Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Mitigation of salinity-induced negative impact on the growth and yield of wheat by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in naturally saline conditions

Abstract

Salinity is one of the major environmental threats for successful crop production, hampering plant growth due to the osmotic effect and nutritional and hormonal imbalances. The application of naturally occurring plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) is an emerging technology aimed at ameliorating the negative impact of salinity. However, the results obtained in the laboratory can sometimes not be reproduced in the field. The aim of the study reported here was to evaluate the effect of PGPR inoculation on seed germination in a saline environment under axenic conditions and on enhancement of the growth and yield of wheat under natural salt-affected field conditions. Wheat seeds were inoculated with pre-isolated strains of Pseudomonas putida, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia ficaria, and Pseudomonas fluorescens and sown at different salinity levels (1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 dS m-1). Inoculation with these strains was found to enhance the germination percentage, germination rate, and index of wheat seeds up to 43, 51, and 123 %, respectively, over the uninoculated control at the highest salinity level. The potential of these PGPR for improving the growth and yield of wheat was also evaluated at two natural salt-affected sites. Inoculation with PGPR resulted a significant increase in the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites. The inoculated plants also improved the nutrient status of the wheat plants. The inoculated plants had low sodium and high nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium contents. Our results show that such rhizobacterial strains may be used as an effective tool for enhancing plant growth under salinity stress and for maximizing the utilization of salt-affected soils.

Introduction

In arid and semi-arid regions with low rainfall and high temperature, salinity is one of the major environmental stresses which reduces plant growth. In these regions, groundwater continuously moves towards the cultivation layer (Li et al. 2003), and the concentration of soluble salts increases due to the recycling of poor quality drainage water for irrigation (Shakirova et al. 2003). A high salt concentration inhibits plant growth (Cuartero and Fernandez-Munoz 1999) and affects many aspects of plant metabolism, resulting in reduced growth and yield (Tank and Saraf 2010). Under salinity stress, Na+ uptake increases, which may cause metabolic disturbance in those processes requiring low Na+ and high K+ and/or Ca+2 for normal function (Marschner 1995). Similarly, the uptake and accumulation of Cl- may disrupt photosynthesis (Xu et al. 2000), and decreases in leaf production and leaf size reduces the expansion of leaf area, leading to the death of the plant (Suarez and Medina 2005).

On an overall basis, plant growth in a saline environment is affected by a complex interaction of osmotic effect, hormonal imbalance, specific ion toxicity, and mineral imbalance (Gorham et al. 1985; Ashraf 1994; Ruiz et al. 1995; Arbona et al. 2005). Among the various plant hormones, enhanced ethylene production has been associated with increased salinity in different crops at different growth stages (Jones and El-Abd 1989; Arbona et al. 2005). Ethylene is considered to be a stress hormone, and its concentration increases under salinity stress via elevated levels of its precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), potentially leading to physiological changes in leaf tissue (Tank and Saraf 2010). Rapid seed germination is a critical factor for crop production, and early seedling growth is the developmental stage that is most sensitive to salinity stress (Ashraf and Foolad 2005). The significant decrease in wheat germination caused by salt stress (Ashraf and O’Leary 1997) might be associated to elevated levels of salinity reducing seed germination and causing poor root growth (Mattoo and Suttle 1991; Sarquis et al. 1991; Zapata et al. 2007). Studies by Heidstra et al. (1997) and Ma et al. (2003) have also shown that ethylene inhibits root growth and causes senescence in crop plants. To improve the germination and growth of plants in the presence of salts, it is necessary to limit ethylene production.

Chemical inhibitors of ethylene synthesis, such as cobalt ions (Co2+) and aminoethoxyvinyle glycine (AVG), are often used to overcome the problems associated with salt stress. However, these chemicals are not only expensive, but they have harmful effects on the environment (Dodd and Belimov 2009). During recent years, a new biocontrol approach has been developed to mitigate the impact of higher ethylene concentrations on plant growth. This approach includes the use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC-deaminase that can hydrolyze the ACC to reduce ethylene production (Mayak et al. 2004) and therefore facilitate plant growth under the salinity stress condition (Nadeem et al. 2010; Siddikee et al. 2010). These PGPR also facilitate plant growth by various direct and indirect mechanisms, such as nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, synthesis of siderophores, phytohormone production, and protection against pathogens (Kloepper et al. 1989; Glick et al. 1999; Saharan and Nehra 2011).

