Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Biocontrol of olive knot disease by Bacillus subtilis isolated from olive leaves

Abstract

We evaluated the biocontrol efficacy of a Bacillus subtilis strain isolated from symptomless olive leaves against the olive knot disease pathogen Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi. Bacillus subtilis F1 and F-4 displayed antibacterial activity against the pathogen. In planta, only B. subtilis F1 significantly reduced the weight of knots caused by P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi IVIA 1628 and Aw9, whereas copper treatment was effective only when using strain Aw9, thus a reduction of 50% was obtained. Preliminary characterisation of the active compound produced by B. subtilis F1 showed that it was proteinaceous in nature. These results suggest that B. subtilis strain F1 could be used to control, and prevent infection by, the causal agent of olive knot disease.

Introduction

Olive groves are cultivated extensively in Tunisia, with a total area of 1.7 million ha. Olive trees are constantly faced with the risk of being attacked by pathogenic bacteria and fungi, which can cause severe damage to olive groves. For example, olive knot disease, caused by Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi (P.s pv. savastanoi), is observed in many areas such as Chbika, Bekalta, Sidi Bouzid, Ouedna and Tunis in the north of Tunisia (Krid et al. 2009). The characteristic symptoms of this disease are overgrowths occurring on young twigs, branches and stems but occasionally on the leaves and fruits as well (Lavermicocca et al. 2002; Surico 1986). This pathogen invades the host through the vascular system (Rodríguez-Moreno et al. 2009), and causes severe damage including a reduction in olive yield and quality (Schroth et al. 1968, 1973).

The control of olive knot disease is a difficult task (Lavermicocca et al. 2002) due to the pathogen’s wide host range. Among the control strategies available, chemical pesticides based on copper compounds are most often employed. Continuous use of such chemicals is known to cause undesirable effects such as residual toxicity, development of resistance, environmental pollution, health hazards to humans and animals, and increased expenditure for plant protection. As an alternative, biological control of plant pathogens using antagonistic fungal and bacterial strains is gaining in importance for the management of plant diseases. Bacillus and Pseudomonas are considered as important classes of biocontrol bacteria that are used frequently against various plant diseases (Saravanakumar et al. 2007). Previously, Rokni Zadeh et al. (2008) reported that several fluorescent Pseudomonas have antibacterial activity in vitro against P.s pv. savastanoi. Recently, Kacem et al. (2009) found that several species of Rhizobium displayed antibacterial activity against P.s pv. savastanoi by producing bacteriocins.

Bacillus subtilis is common in nature, nontoxic and harmless to humans and other animals, and non-pathogenic to plants (Acea et al. 1988). Several strains of B. subtilis are known for their effectiveness in controlling several plant pathogens. This bacterium produces antimicrobial compounds in vitro, including the antibiotics zwittermicin-A and kanosamine (Leifert et al. 1995), lipopeptides (Ahimoua et al. 2000; PalBais et al. 2004; Stelle et al. 2002) and the antifungal protein bacisubin (Liu et al. 2007).

In this study, we analysed the efficacy of two strains of B. subtilis for their potential to control P.s pv. savastanoi in vitro and in planta. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the use of bacteria to control olive knot disease.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

Two strains of P.s pv. savastanoi (strain Aw9 and strain 1628) were used in this study. IVIA 1628 was supplied by the Centro de Proteccion Vegetal y Biotecnologia [Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA), Apartado Oficial, Moncada, Valencia, Spain]. Aw9 was isolated from knots harvested from olive trees (cv. Chemlali) planted in the region of Ouedna (Southeast Tunisia). Bacillus subtilis strains F1, B2, and F-4, and Pseudomonas fluorescens strains kf and kf1 were isolated from symptomless olive leaves from orchards located in the region of Sfax (Tunisia) and Kairouan (Tunisia), respectively. Identification of bacterial strains was achieved by comparing 16S rRNA gene (rrs) sequences with the GenBank database using the Basic Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). The pathogenicity of the strains was confirmed by inoculation of bacterial suspension (108 CFU ml−1) on stems of 1-year old olive (cv. Chemlali). Symptom development was noted for up to 2 months after inoculations.

