Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Prevalence of toxicogenic bacteria in some foods and detection of Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin genes using multiplex PCR

Abstract

Thirty-three food samples representing seven different food products were collected from the market in Sharkia Governorate (Egypt) and analyzed for their bacterial burden, including total mesophilic bacteria, spore formers, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus cereus, using specific and selective nutrient media. The identified strains were screened for their virulence factors using the agar diffusion method. B. cereus strains CH, GT1, LB3, and G8 were found to be the most potent isolates, with four S. aureus showing nearly equal potency in terms of the virulence factors investigated. Separation of the extracellular proteins of the four most potent B. cereus strains by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed the presence of protein bands with molecular weights ranging from 30 to 53 kDa that were suspected to be hemolytic enterotoxins. Protein bands having molecular weights between 22 and 33 kDa were also observed in three strains (S1, S2, and S3) of the S. aureus strains examined. Applying the multiplex PCR technique, we used two pairs of primers (FHblC and RHblC; FCytK and R2Cytk) to detect the toxin genes (hblC and cytK) in the suspected toxic B. cereus strains and five pairs of primers (SEA-3 and SEA-4; SEB-1 and SEB-2; SEC-5 and SEC-6; SED-1 and SED-2; SEE-1and SEE-2) to detect the five enterotoxins in the S. aureus strains. Our results indicate that the multiplex PCR amplification enabled the rapid detection and identification of enterotoxin genes in food-borne bacteria.

Introduction

Extracellular proteins of pathogenic bacteria are main the contributors to their pathogenesis and are indisputably involved in bacterial virulence. These proteins are involved in a variety of biological functions, ranging from host cell toxicity to more subtle alterations of the host cell for the benefit of the invader (Wooldridge 2009).

The virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria are divided into several groups on the basis of the mechanism of virulence and function. secretary proteins, such as toxins and enzymes, are considered to be important virulence factors (Wu et al. 2008). Members of the genus Bacillus and Staphylococcus are among the pathogenic bacteria, causing a wide variety of diseases through the production of toxins on several substrates, including "food", resulting in "food poisoning".

Bacillus cereus is a spore former and Gram-positive bacillus that is able to survive and proliferate in a wide range of environments, including soil, water, and many types of processed food, such as herbs, spices, milk, meat, raw and cooked vegetables, boiled or fried rice, vanilla sauce, custards, soups, ice cream, and cereals (Mckillip 2000; Granum 2001; Kotiranta et al. 2000; Lindback et al. 2004). Numerous studies performed worldwide have reported on the importance of B. cereus as a cause of food poisoning outbreaks, but as a less causative agent of diarrhea (Kotiranta et al. 2000).

Bacillus cereus causes diarrheal and emetic food poisoning and a variety of typically necrotic non-gastro-intestinal infections (Beecher and MacMillan 1990; Drobniewski 1993; Beecher and Wong 2000; Granum and Baird-Parker 2000; Mckillip 2000; Callegan et al. 2002; Schoeni and Wong 2005). Among the many potential virulence factors of B. cereus, Hemolysin BL (HBL) is a unique and potent three-component pore-forming toxin consisting of three distinct proteins, namely the binding component (B), lytic component (L1), and lytic component (L2) (Beecher and MacMillan 1991; Beecher and Wong 1994).

Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive facultative anaerobic, non-spore former, coagulase-positive coccus. Staphylococcal food poisoning is caused by the ingestion of food containing pre-formed toxins secreted by the bacteria. These are known as staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), and eight serologically distinct types (A, B, C1, C2, C3, D, E, and F) have been recognized to date. Enterotoxin F has been shown to be identical biochemically to toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) that produces toxic shock syndrome commonly associated with the use of tampons during menstruation (Doyle 1989). SEs are responsible for the symptoms associated with staphylococcal food poisoning (Kenny et al. 1993; Matsunaga et al. 1993; Llewelyn and Cohen 2002). The disease is characterized by such symptoms as nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea lasting from 24 to 48 h, with complete recovery usually occurring within 1–3 days. The enterotoxin genes, however, are not uniformly distributed among all S. aureus strains. Dinges et al. (2000) and Boerema et al. (2006) reported on the potency of SEs.

SEA is the most common enterotoxin recovered from food poisoning outbreaks (Balaban and Rasooly 2000), and it is known that 59% of staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks are caused by SEA to SEE (Bergdoll 1989). Argudin et al. (2010) reported that S. aureus produces a wide variety of toxins, including SEA to SEE, SEG to SEI, and SER to SET), as well as and staphylococcal-like (SEl) proteins, which are not emetic in a primate model (SElL and SElQ) or have yet to be tested (SElJ, SElK, SElM to SElP, SElU, SElU2, and SElV). SEs and SEls have been traditionally subdivided into classical (SEA to SEE) and new (SEG to SElU2) types.