Although a number of studies conducted under laboratory and field conditions have shown that PGPR treatments can enhance plant growth (Abbaspoor et al. 2009; Zabihi et al. 2010; Siddikee et al. 2011), most of these studies were conducted under normal field conditions. Additionally, in certain cases the results obtained in the laboratory could not be reproduced in the field (Zhender et al. 1999; Smyth et al. 2011). Studies by Ahmad et al. (2011a, b) performed under salinity stress conditions demonstrated that the test strains performed differently under axenic and field conditions, possibly due to the low quality of the inoculums and/or the inability of the bacteria to compete with the indigenous population under adverse environmental conditions (Brockwell and Bottomley 1995; Catroux et al. 2001). Therefore, the selection of efficient strains of rhizobacteria with the ability to tolerate adverse field conditions could prove to be an efficient additive to biofertilizers. Only a few studies have evaluated the performance of PGPR in enhancing plant growth and development under natural salt-affected conditions. Thus, the aim of the study reported here was to evaluate the effectiveness of preselected rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase (Nadeem et al. 2010) for enhancing seed germination and improving the growth and yield of wheat cultivated on natural salt-affected soils. The efficient strains identified here can be considered as potential additives to biofertilizer for use in sustainable agriculture.

Materials and Methods

The strains used in this study had been screened for their growth-promoting activity in the presence of salinity in previous axenic and pot trials (Nadeem et al. 2010). The four strains showing the most prolific growth in these trials were identified as Pseudomonas putida (W2), Enterobacter cloacae (W6), Serratia ficaria (W10), and Pseudomonas fluorescens (W17) and selected for use in our field trials.

Preparation of inoculum

For inoculum preparation, DF medium without ACC was sterilized in 250-mL flasks at 121 °C for 20 min, following which a 3-mL aliquot of heat-labile, filter-sterilized (membrane pore size 0.2 mm) ACC was added to the cooled DF medium. After each flask was inoculated with one of the PGPR test strains, the broth was incubated at 28 ± 1° C for 48 h in an orbital shaking incubator at 100 rpm. In order to obtain a uniform population of rhizobacteria (108–109 colony-forming units mL–1), we adjusted the optical density of the broth to 0.5 at 535 nm using a turbidity meter (OD meter; model 21907; Biolog, Haywood, CA).

Germination assay

For evaluating the effect of PGPR stains on the germination of wheat seeds in the presence of different salinity levels, we first selected uniformly sized wheat seeds showing no signs of damage. The seeds were surface sterilized by a very short immersion in 95 % ethanol solution followed by a 3-min immersion in a 0.2 % HgCl2 solution, and then washed thoroughly with sterilized distilled water to remove all remaining HgCl2. The germination test was performed in sterilized petri dishes. Six salinity levels (1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 dS m-1) were obtained by dissolving a specified amount of NaCl in distilled water. The surface-sterilized seeds were first dipped in liquid broth (inoculum prepared in DF salt minimal medium with no agar) for 10 min and then sown in a petri dish (15 seeds per plate) containing cotton moistened with water containing the desired salt concentration (Rueda-Puente et al. 2007). Seeds dipped in broth not containing a PGPR strain and then sown under the same conditions as the inoculated seeds served as the un-inoculated control. The petri dishes were placed in an incubator at 28 ± 2 °C. Germination was observed daily according to the method described in by the Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA 2004). A seed was scored as germinated when the coleoptile and root reached lengths of 2–3 mm. The final germination percentage was determined after 7 days. The germination rate was calculated according to the formula described by Maguire (1962), and the germination index was calculated according to AOSA (1983).

Field trials

The performance of PGPR stains containing ACC-deaminase activity were evaluated under natural salt-affected conditions during field experiments conducted at the Postgraduate Agriculture Research Station (PARS), University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan. The experiments were conducted at two different locations with different levels of soil salinity. Soil samples were collected, air dried, mixed thoroughly, sieved (pore size 2.0 mm), and analyzed for physico-chemical characteristics (Table 1).

