Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Characterisation of the bacteriocins produced by two probiotic Lactobacillus isolates from idli batter

Abstract

Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JJ60, probiotics from idli batter, produce bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 having a wide spectrum of activity. After optimising the environmental conditions for bacteriocin production the effect of various media components was determined. Maximum bacteriocin production was observed in MRS broth, pH 6.4 at 37 °C after 36 h. Tryptone (as nitrogen source) and glucose (as carbon source) are required for optimal production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60. Activity was not affected by surfactants like Triton X-100, Tween 80 and Tween 20 or by treatment with NaCl, urea and EDTA. Protease treatment resulted in complete loss of activity of the partially purified bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60, while lipase and α-amylase had no effect, indicating that the bacteriocin is a simple protein. Tris tricine SDS-PAGE electrophoresis depicted a single band of less than 3.5 kDa. However, the strain Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 was inhibited by bacteriocin JJ60 and Lactobacillus plantarum JJ60 by bacteriocin JJ18, whereas no inhibition was observed against the respective producer strains, indicating that the two bacteriocins are different. The bacteriocins remained active over a wide range of pH and temperature. The bacteriocins were able to adsorb onto producer and target cells, Lactobacillus plantarum and Listeria monocytogenes and differentially in the presence of various surfactants, salts and solvents. A bactericidal mode of action was observed against Listeria monocytogenes. Given their wide spectrum of activity against various pathogens, the bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 can be applied as bio-preservatives in the food industry.

Introduction

Food fermentation is one of the oldest methods of food processing and preservation. Fermentation adds safety and nutritional value and characteristic flavor to the food. It increases the shelf life and microbiological safety of food and makes it more digestible (Caplice and Fitzgerald 1999). Food safety is a major issue for both the food industry and consumers. The general public demands high quality, preservative-free, safe, and minimally processed foods with extended shelf-life. Among the proposed technologies, biopreservation is considered as a promising perspective (Malheiros et al. 2010). Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are promising alternatives to chemical preservatives. LAB are a heterogeneous group of bacteria used as starter culture for fermentation of different foods such as dairy, meat, vegetables and cereals. Their preserving effect relates mainly to the production of antimicrobial compounds such as lactic acid, acetic acid, hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, CO2, and bacteriocin (El-Ghaisha et al. 2011). Furthermore, LAB are indigenous inhabitants of the human gastrointestinal tract, and are thought to be among the dominant colonists of the small intestine (Marco et al. 2006). The increase in bacterial resistance to various antibiotics has stimulated investigators around the world to improve disease control strategies, which has led to the discovery of new vaccines and non-specific immune-stimulants. Thus, there is a growing interest worldwide in the use of probiotic bacteria for their various beneficial influences on animal and human health. Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JJ60, which are explored in this study, are potent isolates from idli batter having beneficial properties (Agaliya and Jeevaratnam 2012). Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 also has good cholesterol-lowering capacity (Agaliya and Jeevaratnam 2012).

Idli is a natural yeast-lactic fermented product, used mainly as a breakfast snack in southern India. In the majority of fermented foods, particularly traditional foods of India, which are based on cereals and legumes, the nature of fermentation involves LAB (Agrawal et al. 2000). The bacteriocins from lactobacilli isolated from other traditional foods of India have proven its applicability in biopreservation (Jamuna and Jeevaratnam 2004; Jamuna et al. 2005). Bacteriocins of LAB are defined as ribosomally synthesised proteins or protein complexes usually antagonistic to genetically closely related organisms (Klaenhammer 1988; Nes and Johnsborg 2004). Since the majority of bacteriocinogenic LAB are natural food isolates, their antimicrobial peptides can be exploited by the food industry as a tool to control undesirable bacteria in a food-grade and natural manner (Cleveland et al. 2001). A number of bacteriocins have been described for Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from various food sources and fermented beverages (Powell et al. 2007).

The bacteriocins from LAB have attracted significant attention because of their potential use as non-toxic and safe additives for food preservation and prevention of food spoilage by food borne gram-positive pathogenic bacteria (Henderson et al. 1992; Morisset et al. 2004). Studies have been conducted on the effect of various media components on the production of bacteriocins (Todorov and Dicks 2005a; Todorov et al. 2011b). The effect of organic nitrogen and carbon on the production of plantaricins has been studied. Bacteriocin production is known to be altered in different environmental conditions and optimum production may require a specific combination of environmental parameters (Leal-Sánchez et al. 2002). The production is often regulated by microbial growth, pH and temperature (Aasen et al. 2000)

Bacteriocins are generally low molecular weight proteins that gain entry into target cells by binding to cell surface receptors. The modes of action of bacteriocins are generally via targeting of the cytoplasmic membrane. They dissipate the proton motive force through the formation of pores in the phospholipids bilayer. This action results in the inhibition of protein or nucleic acid biosynthesis and loss of ions (Bauer and Dicks 2005).

