Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Molecular phylogeny and evogenomics of heterocystous cyanobacteria using rbcl gene sequence data

Abstract

Taxonomic affiliations and molecular diversity of 41 heterocystous cyanobacteria representing 12 genera have been assessed on an evolutionary landscape using rbcl gene sequence data-based phylogenomics and evogenomics approaches. Phylogenetic affiliations have clearly demonstrated the polyphyly of the true branching cyanobacteria, along with a frequent intermixing amongst the heterocystous cyanobacteria. The monophyletic origin of the heterocystous cyanobacteria was also quite evident from maximum parsimony and neighbor joining analyses. Incongruency with the traditional scheme of cyanobacterial taxonomy was frequently observed, thus advocating towards some re-amendments in the cyanobacterial classificatory schemes. Evogenomics analyses of gene sequence data gave a clear indication about the greater evolutionary pace of the unbranched cyanobacteria as compared to the branched forms. It was evident that the order Nostocales would be controlling the future pace of evolution of heterocystous cyanobacteria. The cyanobacteria Nostoc was found to have the greatest genetic heterogeneity amongst the studied genera, along with some evidence towards events of lateral gene transfer amongst the heterocystous cyanobacteria in case of the rbcl gene. Thus, heterocystous cyanobacteria were found to be a fast evolving group, with estimates of gene conversion tracts pointing towards the unbranched heterocystous cyanobacteria being at the base of evolutionary diversifications of the complete heterocystous lineage.

Introduction

Cyanobacteria are one of the most morphologically and genetically diverse groups of prokaryotes and show significant efficiency for cellular and colonial differentiation. They can be grossly considered as one of the most prevalent groups of photosynthetic prokaryotes having an all-inclusive distribution and occupying a vast array of terrestrial and aquatic environments (Meeks and Elhai 2002). They are also responsible for converting the ancient Earth’s anaerobic atmosphere to an aerobic one, which led to the creation of an aerobic environment that has allowed for the existence of life on earth and the diversity of life that exists today. They constitute one of the oldest and most ancient groups of organisms, with fossil records that date back to about 3.5 billion years (Henson et al. 2004; Singh et al. 2013). Molecular phylogenetic approaches have made it evident that all photoautotrophic eukaryotes (plants and algae) share a single origin, as well as a common endosymbiotic ancestry for cyanobacteria-derived chloroplasts (Yoon et al. 2004). Cyanobacteria are one of the premier photosynthetic prokaryotes, along with being very important nitrogen fixers through the nitrogenase gene complex (Lammers and Haselkorn 1984).

Cyanobacterial classification based on morphological characters has long been a matter of immense debate, because of the incongruency of molecular findings with the morphological schemes (Mollenhauer 1988; Mishra et al. 2013). A major drawback of this scheme was that it did not represent the true evolutionary relationships and phylogeny within the cyanobacterial lineage (Komárek and Anagnostidis 1989). Characteristics of vegetative cells, heterocysts and akinetes are controversial, and are considerably altered due to phenotypic changes under different environmental conditions and selective culturing conditions (Desikachary 1959). Cyanobacteriologists all across the globe have done a lot of work to test and prove the inadequacy of the morphological scheme of classification, and it is estimated that around 50 % of the cyanobacterial strains found in culture collections all over the world have been wrongly marked (Komárek and Anagnostidis 1989).

