifidobacteria and L. acidophilus. This is the first report on the associative behavior of dahi and yoghurt cultures with these cultures in buffalo skim milk (BSM).

Materials and methods

Materials

The starter cultures used for the preparation of dahi (mesophiles, designated as D, containing Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis C10, L. lactis ssp. cremoris C1, L. lactis ssp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis DRC10 in a 1:1:1 ratio), yoghurt (thermophiles, designated as Y, containing Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus HST and Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus RTS in a 1:1 ratio), Bifidobacterium bifidum I and Lactobacillus acidophilus R were collected from the culture collection center of the National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, India (Vijayendra and Gupta 2011). All mesophilic and thermophilic lactic cultures including L. acidophilus were grown in chalk litmus milk, incubated at 30 °C and 37 °C, respectively, and maintained at 4 °C till use. B. bifidum I was grown at 37 °C in deMan Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) broth supplemented with filter-sterilized 0.1 % N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and 0.05 % cysteine hydrochloride solutions and stored at 5 °C until use. For routine use, this culture was grown anaerobically in yeast dextrose milk containing 0.1 % yeast extract and 1.0 % dextrose in BSM. B. bifidum I and L. acidophilus R were added in the ratio of 3:1 to culture combinations of dahi (D) and yoghurt (Y), and designated as DAB and YAB, respectively.

Preparation of the samples

Samples of freshly prepared BSM (200 ml) were poured into 500-ml Erlenmeyer flasks and sterilized at 121 °C for 15 min. After cooling to room temperature, the milk samples were inoculated with 1 % of either the D, DAB, Y and YAB culture combinations. One set of milk samples mixed with culture combinations D and DAB were incubated at 30 °C; another set of milk samples having culture combinations DAB, Y and YAB were incubated at 37 °C. To evaluate the performance of the cultures prepared in various combinations, samples were withdrawn aseptically at regular intervals (6, 12 and 18 h post-inoculation), and the viability and biochemical activity of the cultures were determined (Fig. 1).

Fig.1
figure 1

Schematic flow chart of the experiment conducted to study the associative growth behaviour of dahi and yoghurt starter cultures with probiotic cultures in buffalo milk (BSM). See Table 1 for the culture codes. YD Yeast dextrose, TGV tryptone glucose vegetable

Determination of viable count

To determine the viable count, the samples were serially diluted in sterile phosphate buffer. Appropriate dilutions of the dahi culture combinations was spread on yeast dextrose (YD) agar and LA agar (Klupsch 1984) plates, whereas the formulated yoghurt culture combinations were spread onto tryptone glucose vegetable (TGV) agar and LA agar plates. The YD agar and TGV agar plates were incubated aerobically at 30 °C and 37 °C, respectively, and the LA agar plates were incubated at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions. The viable count was made after 48 h of incubation, and the results were expressed in terms of log colony forming units (CFU) per gram. On LA agar plates, the elevated chocolate brown-coloured colonies were considered to be B. bifidum and the larger, flat grayish-coloured colonies were counted as L. acidophilus.

Biochemical performance of mixed cultures

The titratable acidity (TA) of the samples (10 ml each) was determined by titration against 0.1 N sodium hydroxide (NaoH); acidity was expressed in terms of lactic acid as %TA. The activity of the cultures was determined according to the procedure of Horrall and Elliker (1950). Volatile acidity (VA) of the samples was determined using the method of Hempenius and Liska (1968) by adding 50 g of the sample to a tube containing 3 ml of 1 N sulphuric acid and antifoam A–silicone oil [poly(dimethylsiloxane-co-methylphenylsiloxane)] and subjecting the combination to steam distilling. The first 100 ml of the fraction collected was titrated against 0.01 N NaoH using 0.1 % phenolphthalein indicator. The VA was expressed as millilitres of 0.01 N NaoH per 50 g of sample. The diacetyl and acetaldehyde contents of the samples were determined by the method of Pack et al. (1964) and Lindsay and Day (1965), respectively, and expressed in parts per million (ppm). The proteolytic activity of the samples was determined by the method of Hull (1947), and the tyrosine content was expressed as milligrams per gram sample.

Statistical analysis

The results are presented as the means of replicates ± the standard deviation (SD). The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) method (Senedcor and Cochran 1967).