The present study is focussed on the optimisation of bacteriocin production, partial purification and characterisation of bacteriocins produced by two Lactobacillus plantarum from idli batter.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

The probiotic lactobacilli isolated from idli batter were characterised as Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 (GenBank ID: JN573601) and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JJ60 (GenBank ID: JN573602) by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis and species specific multiplex PCR using recA primer. The Lactobacillus was maintained on semisolid De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) agar and was grown in MRS broth at 37 °C. The indicator organisms, viz., Listeria monocytogenes (MTCC 657), Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus (MTCC 737), Aeromonas hydrophila subsp. hydrophilia (MTCC 1739), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC 2295), Micrococcus luteus (MTCC 106), Bacillus cereus (MTCC 1272), Vibrio parahaemolyticus (MTCC 451), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC 619), Escherichia coli (MTCC 728) for antibacterial activity determination were procured from the Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC) at Institute of Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. All the bacteria cultures used in the study were preserved in 70 % glycerol. They were propagated subsequently for use in appropriate media and temperature.

Bacteriocin activity and production

Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JJ60 were grown in MRS broth at 37 °C using inoculums of an overnight culture at 1 % level. The changes in the pH and optical density (600 nm) were recorded for every 6 h over a period of 72 h for the two cultures. The cell-free supernatant (CFS) concentrated (10-fold) using a rotary evaporator was used to determine bacteriocin activity using the agar well diffusion assay (Jamuna and Jeevaratnam 2004) against the indicator strains Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 and Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 737 at the same time interval, and activity was expressed as arbitrary units per millilitre (AU/mL) (Todorov et al. 2011a). Bacteriocin production was checked by growing the culture in MRS broth of various initial pH values (4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5 and 7.0) and at various temperatures (4, 10, 15, 25, 30, 37, and 45 °C).

Effect of media components on bacteriocin production

Fresh overnight inoculums of Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JJ60 were added to the growth media MRS broth, pH 6.4 (without tryptone, meat and yeast extract), supplemented with tryptone (20.0 g/L), meat extract (20.0 g/L), yeast extract (20.0 g/L), tryptone (12.5 g/L) plus meat extract (7.5 g/L), tryptone (12.5 g/L) plus yeast extract (7.5 g/L), meat extract (10.0 g/L) plus yeast extract (10.0 g/L), and a combination of tryptone (10.0 g/L), meat extract (5.0 g/L) and yeast extract (5.0 g/L), respectively; MRS broth, pH 6.4 (without glucose), supplemented with 20.0 g/L glucose, fructose, sucrose, mannose, maltose, lactose, respectively. MRS broth (pH 6.4) supplemented with different concentrations K2HPO4 and KH2PO4 (0.2–10.0 g/L); and MRS broth (pH 6.4) supplemented with glycerol (1.0, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0 and 50.0 g/L, respectively). MRS broth (pH 6.4) supplemented with Tri-ammonium citrate (0.0, 5.0 and 10 g/L), MgSO4 (0.0 and 0.1 g/L), MnSO4 (0.0 and 0.02 g/L) and Tween 80 (0.0, 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 g/L). The effect of various vitamins like vitamin C, vitamin B1, vitamin B12 and dl-6,8-thioctic acid (1.0 g/L) were also checked (Todorov et al. 2011b).

Partial purification of the bacteriocins

Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JJ60 were grown in 500 mL optimised media and incubated at 37 °C for 36 h. The CFS concentrate maintained at <0 °C was used to obtain an acetone extract of bacteriocins by gently adding ice-cold acetone with constant stirring to a saturation of 50 %, which was further subjected to 75 % acetone precipitation, wherein the precipitate was dissolved in distilled water and the residual acetone removed by rotary vacuum evaporation (Jamuna and Jeevaratnam 2004). The dry precipitate was dissolved in 5 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.0) and stored at 4 °C. The precipitate was passed through Sephadex G 25 column. By checking the fractions for inhibitory effect against Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 and Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 737 the active fraction was obtained. The active fraction was again passed through a Sephadex G 25 (super fine) column to obtain a homogenous partially purified bacteriocin, which was examined by Tris-tricine (16 % gel) SDS- PAGE electrophoresis. One half of the gel was fixed with 5 % glutaraldehyde solution and stained with Coomassie Brilliant blue G 250 (Schägger and Von Jagow 1987). The other half of the gel was fixed with 20 % isopropanol and 10 % acetic acid for activity staining. After washing with distilled water, the gel was overlaid with the indicator Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 of 106 CFU/mL (Todorov et al. 2010).