In vitro effect of bacterial antagonists against pathogen

Double layer method

The effect of bacterial antagonists against P.s pv. savastanoi was estimated by means of the modified method of Vidaver (1976) and Stonier (1960). The isolates F1, B2 and F-4 were grown on solid LBA medium at 26°C for 48 h and bacterial suspensions were prepared in sterile distilled water (SDW) at 108 CFU ml−1. Aliquots (20 μl) of the bacterial suspensions were spot-inoculated onto solid LBA medium, and incubated at 25°C for 2 days. At the same day of the spot inoculation, the two P.s pv. savastanoi strains to be tested (IVIA 1628 and Aw9) were streaked over solid King’s medium B. After 2 days of incubation, the antagonistic bacteria were exposed to chloroform vapour for 30 min and the plates were left open for 15 min in a flow cabinet. Bacterial suspension (1 ml) of P.s pv. savastanoi (108 CFU ml−1) was mixed with 3 ml LBA medium (0.6% of agar) at 45°C. This solution was overlaid quickly on plates containing the antagonists. Plates were incubated at 25°C and checked after 24–48 h for the appearance of inhibition haloes surrounding the antagonist spots. The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design with three replicates, and was repeated three times.

Agar well diffusion method

The ability of the antagonist to produce diffusible metabolites was tested using the agar well diffusion assay (AWDA) as reported by Tagg and McGiven (1971). All bacterial isolates were transferred individually to 50 ml Luria-Bertani broth medium (LB broth) in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask and incubated by shaking at 200 rpm for 4 days at room temperature (25–26°C). LBA medium (20 ml) was poured into each sterile Petri dish (90 mm diameter). Bacterial suspension (1 ml; 108 CFU ml−1) of the two P.s pv. savastanoi strains to be tested (IVIA 1628 and Aw9) was mixed with 3 ml LBA medium (0.6% agar) at 45°C. This solution was then quickly overlaid to plates containing LBA medium, and wells of 6 mm diameter were punched in the agar with a sterile steel borer. The antagonist cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 min to remove cell debris. After centrifugation, 100 μl of each sample was filtered through 0.45 μm filters under sterile conditions and used to fill three prepared wells. Copper sulfate solution (100 μl; 1 g l−1) was added to the fourth well and used as a positive control. The plates were then incubated at 25°C and subsequently examined for halos of inhibition around the wells. The inhibition zones were measured. Three replicates were used for each bacterial isolate, and three separate tests were performed.

Effect of antagonistic bacteria on the reduction of olive knot disease

In vivo assays were performed to determine the effect of antagonistic bacteria on the development of knots. A 10-μl aliquot of bacterial suspension containing 108 CFU ml−1 strain IVIA 1628 and Aw9 was inoculated on V-shaped slits (2 mm deep × 3 mm wide) of 2-year-old olive (cv. Chemlali). The slits were protected by Parafilm M. Three days after inoculation, 10 μl SDW (control), or a suspension of antagonistic bacteria or copper sulphate (0.5%) was added to the wounds, which were then covered again with Parafilm M.

The experiment was carried out in duplicate on two different plants, and was performed three times. For each treatment, three inoculations were performed on the main stem of six plants. The inoculated trees were kept in a greenhouse at 25°C. After 2 months, overgrowths were excised from stems and their weights compared. The percentage of inhibition was calculated by counting sites that did not develop knots with respect to the total sites treated.

Preliminary characterisation of antibacterial compounds

Preliminary characterisation of the antibacterial compounds produced by the effective strain F1 was achieved using supernatant samples collected from 72 h cultures according to Rhouma et al. (2008).

Proteinase sensitivity

Sensitivity of the antibacterial compounds to proteolytic enzymes (Proteinase K) was determined by incubation of cell-free supernatant samples for 1 h at 37°C with proteinase K (1 mg ml−1). After incubation, proteinase K was heat inactivated for 3 min at 100°C.

Heat stability

Heat stability of the antibacterial activity was determined by incubation of aliquots (500 μl) of cell-free supernatant at 40°C, 60°C, 80°C and 100°C for 30 min. The activity was also tested at 100°C with incubation times of 30 min, 60 min and 90 min.

pH sensitivity

The activity of the antibacterial compounds at different pH values was estimated after storage of the supernatant culture for 1 day at 4°C in buffer solution ranging from pH 3 to pH 9. After incubation at the indicated pH, the medium was neutralised before the assay was conducted.

