Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

Characterization of a novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH and some aspects of its mode of action

Abstract

Bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides, with a diverse mode of bactericidal activity. This study focused on characterization of the bactericidal activity of bacteriocin ST8SH, with special attention to control of Listeria and Enteroccus species. Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH produces a bacteriocin of the pediocin PA-1 family (sharing 96 % similarity on genetic level) with activity against several LAB, Enterococcus spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Listeria spp., Streptococcus spp. and some other human and foodborne pathogens. Addition of bacteriocin ST8SH to exponential or stationary phase cultures of L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 inhibited growth for 12 h. The effects of bacteriocin ST8SH on L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 were recorded indirectly based on enzyme, protein and nucleotide material leakage. Considering the antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin ST8SH against the tested microorganisms, and the physiological characteristics of Lb. plantarum ST8SH, either the bacteriocin or the strain may be used as tools for biopreservation.

Introduction

Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesized antibacterial peptides that are usually active against genetically related species (Jack et al. 1995). They have been grouped into four classes based on their structure and mode of action (Heng et al. 2007). In the last two decades several reports have focused on the production of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from different ecological niches, including fermented products, vegetables, fruits, meat, fish, human and animal gastrointestinal tract (GIT) (Cotter et al. 2005).

The preservation of meat products is increasingly directed towards biocontrol using bacteriocinogenic Lactobacillus species as protective microbiota to inhibit the growth of Listeria monocytogenes and other undesirable microorganisms (Bredholt et al. 2001; Mataragas et al. 2003; Castellano et al. 2004). Numerous strains of bacteriocinogenic Lactobacillus plantarum have been isolated in the last two decades and have been reviewed by Todorov (2009). However, most of these bacteriocins have not been fully characterized.

For proper usage as biopreservatives, the bacteriocins must be characterized by biochemical and molecular methodologies. Bacteriocin production does not always correlate with an increase in cell mass or growth rate of the producer strain (Kim et al. 1997). Higher bacteriocin levels are often recorded in the absence of growth-stimulating nutrients, or at temperatures and pH conditions lower than required for optimal growth (Krier et al. 1998; Todorov et al. 2000). Optimal bacteriocin production is often detected in a medium with limiting concentrations of sugars, nitrogen sources, vitamins and potassium phosphate, or when the medium pH is regulated (Todorov and Dicks 2005).

The objective of this study was to characterize the bacteriocin ST8SH, produced by Lb. plantarum strain ST8SH isolated from Bulgarian salami, with the aim of using this strain as a biopreservative culture in fermented food products for control of L. monocytogenes and/or Enterococcus spp.

Materials and methods

Screening for bacteriocinogenic strains from Shpek

Isolation of bacteriocinogenic strains

“Shpek” is a Bulgarian type of fermented dry or semi-dry sausage produced from mixture of pork and beef meat. Traditionally this product is produced without addition of specific starter cultures. Samples of “shpek” (12 products, manufactured by different producers) were obtained from a local supermarket (Belogratchik, Bulgaria), and 20 g of each sample was cut into small pieces with a sterile scalpel and homogenized with 180 mL 0.85 % (w/v) NaCl in a stomacher (Stomacher® 400 circulator, Sevard, France) for 2 min. For isolation of bacteriocinogenic LAB, samples were surface-plated on agar (1 %) and covered with 10 mL MRS (BD Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) supplemented with 1 % agar. After formation of the individual colonies (incubation for 48 h at 37 °C) BHI (Difco) supplemented with 1 % agar and inoculated with L. monocytogenes ScottA or E. faecalis ATCC 19433 at 106 colony forming units (CFU)/mL was added as a third level. These plates were then incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Colonies with visual inhibition zones were selected for future study. Isolation and cultivation in MRS broth were followed by surface plating on MRS agar. Isolated colonies were identified by morphology, Gram staining and biochemical tests. Gram-positive, non-sporulating, catalase-negative and oxidase-negative isolates were considered as LAB. Pure cultures were maintained at −80 °C in MRS broth supplemented with 30 % (v/v) glycerol. All other strains used as control strains or target microorganisms in antimicrobial tests were cultured in the recommended growth medium and stored at −80 °C in presence of 30 % (v/v) glycerol (Table 1). Before use, all cultures were activated by successive transfer in their respective culture media at 30 °C or 37 °C (Table 1).

Table 1 Spectrum of activity recorded for bacteriocin ST8SH

Isolated cultures (24 in total) were grown in MRS broth at 37 °C for 24 h. The pH of the cell-free supernatant obtained after centrifugation (8000 g, 10 min, 4 °C) was adjusted to pH 6.0 with 1 M NaOH, after which it was heat-treated (80 °C for 10 min) and tested for potential bacteriocin production against the indicator strains L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433, according the protocol described by Todorov (2009).

