Insights into the deriving of rhizosphere microenvironments and its effects on the growth of authentic Angelica sinensis seedlings under continuous monoculture

Table 2 Comparisons of the rhizosphere soil pH value and nutrient concentration in A. sinensis seedlings between RW and CC

Treatment	pH value	SOM (g·kg⁻¹)	Total N (mg·kg⁻¹)	Available P (mg·kg⁻¹)	Available K (mg·kg⁻¹)
RW	6.18 ± 0.01	58.4 ± 1.9*	3759.3 ± 7***	55.5 ± 0.7***	791.3 ± 4.3***
CC	7.10 ± 0.01**	53.0 ± 1.5	1884.7 ± 6	38.2 ± 0.6	325.1 ± 3.1

DATA means ± SE, n = 3. Significant differences were determined using least significant differences (LSD ≤ 0.05) of the Student’ s t-test after one-way ANOVA
SOM soil organic matter, total N total nitrogen, available P available phosphorus, available K available potassium
*, **, and *** indicate significant difference at P-values in 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 level of probabilities, respectively

ISSN: 1869-2044