Results and discussion

Effect on viable cell count

Viable cell counts (VCC) increased up to 18 h of incubation but decreased considerably thereafter with incrasing incubation time (Table 1). The mesophilic lactic count of dahi in the combination DAB after 18 h of incubation was comparatively less at 37 °C than when grown at 30 °C, which indicates the necessity of using the optimum temperature for obtaining the maximum VCC. Higher counts of bifidobacteria and L. acidophilus of dahi in the combination DAB were obtained at an incubation temperature of 37 °C than at 30 °C, possibly due to the higher optimum temperature requirement for these cultures. There was nearly a one log difference in mesophilic count in dahi in the combinations D and DAB after 18 h of incubation at 30 °C, which can be attributed to the presence of the comparatively high acid-producing L. acidophilus in the latter combination, which might have affected the growth of the mesophiles. This effect was more prominent at 37 °C, the temperature at which the maximum growth rate of L. acidophilus was achieved. Higher VCC were achieved for both L. acidophilus R and B. bifidum I at 37 °C than at 30 °C, indicating the need for incubation at 37 °C to achieve higher counts of these cultures and ensure adequate therapeutic properties. Czulak and Hammond (1954) found increased starter activity of the same mesophilic cultures when grown together. Kim (1990) found higher counts of Streptococcus lactis and S. lactis ssp. cremoris or of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and S. salivarius ssp. thermophilus when cultured in mixed cultures than when grown individually.

Table 1 Effect of associative growth behaviour between starter cultures of dahi/yoghurt and probiotic cultures (Bifidobacterium bifidum I and Lactobacillus acidophilus R) on viability in fermented buffalo skim milk

The observations pertaining to yoghurt culture combinations indicated a very slight decrease in the VCC of yoghurt made with the combination YAB than with the combination Y after 18 h of incubation at 37 °C. At this temperature the VCC of therapeutic cultures, especially of bifidobacteria, was comparatively less in yoghurt made with YAB than in dahi in the combination DAB, which may be due to the presence of high acid-producing cultures of yoghurt, the acidity of which might have hampered growth. Similar to our findings, a viability of bifidobacteria exceeding 7 log CFU/ml after 24 h of culture in fermented soy milk was reported recently by Yeo and Liong (2010). In a study involving probiotic bacteria and other starter cultures, Vinderola et al. (2002) observed that starter cultures were more highly inhibited by probiotic bacteria, such as L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. In the presence of co-cultures or cocktail cultures, S. thermophilus exhibited the shortest generation time (0.22–0.28 h) in reconstituted skim milk, which is due to the synergistic effect associated with the release of organic acids, changes in physiology, among others (Oliveira et al. 2011). Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 had a stimulating effect on the growth of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12 and the viable count increased significantly by 6 h of fermentation when grown in ultrahigh temperature-treated (UHT) milk (Moayednia and Mazaheri 2011), which may be due to an increased availability of nonprotein nitrogen due to the higher proteolytic activity of the former culture (Shihata and Shah 2000).

Effect on TA

The TA of dahi and yoghurt prepared with BSM using different cultures is presented in Table 2. The TA produced after 18 h by the combination DAB at 30 °C was slightly higher than that produced by combination D and significantly less (p < 0.05) than the TA produced by combination DAB incubated at 37 °C, which may be due to this being the optimum temperature for the L. acidophilus present in this combination. Dahiya and Speck (1966) reported that S. lactis and Lactobacillus isolates produced acid at a faster rate in a mixed culture than when either strain was grown individually. Mixed cultures of S. lactis ssp. lactis and S. lactis ssp. cremoris perform better in terms of acid production than single cultures (Kim 1990). The stimulation of acid production by paired cultures of S. lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus has also been documented (Kothari 1970).