Table 1 Physico-chemical characteristics of soils analyzed in the field trials

For inoculation, the inoculum (prepared as described earlier) was mixed with sterilized peat. Wheat seed dressing was done using inoculated peat mixed with a 10 % sterilized sugar (sucrose) solution. In the case of the un-inoculated control, seeds were coated with sterilized peat treated with sterilized broth only and the 10 % sterilized sugar solution. The experiment was laid out according to randomized complete block design (RCBD) with a plot size of 5 × 2 m and three replications of each condition.

Nutrients were supplied through the application of the recommended dose of NPK fertilizers (120:90:60 kg ha-1) in the form of urea, diammonium phosphate, and murate of potash, respectively. Phosphorus and potassium were applied as a basal dose, while nitrogen was applied in splits, i.e., at the tillering, booting stage, and grain filling stages.

Plants were irrigated with good quality canal water that meting the irrigation quality criteria for crops, i.e., an electrical conductivity of 0.05 dS m–1, a sodium adsorption ratio of 0.1 [(mmol L–1)½], and a residual sodium carbonate content of 0.02 meq L–1 (Ayers and Westcot 1985). At plant maturity, data on growth and yield-contributing parameters were recorded following standard procedures. Data were collected from a 1-m2 area randomly selected in each plot. Total nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium uptake was calculated after measuring their contents in plant tissues according to the methods described by Ryan et al. (2001). Briefly, the plant samples were first digested with concentrated H2SO4 and H2O2 according to the method of Wolf (1982). A 5-mL aliquot of the digested plant tissue was placed in a Kjeldhal flask, and the nitrogen content was determined by the Kjeldhal method. For the phosphorus determination, a 5-mL aliquot of the digested plant tissue was mixed in 10 mL of Barton reagents, and samples were allowed to stand for 30 min, following which phosphorus was determined by spectrophotometer using a standard curve.

Potassium and sodium were determined using a flame photometer according to the method described by the U.S. Salinity Laboratory staff (Richards 1954). The values of potassium and sodium determined from the flame photometer were compared with a standard curve and total quantities were computed

The data collected on germination were analyzed statistically using MSTATC software by applying a completely randomized design (CRD). The data on the effect of inoculation on the various growth and yield parameters of wheat were analyzed by applying a CRBD (Steel et al. 1997). Means were compared using the DMR test (p = 0.05) to detect significant differences among treatments (Duncan 1955).

Results

Germination assay

The germination of both inoculated and un-inoculated seeds was significantly affected at higher salinity levels. Increasing levels of salinity depressed seed germination, but this effect was decreased by inoculation with PGPR, and inoculated seeds showed an improved germination compared to the un-inoculated control. At low salinity levels, the effect of inoculation with the PGPR strains was statistically similar (Table 2). At 9 dS m-1, seeds inoculated with strain W2 showed the maximum germination percentage, which differed non-significantly from that of seeds inoculated with W17. At 12 dS m-1, seeds inoculated with strain W17 showed the maximum germination percentage, which was 22 % higher than that of un-inoculated control, followed by seeds inoculated with strains W10 and W2, whose seed germination was statistically similar. At the highest salinity level (15 dS m-1), seeds inoculated with W17 showed the maximum germination percentage (43 % higher than the control); however, the germination of these seeds was statistically similar to that of seeds inoculated with the other strains.

Table 2 Effect of inoculation on germination percentage, age, germination rate, and germination index of wheat seeds under different salinity levels

The data presented in Table 2 show that at the highest salinity level, inoculation with PGPR significantly increased the germination rate compared to un-inoculated control. The maximum germination rate was obtained with W17 at 9 and 12 dS m-1 and was up to 34 % higher than that of un-inoculated control. This germination rate was statistically similar with that of seeds inoculated with W2 at 9 dS m-1 and with those inoculated with the other strains at 12 dS m-1. At the highest salinity level, i.e., 15 dS m-1, the maximum germination rate (82 % more than that of the control) was obtained in seeds inoculated with strain W2, followed those inoculated with strain W17. The germination rates of seeds inoculated with strains W6 and W10 were statistically similar and were up to 50 % higher than that of the un-inoculated control.