Identification of bacteriocin-producing isolates

LAB isolates that showed bacteriocin production against L. monocytogenes ScottA or E. faecalis ATCC 19433 were differentiated by RAPD-PCR and identified by 16S rRNA sequencing analysis. Total genomic DNA was extracted and purified using the ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total DNA was used for differentiation of isolates according to Todorov et al. (2010) with primers OPL-02, OPL-04, OPL-14 and OPL-20. DNA from unique isolates was used as a template for 16S rRNA amplification using universal bacterial primers 8F and R1512 (Felske et al. 1997). PCR products have been purified by QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and the fragments obtained were sequenced at the Center for Human Genome Studies, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, and compared to sequences available at GenBank using BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).

Characterization of bacteriocin produced by ST8SH

Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Lb. plantarum ST8SH (selection based on the preliminary antimicrobial test and genetic identification) was grown in MRS broth at 37 °C for 24 h. Cell-free supernatant was obtained as described above.

Effects of enzymes, pH, detergents and temperature on bacteriocin stability

To determine and confirm the proteinaceous nature of the active component, the cell-free supernatant was treated with trypsin, proteinase K, pronase, α-amylase and catalase (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), at final concentrations of 0.1 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. After enzymatic treatment of cell-free supernatants, enzymes were inactivated by thermal treatment (98 °C for 3 min) and the samples tested for presence of antimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 by agar spot on the low assay as described by Todorov (2009).

The effect of the pH on the stability of the antimicrobial substance(s) was investigated by treatment of cell-free supernatant obtained from Lb. plantarum ST8SH as described before, and submitted to pH treatment with sterile solutions of 5 N NaOH or 5 N HCl to reach a range of pH-values from 4.0 to 11.0 with 1.0 intervals. After incubation at each of these pH-values for 1 h, the samples were re-adjusted to pH 6.0 and the antimicrobial activity was determined against L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 as described by Todorov (2009).

The influence of different temperatures (15, 30, 37, 60, 80 and 100 °C for 10, 30 and 60 min, respectively, and 121 °C for 15 min) on the antimicrobial activity of the cell-free supernatant was also tested. After incubation for 1 h, the samples were re-adjusted to pH 6.0 and the antimicrobial activity was determined against L. monocytogenes ScottA or E. faecalis ATCC 19433 as described before.

Sterile MRS broth treated with the particular enzyme, pH and temperature and untreated samples were used as controls. All investigations were performed as three independent experiments.

Identification of genes involved in production of bacteriocin by ST8SH

Total DNA from Lb. plantarum ST8SH was isolated using the ZR Fungal/Bacterial DNA Kit following the instructions of the manufacturer and subjected to PCR using the primers Pedpro and Pedc1041 (Table 2), designed on the basis of information related to the operon encoding Pediocin PA-1/AcH (accession number M83924) (Todorov et al. 2010). PCR reactions were performed using the GeneAmp® PCR Instrument System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with the following conditions: an initial denaturation step of 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 30 s at 50 °C and 1 min at 72 °C, and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplified product was visualized in a 1.0 % (w/v) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma). A band of interest, corresponding to the correct size of Pediocin PA-1/AcH, was purified from the gel using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and DNA fragments were sequenced in an automatic sequencer at the Center for Human Genome Studies, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Sequences were analyzed using database of GenBank using the BLAST algorithm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).

Table 2 Primers used in this study

In addition to previous descriptions, total DNA from Lb. plantarum ST8SH was tested for presence of genes encoding plantaricin NC8 (primers: planNC8-F and planNC8-R; Maldonado et al. 2003), plantaricin S (primers: planS-F and planS-R; Stephens et al. 1998), plantaricin W (primers: planW-F and planW-R; Holo et al. 2001) and nisin (primers: nis-F and nis-R; Kruger et al. 2013) (Table 2).

Production of bacteriocin by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Lb. plantarum ST8Sh was cultured overnight in MRS broth at 30 °C and used to inoculate three flasks with 200 mL MRS broth each. These cultures were grown until stationary phase at 25 °C, 30 °C and 37 °C, respectively, for 36 h. Bacterial growth was monitored by turbidity measurements of the cultures at 600 nm (UV-VIS Spectrophotometer, BEL Photonics, Monza, Italy) every hour. In addition, changes in pH were recorded. Every 3 h, samples were drawn for determination of the production of bacteriocin, expressed in AU/mL, against L. monocytogenes Scott A and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 as described by Todorov (2009).