Table 2 Effect of associative growth behaviour between starter cultures of dahi/yoghurt and probiotic cultures (B. bifidum I and L. acidophilus R) on titratable acidity of fermented buffalo skim milk

The rate of acid development by yoghurt culture Y decreased significantly with the addition of L. acidophilus and B. bifidum, which is in agreement with the observations of Yu and Nakanishi (1975) who also recorded a decrease in TA from 2.75 to 1.62 % with the addition of L. acidophilus to yoghurt culture. However, no significant difference in the TA of yoghurt cultures alone and in association with L. acidophilus after 12 h of incubation at 37 °C in skim milk was observed by Sharma and Singh (1982). The incorporation of Bifidobacterium into yoghurt starter was found to result in a slight reduction of acidity (Kisza et al. 1978). Similarly, while preparing yoghurt from ewe’s milk, Bonczar et al. (2002) noticed the production of significantly less acid by supplementing L. acidophilus and B. for S. thermophilus. Souza and Saad (2009) obtained higher TA values in minas cheese prepared with a combination of S. thermophilus and L. acidophilus than in that prepared with the former culture alone. S. thermophilus stimulated the growth of other LAB either in co-culture (B. lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. rhamnosus or L. bulgaricus) or in cocktail cultures, and S. thermophilus in the presence of L. acidophilus or Bifidobacterium had lower V max (maximum rate of acidification) values than with other cultures and took longer (10 h) to complete the fermentation (to reach pH 4.5) than with other cultures (4–5 h) (Oliveira et al. 2009a). According to the authors of this latter study, either in the presence or absence of inulin, a co-culture of L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus had higher acidity than with other combination of co-cultures. This may be due to the homolactic metabolism of the former culture (Zhao et al. 2007), and the low acidity development in a co-culture of S. thermophilus and Bifidobacterium may be due to the heterolactic nature of the latter culture (Bongaerts et al. 2005). Moayednia and Mazaheri (2011) noticed higher TA (77.25 °D) of the fermented UHT milk when L. acidophilus La-5 and B. lactis Bb-12 were grown together than when they were grown individually (41.83 and 25.60 °D, respectively).

Effect on VA

The pleasing flavour of dahi and yoghurt can be attributed to the optimum level of volatile acid production by the LAB. With regard to VA production, variations were observed between dahi culture combinations D and DAB (Table 3). The addition of therapeutic cultures to dahi culture D drastically decreased VA production from 36.0 to 15.8 ml after 18 h of incubation at 30 °C. No significant difference in VA production by dahi culture DAB was observed, irrespective of incubation temperature, but an increase in VA in yoghurt prepared with YAB cultures was noticed. Similarly, an increased VA development (3.6 ml/50 g) by mixed cultures of yoghurt compared to that of the single cultures (0.6 ml by S. thermophilus and 2.0 ml by Lactobacillus bulgaricus) was found by Singh et al. (1982). Conversely, no significant difference in the VA in mixed cultures of either yoghurt or yoghurt cultures following the addition of L. acidophilus was reported by Yu and Nakanishi (1975) and Sharma and Singh (1982). Bonczar et al. (2002) did not find a significant difference in the production of free fatty acid content with the supplementation of L. acidophilus and B. bifidum to S. thermophilus. However, Güler-Akin (2005) noticed higher VA production (9.1 ml/100 g) in bioyoghurt prepared in combination with L. acidophilus and B. bifidum along with regular yoghurt cultures than in plain yoghurt (7.2 ml) after 14 days of storage at 4 °C.

Table 3 Effect of associative growth behaviour between starter cultures of dahi/yoghurt and probiotic cultures (B. bifidum I and L. acidophilus R) on volatile acidity of fermented buffalo skim milk

Effect on flavour production

The most important flavour components of fermented dairy products are diacetyl and acetaldehyde. The diacetyl content of BSM curds prepared by dahi cultures D and DAB is shown in Fig. 2. From the results, it is evident that the amount of diacetyl liberated by dahi culture D fell significantly (p < 0.05) from 4.05 to 2.80 ppm following the addition of the therapeutic cultures. This fall in diacetyl production might be due to the decrease in the lactococci count in the presence of probiotic cultures. However, with the change in incubation temperature from 30 to 37°C, dahi culture DAB did not show any significant change in diacetyl content. In contrast, Pack et al. (1968) reported higher levels of diacetyl at 22 °C than at 30 °C. In a comparison of single verus mixed cultures, Lindsay and Day (1965) found that diacetyl was produced in the range of 0.1–3.24 ppm by strains of S. lactis ssp. lactis, S. lactis ssp. cremoris, S. lactis ssp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis and Leuconostoc citrovorum grown individually, whereas the mixed cultures of these same species produced as much as 5.45 ppm diacetyl. Contrary to this, Kneifel et al. (1992) found that slightly less diacetyl was produced (3.1–3.4 ppm) by mixed mesophilic cultures (S. lactis ssp. lactis, S. lactis ssp. cremoris and S. lactis ssp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis) than by S. lactis ssp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis alone (3.7 ppm). Nevertheless, this value is relatively very high compared to that produced by the combined culture of S. lactis ssp. lactis and S. lactis ssp. cremoris (0.3 ppm) in cultured milk.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of associated growth among dahi and yoghurt cultures with B. bifidum I and L. acidophilus R on the production of diacetyl and acetaldehyde in fermented BSM. Open diamond Dahi fermented at 30 °C with culture combination D, filled diamond dahi fermented at 30 °C with culture combination DAB, X dahi fermented at 37 °C with culture combination DAB, open circle yoghurt fermented at 37 °C with culture combination Y, filled circle yoghurt fermented at 37 °C with culture combination YAB. See Table 1 for the culture codes