Protein assay

The protein was determined by modified Biuret method of Gornall et al. (1949) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard.

Antibacterial (spectrum) activity screening

The partially purified bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were used to obtain the antibacterial (spectrum) activity against various LAB and pathogens by agar well diffusion method (Jamuna and Jeevaratnam 2004).

Effect of various treatments on activity of bacteriocin

The influence of various enzymes, temperature and pH on the antibacterial activity of partially purified bacteriocins was analysed. Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were treated with proteinase K, pepsin, protease, lipase and α-amylase at 1 mg/mL and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C (Todorov et al. 2011b). The bacteriocins were also treated with 1 % (w/v) of sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), Tween 20, Tween 80, urea, Triton X-100, bile and NaCl. Untreated bacteriocins and detergents at these respective concentrations in water were used as controls. All samples were incubated at 37 °C for 5 h and tested for antibacterial activity. The effect of pH on the activity of bacteriocins was tested by adjusting the pH  from 2.0 to 12.0 (in increments of two pH units) with sterile 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl. After 1 h of incubation at room temperature (28 °C) the antibacterial activity was determined by readjusting the samples to pH 6.0. The effect of temperature on the bacteriocin activity was also tested by incubating the bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 at pH 6.0 at 4, 10, 25, 30, 37, 60, 80 and 100 °C for 2 h, except for 121 °C (20 min) (Todorov et al. 2011b). The antibacterial activity of the partially purified bacteriocin after these treatments was tested against Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 and Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 737 (Jamuna and Jeevaratnam 2004).

Adsorption of bacteriocin to producer and target cells

Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JJ60 were cultured at 30 °C for 18 h. The pH of the culture was adjusted to 6.0 with 1 M NaOH to allow maximal adsorption of the bacteriocin to the producer cells (Yang et al. 1992). The cells were then harvested (12,000 g, 15 min, at 4 °C) and washed with sterile 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). The pellet was re-suspended in 10 mL 100 mM NaCl (pH 2.0) and stirred slowly for 1 h at 4 °C. The suspension was then centrifuged (12,000 g, 15 min, 4 °C), the CFS adjusted to pH 6.0 with sterile 1 M NaOH and was tested for bacteriocin activity. Adsorption of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 to target cells was also studied against one resistant (Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 6160) and one sensitive strain (Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657). The early stationary phase target cells were harvested and washed twice with 5 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and its OD adjusted to 1.0. Equal volumes of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 (adjusted to pH 6.0, 1,600 AU/mL) were then added to the resuspended cells and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Finally, the activity of unbound bacteriocin in the supernatant was tested (Todorov et al. 2011b). The target cells were treated with 1 % (m/v) Tween 20, Tween 80, NaCl, ascorbic acid, potassium sorbate and sodium nitrate along with the bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60. The pH of all samples were adjusted to 6.5 with 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. The effect of various pH and temperature on the adsorption to the target cells was also determined. The activity of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 in the CFS was tested (Todorov et al. 2011b). The effect of solvents like methanol, ethanol and chloroform was also studied (Todorov et al. 2007b).

Mode of action of the bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60

Ten millilitres of filter-sterilised partially purified bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were added to a 50-mL culture of Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 at early exponential phase and then incubated at 37 °C. Samples were taken hourly to determine the viable cells (CFU/mL) on TSYE agar plates. The optical density (OD) of the samples was also monitored for every hour. Culture without bacteriocin was used as control (Xie et al. 2011).