Molecular parameters based on PCR based methods, such as the 16S rRNA sequences, nif gene(s), phycocyanin encoding locus and RNA polymerase gene (Giovannoni et al. 1988; Ludwig and Schleifer 1994; Nelissen et al. 1996; Lee et al. 1996; Zehr et al. 1997; Honda et al. 1999; Neilan et al. 2002; Hartmann and Barnum 2010; Mishra et al. 2013; Singh et al. 2013), have been used as genetic markers for assessing cyanobacterial diversity and phylogenetic designs. A very important functional gene present in cyanobacteria is the plastid-encoded rbcl gene. Apart from being a single copy gene, approximately 1,430 base pairs in length, it is also free from length mutations except at the far 3′ end, and is known to have a fairly conservative rate of evolution. The form I enzyme, found predominantly in plants, eukaryotic algae, and cyanobacteria, contains large (rbcl) and small (rbcs) subunits that have been shown to assemble into a complex hexadecameric structure, (L2)4(S4)2. Its catalytic site contains active amino acids from two neighboring large subunits, and studies of site-specific enzymes indicate that the small subunit is required for maximal catalysis and contributes to CO2/O2 specificity. Reports about the phylogenetic assessment of the rbcl gene are much fewer (Morden and Golden 1991; Gugger et al. 2002) and do not encompass many of the cyanobacterial genera. Hence, in this manuscript, the rbcl gene has been used as a molecular marker to establish the phylogenetic tendencies, taxonomic affiliations and evolutionary pace of heterocystous cyanobacteria representing 12 genera of subsections IV and V. This work is in continuation of our reports on the nifH gene (Singh et al. 2013) and 16S rRNA and nifD and psbA genes (communicated), using the same set of 41 heterocystous cyanobacteria collected and isolated from different parts of India.

Materials and methods

Growth and maintenance of cultures

Forty-one freshwater-dwelling heterocystous cyanobacterial strains were isolated, identified, purified and selected for the rbcl-gene-based genetic diversity and phylogenetic analysis in the present communication (Table 1). The strains were collected from many parts of India, with the constant feature being the fresh water habitat of the samples (Singh et al. 2013). The heterocystous cyanobacterial strains were grown axenically in 150 ml basal medium (BG-110 medium) (Rippka et al. 1979) in cotton-stoppered Erlenmeyer flasks (capacity 500 ml). pH of the medium was adjusted to 7.4 and the cultures were maintained in a culture room under illumination of approximately 50–55 μE m−2 s−1 with a 14/10 h light/dark cycle at 28 ± 2 °C.

Table 1 List of cyanobacterial strains used in present study, with habitats and accession numbers

DNA isolation and PCR amplification of the rbcl gene

The DNA was isolated from 12-day-old cultures using Himedia Ultrasensitive Spin Purification Kit (MB505) with some modifications (Singh et al. 2013). The DNA was stored at −20 °C. The rbcl gene was amplified using the primer pairs rbclf (5′-GACTTCACCAAAGAYGACGAAAACAT-3′) and rbclr (5′-GAACTCGAACTTRATYTCTTTCCA-3′) (Halinen et al. 2007). The amplification reaction was carried out at an initial denaturation of DNA at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 92 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min. The final extension was done at 72 °C for 6 min, followed by incubation at 4 °C for 20 min. The appropriate sized bands of 700 bp were cut using sharp aseptic blades and sent for sequencing.

Phylogenomics analyses

The phylogenomic analysis was done using MEGA 5.1 Beta 2 version (Tamura et al. 2011). The phylogenetic tree was constructed using maximum parsimony and neighbor joining algorithms. The consensus tree was inferred from the 15 most parsimonious trees, and branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % of trees were collapsed. The neighbor joining tree was constructed with an aim to find an optimum tree with balanced minimum evolution. Also, since the algorithm does not assume that all the lineages evolved at the same rate, it was more appropriate to use the neighbor joining algorithm for estimating the phylogeny of investigated cyanobacterial strains (Gascuel and Steel 2006). The neighbor joining tree was computed using the number of differences method, and are in the units of the number of base differences per sequence.

Evogenomics analyses

Evolutionary tendencies of the heterocystous cyanobacteria were assessed by analyzing the gene sequences of the sampled taxa in perspective of calculating nucleotide diversity (level I), recombination frequencies (level II), and the DNA divergence (level III) that finally helped in studying the future course of evolution of the heterocystous cyanobacteria, based on rbcl gene sequences using the software DnaSP 5.10 (Librado and Rozas 2009).