The data on the germination index are also presented in Table 2. At low salinity levels (1 and 3 dS m-1), the inoculation effect was non-significant; however, at high salinity levels, seeds inoculated with PGPR stains showed a higher germination index than untreated seeds. At 6 and 9 dS m-1, seeds inoculated with strain W17 had the highest germination index which was statistically similar with those of seeds inoculated with strains W2 and W10 at 6 dS m-1 and that of seeds inoculated with strain W2 at 9 dS m-1. At 12 dS m-1, seeds inoculated with PGPR showed up to a 87 % increase in the germination index; however, the treatments were statistically similar. At the highest salinity level, i.e., 15 dS m-1, seeds inoculated with strain W17 had the maximum germination index (1.63-fold higher than the inoculated control) followed by those inoculated with strains W2, W6, and W10.

Field trials

In two salt-affected fields [site I, electrical conductivity (EC) 11.8 dS m-1; site II, EC 14.2 dS m-1], inoculation with PGPR was found to significantly affect the growth and yield parameters of wheat compared to the un-inoculated control. However, the strains differed significantly in their performance for improving growth of wheat under salt-stressed conditions.

The data collected on plant height at site I showed that the effect of inoculation was non-significant. At site II, however, strains W2 and W17 significantly increased plant height (up to a 29.6 % increase) compared to the un-inoculated control (Table 3). The effect of strains W6 and W10 was statistically similar, and inoculation with either strain also increased plant height compared to the control, but the effect was non-significant.

Table 3 Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on wheat in salt-affected fields

Like plant height, PGPR strains differed non-significantly from each other in the number of tillers produced at both sites (Table 3); however, inoculation resulted in a significant increase in tiller number over the un-inoculated control at site I, with an up to 21 % increase in tiller number relative to the control. At site II, inoculation resulted in a 24 % increase in tiller number compared to the control, but the effect of inoculation was at par with the un-inoculated control. Inoculation with strain W17 caused the maximum increase in number of tillers at both sites, followed by W2.

Data on the number of grains per spike showed that inoculation significantly increased the number of grains per spike at both sites (Table 3). At site I, the number of grains per spike with strains W2 and W17 was statistically similar, with 68 % more grains per spike produced than the control. At site II, inoculation with strain W17 resulted in the maximum increase in number of grains per spike (56 % higher than the un-inoculated control), followed by W2 and W10.

Inoculation with all the strains significantly increased the grain yield of wheat grown under salinity stress (Table 3). Similar to number of grains per spike, at site I inoculation with strains W2 and W17 caused the maximum increase (up to 24 %) in grain yield compared to the un-inoculated control. Also, at site II, inoculation with strain W17 produced the maximum grain yield (up to 31 % more grain yield compared to un-inoculated control) and this effect was statistically similar to that of strain W2. The effects of strains W6 and W10 on grain yield were also statistically similar and caused up to a 20 % increase in grain yield compared to the control.

At site I, inoculation with W17 resulted in the maximum 1,000 grain weight, which was 72 % more than that of the un-inoculated control, followed inoculation with W2 (Table 3); however, the 1,000 grain weight of both strains was statistically similar. At site II, strain W17 again resulted in the maximum 1,000 grain weight (69 % more than un-inoculated control), but the value was statistically similar to that of strains W2 and W10. Strain W6 caused a minimum increase in 1,000 grain weight compared to other strains; however, its increase was significantly higher (40 %) than the 1,000 grain weight of the un-inoculated control.

Inoculation with the PGPR strains significantly increased the straw yield (Table 3). At both site I and II, strain W17 showed the maximum increase in straw yield (up to 73 %) compared to the un-inoculated control, and the increase was statistically similar with that of W2 at both site I and W2 and with that of W6 at site II. Overall, strains W2 and W17 were the most effective strains in terms of improving the growth and yield parameters of wheat at both sites under salt-stressed conditions.

Our data revealed that PGPR inoculation had variable effects on the uptake of major nutrients, i.e., nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium (Table 4). Inoculation with strain W17 caused up to a 22 % increase in nitrogen uptake over the control at both sites, and this increase was statistically similar with that of W2 and W6 at site I. The increase in nitrogen uptake following inoculation with strains W2 and W10 was statistically similar at site II, while inoculation with strain W10 resulted in a non-significant difference from the control at both sites. Inoculation significantly increased the uptake of phosphorus at both sites, with strain W17 causing the maximum increase in phosphorus content at site I (61 % more than control) and W2 (92 % more than control) at site II. Phosphorus uptake caused by strains W6, W10, and W17 were statistically similar at site II. The data on potassium uptake also showed that inoculation significantly enhanced the uptake of potassium. Maximum potassium uptake was observed with W17 at both sites and was up to 17 % higher than that of the un-inoculated control, followed by W2, which caused up to a 15 % increase in potassium uptake compared to the control.