Adsorption of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH to producer cells

Adsorption of bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH to its own producer cells was studied according to the method proposed by Yang et al. (1992). Lb. plantarum ST8SH was grown in 200 mL MRS broth for 24 h at 37 °C, followed by adjustment of the pH to 6.5 with 10 M NaOH and harvesting of the cells by centrifugation (5000 g, 4 °C, 15 min). Cells were washed three times with 100 mM phosphate buffer at pH 6.5 and resuspended in 20 mL 100 mM NaCl, pH 2.0 and stirred for 2 h at 4 °C. Cells were separated by centrifugation (5000 g, 4 °C, 15 min) and the pH of the supernatant adjusted to 6.5 with 10 M NaOH. Bacteriocin activity was determined at all stages of the experiment against L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433.

Isolation and partial purification of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Lb. plantarum ST8SH was cultured in 200 mL MRS broth (Difco) for 24 h at 37 °C. The cells were harvested (8000 g, 10 min, 4 °C), the cell-free supernatant was adjusted to pH 6.0 with 1 M NaOH, heat-treated (80 °C for 10 min) and the bacteriocin ST8SH precipitated with 60 % ammonium sulfate (4 h at 4 °C with permanent mixing). The obtained precipitate (10,000 g, 60 min, 4 °C) was re-suspended in 20 mL 25 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.5) and the level of antimicrobial activity determined using the indicator strains L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433.

Total proteins were pre-separated by reversed-phase chromatography on SepPak C18 columns (Waters, Milford, MA, USA), eluted with ammonium acetate buffer (25 mM, pH 6.5) containing increasing concentrations of iso-propanol (20 %, 40 %, 60 % and 80 %). Bacteriocin activity of each fraction was tested against L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433. Fractions showing activity were pooled and dehydrated under reduced pressure (Speed-Vac, Savant, France) and stored at −20 °C. For future experiments material was redissolved in sterile ultra-pure water.

Molecular weight of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Separation of the bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH in Tris-Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed in continuous gradient gel designed for low molecular weight proteins as described by Schägger and Van Jagow (1987). A standard low molecular weight marker ranging from 2.5 to 45.0 kDa (Amersham Biosciences, Freiberg, Germany) was used. The position of the bacteriocin was determined by antagonistic test with L. monocytogenes ScottA (105–106 CFU/mL) as described by Todorov et al. (2010).

Mode of action of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Growth of the test-microorganisms in presence of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

A 20 mL aliquot of bacteriocin-containing filter-sterilized (0.20 μm, Minisart®, Sartorius, Bohemia, NY, USA) supernatant (pH 6.0) was added to 100 mL culture of L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 in the early exponential phase (OD600nm = 0.052) and incubated for 12 h. Optical density readings (at 600 nm) were recorded at 1-h intervals.

Cell lysis of test microorganisms in presence of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Cell lysis was measured using sterile flat-bottom 96-well TPP (Zellkultur Testplatte, Trasadingen, Switzerland). Cells of L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 were obtained by centrifugation (5000 g, 4 °C, 15 min) of 20 mL 24-h cultures that were washed and re-suspended in 10 mL potassium phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 6.5). Each bacterial suspension (100 μL) was placed individually in microtiter plate wells and 50 μL potassium phosphate buffer containing semi-purified bacteriocin ST8SH (as previously described) at different two-fold serial dilutions. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for up to 24 h. Absorbance at 655 nm was measured using a Microplate reader (VERSAmax Microplate Reader, Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The percentage of cell lysis was calculated as [100 – (At/Ao × 100)], where Ao and At were absorbance measured at 0 and 3, 9 and 18 h of incubation, respectively.

Determination of cell lysis by measuring the levels of intracellular materials

Extracellular levels of β-galactosidase activity were monitored. An 11-h-old culture of 20 mL  L. monocytogenes ScottA (100 mL) was harvested (5 000 g, 4 °C, 15 min) and the cells were washed twice with 0.03 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and re-suspended in 20 ml of the same buffer. Equal volumes of partial purified bacteriocin (60 % iso-propanol fraction, 12 800 AU/mL) and cell suspension of L. monocytogenes ScottA (2 mL) were mixed for 5 min at 25 °C, followed by the addition of 0.2 mL 0.1 M ONPG (O-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside, Sigma) in 0.03 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). After 10 min at 37 °C, the reaction of β-galactosidase was stopped by the addition of 2.0 mL 0.1 M sodium carbonate. The cells were harvested (5000 g, 15 min, 25 °C) and absorbance readings of the supernatant recorded at 420 nm. Cells of L. monocytogenes Scott A cultured under the same conditions that were mechanically disrupted with 0.1 mm diameter glass beads (vortexed for 5 min) served as controls. All experiments were conducted in duplicate at two independent stages, also with E. faecalis ATCC 19433 as test microorganism.