Results

Insights into the molecular phylogeny

The maximum parsimony tree, constructed using the rbcl gene sequences, revealed nine interesting groups, viz., A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I (Fig. 1). Group A comprised of the closely related cyanobacterial genera Nostoc and Anabaena. All the branches had strong bootstrap values, with the minimum being 86. Group A was further subdivided into five subgroups, viz., A1, A2, A3, A4 and A5, with Nostoc and Anabaena species being evident at all positions. Group B comprised of four Anabaena strains along with the strain Nostoc calcicola Ind 30. Group C comprised of four members of the order Nostocales, in which the gene bank strain Nodularia sp. KAC 17 separated first from the gene bank strain Nostoc sp. IO-102-I, which further diverged to strains Nostoc spongiforme Ind 42 and Nostoc muscorum Ind 33. Group D was a larger, much complex and interesting group comprising of three subgroups, D1, D2 and D3, with representatives from both the unbranched heterocystous and the branched heterocystous orders. Group E was represented by the strain Nostoc calcicola Ind 32 pairing with Nostoc sp. Ind 40 substrain 2. This pairing was in a tight conjunction with the strain Anabaenopsis sp. Ind 8, with a bootstrap value of 100. Group F was solely represented by the false branching species Tolypothrix tenuis Ind 16 and Tolypothrix nodosa Ind 17. Group G comprised of the branching forms exclusively, with two subgroups, G1 and G2. Group H was represented by the strains Cylindrospermum muscicola Ind 12 and Cylindrospermum stagnale Ind 15, in conjunction with the false branching strains Scytonema bohnerii Ind 24 and Ind 25. Finally, Group I saw the clustering of strains Cylindrospermum muscicola Ind 13 and Cylindrospermum sp. Ind 14.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Maximum parsimony analysis of heterocystous cyanobacteria using rbcl gene sequence data. The evolutionary history was inferred using the maximum parsimony (MP) method. The consensus tree inferred from 15 most parsimonious trees is shown. Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50 % of trees are collapsed. The consistency index is (0.672414), the retention index is (0.940470), and the composite index is 0.634145 (0.632385) for all sites and parsimony-informative sites. The percentages of parsimonious trees in which the associated taxa clustered together are shown next to the branches. The MP tree was obtained using the Close-Neighbor-Interchange algorithm (Nei and Kumar 2000) with search level 1, in which the initial trees were obtained with the random addition of sequences (ten replicates). The analysis involved 47 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 166 positions in the final data set. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011)

The neighbor joining tree showed two major groups, A and B (Fig. 2). Group A further subdivided into six subgroups: A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 and A6. Subgroup A1 exclusively comprised of the two nostocalean genera Nostoc and Anabaena, with the bootstrap values being satisfactorily robust enough at all the nodes. Noteworthy was the aligning of Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 with the gene bank strain Anabaena sp. BIR 84, thus supporting and providing validity to the findings of the maximum parsimony tree. Subgroup A2 comprised of four Anabaena strains sharing affinity with Nostoc calcicola Ind 30. Subgroup A3 comprised of two gene bank strains, Nodularia sp. KAC 17 and Nostoc sp. IO-102-I with Nostoc spongiforme Ind 42 and Nostoc muscorum Ind 33. Subgroup A4 had representatives of the true branching cyanobacteria Hapalosiphon, along with an initial divergence of the gene bank strain Calothrix desertica. Group A5 was composed of strains belonging to the genus Calothrix, along with the strain Nostoc sp. Ind 36. Finally, subgroup A6 was represented by Anabaenopsis sp. Ind 8, along with Nostoc calcicola Ind 32 and Nostoc sp. Ind 40.2 being in conjunction. Group B had two major subgroups, B1 and B2. Group B1 consisted entirely of the true branching forms, with the strains being Mastigocladus laminosus Ind 29, Westiellopsis sp. Ind 19 and Ind 20, Fischerella sp. Ind 26 and Ind 81, and finally, Nostochopsis sp. Ind 28. Sub-subgroup B2-1 was an assemblage of false branching cyanobacteria Scytonema bohnerii Ind 24 and Ind 25, while sub-subgroup B2-2 was represented by the false branching strains Tolypothrix tenuis Ind 16 and Tolypothrix nodosa Ind 17. Sub-subgroup B2-3 was an exclusive assemblage of Cylindrospermum strains, along with the gene bank reference strain Cylindrospermum licheniforme UTEX 2014.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987). The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 299.60745239 is shown. The percentages of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1,000 replicates) are shown next to the branches (Felsenstein 1985). The evolutionary distances were computed using the number of differences method (Nei and Kumar 2000) and are in the units of the number of base differences per sequence. The analysis involved 47 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 166 positions in the final data set. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA5 (Tamura et al. 2011)