Table 4 Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on total nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium uptake and K+/Na+ ratio of wheat under salt-stress conditions

We also observed that inoculated plants showed low Na+ contents as compared to the un-inoculated control, which resulted in a significant increase in the K+/Na+ ratio in the inoculated treatments. The maximum K+/Na+ ratio was noted with W2 at site I, followed by W17. At site II, strain W17 performed better and a caused maximum increase in the K+/Na+ ratio, followed by W2. Strains W6 and W10 also caused a significant increase in the K+/Na+ ratio compared to un-inoculated control; however, these ratios were statistically similar at both sites.

Discussion

Salinity is one of the most important constraints which hamper agricultural productions in most of the arid and semi-arid regions of the world. Rapid seed germination is a critical factor in crop production, and in many crop species, seed germination and early seedling growth are the most sensitive developmental stages to salinity stress (Ashraf and Foolad 2005). A high concentration of salts has a negative impact on seed germination and plant growth by affecting various metabolic processes (Sidari et al. 2008). In plants, certain physiological processes are regulated by endogenous ethylene (Mattoo and Suttle 1991; Frankenberger and Arshad 1995), and although a burst of ethylene is required to break seed dormancy (Esashi 1991), the high concentration of ethylene produced under salinity stress (Arbona et al. 2005; Zapata et al. 2007) has a negative impact on seed germination and root growth (Bernardo et al. 2000; Mattoo and Suttle 1991; Sarquis et al. 1991).

As seed germination and early seedling growth are generally the most sensitive stages affected by salinity (Foolad 2004), mitigation of the effect of salts at these early stages will improve the chance of establishing a successful crop under salt stress (Sallam 1999; Foolad 2000; Ashraf et al. 2003). In our study, the inoculation of wheat seeds with PGPR not only enhanced seed germination but also improved the growth and yield of wheat under naturally salt-affected conditions. The improved germination might be due to their ability to degrade ACC produced during stress and, therefore, reduce the elevated ethylene level in the immediate vicinity of seeds. It is also evident from the results of our previous study that the intensity of the classical triple response imposed by ethylene can be diluted through treating the seeds with these PGRP strains (Nadeem et al. 2010).

Inoculation also enhanced the germination rate and germination index under salinity stress. Other researchers have also reported enhanced germination percentages and germination rates under saline conditions through inoculation with PGPR (Nelson 2004; Barassi et al. 2006; Mishra et al. 2010). Although, no mention was made about the role of ACC-deaminase in their respective studies, these authors did correlate the growth promotion with a number of specific particular activities of PGPR. Rueda-Puente et al. (2007) suggested the possible role of plant growth promoting substances for growth enhancement under saline conditions.

In addition to enhanced germination, the better performance of inoculated wheat seedlings at two salt-affected sites further demonstrates their effectiveness in salinity tolerance. It is evident from the literature that under salinity stress, plant growth is affected by physiological disorders, such as enhanced ethylene production and nutritional and hormonal imbalances (Ashraf 1994; Marschner 1995; Glick et al. 1997; Sairam and Tyagi 2004). Elevated levels of ethylene concentration inhibit root growth, which ultimately affects overall plant growth (Mattoo and Suttle 1991; Sobeih et al. 2004). Any check on this enhanced synthesis of ethylene is essential for improving plant growth (Glick et al. 1997; Mayak et al. 2004; Saleem et al. 2007). The PGPR strains used in this study may, therefore, protect the plant from the harmful effect of ethylene by decreasing its concentration, resulting in better root growth. Many researchers have also shown that PGPR strains do improve crop growth under salinity stress conditions (Saravanakumar and Samiyappan 2007; Nadeem et al. 2009; Zahir et al. 2009; Tank and Saraf 2010).