Data analysis

Data were subjected to analysis of variance using SPSS software (version 11; http://www.spss.com). Means values among treatments were compared by Duncan’s multiple range test at the 5% (P = 0.05) level of significance.

Results

In vitro effect of bacterial antagonists

Diameters of the inhibition zone induced by the antagonists F1, B2 and F-4 against the two strains of P.s pv. savastanoi (IVIA 1628 and Aw9) are shown in Table 1 and Fig. 1a,b. The results revealed that the highest level of inhibition zone diameter was observed with B. subtilis strain F-4 (Table 1).

Table 1 Inhibition zone diameter (mm) induced by some bacterial strains against Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi strains IVIA1628 and Aw9
Fig. 1
figure 1

Inhibition zones induced by Bacillus subtilis in agar well diffusion (a) and double layer (b) against Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi strain Aw9. a 1 100 μl CuSO4 (1%), 24 100 μl supernatant of B. subtilis strain B2, F1 and F-4, respectively. b PTFb2, PTT and CHb3 (negative control): strains isolated from olive leaves

In planta experiments

Sixty days after inoculation of strains IVIA 1628 and Aw9, typical knots appeared at sites inoculated with strain IVIA 1628, with weights ranging from 0.0508 to 0.7269 g, and from 0.0248 to 0.3636 g when sites were inoculated with strain Aw9. Addition of B. subtilis strain F1 resulted in a percentage of inhibition of 34%, and a reduction in the weight of knots of 70% in V-shaped slits inoculated with strain IVIA 1628. When strain F1 was added to the wounds inoculated with Aw9, formation of smaller knots was observed at all sites (Fig. 2). Analysis of variance of the average weight of knots (Duncan’s test) showed significant differences between treatment with strain F1 and the control, and a reduction of 56% was observed (Fig. 3). When strain F-4 was added to the wounds inoculated with strain IVIA 1628 or Aw9, a reduction of 17% in the weight of knots was obtained. A percentage of inhibition of 23% was obtained for wounds inoculated with strain IVIA 1628. However, in the case of strain Aw9, no inhibition was observed and all sites developed knots. Treatment with copper sulphate (0.5%) resulted in inhibition of 6% and 12% in the case of wounds inoculated with strain IVIA 1628 and Aw9, respectively (Fig. 4) but no significant differences were found between copper treatment and the control in the case of strain IVIA 1628. However, the average weight of knots was significantly lower in copper-treated than in control plants using strain Aw9, with a reduction of 50% being observed (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of antagonistic bacteria on the inhibition of knot formation induced 60 days after inoculation with P.s pv savastanoi IVIA 1628 (a, b, c) or Aw9 (d, e, f). a, d Untreated control; b, e V-shaped notches inoculated with B. subtilis F1; c, f V-shaped notches inoculated with B. subtilis F-4. Arrows Sites of inoculation

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of B. subtilis strain F1, F-4 and copper sulphate (0.5%) on knot weight after inoculation with P.s pv. savastanoi IVIA 1628 or Aw9. Bars topped with different letters denote a significant reduction in knot weight according to Duncan’s multiple range test at P < 0.05

Fig. 4
figure 4

Percentage of knot inhibition by B. subtilis strain F1, F-4 and copper sulphate (0.5%) after inoculation with P.s pv. savastanoi IVIA 1628 or Aw9

Characterisation of antibacterial compounds

The antibacterial activity of B. subtilis F1 was lost completely after treatment with proteinase K at 1 mg ml−1, indicating the proteinaceous nature of the antibacterial compounds. The inhibitory activity of the antibacterial compounds was unaffected by incubating the free-cell supernatant at 40, 60 and 80°C for 30 min. The activity of the free cell supernatant was lost at 100°C. The pH stability of the antibacterial compounds showed an optimum of activity against P. s pv. savastanoi at neutral pH (data not shown).

Discussion

The biological control of olive knot disease has not been well studied. Therefore, the present study tested some strains isolated from symptomless olive leaves known for their efficacy to control some diseases caused by fungi and bacteria for their effectiveness to control olive knot disease. These epiphytic strains are present frequently and naturally on symptomless olive leave (Ercolani 1978, 1991).

