Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

fla-typing, RAPD analysis, isolation rate and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli of human origin collected from hospitals in Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the isolation rate, antimicrobial resistance profile and molecular typing of Campylobacter spp. recovered from patients with diarrhea in hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Over a period of 13 months, from 562 diarrheal samples 49 (8.7%) Campylobacter spp. were isolated, of which 34 (69.5%) were Campylobacter jejuni and 12 (24.5%) were identified as Campylobacter coli. Antimicrobial susceptibility and typing of the Campylobacter spp. isolates was carried out using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method, fla-typing and RAPD analysis. The highest resistance in the collected Campylobacter isolates was to ofloxacin (77.5%) followed by ciprofloxacin (73.4%), nalidixic acid (69.3%), ceftazidime (53%), cefotaxime (51%) and carbenicillin (40.8%) while all the isolates were susceptible to imipenem. The results of RAPD analysis and fla-typing showed a relative high diversity and weak clonality amongst Campylobacter spp. isolates from patients with diarrhea in two hospitals in Tehran, Iran. In addition, during the current study, fla-typing proved to be more reliable and reproducible for typing of isolates. To our knowledge, this is the first study providing structural data for RAPD analysis and fla-typing of Campylobacter spp. isolates recovered from Iranian patients.

Introduction

Thermophilic Campylobacter spp. are considered as one of the major causative agents of acute gastro-enteritis in both humans and animals (Al-Mahmeed et al. 2006; Allos 2001; Corcoran et al. 2006; Feodoroff et al. 2009). The clinical manifestations of the enteritis caused by Campylobacter spp. range from asymptomatic infections to severe inflammatory bloody diarrhoea (Muller et al. 2006).

In recent years, many studies from different countries have increasingly reported Campylobacter spp. infections with resistance to commonly used antimicrobials, especially fluroquinolones (Corcoran et al. 2006; Feodoroff et al. 2009). Today, increasing levels of resistance to antimicrobials in Campylobacter spp. has become a major health problem in many countries (Corcoran et al. 2006).

A combination of phenotypic and molecular typing methods, e.g., antimicrobial susceptibility testing and fla-typing, has been used successfully in many epidemiological studies of Campylobacter isolates. These methods have proved reliable for investigation of diversity and relatedness, and to track sources of Campylobacter isolates (Corcoran et al. 2006; Ertaş et al. 2004; Wardak and Jagielski 2009).

To date, limited data focusing on isolation rate, antimicrobial resistance profile and epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. has been published in Iran (Hassanzadeha and Motamedifar 2007), where the isolation rate, significance and prevalence of Campylobacter spp. seem to be higher than previously thought (Feizabadi et al. 2007; Hassanzadeha and Motamedifar 2007; Jafari et al. 2008).

In the current study, we aimed to determine the isolation rate and antimicrobial resistance profile, and to investigate relationships between Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates from patients with diarrhea using fla-RFLPs and RAPD analysis during the period of study in order to gain further insight into the epidemiology of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. circulating in the hospitals of Tehran, Iran.

Material and methods

Study design, bacterial strains and data collection

During November 2008 to December 2009, stool samples of patients with acute diarrhea were investigated for Campylobacter spp. in two hospitals in Tehran, Iran. A diarrheal case was defined according to Sanders et al. (2005). All samples were transported to the laboratory of Department of Foodborne Diseases in Cary-Blair transport medium and microbiological analysis was carried out immediately. Demographic data of the patients were collected using questionnaires handed out to the personnel in hospitals responsible for data collection.

Isolation and microbiological identification of Campylobacter spp.

The collected samples were cultured in different media and an enrichment medium for optimal isolation as follows. Stool samples were transported to the laboratory in Cary-Blair transport medium and then enriched on Preston enrichment broth (Himedia, Mumbai, India) supplemented with polymixinB, rifampicin, trimethoprim lactate, amphotricinB, and 7% defibrinated sheep blood, and incubated under microaerobic conditions (85% N2, 10% CO2, 5% O2) for 24 h at 42°C.

After enrichment, the samples were plated on Brucella agar base (Himedia, Mumbai, India) supplemented with the same antibiotic supplement for the selective isolation of Campylobacter spp. (Himedia, Mumbai, India) and 7% defibrinated sheep blood and incubated under microaerobic conditions (85% N2, 10% CO2, 5% O2) for 48 h at 42°C (Feizabadi et al. 2007).