Evogenomics analyses of rbcl gene sequences

We tested our phylogenomics results using intricate evogenomic tools so as to find whether any correlation existed between the two experiments (Table 2). The analyses of the heterocystous cyanobacteria on the basis of the nucleotide sequences resulted in very interesting findings. In the level I analyses, the nucleotide diversity per site (Pi) was found to be more in the unbranched Nostocales order than in the branched Stigonematales. In the level II analyses, we conducted recombination analyses in between the two intermixed orders and calculated the value of R per gene, which was found to be greater in the Nostocales in comparison to the Stigonematales. In the level III analyses, on studying DNA divergence between the orders, the hypothesis of the simpler Nostocales being more evolutionary progressive gained more evogenomic proof. Further, gene conversion tracts were also calculated individually in the 12 genera of heterocystous cyanobacteria in order to assess intergenic evolutionary pace, and that also supported the greater heterogeneity in the genus Nostoc (Table 3). Thus, our rbcl gene analysis helped in recognizing the importance of the unbranched cyanobacteria in deciding the course of evolution and origin of new species of cyanobacteria.

Table 2 Population genetics analysis of heterocystous cyanobacteria using the rbcl gene sequences
Table 3 Number of gene conversion tracts in different genera of heterocystous cyanobacteria

Discussion

Phylogenetic analyses

The phylogenetic analyses using the maximum parsimony and the neighbor joining methods revealed some crucial insights into the genetic diversity and the phylogenetic relatedness of heterocystous cyanobacteria. The genera Nostoc paired with the genera Anabaena in most of the cases in both the trees constructed. But, the immense genetic diversity of the Nostoc genera was reflected in some of the strains, even appearing in different clusters. Groups A1 and A2 in the maximum parsimony tree and group A1 in the neighbor joining tree had similar strains grouping with each other. The strains Nostoc spongiforme Ind 41 and Nostoc sp. Ind 39 clustered with each other in both the trees, irrespective of the fact that their sites of collection were far apart. Thus, from all of the small subgroups, it seemed pretty evident that the genotypes of the Nostoc genera were not being influenced by geographical constraints, as all the isolates were from freshwater, and hence had almost similar environmental checks.

The genera Anabaena also had overall similar clustering tendencies in both the trees. The alignment of Nostoc sp. PCC 7120 with the gene bank strain Anabaena sp. BIR84 in both the trees once again pointed towards the genetic relatedness of this important strain PCC 7120 with the genera Anabaena. Thus, the rbcl gene that we characterized has once again reignited the continuous debate over the placement of strain PCC 7120 in Nostoc or Anabaena. In some of our own reports using 16S rRNA, and nifD and psbA genes (communicated), we have already advocated the assigning of strain PCC 7120 into a new genus. When considering on an overall scale, it was still evident that Nostoc strains had greater genetic heterogeneity as compared to the Anabaena strains, which is in accordance with our own reports using the nifH gene as a molecular marker (Singh et al. 2013). It has already been reported that Nostoc and Anabaena show a high level of genetic heterogeneity (Rajaniemi et al. 2005), and our rbcl gene locus studies also adhere to the above-mentioned findings.