In vitro experiments showed that B. subtilis strains F1 and F-4, were efficient against P.s pv. savastanoi, with this effectiveness being expressed by a large inhibition zones obtained in the double layer method. Several mechanisms of action were determined in previous studies, including the production of metabolites with antimicrobial activity (antibiosis), and induction of systemic resistance (Shoda 2000; Whipps 2001). In our study, the zone of inhibition seen in agar well diffusion plates indicated the presence of biologically active metabolite(s) produced by the antagonist, which diffused in the agar medium, after induction by chloroform (Fig. 1a). In planta, the release of antibacterial compounds depends on several factors such as environmental conditions, temperature, pH, and the presence of other microorganisms that can interact with the antagonist. Metabolites excreted by the phytopathogen and the plant can inhibit the biocontrol agent (Someya 2008). Preliminary characterisation of the antimicrobial compound produced by strain F1 showed that it is proteinaceous in nature and relatively heat resistant. Heat stability is important if the antibacterial compound is to be used as a biocontrol agent under environmental conditions, with temperatures reaching 40°C in summer.

The results of pot experiments showed that only B. subtilis strain F1 was effective in reducing the percentage of inhibition and knot weight significantly. Bacillus subtilis proved to be effective in controlling a wide range of diseases caused by fungi and bacteria, such as leaf spot caused by Alternaria brassicae (Sharma and Sharma 2006), Sclerotinia stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Zhang and Xue 2010) and crown gall caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Rhouma et al. 2008). Bacillus subtilis is considered to be a safe biological agent (Merriman et al. 1974; Baker et al. 1985; Turner and Backman 1991). Currently, a commercial fungicide Serenade (B. subtilis QST713) is now available to control some diseases, such as mummy berry disease caused by Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi (Scherm et al. 2004), Sclerotonia stem rot caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) and fire blight caused by Erwinia amylovora.

Bacillus subtilis strain F-4 proved to be effective in vitro but did not show a high percentage of inhibition. This lack of correlation between in vitro results and biocontrol in vivo has been documented in other bacteria like P. fluorescens (Ran et al. 2005; Rajkumar et al. 2005). The lack of effectiveness of B. subtilis F-4 applied to the plants could probably be caused by production of the antibacterial compound at a level insufficient to suppress the pathogen. The inability of this strain to colonize protected sites and to compete with the pathogen (Wilson et al. 1999) could also explain the inefficacy of strain F-4. Extraction of these antibacterial compounds is recommended in order to overcome the difficulties that can occur in the application of microorganisms as biocontrol agents and to formulate products for biological control (Lavermicocca et al. 2002).

This work provides novel information for the study of the biological control of olive knot disease. Thus, the biocontrol agent B. subtilis F1 can be well exploited in future, and active principles for the effective management of olive knot disease can also be isolated and formulated.

References

  • Acea MJ, Moore CR, Alexander M (1988) Survival and growth of bacteria introduced into soil. Soil Biol Biochem 20:209–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahimoua F, Jacquesb P, Deleua M (2000) Surfactin and iturin A effects on Bacillus subtilis surface hydrophobicity. Enzyme Microb Technol 27:749–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker CJ, Stavely JR, Mock N (1985) Biocontrol of bean rust by Bacillus subtilis under field conditions. Plant Dis 69:770–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercolani GL (1978) Pseudomonas savastanoi and other bacteria colonizing the surface of olive leaves in the field. J Gen Microbiol 109:245–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Ercolani GL (1991) Distribution of epiphytic bacteria on olive leaves and the influence of leaf age and sampling time. Microb Ecol 21:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacem M, Kazouz F, Merabet C, Rezki M, De Lajudie P, Bekki A (2009) Antimicrobial activity of Rhizobium sp. strains against Pseudomonas savastanoi, the agent responsible for the olive knot disease in Algeria. Grasas Aceites 60:139–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krid S, Rhouma A, Queseda JM, Penyalver R, Gargouri A (2009) Delineation of P. savastanoi pv. savastanoi strains isolated in Tunisia by ramdom-amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J Appl Microbiol 106:886–894