Nutritional imbalance is another major impact of salinity on crop production. A balance in ion accumulation is necessary for good plant growth (Ashraf 2004; Foolad 2004). Salt tolerance in plants has been related to a restricted and controlled uptake of Na+ and continued uptake of K+ (Jeschke and Wolf 1988), and a high K+/Na+ ratio is a good indicator of salt tolerance (Ashraf and O’Leary 1996; Hamdia et al. 2004). In our study, PGPR strains also played an important role in regulating nutrient uptake and maintaining a nutritional balance in wheat plants. We found that the restricted uptake of Na+ resulted in an increased K+ concentration, which in turn resulted in a high K+/Na+ ratio. Although the exact mechanism by which these strains regulate nutrient uptake is not fully understood, it may be due to a better root growth that increases the surface area for the uptake of nutrients from large volumes of soil. It may also be due to the exopolysaccharide activity of bacteria that have the ability to bind sodium and decrease the availability of sodium ions for plant uptake (Ashraf et al. 2004; Kohler et al. 2006; Nadeem et al. 2010).

Our results also reveal that the four PGPR strains tested had different potentials for improving plant growth under salt-stressed conditions. The better performance was observed following inoculation with Pseudomons spp. (W2 and W17) and might be due to the higher ACC-deaminase activity and better root colonization ability of these strains, as indicated in our previous study (Nadeem et al. 2010). The better performance of Pseudomonas spp. was also observed by other researchers in both laboratory and field studies ( Saravanakumar and Samiyappan 2007; Zahir et al. 2009; Abbaspoor et al. 2009; Ahmad et al. 2011a, b).

In summary, the data presented in this manuscript are quite encouraging in terms of promoting the use of PGPR as a means for improving plant growth under field conditions and maximizing the utilization of salt-affected soils for increasing agricultural production from these soils. The more efficient PGPR strains should be further evaluated as inoculums in biofertilizers.

References

  • Abbaspoor A, Zabihi HR, Movafegh S, Asl MHA (2009) The efficiency of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield and yield components of two varieties of wheat in salinity condition. American–Eurasian J Sustainable Agric 3:824–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Asghar M (2011a) Inducing salt tolerance in mung bean through coinoculation rhizobia and plant- growth- promoting rhizobacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase. Can J Microbiol 57:578–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Zahir ZA, Asghar HN, Arshad M (2011b) The combined application of rhizobial strains and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria improves growth and productivity of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) under salt-stressed conditions. Ann Microbiol. doi:10.1007/s13213-011-0380-9

  • AOSA (Association of Official Seed Analysts) (1983) Seed vigour testing handbook. AOSA, Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  • AOSA (Association of Official Seed Analysts) (2004) Rules for testing seeds. AOSA, Las Cruces

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbona V, Marco AJ, Iglesias DJ, Lopez-Climent MF, Talon M, Gomez-Cadenas A (2005) Carbohydrate depletion in roots and leaves of salt-stressed potted Citrus clementina L. Plant Growth Regul 46:153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M (1994) Breeding for salinity tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 13:17–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M (2004) Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora 199:361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2005) Pre-sowing seed treatment-A shotgun approach to improve germination, plant growth, and crop yield under saline and non-saline conditions. Adv Agron 88:223–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, O’Leary JW (1996) Responses of some newly developed salt-tolerant genotypes of spring wheat to salt stress: 1. Yield components and ion distribution. J Agron Crop Sci 176:91–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, O’Leary JM (1997) Ion distribution in leaves of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive lines of spring wheat under salt stress. Acta Bot Neerl 46:207–218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, Zafar R, Ashraf MY (2003) Time-course changes in the inorganic and organic components of germinating sunflower achenes under salt (NaCl) stress. Flora 198:26–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashraf M, Hasnain S, Berge O, Mahmood T (2004) Inoculating wheat seedling with exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria restricts sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress. Biol Fertil Soils 40:157–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers RS, Westcot DW (1985) Water quality for agriculture. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Papers 29 (Rev. 1), FAO, Rome