Food-borne diseases are mainly caused by pathogenic bacteria which are either transmitted to humans from the animal reservoir or which contaminate the food processing chain. The detection and isolation of pathogenic bacteria from food are often difficult due to the high number of contaminating and indigenous bacteria and the low number of the pathogenic bacteria of concern. In order to obtain even a modest sensitivity, most traditional isolation methods include a selective enrichment and, occasionally, a pre-enrichment step, both of which are labor-intensive and time-consuming.

There is, consequently, scope for improvement in terms of detection and isolation methods, especially with respect to the time needed to produce a diagnosis. The last 20–30 years have seen many developments in techniques and also the dawning of technologies, which were predicted to change the approaches used to detect pathogenic bacteria in food. Several reviews have dealt with the use of DNA probes and the PCR technique in food microbiology (Hill and Keasler 1991; Wolcott 1991; Olsen et al. 1995; Hill 1996). Based on the both the speed and the scale that these techniques have been implemented for research purposes, the reviews unanimously praise the potential of these techniques to overcome some of the inherent problems in detecting and isolating bacterial pathogens from food (Olsen 2000).

PCR-based techniques are used increasingly in food microbiology research as they are well developed and, when applied as culture confirmation tests, reliable, rapid, and sensitive. PCR methods offer a sensitive and specific detection of pathogens and can also discriminate virulent bacteria from avirulent members of the same speciesl (Olsen 2000). In the last 10 years, many authors have proposed the use of PCR methods for the detection of food-borne pathogens to replace the time-consuming culture-based classical techniques (Miethke et al. 1992; Gravet et al. 1999); they are rapid, easy to perform, sensitive, and specific and, therefore, constitute very valuable tools for routine applications.

Several pathogens can be detected simultaneously in one step by multiplex PCR. Various multiplex methods relevant in the field of food microbiology have been used to detect variants of food-borne pathogens with special focus on the enterotoxic strains of S. aureus and B. cereus (Becker et al. 1998; Pinto et al. 2005; Guinebretiere et al. 2006; Ngamwongsatit et al. 2008). Such methods demonstrate the potential for the practical everyday use of PCR methods in food microbiology.

Materials and Methods

Collection of samples

Replicates of seven different food samples [beef luncheon meat, defatted Karish cheese (Koshary), raw cow milk, double cream cheese, Turkish cheese (kasar cheese), raw beef] were collected randomly from different localities in Sharkia Governorate (Egypt).

The food samples were transported in sterile containers within a few hours of collection to the Bacteriology laboratory of the Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University and kept under sterile conditions.

Microbiological analysis

A 25-g sample of each food sample was homogenized in 225 ml of sterile saline solution (0.85% NaCl). Decimal dilutions up to 10−8 were prepared to enumerate total mesophilic bacteria (CFU/g) using the pour plate technique and tryptone soya agar (TSA) medium and to enumerate total spore-forming bacteria (CFU/g) (homogenized food samples placed in water bath at 75°C for 20 min) using the pour plate technique and TSA medium. B. cereus and S. aureus were enumerated and isolated by surface spread plating of 0.1 ml aliquots on the surface of mannitol yolk polymyxin (MYP) agar and Baird Parker agar media, respectively. All media used in our investigation were prepared as described in the manuals of Difco (1994) and Oxoid (1990).

Identification of bacteria

Suspected colonies growing on specific media (MYP and Baird Parker agar media, respectively) were picked, purified, and identified according to procedures recommended by the American Public Health Association (1992) and Federal Drug Administration (2001) using Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Krieg and Holt 1984), Rhodehamel and Harmon (2001), and Todar (2005).

Determination of virulence factors

Hemolysin, lecithinase, and protease enzymes were determined using an agar well diffusion assay according to Reinheimer et al. (1990) and Misra and Kuila (1992). Wells in blood agar, egg yolk agar, and casein agar plates were filled with 40-μl aliquots of filter-sterilized (pore size 0.45 μm) bacterial cultures filtrates. Plates were incubated at the desired temperature for 24 h.

Cellular and extracellular protein patterns were determined using the sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) technique according to Laemmli (1970) and LKB application instructions (1997).