Results and discussion

Production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 commenced at the log phase (200 AU/mL at 6 h) as deduced by inhibition against Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 and Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 737. The maximum production (1,600 AU/mL) against Listeria monocytogenes (Fig. 1a,b) and Staphylococcus aureus (Fig. 1c,d) was observed during 30 to 36 h, i.e. in early stationary phase, while the pH of the culture decreased to 5.5 and 5.0, respectively (Fig. 1a,b), while a decline was observed after 48 h. The initial pH of 6.0, 6.5 and 7.0 of MRS broth resulted in maximum production of JJ18 and JJ60 of 1,600 AU/mL (Table 1), while pH 5.0 and 5.5 with 800 AU/mL yielded much lower activity of 400 AU/mL at pH 4.5. The initial pH of the medium plays a crucial role in production of bacteriocins. An initial pH of at least 6.0 is optimal for production of bacteriocin. Other Lactobacillus plantarum strains showed similar results (Todorov et al. 2011b). The optimal temperature for production of bacteriocin JJ18 and JJ60 was 30 to 37 °C, while temperatures below 30 °C and above 37 °C showed decreased production (Table 1). Studies conducted on bacteriocins from other LAB have suggested that production is often regulated by growth, pH and temperature with a few exceptions (Aasen et al. 2000).

Fig. 1
figure 1

ad Effect of duration of incubation at 37 °C on the optical density at 600 nm (▲), pH (■) and antibacterial activity (open bars) of Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and Lactobacillus plantarum JJ60 in MRS broth medium. Antibacterial activity was evaluated against Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 (a, b) and Staphylococcus aureus MTCC 737(c, d)

Table 1 Effect of pH and temperature on production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60

Among the nitrogen sources, tryptone in combination with yeast extract or meat extract yielded an activity of 1,600 AU/mL. The combination of meat extract and yeast extract (10.0 g/L and 10.0 g/L) yielded only 25 % of the activity. When single nitrogen source of meat extract or yeast extract was tested, only 12.5 % of activity was observed (Table 2). The results suggested that tryptone is required for optimal production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60. The results are in agreement with those reported for plantaricins ST194BZ and ST16Pa (Todorov and Dicks 2005a; Todorov et al. 2011b).

Table 2 Effect of various media components on the production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60

Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were produced at 1,600 AU/mL when strain was grown in MRS broth supplemented with 20.0 g/L of either glucose or maltose, while a decreased activity was observed with lactose, galactose, mannose (800 AU/mL) and fructose (400 AU/mL). An increase in bacteriocin JJ18 production was recorded in the presence of 30.0 g/L glucose (3,200 AU/mL) but the activity decreased to 50 % with 50.0 g/L glucose. On the other hand, glucose at 5.0 g/L or 10.0 g/L reduced the production of bacteriocin considerably. This suggests that glucose acts as the primary carbon source. The activity of 800 AU/mL bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 from lactose and sucrose would be because of the glucose moiety. Similar observations were made in other bacteriocins like ST194BZ and ST16Pa (Todorov and Dicks 2005a ; Todorov et al. 2011b). Glucose was shown to be a favourable carbohydrate for production of plantaricin UG1 (Enan et al. 1996) and bacteriocins ST202Ch and ST216Ch (Todorov et al. 2010). However, much higher glucose concentration (50.0 g/L) had a repressive effect resulting in only 800 AU/mL (Table 2). A similar repression effect was observed in the production of bacteriocin ST341LD (Todorov and Dicks 2006a).

Little is known about the influence of potassium ions on the production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60. Levels of 10.0 g/L and 20.0 g/L KH2PO4 increased the production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 (1,600 AU/mL), but 2.0 g/L of the same salt reduced bacteriocin production by 25 %. On the other hand, low levels of K2HPO4 (2.0 g/L and 5.0 g/L) resulted in JJ18 and JJ60 bacteriocin production of 1,600 AU/mL, whereas 10.0 g/L and 20.0 g/L K2HPO4 resulted in a decrease to 400 AU/mL (Table 2). This variation in production cannot be due to pH changes caused by higher or lower potassium levels, since all media were adjusted to pH 6.5 before inoculation as reported by Todorov et al. (2011b).

Addition of glycerol (1.0 or 2.0 g/L) to MRS medium had no effect on production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 (1,600 AU/mL). In contrast, a considerable loss of activity observed when the glycerol concentration increased to 5.0 g/L and above. A similar effect of glycerol was reported for bacteriocin ST202Ch, ST216Ch (Todorov et al. 2010) and bacteriocin ST16Pa (Todorov et al. 2011b). Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 production was higher (1,600 AU/mL) in the absence of tri-ammonium citrate (Table 2), but lower in the presence of 10.0 g/L tri-ammonium citrate. A similar effect of tri-ammonium citrate was found for production of bacteriocins ST8KF (Powell et al. 2007) and ST16Pa (Todorov et al. 2011b).