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lavermicocca PS, Lonigro L, Valerio F, Evidente A, Visconti A (2002) Reduction of olive knot disease by a Bacteriocin from Pseudomonas syringae pv. ciccaronei. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1403–1407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leifert C, Li H, Chidburee S, Hampson S, Workman S, Sigee D, Epton HAS, Harbour A (1995) Antibiotic production and biocontrol activity by Bacillus subtilis CL27 and Bacillus pumilus CL45. J Appl Bacteriol 78:97–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu YF, Chen Z, Ng TB, Zhang J, Zhou M, Song F, Lu F, Liu Y (2007) Bacisubin, an antifungal protein with ribonuclease and hemagglutinating activities from Bacillus subtilis strain B-916. Peptides 28:553–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merriman PR, Price RD, Kollemogen JF, Piggott T, Ridge EH (1974) Effect of seed inoculation with Bacillus subtilis and Streptomyces griseus on the growth of cereals and carrots. Aust J Agric Res 25:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PalBais H, Fall R, Vivanco JM (2004) Biocontrol of Bacillus subtilis against infection of arabidopsis roots by Pseudomonas syringae is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin production. Plant Physiol 134:307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajkumar M, Lee WH, Lee KJ (2005) Screening of bacterial antagonists for biological control of Phytophtora blight of pepper. J Basic Microbiol 45:55–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ran LX, Liu CY, Wu GJ, Van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM (2005) Suppression of bacterial kilt in Eucalyptus urophylla by fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in China. Biol Control 32:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhouma A, Bouri M, Boubaker A, Nesme X (2008) Potential effect of rhizobacteria in the management of crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Plant Pathol 90:517–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Moreno L, Jiménez AJ, Ramos C (2009) Endopathogenic lifestyle of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive knots. Microb Biotechnol 2:476–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rokni ZH, Khavazi K, Asgharzadeh AM, De Mot HR (2008) Biocontrol of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi, causative agent of olive knot disease: antagonistic potential of non-pathogenic rhizosphere isolates of fluorescent Pseudomonas. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 73:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravanakumar D, Vijayakumar C, Kumar N, Samiyappan R (2007) PGPR-induced defence responses in the tea plant against blister blight disease. Crop Protect 26:556–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherm H, Ngugi HK, Savelle AT, Edwards JR (2004) Biological control of infection of blueberry flowers caused by Monilinia vaccinii-corymbosi. Biol Control 29:199–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth MN, Hildebrand DC, O’Reilly HJ (1968) Off-flavor of olives from trees with olive knot tumors. Phytopathology 58:524–525

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth MN, Osgood JW, Miller TD (1973) Quantitative assessment of the effect of the olive knot disease on olive yield and quality. Phytopathology 63:1064–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma N, Sharma S (2006) Control of foliar diseases of mustard by Bacillus from reclaimed soil. Microbiol Res 163:408–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoda M (2000) Bacterial control of plant diseases. J Biosci Bioeng 89:515–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Someya N (2008) Biological control of fungal plant diseases using antagonistic bacteria. J Gen Plant Pathol 74:459–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelle JM, Vlami M, de Souza JT (2002) Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81:379–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonier T (1960) Agrobacterium tumefaciens ConnII. Production of an antibiotic substance. J Bacteriol 79:889–898

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Surico G (1986) Indoleacetic acid and cytokinins in the olive knot disease. An overwiew of their role and their genetic determinants. NATO ASI series. Series H: cell biology, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, pp 315–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagg JR, McGiven AR (1971) Assay system for bacteriocins. Appl Microbiol 21:943

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JT, Backman PA (1991) Factors relating to peanut yield increases after seed treatment with Bacillus subtilis. Plant Dis 75:347–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidaver AK (1976) Prospects for control of phytopathogenic bacteria by bacteriophages and bacteriocins. Annu Rev Phytopathol 14:465–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whipps JM (2001) Microbial interaction and biocontrol in rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 52:485–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Hirano SS, Lindow SE (1999) Location and survival of leaf-associated bacteria in relation to pathogenicity and potential for growth within the leaf. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1435–1443

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang JX, Xue AG (2010) Biocontrol of sclerotinia stem rot (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum) of soybean using novel Bacillus subtilis strain SB24 under control conditions. Plant Pathol 59:382–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the funds of Institut de l’Olivier and Centre de Biotechnologie de Sfax, Tunisia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samira Krid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krid, S., Triki, M.A., Gargouri, A. et al. Biocontrol of olive knot disease by Bacillus subtilis isolated from olive leaves. Ann Microbiol 62, 149–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0239-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0239-0

Keywords