The levels of acetaldehyde, which is the main flavouring compound in yoghurt, in BSM yoghurt prepared by cultures Y and YAB are shown in Fig. 2. Contrary its effect of decreasing diacetyl production by dahi cultures DAB, L. acidophilus and B. bifidum supplementation to yoghurt cultures significantly increased the acetaldehyde content (p < 0.05) from 28.4 to 34.6 ppm after 18 h of incubation at 37 °C. Yuguchi et al. (1989) also found a stimulation of acetaldehyde production in yoghurt cultures supplemented with B. bifidum 15696. These results are contradictory to the observation of Kisza et al. (1978) who reported the production of less acetaldehyde by a mixed yoghurt culture in the presence of Bifidobacterium. However, Sharma and Singh (1982) found no appreciable difference in the acetaldehyde content with yoghurt starters supplemented with L. acidophilus. While preparing yoghurt from ewe’s milk, Bonczar et al. (2002) obtained the production of significantly higher amounts of acetaldehyde by supplementing L. acidophilus and bifidobacteria to S. thermophilus. Similarly, Güler-Akin (2005) noticed the production of a higher acetaldehyde content (> 5 ppm) in bioyoghurt compared to plain yoghurt. There was no significant difference in the taste or sensory quality of dahi and yoghurt with the addition of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium to regular starter cultures of yoghurt and dahi. However, a slightly increased acidic taste was sensed in dahi supplemented with probiotic cultures, possibly because of the higher acid production by L. acidophilus (Vijayendra and Gupta 2011). An increased production of conjugated linoleic acid (38 % higher than the control) was observed by a co-culture of the probiotic L. acidophilus in the presence of maltodextrin as a prebiotic (Oliveira et al. 2009b). The composition of the co-culture influences the level of diacetyl and acetoin production (Oliveira et al. 2012a, b). The addition of a prebiotic, inulin, to a co-culture containing S. thermophilus and L. acidophilus suppressed acetoin production and hindered that of diacetyl due to the catbolic repression of α-acetolactate synthase expression in the former culture (Oliveira et al. 2012a). In a co-culture of S. thermophilus and B. lactis, inulin also increased the amount of volatile compounds and other organic acids, such as lactic and acetic acids, which contribute to the pleasant flavour of the fermented milks, indicating the symbiotic effect between pre- and probiotics (Oliveira et al. 2012b). In the same study, associative growth increased the viable count of S. thermophilus and B. lactis by 15 and 38 % compared to their respective pure cultures, possibly due to mutual interactions.

Effect on proteolytic activity

Lactic acid bacteria are nutritionally fastidious organisms which require an exogenous supply of pre-formed amino acids to initiate growth. They show varying degrees of proteolytic activity, which is generally strain- rather than species-specific. We observed a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the tyrosine content liberated by culture combination DAB, especially when incubated at 37 °C rather than 30 °C (Table 4), which may be due to the high VCC of lactococci in this combination, particularly at 37 °C. Rajagopal and Sandine (1990) observed that lactobacilli possessed greater proteolytic activity than streptococci. The range of tyrosine produced per millilitre of curd was 25–144.6 μg by lactobacilli and 2.4–34 μg by streptococci. Decrease in the proteolysis by mixed mesophilic culture compared to that exhibited by one of the component culture L. lactis ssp. lactis biovar. diacetylactis was observed by Kneifel et al. (1992).