The genera Cylindrospermum represented an interesting case in our study, as in both the trees, it showed deviating affinity from the rest of the nostocalean members, thus pointing towards an evolutionary uncertainty (Rajaniemi et al. 2005) along with a high level of genetic heterogeneity in nostocalean genera. In the maximum parsimony tree, the Cylindrospermum strains aligned with the false branching Scytonema bohnerii strains in the group H with a good bootstrap value, thus pointing towards an evolutionary relatedness of unbranched and false branched cyanobacterial forms. It was also notable to observe the Tolypothrix strains in our study taking an intermediate position between the true branched and unbranched groups (group F of the maximum parsimony tree and sub-subgroup B2-2 in the neighbor joining tree) showing evidence of the false branched cyanobacteria to be intermediate in between the two groups. Further, it has been observed that both the false branching genera paired somewhat distantly in the maximum parsimony tree, while they were relatively closer in the neighbor joining tree. This shifting behavior also suggested having a re-look at the morphological classificatory schemes, as our genetic analyses failed to conclave with the traditional scheme of taxonomy, as has already been reflected by some other reports (Berrendero et al. 2008; Sihvonen et al. 2007; Mishra et al. 2013; Singh et al. 2013 Similar shifting tendencies were also observed in the genera Calothrix, where a relatively better proximity was observed with the true branching cyanobacteria Hapalosiphon in group D in the maximum parsimony tree along with Nostoc sp. Ind 36, suggesting once again the intermixing behavior of heterocystous cyanobacteria (Gugger and Hoffmann 2004). The placement of the Calothrix strains was not adhering with our findings (Singh et al. 2013), where a very tight clustering of this genus was observed using the nifH gene as a molecular marker. It was hence found impossible to assign this genus to its original taxonomic affiliations in the order Nostocales, as it exhibited affinity towards the true branching and the unbranched cyanobacteria in the maximum parsimony tree. The results of the maximum parsimony tree were further confirmed in the neighbor joining tree, where the gene bank strain Calothrix desertica paired with Hapalosiphon genus, while the strains in subgroup A5 in our study formed a cluster with Nostoc sp. Ind 36, with good bootstrap values. The strain Anabaenopsis sp. Ind 8 exhibited relatedness with the genus Nostoc in both the trees constructed, and hence this finding also deviated from our own earlier reports using the nifH gene (Singh et al. 2013), along with reports using the 16S rRNA and RFLP markers (Iteman et al. 2002), where this strain had shown a distinct separating trend from the rest of the heterocystous cyanobacteria. On analysis of the true branching cyanobacteria, it was observed that the genus Hapalosiphon paired separately from the rest of the true branching cyanobacteria, thus pointing towards the suggested polyphyletic origin of the order Stigonematales (Zehr et al. 1997; Gugger and Hoffmann 2004; Henson et al. 2004; Singh et al. 2013). The alignment of this genus separately from the rest of the true branching forms was also in coherence with our own nifH analyses (Singh et al. 2013), thus suggesting a possible distinctiveness in the genetic architecture of the genus Hapalosiphon. The rest of the branched forms all merged into separate and distinct groups with intermixing amongst them, and thus the postulated intermixing of heterocystous cyanobacteria along with the polyphyly of true branching stigonematalean forms was found true.

Thus, our phylogenetic analyses using the rbcl gene as a molecular marker failed to delineate the orders Nostocales and Stigonematales from each other.

Evolutionary tendencies of heterocystous cyanobacteria

Our phylogenetic analyses using the rbcl gene sequences gave a glimpse of the immense genetic diversity and the heterogeneity present in the heterocystous cyanobacteria we studied. Evogenomics analyses were done in order to assess the evolutionary pace of the orders Nostocales and Stigonematales in a comparative way so as to gain some insights into what the DNA sequences could indicate in an evolutionary perspective. In the initial level analyses, it was evident that the order Nostocales had a greater evolutionary pace as compared to the order Stigonematales. The nucleotide diversity calculated in the unbranded heterocystous cyanobacteria was greater (0.71559) as compared to the branched forms (0.67552), and hence was a direct clue of a greater evolutionary pace of heterocystous cyanobacteria. But, the average number of nucleotide differences was found to be greater in the branched forms, thus creating an ambiguity in the results calculated. On close inspection, the reason for this was found to be the presence of 27 singleton variable sites in the order Stigonematales, while no such sites were found in the order Nostocales. The singleton variable sites had perhaps contributed to the average number of nucleotide differences being greater in the true branched forms, and as a result, the polymorphic sites and the parsimony informative sites were also greater in the branched forms. Still, in order to validate our results we performed recombination analyses and found the value of R per gene to be much greater in the order Nostocales in comparison to the order Stigonematales. A greater value of R per gene is directly proportional to the evolutionary pace of an organism or a group of organisms, and hence the results in the recombination analyses fully corroborated with our level I analyses. The estimate of R between adjacent sites was also found to be much greater in the unbranched forms, thus indicating a very high frequency of recombinational tendencies in comparison to the branched forms. Very surprisingly, the minimum number of recombination events detected was found to be 16 in the order Stigonematales, which had a lower value of R per gene. This finding holds importance, as it was being contributed by two factors: greater number of singleton variable sites in Stigonematales and the higher evolutionary rate of the Nostocales. To validate these recombination results, we conducted an in-depth recombination analysis of individual genera in our study, and found that the intergeneric recombination events were very rare (only four each in the genera Anabaena and Cylindrospermum), although there were 45 gene conversion tracts identified, with 40 being found in the order Nostocales and only five being evident in Stigonematales. Thus, this points towards the rate of evolutionary diversification being much greater in the unbranched cyanobacteria, along with a clear-cut bias towards more intrageneric recombination events than intergeneric recombination. Thus, the high number of recombination events detected in the order Stigonematales was in fact an indication of a more favorable horizontal gene transfer between the two orders Nostocales and Stigonematales and a significantly less favorable tendency for vertical gene transfer.