The presence of MgSO4 (0.1 g/L) and MnSO4 (0.02 g/L) was essential for maximum bacteriocin JJ18 and JJ60 (1,600 AU/mL) as there was reduced production in the absence of these salts (Table 2). Similar results were observed for bacteriocin ST16Pa (Todorov et al. 2011b). Omitting MgSO4 from the medium formula had a negative effect on bacteriocin JJ18 and JJ60 production (Table 2). A similar negative effect on the production of both bacteriocin ST202Ch and bacteriocin ST216Ch was reported by Todorov et al. (2010). MRS medium supplemented with 1 g/L Tween 80 showed maximum production of bacteriocin JJ18; the surfactant Tween 80 probably facilitates the discharging of the bacteriocin from the cell surface of the producer strain (Todorov and Dicks 2005a). The absence of Tween 80 in the MRS medium had a positive effect on the production of bacteriocin JJ60, while increasing Tween 80 up to 5.0 g/L in MRS broth had no beneficial effect on bacteriocin production (Table 2). The presence of vitamins like thiamine, cyanocobalamin, vitamin C and dl-6, 8 thioctic acid did not stimulate the production of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 but resulted in decreased activity (Table 2). A similar effect of vitamins on bacteriocin production was observed in bacteriocin ST23LD, ST341LD (Todorov and Dicks 2006a) and ST16Pa (Todorov et al. 2011b).

Partially purified bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were obtained by passing the reconstituted 75 % cold-acetone precipitate through a gel permeation column—Sephadex G 25 initially and the pooled active fractions once again through Sephadex G 25 superfine. The Tris-tricine SDS PAGE electrophoresis of the partially purified bacteriocin preparation revealed a single protein band, with a molecular weight less than 3.5 kDa in one half of the gel stained with Coomassie Brilliant blue G 250 (Fig. 2), while the other half overlaid with Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 showed a zone of inhibition corresponding to the protein band (Fig. 2). A bacteriocin of approximately 2.9 kDa was reported in case of bac AMA-K (Todorov et al. 2007a), while that of bacteriocin LABB and LABP from appam batter were found to be 3.8 and 4.5 kDa, respectively (Jamuna and Jeevaratnam 2004). The molecular size of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 are within the range of most bacteriocins reported for the genus Lactobacillus (Cintas et al. 2001). However, the strain Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 was inhibited by bacteriocin JJ60 (Fig. 3a) and Lactobacillus plantarum JJ60 by bacteriocin JJ18 (Fig. 3b) whereas no inhibition was observed against the respective producer strains (Fig. 3a,b). This indicated that they are different even though they behaved similarly; however, further purification and sequencing of the bacteriocins would confirm these findings.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Tris-tricine-SDS-PAGE of partially purified bacteriocins along with standard markers and the other half of the gel showing an inhibitory zone. Lanes: a Molecular weight marker, b protein band representing the bacteriocin JJ18, c protein band representing the bacteriocin JJ60, d zone of inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by bacteriocin JJ60, e zone of inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes by bacteriocin JJ18

Fig. 3
figure 3

Inhibition of a Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and b Lactobacillus plantarum JJ60 by bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60

Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 showed good antimicrobial activity against pathogens like Bacillus cereus and Staphylococcus aureus, which were earlier reported to be common contaminants in idli batter fermentation, and also showed anti-listerial activity—considered as a common food pathogen in food industry (Aymerich et al. 2000). The inhibition of other pathogens, such as Aeromonas, Pseudomonas, Micrococcus and Bacillus, indicate its application in biopharmaceuticals (Table 3).