Colonies that resembled Campylobacter spp. morphologically were further identified by biochemical tests using standard microbiological and biochemical methods as previously described (Aarestrup et al. 1997; Engberg et al. 2000). Campylobacter jejuni ATCC 29428 was used as a positive control.

DNA isolation and detection of Campylobacter spp. at the molecular level

From the isolates positively identified as Campylobacter spp., whole-cell DNA was extracted as previously described (Jafari et al. 2008). To discriminate C. jejuni and C. coli from other Campylobacter spp. grown at 42°C, a specific conserved fragment of 16S rRNA in C. jejuni and C. coli was amplified using the following primers CCCJF: 5′-AATCTAATGGCTTAACCATTA-3′ and CCCJR: 5′-GTAACTAGTTTAGTATTCCGG-3′ (Linton et al. 1997) giving amplicons 852 bp in size. To distinguish between C. jejuni and C. coli isolates, a hippuricase gene (hipO) specific for C. jejuni was amplified using primers hipOF: 5′-GAAGAGGGTTTGGGTGGTG-3′ and hipOR: 5′-AGCTAGCTTCGCATAATAACTTG-3′, whereas a fragment including the 3′-end of an aspartokinase gene (ask) and a major part of an orf encoding a protein of unknown function located downstream from the ask gene is specific for C. coli (Linton et al. 1997). This latter segment was amplified using the primers ccF: 5′-GGTATGATTTCTACAAAGCGAG-3′ and ccR: 5′-ATAAAAGACTATCGTCGCGTG-3′ (Linton et al. 1997). The hipO gene- and the ask gene-associated fragments were 735 bp and 502 bp long, respectively.

Amplification was carried out in PCR buffer (SuperTaq, London, UK), 0.5 μM of each primer (all from Bioneer, Daejeon, Republic of Korea), and 1 U Super Taq DNA polymerase (SuperTaq). Reaction conditions and cycling programs are described in detail elsewhere (Linton et al. 1997). Molecular weight determination of the PCR products was performed by gel electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose using molecular weight standards (Mixed DNA Ladder; Fermentas, Ontario, Canada).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

The collected isolates identified as Campylobacter spp. were tested for susceptibility by the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method on Muller-Hinton Agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) using ampicillin (10 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), imipenem (20 μg), carbenicillin (100 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ofloxacin (5 μg), neomycin (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), colistin (10 μg), and ciprofloxacin (5 μg) (all from MAST House, Merseyside, UK).

Interpretation of inhibition zones was carried out according to the criteria stipulated by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, CLSI, guidelines (CLSI, Wayne 2006), and the resistance break points were those specified by the CLSI and reported either as sensitive or resistant based on standard break points. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism

To detect restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns of the fla gene of the Campylobacter spp., 10 μl of the amplified PCR products were digested using 2.5 U DdeΙ restriction enzyme in a final reaction volume of 30 μl as previously described (Harrington et al. 2003). The digested fragments were then analyzed on 1.6% agarose gels. Reproducibility of the fla-typing results was verified by repeating RFLPs twice for all 46 C. jejuni and C. coli isolates. A dendrogram of the PCR-RFLP of fla gene was created using NTSYS Software (NTSYSpc; Version 2.01; http://www.exetersoftware.com/cat/ntsyspc/ntsyspc.html).

Random amplified polymorphism DNA analysis

The reaction mixture of the random amplified polymorphism DNA (RAPD) analysis was carried out in a total volume of 25 μl containing 40 ng total DNA of each strain, 1.36 pM OPA-11 primer (5′-CAA TCG CCG T -3′) (Bioneer), 1.6 U Taq DNA polymerase (Super Taq), 1.5 μl 500 mM MgCl2, 0.7 μl 10 mM dNTPs in 1X PCR buffer (all from Super Taq). The samples were amplified through four primary cycles (4 min at 94°C, 4 min at 34°C and 4 min at 72°C) and then 40 cycles of denaturation (30 s at 94°C), annealing (1 min at 36°C), extension (2 min at 72°C), and a final step of extension (10 min at 72°C). The PCR product was then separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. RAPD analysis was carried out twice for all 46 C. jejuni and C. coli isolates to check reproducibility.

