Skip to main content

Table 5 Complete design matrix in terms of predicted and actual responses using Response surface-central composite design (CCD)

From: Bioethanol production from sugarcane molasses by co-fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolate TA2 and Wickerhamomyces anomalus isolate HCJ2F-19

Run

Mixing rate

A

Temperature

B

Molasses concentration

C

Incubation time

D

Bioethanol concentration (g.L−1)

Bioethanol yield (%)

Actual

Predicted

Actual

Predicted

1

105

35

35

36

17.58

16.17

33.81

31.09

2

105

25

35

72

16.92

15.64

32.53

30.08

3

155

25

25

36

17.00

17.56

32.69

33.77

4

130

30

30

54

29.38

28.95

56.49

55.67

5

80

30

30

54

13.00

12.91

25.00

24.82

6

130

30

20

54

22.00

21.11

42.31

40.61

7

130

30

30

54

28.77

28.95

55.32

55.67

8

130

20

30

54

21.00

19.89

40.39

38.26

9

105

35

25

72

17.00

17.78

32.69

34.19

10

155

25

35

72

19.00

20.51

36.54

39.44

11

180

30

30

54

22.75

22.11

43.75

42.53

12

155

35

25

72

21.00

20.23

40.39

38.91

13

130

30

30

90

12.00

11.06

23.08

21.27

14

105

35

25

36

17.00

16.70

32.69

32.11

15

155

25

25

72

19.00

19.93

36.54

38.34

16

155

35

35

72

18.00

17.91

34.62

34.44

17

105

25

25

72

15.00

15.88

28.85

30.55

18

130

30

30

54

28.00

28.95

53.85

55.67

19

105

25

25

36

12.00

11.61

23.08

22.34

20

105

25

35

36

12.00

13.98

23.08

26.89

21

155

25

35

36

22.00

20.74

42.31

39.89

22

130

30

30

54

28.66

28.95

55.11

55.67

23

130

30

40

54

21.00

21.16

40.39

40.69

24

130

40

30

54

22.00

22.38

42.31

43.04

25

130

30

30

54

28.89

28.95

55.56

55.67

26

155

35

35

36

21.00

21.33

40.39

41.02

27

130

30

30

54

30.00

28.95

57.69

55.67

28

130

30

30

18

10.00

10.21

19.23

19.64

29

155

35

25

36

20.25

21.05

38.94

40.47

30

105

35

35

72

14.00

14.65

26.92

28.16