Table 3 Antibacterial activity against various pathogens

Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were completely inactivated after treatment with proteolytic enzymes such as proteinase K, protease and pepsin, while bacteriocin activity remained stable after treatment with amylase and lipase (Table 4), confirming the proteinaceous nature of bacteriocins (Todorov and Dicks 2005b). Moreover, their activities were not affected by lipolytic or glycolytic enzymes, suggesting that the active moiety was not associated with a lipid or a glucan (Tomé et al. 2006). Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were not affected when treated with Tween 20, Tween 80, Triton X-100, and SDS at 1 % (w/v) or EDTA (0.1, 2, and 5 mM) (Table 3). Similar results were recorded for plantaricin C19 (Atrih et al. 2001) and bacteriocin AMA-K (Todorov et al. 2007a). The effect of detergents on different bacteriocins provided information about the structure of the peptides. Anionic detergents often unfold proteins by complexion of the hydrophobic core of their native structure, which may affect their three-dimensional conformation (Todorov and Dicks 2005b). Antimicrobial activity was affected after treatment with either bile or urea (1 % w/v). Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were able to resist temperatures ranging from 4 °C to 60 °C. However, there was loss of 50 % activity from 80–100 °C after 2 h. The bacteriocins exhibited 50 % activity when subjected to 121 °C for 20 min (Table 4). Upon exposure to different pH values, bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 remained stable from pH 2 to 6, whereas at alkaline pH of 8 to 12, a loss of 25–50 % activity was observed (Table 4). This loss of activity might be ascribed to proteolytic degradation, protein aggregation or instability of proteins at this extreme pH (Aasen et al. 2000; Parente and Ricciardi 1994). In conclusion, bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were thermostable, which is a very useful characteristic if they is to be used as a food preservative, because many food-processing procedures involve a heating step. The bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were similar to a great extent to bacteriocin plantaricin MG (Gong et al. 2010), ST8KF (Powell et al. 2007) and AMA-K (Todorov et al. 2007a).

Table 4 Effect of enzymes, chemicals, pH and temperature on activity of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60

Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 adsorbed at 50 % to cells of Lactobacillus plantarum (MTCC 6161) and 75 % to cells of Listeria monocytogenes (MTCC 657). Different levels of adsorption was observed in previous studies but, in general, the highest levels of adsorption were observed against sensitive strains compared to strains resistant to the bacteriocin (Todorov 2008). Bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were adsorbed at 50 % to cells of Listeria monocytogenes and Lactobacillus plantarum at 4 °C and 15 °C. At 30 °C, adsorption was 75 % for Listeria monocytogenes and Lactobacillus plantarum for JJ18 and 50 % for JJ60. At 37 °C and 45 °C, the bacteriocins showed adsorption of 75 % against Listeria monocytogenes and Lactobacillus plantarum. Optimal adsorption of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 at 50 % was recorded at pH 3.5, 5.5 and for Listeria monocytogenes and Lactobacillus plantarum. These results show the potential application of bacteriocin at neutral or moderately acidic pH (Table 5). Effect of various chemicals on adsorption was also checked; 50 % of adsorption was observed with chemicals like Tween 80 and Tween 20. Variation in level of adsorption for ascorbic acid was observed for bactericoins JJ18 and JJ60. Adsorption decreased with chemicals such as potassium sorbate and sodium nitrate (Table 5). Similar results were observed for bacteriocin ST16Pa (Todorov et al. 2011b). Adsorption of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 to the cell surface decreased in the presence of sodium chloride, and the reduction was concentration-dependent. These inhibition patterns show that binding of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 with cell surface receptors may be mediated by ionic interactions (Yildirim et al. 2002); 50 % adsorption was observed in 1.5 and 2 % NaCl, while increased adsorption was observed in 0.5 and 1 % NaCl. Fifty percent adsorption was also observed with different solvents like 80 % alcohol, methanol and chloroform (Table 5). From these results, we conclude that the adsorption of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 to target cells is affected by environmental factors such as pH and temperature, and the presence of surfactants, inorganic salts and alcohols. From an industrial point of view, for instance the application of plantaricin as a food preservative, these are important factors that will have to be taken into account (Todorov and Dicks 2006b).

Table 5 Effect of temperature, pH, chemicals and solvents on adsorption to target cells

The addition of bacteriocin JJ18 and JJ60 to an exponentially growing culture of Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657 did not alter the OD of the cells, indicating that there was no cell lysis (Fig. 4a,b). However, a drastic decrease in viable cell number (CFU) was observed within 3 h for bacteriocin JJ18 (Fig. 4c) and within 2 h for bacteriocin JJ60 (Fig. 4d). This suggested that the mode of action of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 was bactericidal. A bactericidal effect was reported for bacteriocin AMA-K (Todorov et al. 2007a). Understanding the mode of action of a bacteriocin is important for its effective utilisation. Bactericidal mechanisms vary and may include pore formation, degradation of cellular DNA, disruption through specific cleavage of 16S rRNA, and inhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis (Heu et al. 2001).