Results

During the period November 2008 to December 2009, a total of 562 stool samples were collected from patients with diarrhea from two hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The samples were subsequently transferred to the Laboratory of Department of Food Borne Diseases for further analysis. Of all 562 stool samples, 49 (8.7%) were recovered and identified as Campylobacter spp. using microbiological methods. Of all isolated Campylobacter spp., 34 (69.5%) were identified as Campylobacter jejuni and 12 (24.5%) as Campylobacter coli. Three (6.1%) belonged to other Campylobacter spp. and, interestingly, there were no seasonal differences in frequency of Campylobacter spp. isolation. Amongst the positive samples for Campylobacter spp., 31(63.26%) were recovered from children less than 5 years old; no association between sex and Campylobacter isolation rate was observed. The clinical data of patients from whom Campylobacter spp. were isolated are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical data of the 49 patients from whom Campylobacter spp. were isolated

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Susceptibility tests using the Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion method demonstrated that the highest resistance rate among the identified Campylobacter spp. isolates was to ofloxacin 38 (77.5%), followed by ciprofloxacin 36 (73.4%), nalidixic acid 34 (69.3%), ceftazidime 26 (53%), cefotaxime 25 (51%), carbenicillin 20 (40.8%), tetracycline 15 (30.6), ampicillin 8 (16.3%), colistin 7 (14.2%), erythromycin 5 (10.2%), neomycin 5 (10.2%), streptomycin 4 (8.1%), chloramphenicol 4 (8.1%) and gentamicin 2 (4%), whereas all isolates were susceptible to imipenem (Table 2).

Table 2 Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolated from patients with diarrhea from Tehran, Iran. AMP Ampicillin, OFX ofloxacin, CHL chloramphenicol, CIP ciprofloxacin, CAR carbenicilin, ERY erythromycin, GEN gentamicin, NAL nalidixic acid, NEO neomycin, COL colistin, STR streptomycin, TET tetracycline, CAZ ceftazidime, CTX cefotaxime, IMI imipenem

PCR-RFLP analysis of the flaA gene

PCR amplicons of flaA (1,725 bp) were generated from all isolates as well as the reference strains C. jejuni ATCC 29428. After digestion with DdeI, three to seven restriction bands, ranging from 100- to 1,500-bp (Fig. 1), comprised of 38 different banding profiles were observed in the 46 isolates. In addition, five major clusters were identified at a within-cluster similarity level of approximately 80% despite the inconsistency of the RFLP bands at higher similarity levels (Fig. 2). All Campylobacter isolates were distinguishable by the fla-RFLP method. fla-typing of the all C. jejuni and C. coli isolates was demonstrated to be reproducible as the same patterns were seen in two repetitions.

Fig. 1
figure 1

DdeI flaA-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns of Iranian Campylobacter spp. strains. Lanes: 1, 7 Mixed ladder marker; 26 clinical isolates

Fig. 2
figure 2

fla-RFLP dendrogram of Campylobacter coli (c) and Campylobacter jejuni (j) isolates, collected from patients with diarrhea from Tehran, Iran

RAPD analysis

Analysis of the 34 C. jejuni and 12 C. coli isolates by RAPD using the primer OPA-11 yielded 35 distinct band profiles. At a within-cluster similarity level of approximately 70%, five major clusters were identified while all the C. jejuni and C. coli isolates were completely distributed in all clusters. One C. jejuni isolate generated a quite different RAPD profile pattern and clustered as an isolate with less than 60% similarity level (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Random amplified polymorphism DNA (RAPD) analysis dendrogram of C. coli (c) and C. jejuni (j) isolates collected from patients with diarrhea from Tehran, Iran

Repetition of the RAPD-PCR revealed that seven (15%) isolates produced different RAPD patterns when repeated with the same primer (OPA-11), the same reagent concentrations and the same cycling conditions. Furthermore, four isolates (three C. jejuni and one C. coli) did not produce any distinguishable RAPD bands.

Discussion

The current study documents new insights into the isolation rate, antimicrobial resistance profile and epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. clinical isolates in Tehran, Iran. This study also represents the diversity and relatedness of the isolates using RAPD analysis and fla-typing, in combination with antimicrobial susceptibility testing, which have already been proved to be simple and reliable for typing of Campylobacter spp. clinical isolates (Corcoran et al. 2006; Ertaş et al. 2004).

At first glance, the results show a relative higher percentage (8.7%) of Campylobacter spp. in patients with diarrhea in the hospitals of Tehran compared with our previous study (Jafari et al. 2008). The increasing incidence of Campylobacter spp. accentuate on the significance of Campylobacter spp., despite the lack of recognition in the country as, an important cause of diarrhea in Iran like industrialized countries (Wadl et al. 2009). The isolation of Campylobacter spp. in patients with diarrhea in consecutive studies during the 3 years (Baserisaleh et al. 2007; Feizabadi et al. 2007; Jafari et al. 2008) suggests that Campylobacter spp. can be considered as a major diarrheal pathogen, at least in Tehran. In addition, 31(63.26%) of the Campylobacter spp. in the current study were isolated from patients less than 5 years old, revealing the higher incidence of this pathogen in Iranian children compared with older individuals.