Table 4 Effect of associative growth behaviour between starter cultures of dahi/yoghurt and probiotic cultures (B. bifidum I and L. acidophilus R) on proteolytic activity of fermented buffalo skim milk

We observed no significant decrease in proteolytic activity with the addition of therapeutic cultures to the yoghurt culture combination, and this observation is in agreement with that of Sharma and Singh (1982) with mixed yoghurt culture combination containing L. acidophilus. However, the highest reported proteolytic index was obtained with a combination of L. acidophilus and S. thermophilus in yoghurt (Souza and Saad 2009). Similarly, in another study, the presence of probiotic organisms (L. acidophilus and B. lactis) enhanced proteolysis significantly in comparison with the control batch containing Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus Lb1466 and S. thermophilus St1342 only (Donkor et al 2006). According to these latter authors, the proteolytic activity varied due to the termination pH, but it also appeared to be strain related, and the increased proteolysis improved the survival of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus during storage, resulting in a lowering of the pH and the production of higher levels of organic acids. Bergamini et al. (2009) noticed significant influence of L. acidophilus on secondary proteolysis from the beginning of ripening of a semi-hard cheese; this caused an increase in the levels of small nitrogen-containing compounds and free amino acids and changed the peptide profiles. The effect was more noticeable when it was added to cheese–milk after pre-incubation in an enriched milk fat substrate. Enhanced proteolysis with the three-strain mixed culture (L. acidophilus, L. paracasei and B. lactis) was also observed, suggesting that L. acidophilus played a major role in the secondary proteolysis of probiotic cheeses. However, the addition of L. acidophilus R to yoghurt culture was found to reduce the proteolytic activity (from 0.32 to 0.26 mg tyrosine/g curd) when grown in skim milk for 18 h at 37 °C (Sharma and Singh 1982). These authors found that the rate of proteolysis was comparatively less in acidophilus yoghurt than in plain yoghurt. Ramachandran and Shah (2008) observed a higher proteolytic activity in Bifidobacterium longum 5022 than in L. acidophilus 4461. However, it was less than that of S. thermophilus 1275 and higher than that of S. thermophilus 285 and L. bulgaricus 1092, indicating that the proteolytic activity is strain- rather than species-dependent.

Conclusions

Associative growth behaviour among probiotic cultures and starter cultures of dahi and yoghurt was observed in this study, but there was no significant difference in the taste or sensory quality of dahi and yoghurt with the addition of L. acidophilus and Bifidobacterium to regular starter cultures of yoghurt and dahi. As the probiotic cultures have not hampered the technological quality of dahi and yoghurt, it is advantageous to use these cultures along with starter cultures to improve the therapeutic quality of the fermented dairy products, thereby providing health benefits to consumers.

References

  • Bergamini CV, Hynes ER, Palma SB, Sabbag NG, Zalazar CA (2009) Proteolytic activity of three probiotic strains in semi-hard cheese as single and mixed cultures: Lactobacillus acidophilus. Int Dairy J 19:467–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonczar G, Wszolek M, Siuta A (2002) The effects of certain factors on the properties of yoghurt made from ewe’s milk. Food Chem 79:85–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bongaerts G, Severijnenb R, Timmerman H (2005) Effect of antibiotics, prebiotics and probiotics in treatment for hepatic encephalopathy. Med Hypotheses 64:64–68

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Czulak J, Hammond LA (1954) Compatibility amongst strains of lactic streptococci. Aust J Dairy Technol 9:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahiya RS, Speck ML (1966) Associative growth of Lactobacillus casei and Streptococcus lactis in milk. XVII Int Dairy Congr B:459-465

  • Dewan S, Tamang JP (2007) Dominant lactic acid bacteria and their technological properties isolated from the Himalayan ethnic fermented milk products. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 92:343–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Donkor ON, Henriksson A, Vasiljevic T, Shah NP (2006) Effect of acidification on the activity of probiotics in yoghurt during cold storage. Int Dairy J 16:1181–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland SE (1989) Acidophilus milk products: a review of potential benefits to consumers. J Dairy Sci 72:2483–2494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin BR, Gorbach SL (1984) The effect of milk and Lactobacillus feeding on human intestinal bacterial enzyme activity. Am J Clin Nutr 39:755–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes AMP, Xavier MF (1999) Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus acidophilus: biological, biochemical, technological and therapeutical properties relevant for use as probiotics. Trends Food Sci Technol 10:139–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Güler-Akin MB (2005) The effects of different incubation temperatures on the acetaldehyde content and viable bacteria counts of bio-yogurt made from ewe’s milk. Int J Dairy Technol 58:174–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempenius WL, Liska BJ (1968) Method of determining volatile acids in cultured dairy products. J Dairy Sci 51:221–222