Fig. 4a–d
figure 4

Mode of action of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60against Listeria monocytogenes MTCC 657. ad Optical density of cells measured at 600 nm treated with (■) and without (•) bacteriocin (a, b); and log CFU/mL counts of the indicator strain treated with (■) and without (•) bacteriocin (c, d)

In the present study, bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 were produced by Lactobacillus plantarum from idli batter. Various factors affecting the production of bacteriocins were studied. Partially purified bacteriocins of molecular weight less than 3.5 kDa were obtained. The bacteriocins were very stable to various pH and temperature conditions. The bacteriocins showed a broad spectrum of activity against various food spoilage pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli. According to recent trends in food preservation, the improvement of microbiological safety of foods can be attained with the help of bacteriocin-producing strains of LAB isolated from the same food that needs to be preserved. Moreover, Lactobacillus plantarum JJ18 and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum JJ60 have probiotic properties. Thus the broad spectrum of activity of bacteriocins JJ18 and JJ60 could find a potential application in food as a biopreservative and in pharmaceuticals as antibacterial agents.

References

  • Aasen IM, Moreto T, Katla T, Axelsson L, Storro I (2000) Influence of complex nutrients, temperature and pH on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus sakei CCUG 42687. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 53:159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agaliya PJ, Jeevaratnam K (2012) Screening of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from fermented idli batter for probiotic properties. Afr J Biotechnol 11:12856–12864

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal R, Rati ER, Vijayendra SVN, Varadaraj MC, Prasad MS, Nand K (2000) Flavour profile of idli batter prepared from defined microbial starter cultures. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 16:687–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atrih A, Rekhif N, Moir AJG, Lebrihi A, Lefebvre G (2001) Mode of action, purification and amino acid sequence of plantaricin C19, an anti-Listeria bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum C19. Int J Food Microbiol 68:93–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aymerich MT, Garriga M, Monfort JM, Nes I, Hugas M (2000) Bacteriocin-producing lactobacilli in Spanish style fermented sausages: characterization of bacteriocins. Food Microbiol 17:33–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R, Dicks LMT (2005) Mode of action of lipid II-targeting lantibiotics. Int J Food Microbiol 101:201–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Caplice E, Fitzgerald GF (1999) Food fermentations: role of microorganisms in food production and preservation. Int J Food Microbiol 50:131–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cintas LM, Casaus MP, Herranz C, Nes IF, Hernandez PE (2001) Review: bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. Food Sci Technol Int 7:4281–4305