During the last decade, an increasing proportion of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter isolates have been reported around the world (Gupta et al. 2004); our study reports a similar trend (Table 2), as all the C. jejuni and C. coli isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent, with the highest resistance rate being observed for ofloxacin 38 (77.5%) followed by ciprofloxacin 36 (73.4%) and nalidixic acid 34 (69.3%). Overall, the present study shows a higher resistance rate towards all of the commonly used antimicrobials compared with previous studies from Iran and other countries (Feizabadi et al. 2007; Gupta et al. 2004). Other antimicrobials, such as ceftazidime, cefotaxime, carbenicillin and tetracycline, had resistance rates of 53%, 51%, 40.8% and 30.6, respectively, which are also higher than in the previous study (Feizabadi et al. 2007).

To date, several phenotypic and molecular typing techniques have been employed successfully for characterization, molecular typing and epidemiology of Campylobacter spp., although each of them also has its advantages and constraints (Corcoran et al. 2006; Ertaş et al. 2004; Wardak and Jagielski 2009; Wassenaar and Newell 2000). However, despite some limitations, analysis of Campylobacter spp. isolates using RAPD analysis and fla-typing has proved to be useful for rapid, preliminary characterization of strains (Fitzgerald et al. 2001). Surprisingly, in the current study, C. jejuni and C. coli isolates were distributed randomly in all clusters (Fig. 2), and we could not distinguish and/or separate our clinical isolates based on the source, RFLP patterns, RAPD bands or antimicrobial profile. In fact, the RFLP patterns showed a high diversity and weak clonality either in C. jejuni or C. coli isolates. Interestingly, in the current study, fla-typing proved to be more reliable, simpler and more reproducible than OPA-11-RAPD analysis as in some (ca. 15%) cases RAPD analysis was not reproducible and generated different patterns for the same isolate when repeated. Furthermore, four isolates (three C. jejuni and one C. coli) did not generate distinguishable RAPD bands while all isolates produced interpretable fla-RFLP bands. These findings are in agreement with the results of Corcoran et al. (2006) and Ertaş et al. (2004), and contradict the findings of Madden et al. (1998) and Nielsen et al. (2000) who described RAPD analysis as being more discriminatory than fla-typing.

It should be noted that discrepancies in prevalence, antimicrobial resistance and typing results of Campylobacter spp. in the current study compared with other studies may be due to the use of different sampling techniques, susceptibility testing, analytical methods, typing techniques, geographical and/or seasonal differences, and it is thus very hard to compare and judge between findings made under different conditions (Ge et al. 2002).

To put the issue into prospective, the findings of the current study revealed fla-typing to be a reliable and reproducible typing method for our isolates compared with RAPD analysis. The results also revealed in diarrheal patients a relative high percentage of Campylobacter spp. with weak clonality and resistance to most antibiotics, especially fluroquinolones. Further investigations on the isolation rate, antimicrobial resistance profile and molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter spp. isolates are required to provide additional insights and comprehensive information on the extent of occurrence and epidemiology of this pathogen in Iran.