We also tested results on the basis of the Darwinian principles of natural selection for individual genera and found that the genus Nostoc, which is one of the most abundant and genetically heterogeneous groups, also has the maximum number of gene conversion tracts (19). The false branching genera Tolypothrix and Scytonema accounted for nine gene conversion tracts, thus also identifying their importance in being crucial links in between the unbranched and branched forms. In spite of very clear-cut level I and level II analyses, we again conducted level III analyses to calculate the DNA divergence between the orders, and found that there were 153 mutations that were polymorphic in the order Nostocales but monomorphic in Stigonematales, while there were only three mutations that were polymorphic in the order Stigonematales but monomorphic in the order Nostocales. Hence, our evogenomics analyses gave precise indications towards the order Nostocales being the flag bearers of evolutionary diversifications in heterocystous cyanobacteria. We have found crucial evidence that demarcates the origin of the Stigonematales from the Nostocales, with ample chances of this evolution being separated by some transitional false branching forms. Yet, clarifications are needed for this assumption to take shape, taking into account a greater number of genera and using a polyphasic and multi-locus approach. At the present moment, our rbcl gene analysis does suggest the role of the order Nostocales in constituting the skeleton of the course of evolution of heterocystous cyanobacteria. Our recombination analyses clearly show that the order Nostocales could be an essential milestone controlling the future course of evolution of heterocystous cyanobacteria, hence constituting the main route from which the other advanced cyanobacteria either would have evolved in the past or may evolve in the future.

The conditions in the non-heterocystous cyanobacteria remain to be tested, but certainly we have proven mathematically that the lower forms have greater and faster evolutionary tendencies than the higher and advanced forms. The calculations of the gene conversion tracts also adhere to the findings that lateral gene transfer events are a reality in case of the rbcl gene (Gugger et al. 2002).

Thus, phylogenomic and evogenomic analyses of the heterocystous cyanobacteria using the rbcl gene as a molecular marker have indicated the need for classificatory re-amendments in the cyanobacterial taxonomy, the intermixing amongst both the orders and the polyphyletic origin of the Stigonematales. The unbranched Nostocales have proved to be more capable of evolutionary diversifications, and thus have a greater evolutionary pace as compared to the order of branched Stigonematales.

References

  • Berrendero E, Perona E, Mateo P (2008) Genetic and morphological characterization of Rivularia and Calothrix (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria) from running water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:447–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Desikachary TV (1959) Cyanophyta, part I and II. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gascuel O, Steel M (2006) Neighbor-joining revealed. Mol Biol Evol 23:1997–2000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannoni SJ, Turner S, Olsen GJ, Barns S, Lane DJ, Pace NR (1988) Evolutionary relationships among cyanobacteria and green chloroplasts. J Bacteriol 170:3584–3592

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gugger M, Hoffmann L (2004) Polyphyly of the true branching cyanobacteria (Stigonematales). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:349–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gugger M, Lyra C, Henrikson P, Coute A, Humbert JF, Sivonen K (2002) Phylogenetic comparison of the cyanobacterial genera Anabaena and Aphanizomenon. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1867–1880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halinen K, Jokela J, Fewer DP, Wahlsten M, Sivonen K (2007) Direct evidence for production of microcystins by Anabaena strains from the Baltic Sea. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6543–6550

