Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the different of approaches in terms of identification efficiency

From: Mapping of wine yeast and fungal diversity in the Small Carpathian wine-producing region (Slovakia): evaluation of phenotypic, genotypic and culture-independent approaches

No. of isolates analysed

Strain identity based on different methods

ITS sequencinga

Real-time PCRb

Growth on lysine medium

Auxotrophy profiling

A

B

C

D

3

DQ367881 Metschnikowia sp.: 99 %

+

1 strain of the 3 tested was positive

-

-

-

Non-Saccharomyces

Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2

Candida famata

1

AB469378 Saccharomycopsis vini :99 %

-

-

-

-

Non-Saccharomyces

Rhodotorula minuta

2

FN376418, AY027508 Pichia fermentans; FM864201 Pichia kluyveri : 99 %

-

-

-

-

Non-Saccharomyces

Candida krusei / incospicua

6

FJ515178, AM160628 Hanseniaspora uvarum: 100 %

-

+

All 6 strains were positive

-

-

Non-Saccharomyces

Kloeckera sp.

2

AB469378 Torulaspora delbrueckii :99 %

-

-

-

+

All 2 strains were positive

Non-Saccharomyces

Candida magnoliae

7

AM262829, AM262828, AM262827, AY525600 Saccharomyces cerevisiae: 100 %

+

All 7 strains were positive

-

-

-

Saccharomyces

Saccharomyces cerevisiae 1

5

FN393995, GQ376091, FJ793809 Saccharomyces cerevisiae, AY428861 Saccharomyces boulardii: 100 %

+

All 5 strains were positive

-

-

-

Saccharomyces

Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2

5

EU145764 Saccharomyces cerevisiae: 100 %

+

All 5 strains were positive

-

-

-

Saccharomyces

Saccharomyces cerevisiae 2

  1. +, Indicates positive PCR amplification; -, indicates negative PCR amplification
  2. a Percentage accompanying each strain is the percentage similarity
  3. bA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae; B, Hanseniaspora sp.; C, Metschnikowia pulcherrima; D, Torulaspora delbrueckii