The examined bacterial strains were grown in 50 ml tryptone soya broth (TSB) at 30°C for 24 h. Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation, and the filtrates were separated for further extraction of the extracellular proteins. Bacterial pellets were washed twice using sterile double-distilled water. The bacterial pellets were sonicated, re-suspended in sterile distilled water, and centrifuged. The precipitated cellular proteins were then separated and re-suspended in phosphate buffer, pH 7. The supernatants separated by centrifugation were concentrated 100 times using 70% saturated (NH4)2·SO4. The precipitated extracellular proteins were re-suspended in phosphate buffer, pH 7, and 100 μl of each cellular and extracellular protein preparation was then mixed with 50 μl treatment buffer, boiled in a water bath for 5 min, and injected into the well of the prepared polyacrylamide gel. The separated proteins were first stained with commasie blue, and their molecular weights were determined by comparison with marker proteins having molecular weights ranging between 14 to 116 kDa.

DNA extraction for multiplex-PCR

DNA templates of the tested bacterial cultures were prepared from 4-h cultures grown in TSB at 30°C separately according to the method described by Ngamwongsatit et al. (2008).

Specific multiplex PCR amplification conditions for S. aureus enterotoxin genes sea, seb, sec, sed, and see were as described by Pinto et al. (2005).

PCR amplifications were conducted in a solution containing 1× PCR buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 0.1% Triton X-100), 100 mM of each dNTP, 1 mM of each primer, and 0.5 U of thermostable DNA polymerase (DyNAzyme II DNA polymerase; Finnzymes Oy, Vantaa, Finland) and 5 μl of DNA template, in a final volume of 50 μl. The amplification conditions consisted of 5 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 45 s at the corresponding annealing temperature, and 45 s at 72°C, with a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. PCR products (15 ml) were electrophoresed in a 2% agarose gel in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris–acetate, pH 8.0; 1 mM Na2EDTA). The sizes of the amplicons were estimated using a 100-bp DNA ladder (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) run on the same gel. The oligonucleotides used in this work, their sequences, target positions, and size of amplification fragments are summarized in Table 1 according to Pinto et al. (2005).

Table 1 Oligonucleotides used for multiplex PCR amplification of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin genes

Specific multiplex PCR amplification conditions for B. cereus enterotoxin genes hblC and cytK were according to Ngamwongsatit et al. (2008).

The multiplex PCR amplification was performed in a final volume of 20 μl containing 5 μl of DNA template in a final concentration 1×PCR buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each dNTP, 5 U Taq DNA polymerase, 0.4 μM hlbC primer, and 0.2 μM cytK primer. The oligonucleotides used in our study work, their sequences, target positions, and size of amplification fragments are summarized in Table 2 according to Ngamwongsatit et al. (2008).

Table 2 Primers used for multiplex PCR amplification of Bacillus cereus entrotoxin genes

The amplification consisted of an initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 54 and 56°C for 1 min for hblC and at 58°C for cytK, and elongation at 72°C for 2 min, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. Amplicons were separated in a 1.5% agarose gel and sizes were estimated using a 100 bp DNA ladder (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) run on the same gel. All multiplex PCR reactions were carried out in a GeneAmp PCR System 9700 Thermal Cycler (PE Applied Biosystems, Norwalk, CT).

Primers used in this study were synthesized by Metabion International AG (Martinsried, Germany).

Results and discussion

Contaminated food is a real threat to human public health and welfare. Food-borne diseases are mainly caused by pathogenic bacteria which are either transmitted to humans from the animal reservoir or which contaminate the food processing chain. B. cereus and S. aureus are currently the focus of increasing attention due to their capability to produce a range of enterotoxins and tissue-degrading enzymes (Lund and Granum 1997; Klotz et al. 2003; Do Carmo et al. 2004; Schoeni and Wong 2005). The prevalence of toxigenic stains of B. cereus and S. aureus has been extensively documented in different starchy foods, such as vegetables, puddings, sauces, milk, dairy products, cereals, infant cereal formulas, fried and cooked rice, salads, meat products, salmon, meatballs, pork entrails, pasteurized eggs, ready-to-serve dishes, and cakes (Agata et al. 2002; Schneider et al. 2004; Duc et al. 2005; Pinto et al. 2005; Shaheen et al. 2006; King et al. 2007; Svensson et al. 2007; US FDA/CFSAN 2007). Thus, it is important to evaluate the food safety of different food products widely distributed and sold in Egypt.

The data presented in Table 3 show the prevalence and frequency of B. cereus and S. aureus among the tested food samples. Suspected colonies were counted and isolated using MYP agar and Baird Parker agar media, respectively. In total, 19 isolates related to the B. cereus group and four isolates related to S. aureus were isolated and their identify confirmed according to key of Bergey (Krieg and Holt 1984). Thereafter, the identified isolates were screened for their capability to produce specific virulence factors, namely, hemolysin, licithinase, and protease enzymes (Table 4), using zone diameters (mm) based on a well agar diffusion assay on blood agar, egg yolk agar, and casein agar plates, respectively. B. cereus strains 1, 2, 3, and 4 and S. aureus strains 5, 6, 7, and 8 were chosen as the most potent strains in terms of their virulence factors.