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann LS, Barnum SR (2010) Inferring the evolutionary history of mo-dependent nitrogen fixation from phylogenetic studies of nifK and nifDK. J Mol Evol 71:70–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henson BJ, Hesselbrock SM, Watson LE, Barnum SR (2004) Molecular phylogeny of the heterocystous cyanobacteria (subsections IV and V) based on nifD. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:493–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Honda D, Yokota A, Sugiyama J (1999) Detection of seven major evolutionary lineages in cyanobacteria based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis with new sequences of five marine Synechococcus strains. J Mol Evol 48:723–739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iteman I, Rippka R, Tandeau de Marsac N, Herdman M (2002) rdna analyses of planktonic heterocystous cyanobacteria, including members of the genera Anabaenopsis and Cyanospira. Microbiology 148:481–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Komárek J, Anagnostidis K (1989) Modern approach to the classification system of cyanophytes 4 Nostocales. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 82:247–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers P, Haselkorn R (1984) Sequence of the nifD gene coding for the α subunit from the cyanobacterium Anabaena. Cell 44:905–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DH, Zo YG, Kim SJ (1996) Non-radioactive method to study genetic profiles of bacterial communities by PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:3112–3120

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA Polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1994) Bacterial phylogeny based on 16S and 23S rRNA sequence analysis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 15:155–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks JC, Elhai J (2002) Regulation of cellular differentiation in filamentous cyanobacteria in free-living and plant-associated symbiotic growth states. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:94–121

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra AK, Shukla E, Singh SS (2013) Phylogenetic comparison among the heterocystous cyanobacteria based on a polyphasic approach. Protoplasma 250:77–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mollenhauer D (1988) Nostoc species in the field. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 80:315–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Morden CW, Golden SS (1991) Sequence analysis and phylogenetic reconstruction of the genes encoding the large and small subunits of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase from the chlorophyll b-containing prokaryote Prochlorothrix hollandica. J Mol Evol 32:379–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilan BA, Burns BP, Relman DA, Lowe DR (2002) Molecular identification of cyanobacteria associated with stromatolites from distinct geographical locations. Astrobiology 2:271–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen B, De Baere R, Wilmotte A, De Wachter R (1996) Phylogenetic relationships of nonaxenic filamentous cyanobacterial strains based on 16S rRNA sequence analysis. J Mol Evol 42:194–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajaniemi P, Hrouzek P, Kastovska K, Willame R, Rantala A, Hoffmann L, Komárek J, Sivonen K (2005) Phylogenetic and morphological evaluation of the genera Anabaena, Aphanizomenon, Trichormus and Nostoc (Nostocales, Cyanobacteria). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:11–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stanier RY (1979) Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol 111:1–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour joining method—a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic tree. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sihvonen LM, Lyra C, Fewer DP, Rajaniemi-Wacklin P, Lehtimáki JM, Wahlsten M, Sivonen K (2007) Strains of the cyanobacterial genera Calothrix and Rivularia isolated from the Baltic Sea display cryptic diversity and are distantly related to Gloeotrichia and Tolypothrix. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 61:74–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh P, Singh SS, Mishra AK, Elster J (2013) Molecular phylogeny, population genetics and evolution of heterocystous cyanobacteria using nifH gene sequences. Protoplasma 250:751–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon HS, Hackett JD, Ciniglia C, Pinto G, Bhattacharya D (2004) A molecular timeline for the origin of photosynthetic eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol 21:809–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr JP, Mellon MT, Hiorns WD (1997) Phylogeny of cyanobacterial nifH genes: evolutionary implications and potential applications to natural assemblages. Microbiology 143:1443–1450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi for providing financial support. The Head of the Department of Botany, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India is gratefully acknowledged for providing laboratory facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arun Kumar Mishra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, P., Fatma, A. & Mishra, A.K. Molecular phylogeny and evogenomics of heterocystous cyanobacteria using rbcl gene sequence data. Ann Microbiol 65, 799–807 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-014-0920-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-014-0920-1

Keywords