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland J, Montville TJ, Nes IF, Chikindas ML (2001) Bacteriocins: safe, natural antimicrobials for food preservation. Int J Food Microbiol 71:1–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva MP, Daroit DJ, Brandelli A (2010) Food applications of liposome-encapsulated antimicrobial peptides. Trends Food Sci Technol 21:284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Ghaisha S, Ahmadovaa A, Hadji-Sfaxia I, El Mecherfia KE, Bazukyane I, Choiseta Y, Rabesona H, Sitohy M, Popov YG, Kuliev AA, Mozzi FM, Cobert JM, Haertle T (2011) Potential use of lactic acid bacteria for reduction of allergenicity and for longer conservation of fermented foods. Trends Food Sci Technol 22:509–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enan G, El-Essawyb AA, Uyttendaele M, Debeverea J (1996) Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus plantarum UGl isolated from dry sausage: characterization, production and bactericidal action of plantaricin UG 1. Int J Food Microbiol 30:189–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong HS, Meng XC, Wang H (2010) Plantaricin MG active against Gram-negative bacteria produced by Lactobacillus plantarum KLDS1.0391 isolated from “Jiaoke”, a traditional fermented cream from China. Food Control 21:89–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gornall AG, Bardwill GJ, David MM (1949) Determination of serum proteins by means of biuret reaction. J Biol Chem 117:751–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JR, Chopko AL, van Wassenaar D (1992) Purification and primary structure of pediocin PA-1 produced by Peciococcus acidilactici PAC-1.0. Arch Biochem Biophys 295:5–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heu S, Oh J, Kang Y, Ryu S, Cho SK, Cho Y, Cho M (2001) Gly gene cloning and expression and purification of Glycinecin A, a bacteriocin produced by Xanthomonas campestris pv. Glycines 8ra. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4105–4110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamuna M, Jeevaratnam K (2004) Isolation and characterisation of lactobacilli from some traditional fermented foods and evaluation of the bacteriocins. J Gen Appl Microbiol 50:79–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamuna M, Babusha ST, Jeevaratnam K (2005) Inhibitory efficacy of nisin and bacteriocins from Lactobacillus isolates against food spoilage and pathogenic organisms in model and food systems. Food Microbiol 22:449–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klaenhammer TR (1988) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria. Biochimie 70:337–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leal-Sánchez MV, Jiménez-Díaz R, Maldonado-Barragán A, Garrido-Fernández A, Ruiz-Barba JL (2002) Optimization of bacteriocin production by batch fermentation of Lactobacillus plantarum LPCO10. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4465–4471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marco ML, Pavan S, Kleerebezem M (2006) Towards understanding molecular modes of probiotic action. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:204–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morisset D, Berjeaud JM, Marion D, Lacombe C, Frère J (2004) Mutational analysis of mesentericin Y105, an anti-Listeria bacteriocin, for determination of impact on bactericidal activity, in vitro secondary structure, and membrane interaction. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:4672–4680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nes I, Johnsborg O (2004) Exploration of antimicrobial potential in LAB by genomics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 15:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Parente E, Ricciardi A (1994) Influence of pH on the production of enterocin 1146 during batch fermentation. Lett Appl Microbiol 9:12–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell JE, Witthuhn RC, Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2007) Characterization of bacteriocin ST8KF produced by a kefir isolate Lactobacillus plantarum ST8KF. Int Dairy J 17:190–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schägger H, Von Jagow G (1987) Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166:368–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD (2008) Bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum AMA-K isolated from Amasi, a Zimbabwean fermented milk product and study of adsorption of bacteriocin AMA-K to Listeria spp. Braz J Microbiol 38:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2005a) Effect of growth medium on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum ST194BZ, a strain isolated from boza. Food Technol Biotechnol 43:165–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2005b) Pediocin ST18, an anti-listerial bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus pentosaceus ST18 isolated from boza, a traditional cereal beverage from Bulgaria. Process Biochem 40:365–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2006a) Effect of medium components on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum strains ST23LD and ST341LD, isolated from spoiled olive brine. Microbiol Res 161:102–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2006b) Parameters affecting the adsorption of plantaricin 423, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum 423 isolated from sorghum beer. Biotechnol J 1:405–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Nyati H, Meincken M, Dicks LMT (2007a) Partial characterization of bacteriocin AMA-K, produced by Lactobacillus plantarum AMA-K isolated from naturally fermented milk from Zimbabwe. Food Control 18:656–664

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Powell JE, Mencken M, Witthuhn RC, Dicks LMT (2007b) Factors affecting the adsorption of Lactobacillus plantarum bacteriocin bacST8KF to Enterococcus faecalis and Listeria innocua. Int J Dairy Technol 60:221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Ho P, Vaz-Velho M, Dicks LMT (2010) Characterization of bacteriocins produced by two strains of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from Beloura and Chouriço, traditional pork products from Portugal. Meat Sci 84:334–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Furtado DN, Saad SMI, Tome E, Franco BDGM (2011a) Potential beneficial properties of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria isolated from smoked salmon. J Appl Microbiol 110:971–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Prévost H, Lebois M, Dousset X, LeBlanc JG, Franco BDGM (2011b) Bacteriocinogenic Lactobacillus plantarum ST16Pa isolated from papaya (Carica papaya)—from isolation to application: characterization of a bacteriocin. Food Res Int 44:1351–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomé E, Teixeira P, Gibbs PA (2006) Anti-listerial inhibitory lactic acid bacteria isolated from commercial cold smoked salmon. Food Microbiol 23:399–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, An H, Hao Y, Qin Q, Huang Y, Luo Y, Zhang L (2011) Characterization of an anti-Listeria bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum LB-B1 isolated from koumiss, a traditionally fermented dairy product from China. Food Control 22:1027–1031

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Johnson MC, Ray B (1992) Novel method to extract large amounts of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3355–3359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim Z, Avşar YK, Yildirim M (2002) Factors affecting the adsorption of buchnericin LB, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus buchneri. Microbiol Res 157:103–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

P.J.A., Junior Research Fellow, thanks the Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi for financial support in the form of fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kadirvelu Jeevaratnam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agaliya, P.J., Jeevaratnam, K. Characterisation of the bacteriocins produced by two probiotic Lactobacillus isolates from idli batter. Ann Microbiol 63, 1525–1535 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-013-0616-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-013-0616-y

Keywords