Table 3 Distribution of bacterial load among food samples
Table 4 Test for virulence factors of toxic bacterial isolates

Bacillus cereus strains were observed to produce both an emetic and diarrhoeal enterotoxin, respectively, in addition to other virulence factors, including phospholipase protease and hemolysins, one of which, cereolysin, is a thiol-activated hemolysin. These virulence factors may contribute to enteric and non enteric diseases (Drobniewski 1993). B. cereus emetic toxin has been associated with life-threatening acute conditions, such as fulminant liver failure and rhabdomylosis (Mahler et al. 1997; Yokoyama et al. 1999). This toxin is unique among enterotoxins since it is resistant to proteolytic degradation, extreme pH, and elevated temperatures, being able to survive at 121°C for 90 min (Granum and Lund 1997). Lund et al. (2000) were the first to report that the cytotoxic gene cytK of B. cereus (a clinical isolate) was the only cause of a severe food poisoning outbreak that killed three people. They also reported that CytK toxin had necrotic and hemolytic actions and was completely different from other B. cereus enterotoxins.

Staphylococcus aureus produces one or more toxins simultaneously. Classically, SEs have been divided into five major serological types (SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, and SEE) on the basis of their antigenic properties (Su and Wong 1997). SEA is the most common enterotoxin recovered from food poisoning outbreaks (Balaban and Rasooly 2000), and 59% of all staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks are caused by SEA to SEE (Bergdoll 1989). Staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP), a form of enteritis, is an intoxication rather than a disease, and results from the ingestion of food contaminated with preformed staphylococcal enterotoxins (Bergdoll et al. 1974). Symptoms of SFP usually occur within 1–6 h after food intake and are characterized by nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, and diarrhoea. These symptoms usually subside within 1–3 days, but the patient remains sick for 7–10 days due to effects of toxic shock (Jett et al. 1994; Do Carmo et al. 2004).

SDS-PAGE, which is a common technique used to analyze complex mixtures of proteins, is considered to be a suitable tool for studying gene expression and for fingerprinting living organisms (Smith 1997; Wong and Hancock 2000). In our study, total cellular proteins of selected virulent strains of B. cereus (GT1, CH, LB3, and G8) and S. aureus (S, S1, S2, and S3) were extracted and then fractionated by PAGE. The electrophoretic separation verified the protein patterns of the selected strains and revealed protein bands with molecular weights ranging between 33 to 108 kDa (B. cereus strains) and between 17 to 220 kDa (S. aureus) (Fig. 3). Analysis of the gel photograph by Gel-Pro Analyzer software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD) revealed similarity percentages within B. cereus strains and within S. aureus strains that varied between 20 and 90% and between 63.2 and 82.4%, respectively. Differences were also observed in the number of separated cellular protein bands in the investigated strains (Tables 5, 6; Fig. 1). B. cereus GT1 showed nine protein bands, while B. cereus G8 showed only seven bands; S. aureus strains S and S3 showed 19 bands and strains S1 and S2 showed 17 bands.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) showing the cellular protein pattern of virulent isolates. Lanes: M Protein marker (mixture of 7 purified proteins with molecular weights of 214, 118, 92, 52.2, 35.7, 28.8, 20.8, and 6.8 kDa, respectively), 1, 2, 3, 4 Bacillus cereus strains CH, GT1, LB3, and G8, respectively, 5, 6, 7, 8 Staphylococcus aureus strains S, S1, S2, S3, respectively

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analysis of separated cellular protein bands (Gel-Pro Analyzer software) of the 8 toxigenic strains on acrylamide gel showing their intensities and molecular weights compared with those of the marker protein (6.8–214 kDa)

Table 5 Similarity percentage between selected B. cereus strains for cellular protein
Table 6 Similarity percentage between selected S. aureus for cellular protein