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horrall BE, Elliker PR (1950) An activity test for cheddar and cottage cheese starters. J Dairy Sci 33:245–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hull ME (1947) Studies on milk proteins II. Colorimetric determinations of the partial hydrolysis of proteins in milk. J Dairy Sci 30:891–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim KS (1990) Study on the characteristics of mixed lactic culture bacteria. Res Rep RAD (L) 32:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisza J, Zbikowski Z, Kolend AH (1978) Biochemical and rheological properties of yoghurt with added Bifidobacterium bifidum. XX Int Dairy Cong 1E:545–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Klupsch HJ (1984) Modified bifidus blood agar. Sâure Milcherzeugnisse-Milchmi schgetrânke und Desserts. VerJag Th. Mann, Gelsenkirchen-Buer, p. 362. Cited in: Rasic J ji (1990). Culture media for detection and enumeration of bifidobacteria in fermented milk products. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium. Int Dairy Fed Bull No. 252 pp. 27

  • Kneifel W, Maria K, Angela F, Ulberth F (1992) Screening of commercially available mesophitic dairy starter cultures: biochemical, sensory and microbiological properties. J Dairy Sci 75:3158–3166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothari SL (1970) Associative growth of lactic acid bacteria in starter cultures. Ph.D. thesis. Udaipur University, Udaipur

  • Kurmann JA, Rasic JL (1988) Technology of fermented special products. Int Dairy Fed Bull 227:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy F, De Vuyst L (2004) Lactic acid bacteria as functional starter cultures for the food fermentation Industry. Trends Food Sci Technol 15:67–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Yan L, Wang J, Zhang Q, Zhou Q, Sun T, Chen W, Zhang H (2012) Fermentation characteristics of six probiotic strains in soymilk . Ann Microbiol. doi: 10.1007/s13213-011-0401-8

  • Lindsay C, Day EA (1965) Rapid quantitative method for determination of acetaldehyde in lactic starter cultures. J Dairy Sci 48:665–669

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall VM, Tamime AY (1997) Starter cultures employed in the manufacture of biofermented milks. Int J Dairy Technol 50:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moayednia N, Mazaheri AF (2011) Growth and activity of selected probiotic strains in UHT milk. J Food Biosci Technol 1:63–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RPS, Perego P, Converti A, Oliveira MN (2009a) Effect of inulin on growth and acidification performance of different probiotic bacteria in co-cultures and mixed culture with Streptococcus thermophilus. J Food Eng 91:133–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RPS, Florence ACR, Silva RC, Perego P, Converti A, Gioielli LA, Oliveira MN (2009b) Effect of different prebiotics on the fermentation kinetics, probiotic survival and fatty acids profiles in nonfat synbiotic fermented milk. Int J Food Microbiol 128:467–472

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RPS, Perego P, Oliveira MN, Converti A (2011) Effect of inulin as a prebiotic to improve growth and counts of a probiotic cocktail in fermented skim milk. LWT–Food Sci Technol 44:520–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RPS, Rivas Torres B, Perego P, Oliveira MN, Converti A (2012a) Co-metabolic models of Streptococcus thermophilus in co-culture with Lactobacillus bulgaricus or Lactobacillus acidophilus. Biochem Eng J 62:62–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira RPS, Perego P, Oliveira MN, Converti A (2012b) Growth, organic acids profile and sugar metabolism of Bifidobacterium lactis in co-culture with Streptococcus thermophilus: the inulin effect. Food Res Int 48:21–27. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2012.02.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ooi LG, Liong MT (2010) Cholesterol-lowering effects of probiotics and prebiotics: a review of in vivo and in vitro findings. Int J Mol Sci 11:2499–2522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Özer BH, Kirmaci HA (2010) Functional milks and dairy beverages. Int J Dairy Technol 63:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pack MY, Sandine WE, Elliker PR, Day EA, Lindsay RC (1964) Owades and Jakovac method for diacetyl determination in mixed strain starters. J Dairy Sci 47:981–986