References

  • Aarestrup FM, Nielsen EM, Madsen M, Engberg J (1997) Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. from humans, pigs, cattle and broilers in Denmark. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:2244–2250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allos BM (2001) Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends. Clin Infect Dis 32(8):1201–1206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mahmeed A, Senok AC, Ismaeel AY, Bindayna KM, Tabbara KS, Botta GA (2006) Clinical relevance of virulence genes in Campylobacter jejuni isolates in Bahrain. J Med Microbiol 55:839–843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baserisaleh M, Bahador N, Kapadnis BP (2007) A comparison study on antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. Isolates from fecal samples of domestic animals and poultry in India and Iran. J Biol Sci 7(6):977–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran D, Quinn T, Cotter L, Whyte P, Fanning S (2006) Antimicrobial resistance profiling and fla-typing of Irish thermophilic Campylobacter spp. of human and poultry origin. Lett Appl Microbiol 43:560–565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engberg J, On SL, Harrington CS, Gerner-Smidt P (2000) Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. Aerobacter, Helicobacter, and Sutterella spp. In human fecal samples as estimated by re-evaluation of isolation methods for Campylobacters. J Clin Microbiol 38:286–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ertaş HB, Cetinkaya B, Muz A, Ongör H (2004) Genotyping of broiler-originated Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli isolates using fla-typing and random amplified polymorphic DNA methods. Int J Food Microbiol 15(94):203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feizabadi MM, Dolatabadi S, Zali MR (2007) Isolation and drug-resistant patterns of Campylobacter strains cultured from diarrheic children in Tehran. Jpn J Infect Dis 60(4):217–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feodoroff FB, Lauhio AR, Sarna SJ, Hänninen ML, Rautelin HI (2009) Severe diarrhoea caused by highly ciprofloxacin-susceptible Campylobacter isolates. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:188–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald C, Helsel LO, Nicholson MA, Olsen SJ, Swerdlow DL, Flahart R, Sexton J, Fields PI (2001) Evaluation of methods for subtyping Campylobacter jejuni during an outbreak involving a food handler. J Clin Microbiol 39(7):2386–2390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ge B, Bodeis S, Walker RD, White DG, Zhao S, McDermott PF, Meng J (2002) Comparison of the E test and agar dilution for in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Campylobacter. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:487–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta A, Nelson JM, Barrett TJ, Tauxe RV, Rossiter SP, Friedman CR, Joyce KW, Smith KE, Jones TF, Hawkins MA, Shiferaw B, Beebe JL, Vugia DJ, Rabatsky-Her T, Benson JA, Root TP, Angulo FJ (2004) Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter strains, United States, 1997–2001. Emerg Infect Dis 10(6):1102–1109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington CS, Moran L, Ridley AM, Newell DG, Madden RH (2003) Inter-laboratory evaluation of three flagellin PCR/RFLP methods for typing Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli: the CAMPYNET experience. J Appl Microbiol 95:1321–1333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzadeha P, Motamedifar M (2007) Occurrence of Campylobacter jejuni in Shiraz, Southwest Iran. Med Princ Pract 16:59–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jafari F, Shokrzadeh L, Hamidian M, Salmanmzadeh-Ahrabi S, Zali MR (2008) Acute diarrhea due to enteropathogenic bacteria in patients at hospitals in Tehran. Jpn J Infect Dis 61(4):269–273

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linton D, Lawson AJ, Owen RJ, Stanley J (1997) PCR detection, identification to species level, and fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples. J Clin Microbiol 35:2568–2572

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Madden RH, Moran L, Scates P (1998) Frequency of occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in red meats and poultry in Northern Ireland and their subsequent subtyping using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism and the random amplified polymorphic DNA method. J Appl Microbiol 84:703–708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller J, Schulze F, Müller W, Hänel I (2006) PCR detection of virulence-associated genes in Campylobacter jejuni strains with differential ability to invade Caco-2 cells and to colonize the chick gut. Vet Microbiol 113:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen EM, Engberg J, Fussing V, Petersen L, Brogren CH, On SLW (2000) Evaluation of phenotypic and genotypic methods for subtyping Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans, poultry, and cattle. J Clin Microbiol 38:3800–3810

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders JW, Putnam SD, Gould P, Kolisnyk J, Merced N, Barthel V, Rozmaizl PJ, Shaheen H, Fouad S, Frenck RW (2005) Diarrheal illness among deployed US military personnel during Operation Bright Star 2001-Egypt. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 52:85–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wadl M, Pölzler T, Flekna G, Thompson L, Slaghuis J, Köfer J, Hein I, Wagner M (2009) Easy-to-use rapid test for direct detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken feces. J Food Prot 72(12):2483–2488

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wardak S, Jagielski M (2009) Evaluation of genotypic and phenotypic methods for the differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli clinical isolates from Poland. II. PFGE, ERIC-PCR, PCR-flaA-RFLP and MLST. Med Dosw Mikrobiol 61(1):63–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wassenaar TM, Newell DG (2000) Genotyping of Campylobacter spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, PA (2006) CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 16th informational supplement M100–S16; 26:3

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Feizabadi, Dr. Alebouyeh, Ms. Mehrnoosh Enjelasi and staff members of the Department of Food Borne Diseases in the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Shaheed Beheshti University M.C., whose technical assistance made this work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Hamidian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamidian, M., Sanaei, M., Azimi-Rad, M. et al. fla-typing, RAPD analysis, isolation rate and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli of human origin collected from hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Ann Microbiol 61, 315–321 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0141-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0141-1

Keywords