The Gel-Pro Analyzer analysis of the extracellular protein bands of the tested isolates also revealed varying degres of similarity between the virulent strains, with a range of 50 to 83.3% in B. cereus and 50 to 75% in S. aureus (Tables 7, 8; Fig. 2). Figure 4 shows distinct protein bands in lanes 1, 2, 3 and 4 (B. cereus strains CH, GT1, LB3, and G8, respectively), with molecular weights of 19.26, 30.24, 33.98, 53.44, and 72.59 kDa; 19.6, 30.12, 33.75, 35.53, and 53.19 kDa; (30.03, 33.67, 35.08, 43.24, 53.14, and 234.36 kDa, and 19.63, 22.77, 30.93, 33.53, 43.23, and 234.36 kDa, respectively. S. aureus strains S, S1, S2, and S3 possessed extracellular proteins with molecular weights of 43.23, 93.486, and 234.36 kDa; 22.82, 43.54, 53.676, and 234.36 kDa); (22.67, 33.21, 43.57, and 92.19 kDa, and 30.39, 33.31, 43.74, and 234.36 kDa, respectively.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) showing the cellular protein pattern of virulent isolates. Lanes: M Protein marker (mixture of 7 purified proteins with molecular weights of 214, 118, 92, 52.2, 35.7, 28.8, 20.8, and 6.8 kDa, respectively), 1, 2, 3, 4 Bacillus cereus strains CH, GT1, LB3, and G8, respectively, 5, 6, 7, 8 Staphylococcus aureus strains S, S1, S2, S3, respectively

Table 7 Similarity percentage between selected B. cereus strains for extracellular protein
Table 8 Similarity percentage between selected S. aureus strains for extracellular protein
Fig. 4
figure 4

PAGE showing the extracellular protein pattern of the selected toxigenic isolates. Lanes: M Protein marker (mixture of 7 purified proteins with molecular weights 116, 97.4, 66.2, 37.6, 28.5, 18.4, and 14 kDa, respectively, 1, 2, 3, 4 B. cereus strains CH, GT1, LB3, G8, respectively, 5, 6, 7, 8 S. aureus strains S, S1, S2 and S3, respectively

Beecher and MacMillan (1990, 1991) reported that molecular weights of B. cereus enterotoxin proteins were 35, 36, and 45 kDa for binding protein B, lytic protein L1 (HBLD), and lytic protein L2 (HBLC), respectively. Beecher and Wong (1994) reported that the molecular weights of the B, L1, and L2 components were 37.8 38.5, and 43.2 kDa, respectively. Schoeni and Wong (2005) reported that the three components isolated from prototype strain of B. cereus F837/76 have molecular weights of 37.5, 38.2, and 43.5 kDa, respectively. They also added that an individual strain could produce single or multiple bands of each component. They observed two bands (38 and 42 kDa) for the B protein, two L1 proteins (38 and 41 kDa), and two L2 proteins (both 43 kDa) in a soil isolate encoded S1C strain.

In terms of S. aureus, the toxic shock causing SEs are single chain polypeptides having a molecular weight ranging from 27 to 29 kDa. SEs can withstand a boiling temperature for several minutes, extremes of pH (3–11), and protease digestion by gastric enzymes (Soriano et al. 2002). Twenty different types of SEs, including SEA through SEE, SEG through SER, and SEU have already been identified, however, only a few of the toxin serotypes are frequently associated with food poisoning outbreaks (Martin et al. 2004; Smyth et al. 2005; Fernandez et al. 2006).

Multiplex PCR technique has been recently used for the rapid detection and discrimination of enterotoxin genes in B. cereus (Guinebretiere et al. 2006; Ngamwongsatit et al. 2008) and also for the direct detection of food contamination with enterotoxigenic B. cereus (Ombui et al. 2008). Ngamwongsatit et al. (2008) have developed and evaluated a group of new primers and found these to be highly efficient in detecting the toxin genes in 100% of their tested B. cereus and B. thuringensis strains. Thus, it can be expected that the presence of either gene is an indication for the presence of the whole operon.

In this study, we used the primers designed by Ngamwongsatit et al. (2008) under specific multiplex PCR conditions (see Materials and methods) to detect the presence of the enterotoxin genes (hblC and cytK) in the tested strains. Figure 5 shows that the presence of amplified DNA fragments of these two toxin genes in three strains of B. cereus (CH, GT1, and G8) can be determined in one quick step. The toxin genes hblC and cytK predicted molecular sizes of 695 and 565 bp, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Agarose gel showing the PCR amplicons resulting from amplification of enterotoxins genes hblC and cytK using the FHblC and RHblC and FCytk and R2Cytk primer pairs, respectively. Lanes: M100-bp DNA ladder marker, 1, 2, 3, 4 DNA amplicons of B. cereus G8, CH, GT1 and LB3, respectively. The gel reveals the presence of both enterotoxin genes (hblC and cytK) in strains GT1, LB3, and G8

Regarding the enterotoxin genotype, previous studies on S. aureus proved that enterotoxin PCR determinations are in a high agreement (97–100%) with toxin production, as defined by immunoassays (Fueyo et al. 2001, Letertre et al. 2003; McLauchlin et al. 2000).

