Skip to main content

Table 1 The basic physical and chemical properties of the soil

From: Effect of transgenic cotton continuous cropping on soil bacterial community

Yearsa

Treatmentb

PH

EC (ms m−1)

OM (g kg−1)

TN (g kg−1)

AP (mg kg−1)

AK (mg kg−1)

1

TH2

7.88 ± 0.08 a

0.21 ± 0.10 a

8.74 ± 1.17 a

0.33 ± 0.06 bc

15.51 ± 9.35 a

286.16 ± 47.16 a

25C-1

7.84 ± 0.32 a

0.22 ± 0.10 a

8.68 ± 5.17 a

0.27 ± 0.12 c

13.22 ± 4.25 a

276.36 ± 77.25 a

2

TH2

7.94 ± 0.24 a

0.42 ± 0.47 a

12.22 ± 2.56 a

0.61 ± 0.10 a

20.22 ± 3.71 a

322.05 ± 37.59 a

25C-1

7.84 ± 0.28 a

0.44 ± 0.39 a

12.33 ± 2.39 a

0.44 ± 0.04 b

13.90 ± 5.45 a

302.57 ± 48.22 a

3

TH2

7.50 ± 0.07 a

0.19 ± 0.06 a

11.09 ± 0.39 a

0.39 ± 0.05 bc

11.08 ± 2.71 a

285.48 ± 41.41 a

25C-1

7.67 ± 0.38 a

0.15 ± 0.05 a

10.72 ± 1.45 a

0.28 ± 0.03 c

10.10 ± 4.32 a

248.57 ± 126.77 a

  1. The data have been shown as mean ± SE. Letters following the data indicate significant differences between samples during different sowing years of each cotton line (Duncan’s multiple range test was employed, P < 0.05)
  2. a1, 2, and 3 represent continuous cropping during the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd year, respectively
  3. bAcceptor cotton rhizosphere soil (TH2) and rhizosphere soil of transgenic cotton (25C-1)
Back to article page

Annals of Microbiology

ISSN: 1869-2044

Contact us