  • Barassi CA, Ayrault G, Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Sobrero MT (2006) Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce. Sci Hortic 109:8–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo MA, Dieguez ET, Jones HG, Chairez FA, Ojanguren CLT, Cortes AL (2000) Path analysis of cowpea early seedling growth under saline conditions. Int J Exp Bot 67:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockwell J, Bottomley PJ (1995) Recent advances in inoculant technology and prospects for the future. Soil Biol Biochem 27:683–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Catroux G, Hartmann A, Revellin C (2001) Trends in rhizobial inoculant production and use. Plant Soil 230:21–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cuartero J, Fernandez-Munoz R (1999) Tomato and salinity. Sci Hortic 78:83–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd IC, Belimov AA (2009) Agricultural opportunities for ACC deaminase-containing rhizobacteria: a review. In: Int Conf on Positive Plant Microbial Interactions in Relation to Plant Performance and Ecosystem Function. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, pp151–156

  • Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esashi Y (1991) Ethylene and seed germination. In: Matto AK, Suttle JC (eds) The plant hormone ethylene. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 133–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Foolad MR (2000) Genetic basis of salt tolerance and cold tolerance in tomato. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2:35–49

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foolad MR (2004) Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 76:101–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberger WTJ, Arshad M (1995) Phytohormones in soils: microbial production and function. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Liu C, Ghosh S, Dumbroff EB (1997) Early development of canola seedlings in the presence of the plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2. Soil Biol Biochem 29:1233–1239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glick BR, Patten CL, Holgiun G, Penrose DM (1999) Biochemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth-promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham J, Jones R, McDonnell E (1985) Some mechanisms of salt tolerance in crop plants. Plant Soil 89:15–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamdia MAES, Shaddad MAK, Doaa MM (2004) Mechanisms of salt tolerance and interactive effects of Azospirillum brasilense inoculation on maize cultivars grown under salt stress conditions. Plant Growth Regul 44:165–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heidstra R, Yang WC, Yalcin Y, Peck S, Emons A, van Kammen A, Bisseling T (1997) Ethylene provides positional information on cortical cell division but is not involved in Nod factor-induced root hair tip growth in Rhizobium—legume interaction. Development 124:1781–1787

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeschke WD, Wolf O (1988) External potassium supply is not required for root growth in saline conditions: experiments with Ricinus communis L. grown in a reciprocal split-root system. J Exp Bot 39:1149–1167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RA, El-Abd SO (1989) Prevention of salt-induced epinasty by α-aminoacetic acid and cobalt. Plant Growth Regul 8:315–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Lifshitz R, Zablotowicz RM (1989) Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity. Trends Biotechnol 7:39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler J, Caravaca F, Carrasco L, Roldan A (2006) Contribution of Pseudomonas mendocina and Glomus intraradices to aggregate stabilization and promotion of biological fertility in rhizosphere soil of lettuce plants under field conditions. Soil Use Manag 22:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li FH, Benhur M, Keren R (2003) Effect of marginal water irrigation on soil salinity, sodicity and crop yield. Trans Chinese Soc Agric Eng 19:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma W, Guinel FC, Glick BR (2003) Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase promotes nodulation of pea plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4396–4402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire JD (1962) Speed of germination-aid in slection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigour. Crop Sci 2:176–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattoo AK, Suttle CS (1991) The plant hormone ethylene. CRS Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:565–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra M, Kumar U, Mishra PK, Prakash V (2010) Efficiency of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for the enhancement of Cicer arietinum L. growth and germination under salinity. Adv Biol Res 4:92–96

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeem SM, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Arshad M (2009) Rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase confer salt tolerance in maize grown on salt-affected fields. Can J Microbiol 55:1302–1309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeem SM, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Asghar HN, Arshad M (2010) Rhizobacteria capable of producing ACC-deaminase may mitigate salt stress in wheat. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:533–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson LM (2004) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Prospects for new inoculants. Online. Crop Manag. doi:10.1094/CM-2004-0301-05-RV

  • Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueda-Puente EO, Garcia-Hernandez JL, Preciado-Rangel P, Murillo-Amador B, Tarazon-Herrera MA, Flores-Hernandez A, Holguin-Pena J, Aybar AN, Hoyos JMB, Weimers D (2007) Germination of Salicornia bigelovii ecotypes under stressing conditions of temperature and salinity and ameliorative effects of plant growth-promoting bacteria. J Agron Crop Sci 193:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz D, Martinez V, Cerda A (1995) Citrus response to salinity: growth and nutrient uptake. Tree Physiol 17:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan J, Estefan G, Rashid A (2001) Soil and plant analysis: laboratory manual. International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo

    Google Scholar 

  • Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res 2011: LSMR-21

  • Sairam RK, Tyagi A (2004) Physiology and molecular biology of salinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr Sci 86:407–421

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem M, Arshad M, Hussain S, Bhatti AS (2007) Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34:635–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sallam HA (1999) Effect of some seed-soaking treatments on growth and chemical components on faba bean plants under saline conditions. Ann Agric Sci 44:159–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravanakumar D, Samiyappan R (2007) ACC deaminase from Pseudomonas fluorescens mediated saline resistance in groundnut (Arachis hypogea) plants. J Appl Microbiol 102:1283–1292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarquis JI, Jordan WR, Morgan PW (1991) Ethylene evolution from maize (Zea mays L.) seedling roots and shoots in response to mechanical impedance. Plant Physiol 96:1171–1176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shakirova FM, Sakhabutdinova AR, Bezrukova MV, Fatkhutdinova RA, Fatkhutdinova DR (2003) Changes in the hormonal status of wheat seedlings induced by salicylic acid and salinity. Plant Sci 164:317–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sidari M, Mallamaci C, Muscolo A (2008) Drought, salinity and heat differently affect seed germination of Pinus pinea. J For Res 13:326–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddikee MA, Chauhan PS, Anandham R, Han G, Sa T (2010) Isolation, characterization and use for plant growth promotion under salt stress, of ACC deaminase-producing halotolerant derived from coastal soil. J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:1577–1584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siddikee MA, Glick BR, Chauhan PS, Yim W, Sa T (2011) Enhancement of growth and salt tolerance of red pepper seedlings (Capsicum annuum L.) by regulating stress ethylene synthesis with halotolerant bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase activity. Plant Physiol Biochem 49:427–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth EM, McCarthy J, Nevin R, Khan MR, Dow JM, O’Gara F, Doohan FM (2011) In vitro analyses are not reliable predictors of the plant growth promotion capability of bacteria; a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain that promotes the growth and yield of wheat. J Appl Microbiol 111:683–692

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sobeih WY, Dodd IC, Bacon MA, Grierson D, Davies WJ (2004) Long-distance signals regulating stomatal conductance and leaf growth in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants subjected to partial root-zone drying. J Exp Bot 55:2353–2363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steel RGD, Torrie JH, Dicky DA (1997) Principles and procedures of statistics—a biometrical approach. McGraw Hill Book, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez N, Medina E (2005) Salinity effect on plant growth and leaf demography of the mangrove, Avicennia germinans L. Trees 19:721–727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tank N, Saraf M (2010) Salinity-resistant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria ameliorates sodium chloride stress on tomato plants. J Plant Interact 5:51–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf B (1982) A comprehensive system of leaf analyses and its use for diagnosing crop nutrient status. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 13:1035–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu G, Magen H, Tarchitzky J, Kafkafi U (2000) Advances in chloride nutrition of plants. Adv Agron 68:97–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zabihi HR, Savaghebi GR, Khavazi A, Ganjali A, Miransari M (2010) Pseudomonas bacteria and phosphorous fertilization, affecting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield and P uptake under greenhouse and field conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 33:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahir ZA, Ghani U, Naveed M, Nadeem SM, Asghar HN (2009) Comparative effectiveness of Pseudomonas and Serratia sp. containing ACC-deaminase for improving growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under salt-stressed conditions. Arch Microbiol 191:415–424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata PJ, Botella MÁ, Pretel MT, Serrano M (2007) Responses of ethylene biosynthesis to saline stress in seedlings of eight plant species. Plant Growth Regul 53:97–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhender GW, Yao C, Murphy JF, Sikora ER, Kloepper JW, Schuster DJ, Polston JE (1999) Microbe-induced resistance against pathogens and herbivores: evidence of effectiveness in agriculture. In: Agarwal AA, Tuzun S, Bent E (eds) Induced plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores: biochemistry, ecology agriculture. APS Press, St Paul, p 33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajid Mahmood Nadeem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadeem, S.M., Zahir, Z.A., Naveed, M. et al. Mitigation of salinity-induced negative impact on the growth and yield of wheat by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in naturally saline conditions. Ann Microbiol 63, 225–232 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0465-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-012-0465-0

Keywords