Enterotoxin genotyping of the tested strains revealed the presence of the sed gene in two strains of S. aureus (S1 and S3) and the sea gene in strain S1 only (Fig. 6). Pinto et al. (2005) found a total of 40 (30%) S. aureus food isolates positive for se genes. Among these, the sec genotype was the most frequent (22 strains, 20% of total se-positive strains), followed by the sea genotype (14 strains, 13%), which is in accordance with the results obtained by Fueyo et al. (2001). Data on enterotoxin genotyping confirmed the grouping of strains according to nuc PCR-positivity and se PCR-positivity in S. aureus clusters. On the basis of these results, we suggest the amplification of enterotoxin genes as target genes, using multiplex PCR test as a rapid and valuable technique that can be applied directly to single colonies growing on selective plates, for the rapid, accurate, and unequivocal identification of B. cereus and S. aureus. This approach could be implemented as an alternative to phenotypic and immunology-based tests in routine food microbiological analyses.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Agarose gel showing the PCR amplicons resulting from amplification of enterotoxin genes Sea, seb, sec-1, sed, and see using their specific primers. Lanes: M 100-bp DNA ladder marker, 1, 2, 3, 4 DNA amplicons of S. aureus S, S1, S2, and S3, respectively. The gel reveals the presence of enterotoxins Sea and sed in S. aureus S1 and sed in S. aureus S3

References

  • Agata N, Ohta M, Yokoyama K (2002) Production of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin (cerulide) in various foods. Int J Food Microbiol 73:23–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association (1992) Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination, 3rd edn. APHA, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argudin M, Mendoza M, Rodicio M (2010) Food poisoning and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins. Toxins 2(7):1751–1773

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balaban N, Rasooly A (2000) Staphylococcal enterotoxins. Int J Food Microbiol 61:1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Becker K, Roth R, Peters G (1998) Rapid and specific detection of toxigenic Staphylococcus aureus: use of two multiplex PCR enzyme immunoassays for amplification and hybridization of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes, exfoliative toxin genes, and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 gene. J Clin Microbiol 36:2548–2553

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher DJ, MacMillan JD (1990) A novel bicomponent haemolysin from Bacillus cereus. Infect Immun 58:2220–2227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher DJ, MacMillan JD (1991) Characterization of the components of haemolysin BL from Bacillus cereus. Infect Immun 59:1778–1784

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher DJ, Wong AC (1994) Identification of heamolysin Bl producing Bacillus cereus isolates by a discontinuous haemolytic pattern in blood agar. Appl Environ Microbiol 60:1646–1651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher DJ, Wong AC (2000) Cooperative, synergistic and antagonistic haemolytic interactions between haemolysin BL, phosphatidylcholine phospholipase C and sphingomyelinase from Bacillus cereus. Microbiology 146:3033–3039

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bergdoll MS (1989) Staphylococcus aureus. In: Doyle MP (ed) Foodborne bacterial pathogens. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 463–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergdoll MS, Huang IY, Schantz EJ (1974) Chemistry of the staphylococcal enterotoxins. J Agric Food Chem 22(1):9–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boerema JA, Clemens R, Brightwel G (2006) Evaluation of molecular methods to determine enterotoxigenic status and molecular genotype of bovine, ovine, human and food isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Food Microbiol 107:192–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callegan MC, Cochran DC, Kane ST, Gilmore MS, Gominet M, Lereclus D (2002) Contribution of membrane-damaging toxins to Bacillus endophthalmitis pathogenesis. Infect Immun 70:5381–5389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Difco Laboratories (1994) Difco manual: dehydrated culture media reagents for microbial, 10th edn. Difco Laboratories, Detroit

  • Dinges MM, Orwin PM, Schlievert PM (2000) Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Rev13:16–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Do Carmo LS, Cummings C, Linardi VR, Dias RS, De Souza JM, De Sena MJ, Dos Santos DA, Shupp JW, Peres Pereira RK, Jett M (2004) A case study of a massive staphylococcal food poisoning incident. Food Borne Pathogens Dis 1(4):241–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle MP (ed) (1989) Food borne bacterial pathogens. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Drobniewski F (1993) Bacillus cereus and related species. Clin Microbiol Rev 4:324–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Duc LH, Dong TC, Logan NA, Sutherland AD, Taylor J, Cutting SM (2005) Cases of emesis associated with bacterial contamination of an infant breakfast cereal product. Int J Food Microbiol 102:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Drug Administration (2001) Food and Drug Administration bacteriological analytical manual. FDA, Washington D.C.