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pack MY, Vedamuthu ER, Sandine WE, Elliker PR, Leesment H (1968) Effect of temperature on growth and diacetyl production by aroma bacteria in single and mixed strain lactic cultures. J Dairy Sci 51:339–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal SN, Sandine WE (1990) Associative growth and proteolysis of Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus in skim milk. J Dairy Sci 73:894–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran L, Shah NP (2008) Proteolytic profiles and angiotensin-I converting enzyme and α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of selected lactic acid bacteria. J Food Sci 73:M75–M81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran L, Shah NP (2010) Characterization of functional, biochemical and textural properties of synbiotic low-fat yogurts during refrigerated storage. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:819–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy D (2005) Technological aspects related to the use of bifidobacteria in dairy products. Dairy Sci Technol 85:39–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santosa S, Farnworth E, Jones PJH (2006) Probiotics and their potential health claims. Nutr Rev 64:265–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S (2008) Effect of probiotics on biotechnological characteristics of yoghurt: a review. Br Food J 110:717–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senedcor WG, Cochran GW (1967) Statistical methods, 6th edn. Oxford-IBH Publishing, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah NP (2007) Functional cultures and health benefits. Int Dairy J 17:1262–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamekhi F, Shuhaimi M, Ariff AB, Yazid AM (2011) Optimization of a cryoprotective medium for infant formula probiotic applications using response surface methodology. Ann Microbiol doi: 10.1007/s13213-011-0328-0

  • Sharma DK, Singh J (1982) Yoghurt starters in skim milk. II. Behaviour of Lactobacillus acidophilus with yoghurt starters. Cult Dairy Prod J 17(4):10–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shihata A, Shah NP (2000) Proteolytic profiles of yoghurt and probiotic bacteria. Int Dairy J 10:401–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singh J, Sharma DK, Jain LK (1982) Acid and flavour production and proteolytic activity by yoghurt starters. Egypt J Dairy Sci 10:125–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza CHB, Saad SMI (2009) Viability of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 added solely or in co-culture with a yoghurt starter culture and implications on physico-chemical and related properties of minas fresh cheese during storage. LWT Food Sci Technol 42:633–640

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamime AY, Robinson RK (1988) Fermented milks-science and technology. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium. Int Dairy Fed Bull No. 227

  • Tham CSC, Peh KK, Bhat R, Liong MT (2011) Probiotic properties of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli isolated from local dairy products. Ann Microbiol. doi: 10.1007/s13213-011-0349-8

  • Vijayendra SVN, Gupta RC (2011) Assessment of probiotic and sensory properties of dahi and yoghurt prepared using bulk freeze dried cultures in buffalo milk. Ann Microbiol. doi: 10.1007/s13213-011-0331-5

  • Vinderola CG, Mocchiutti P, Reinheimer JA (2002) Interactions among lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria used for fermented dairy products. J Dairy Sci 85:721–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav H, Jain S, Sinha PR (2007) Evaluation of changes during storage of probiotic dahi at 7°C. Int J Dairy Technol 60:205–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo S, Liong MT (2010) Effect of prebiotics on viability and growth characteristics of probiotics in soymilk. J Sci Food Agric 90:267–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu JH, Nakanishi T (1975) Studies on production of flavour constituents by various lactic acid bacteria. V. Effect of milk fat on production of volatile carbonyl compounds by mixed lactic acid bacteria starter. Jpn J Dairy Sci 24:A117–A120

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yuguchi H, Hiramatsu A, Doi K, Ida C, Okonogi S (1989) Studies on the flavour of yoghurt cultured with bifidobacteria: significance of volatile components and organic acids in the sensory acceptance of yoghurt. Jpn J Zootech Sci 60:734–741

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao R, Sun J, Mo H, Zhu Y (2007) Analysis of functional properties of Lactobacillus acidophilus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:195–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The corresponding author acknowledges the fellowship received from NDRI, Karnal, to carry out the study. The help received from Dr. K. Jayaraj Rao, Principal Scientist, Dairy Technology Division, NDRI, Bangalore, India for statistical analysis of the data is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sistla Venkata Naga Vijayendra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vijayendra, S.V.N., Gupta, R.C. Associative growth behavior of dahi and yoghurt starter cultures with Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus in buffalo skim milk. Ann Microbiol 63, 461–469 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0490-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0490-z

Keywords