  • FDA/CFSAN (2007) Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus spp. In: Food Borne pathogenic microorganisms and natural toxins handbook. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington D.C. Available at: mow/las/dav/ear

  • Fernandez MM, De Marzi MC, Berguer P, Burzyn D, Langley RJ, Piazzon I, Mariuzza RA, Malchiodi EL (2006) Binding of natural variants of staphylococcal superantigens SEG and SEI to TCR and MHC class II molecule. Mol Immunol 43(7):927–938

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fueyo JM, Martin MC, Gonzalez-Hevia MA, Mendoza MC (2001) Enterotoxin production and DNA fingerprinting in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from human and food samples. Relations between genetic types and enterotoxins. Int J Food Microbiol 67:139–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Granum PE (2001) Bacillus cereus. In: Doyle MP (ed) food microbiology fundamentals and frontiers. ASM Press, Washington D.C., pp 373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Granum PE, Baird-Parker TC (2000) Bacillus species. In: Lund B, Baird-Parker T, Gould G (eds) The microbiological safety and quality of food. Aspen Publ, Gaitherburg, pp 1029–1039

    Google Scholar 

  • Granum PE, Lund T (1997) Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiol Lett 157:223–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gravet A, Rondeau M, Harf-Monteil C, Grunenberger F, Monteil H, Scheftel JM, Prevost G (1999) Predominant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from antibiotic-associated diarrhea is clinically relevant and produces enterotoxin A and the bicomponent toxin LukE-LukD. J Clin Microbiol 37:4012–4019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guinebretiere M, Fagerlund A, Granum PE, Nguyen-The C (2006) Rapid discrimination of cytK-1 and cytK-2 genes in Bacillus cereus strains by a novel PCR system. FEMS Microbiol Lett 59(1):74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WE (1996) The polymerase chain reaction: application for the detection of food borne pathogens. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 36:123–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WE, Keasler SP (1991) Identification of food borne pathogens by nucleic acid hybridization. Int J Food Microbiol 12:67–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jett M, Neill R, Welch C, Boyle T, Bernton E, Hoover D, Lowell G, Hunt RE, Chatterjee S, Gemski P (1994) Identification of staphylococcal enterotoxin B sequences important for induction of lymphocyte proliferation by using synthetic peptide fragments of toxin. Infect Immun 62(8):3408–3415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny K, Reiser RF, Bastida-Corcucra FD, Norcross NL (1993) Production of enterotoxins and toxic shock syndrome toxin by bovine mammary isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 31:706–707

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King NJ, Whyte R, Hudson JA (2007) Presence and significance of Bacillus cereus in dehydrated potatoes. J Food Protect 70(2):514–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz M, Opper S, Heeg K, Zimmermann S (2003) Detection of Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins A to D by real-time Fluorescence PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 41(10):4683–4687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kotiranta A, Lounatmaa K, Haapasalo M (2000) Epidemiology and pathogenesis of Bacillus cereus infections. Microbiol Infect 2:189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krieg NR, Holt JG (1984) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, 9th edn, vol. 1, 2. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

  • Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (London) 227:680–685

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Letertre C, Perelle S, Dilasser F, Fach P (2003) Identification of a new putative enterotoxin SEU encoded by the egc cluster of Staphylococcus aureus. J Appl Microbiol 95:38–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lindback T, Fagerlund A, Rodland MS, Granum PE (2004) Characterization of the Bacillus cereus Nhe enterotoxin. Microbiology 150:3959–3967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LKB Application note (1997) SDS-PAGE. LKB, Sweden

  • Llewelyn M, Cohen J (2002) Superantigens: Microbial agents corrupt immunity. Lancet Infect Dis 2:156–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lund T, Granum PE (1997) Comparison of biological effect of the two different enterobtoxin complexes isolated from three different strains of Bacilus cereus. Microbiology 143:3329–3336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lund T, Buyser ML De, Granum PE (2000) A new cytoxin from Bacillus cereus that may causenecrotic enteritis. Mol Microbiol 38: 254–261

  • Mahler H, Pasi A, Kramer JM, Schulte P, Scoging AC, Bar W, Krahenbuhl S (1997) Fulminant liver failure in association with emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus. N Engl J Med 336:1142–1148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin MC, Fueyo JM, Gonzalez-Hevia MA, Mendoza MC (2004) Genetic procedures for identification of enterotoxigenic strains of Staphylococcus aureus from three food poisoning outbreaks. Int J Food Microbiol 94(3):279–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga T, Kamata S, Kakiichi N, Uccida A (1993) Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from peracute, acute and chronic bovine mastitis. J Vet Med Sci 55:297–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKillip JL (2000) Prevalence and expression of enterotoxins in B. cereus and other B. spp., a literature review. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 77:393–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLauchlin J, Narayanan GL, Mithani V, O’Neill G (2000) The detection of enterotoxins and toxic shock syndrome toxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus by polymerase chain reaction. JFood Protect 63(4):479–488

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miethke T, Wahl K, Heeg B, Echtenacher PH, Krammer HW (1992) T cell-mediated lethal shock triggered in mice by the superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B: critical role of tumor necrosis factor. J Exp Med 175:91–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Misra AK, Kuila RK (1992) Use of Bifidobacterium bifidum in the manufacture of bifidus milk and its antibacterial activity. Lait 72(2):213–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngamwongsatit P, Busari W, Pianariyanon P, Pulsrikarn C, Ohba M, Assavanig A, Panbangred W (2008) Broad distribution of entertoxin genes (hblCDA, nheABC, cytK, and entFM) among Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus cereus as shown by novel primers. Int J Food Microbiol 121:352–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JE (2000) DNA-based methods for detection of food-borne bacterial pathogens. Food Res Int 33(3–4):257–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JE, Aabo S, Rasmussen OF, Rossen L (1995) Oligo-nucleotide probes specific for the genus Salmonella and for S. typhimurium. Lett Appl Microbiol 20:160–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ombui JN, Gitahi N, Gicheru M (2008) Direct detection of Bacillus cereus enterotoxin genes in food by multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Int J Integr Biol 2(3):172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oxoid Ltd. (1990) Culture media, including in gradients and other laboratory services. Oxoid, London

  • Pinto B, Chenoll E, Aznar R (2005) Identification and typing of food borne Staphylococcus aureus by PCR-based techniques. Syst Appl Microbiol 37:4012–4019

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinheimer JA, Demkow MR, Canditi MC, Austr B (1990) J Dairy Technol 45:5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodehamel EJ, Harmon SM (2001) Bacteriological analytical manual online: chapter 14, Bacillus cereus. Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition, FDA, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider KR, Parish ME, Goodrich RM, Cookingham T (2004) Preventing food borne illness: Bacillus cereus and Bacillus anthracis. University of Florida, IFAS Extension. FSHNO04-05. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu

  • Schoeni JL, Wong ACL (2005) B. cereus food poisoning and its toxins. J Food Protect 68:636–648

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen R, Andersson MA, Apetroaie C, Schulz V, Salkinoja-Salonen MS (2006) Potential of selected infant food formulas for production of Bacillus cereus emetic toxin, cerulide. Int J Food Microbiol 107(3):287–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith BJ (1997) SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for N-terminal protein sequencing In: Smith BJ (ed) Methodsin molecular biology: protein sequencing protocols. Humana PressTotowa

  • Smyth DS, Hartigan PJ, Meaney WJ, Fitzgerald JR, Deobald CF, Bohach GA, Smyth J (2005) Superantigen genes encoded by the egc cluster and SaPIbov are predominant among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from cows, goats, sheep, rabbits and poultry. J Med Microbiol 54(4):401–411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano JM, Font G, Molto JC, Manes J (2002) Enterotoxigenic staphylococci and their toxins in restaurant foods. Trends Food Sci Technol 13(2):60–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su YC, Wong AL (1997) Current perspectives on detection of staphylococcal enterotoxins. J Food Protect 60:195–202

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson B, Monthan A, Guinebretiere HM, Nguyen C, Christiansson A (2007) Toxin production potential and the detection of toxin genes among strains of Bacillus cereus group isolated along the dairy production chain. Int Dairy J 17:1201–1208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todar K (2005) Textbook of bacteriology. The Genus Bacillus. Available at: http://www.textbookofbacteriology.net/Bacillus.html

  • Wolcott MJ (1991) DNA-based rapid methods for the detection of food borne pathogens. Journal Food Protect 54:387–401

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge K (2009) Secretory mechanisms and role pathogenesis. In: Wooldridge K (ed) bacterial secreted proteins. Caister Academic Press, London

  • Wong KKY, Hancock REW (2000) Insertion mutagenesis and membrane topology model of thePseudomonasae ruginosa outer membrane protein OprM. J Bacteriol 182: 2402–2410

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu HJ, Wang AHJ, Jennings PM (2008) Discovery of virulence factors of pathogenic bacteria. Curr Opin Chem Biol 12:93–101

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama K, Ito M, Agata N, Isobe M, Shibayama K, Horii T, Ohta M (1999) Pathological effect of synthetic cerulide, an emetic toxin of Bacillus cereus, is reversible in mice. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 24:115–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed A. Abdou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abdou, M.A., Awny, N.M. & Abozeid, A.AE.M. Prevalence of toxicogenic bacteria in some foods and detection of Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin genes using multiplex PCR. Ann Microbiol 62, 569–580 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0293-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0293-7

Keywords