In addition, in order to investigate the effect of bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH on cell integration, cells from 20 mL of 11-h cultures of L. monocytogens ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 were harvested by centrifugation (5000 g, 4 °C, 15 min), followed by washing with sterile 5 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.0). Bacteriocin ST8SH (60 % iso-propanol fraction, 12 800 AU/mL) was added at a ratio of 0.1:1.0 to a cell suspension of L. monocytogens ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 and the mixture incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. Cells were removed after centrifugation (5 000 g, 4 °C, 15 min) and cell-free supernatant was filtered thought a 0.20 μm membrane (Minisart®, Sartorius). Absorbance readings of the presence of liberated intracellular material were recorded at 260 nm. L. monocytogens ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 suspended in 5 mM phosphate buffer without bacteriocin STSH served as controls, while a third control comprised the same buffer containing bacteriocin ST8SH without cells of the two mentioned test microorganisms. All experiments were performed in duplicate on three independent occasions.

Reduction of viable cells of test microorganisms in the presence of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Early stationary phase (18 h) culture of L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was harvested (5000 g, 5 min, 4 °C), washed twice with sterile saline water and re-suspended in 10 mL saline water. Equal volumes of the cell suspensions and filter-sterilized (0.20 μm, Minisart®, Sartorius) bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH containing cell-free supernatant were mixed. Viable cell numbers were determined before and after incubation for 1 h at 37 °C by plating onto MRS agar. Cell suspension of L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 with no bacteriocin added served as a control.

Adsorption of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH to test microorganisms

Adsorption to sensitive and resistant test-microorganisms

Adsorption to target cells (Table 1) was tested according to Todorov (2008). The bacterial strains (L. innocua 2030C, L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119, L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433) were grown overnight in BHI broth at 37 °C to OD600nm = 0.1–0.2 and the cells harvested (5000 g, 15 min, 4 °C). Cells were washed twice in 5 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and re-suspended in the same buffer to the original volume. Each cell suspension (0.7 mL) was mixed with an equal volume of bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The cells were harvested (5000 g for 15 min) and activity of unbound bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH in the cell-free supernatant determined using the agar-spot method as described above. Adsorption of bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH to the target cells was calculated according to the following formula: % Adsorption = 100 – [(bacteriocin ST8SH activity after treatment/original bacteriocin ST8SH activity) x 100]. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Effect of pH and temperature on adsorption of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Cells suspensions of L. innocua 2030C, L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119, L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 were prepared as described in the previous paragraph, but resolved in sterile physiological water and the pH was corrected to values between 2.0 and 10.0 with sterile 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl (Todorov 2008). Bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH was added to the cell suspension and incubated at 4, 10, 25, 30, 37, 45 and 60 °C for 1 h. The cells were harvested (5000 g, 15 min, 25 °C) and the pH of the supernatants adjusted to 6.0 with sterile 1 M NaOH or 1 M lactic acid. Bacteriocin activity was determined as described before. All experiments were performed on three independent occasions in duplicate.

Effect of surfactants, inorganic salts and organic compounds on the adsorption of bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH

Cell suspensions of L. innocua 2030C, L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119, L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 were prepared as described before and treated with 1 % (w/v) Tween 80, Tween 20, ascorbic acid, potassium sorbate, sodium nitrate and 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 % sodium chloride (Todorov 2008). The pH of each suspension was adjusted to 6.5 with 1 M NaOH or 1 M HCl. Bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH was added to the treated cells, as before, and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The cells were harvested (5000 g, 15 min, 25 °C) and activity of the cell-free supernatant was determined as before. Duplicate experiments were performed on three independent occasions.

Growth and bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH in a mixed culture with Listeria monocytogenes ScottA

Overnight cultures of Lb. plantarum ST8SH and L. monocytogenes Scott A were inoculated into MRS broth at concentrations of 2.0 % (v/v) and 0.1 % (v/v), respectively. Low cell numbers of L. monocytogenes Scott A were used to simulate conditions normally expected in food contamination. Lb. plantarum ST8SH of 107 CFU/mL was chosen to represent optimal cell numbers during application in food fermentation processes involving starter cultures. The mixed culture was incubated at 37 °C for 32 h. At different time intervals samples were taken to follow changes in pH while cell numbers of L. monocytogens Scott A were determined on listeria enrichment broth (LEB) and of total cell numbers on MRS agar. Bacteriocin production was determined by using the agar-spot method as described previously. The experiment was repeated three times.

Results

The screening for potential bacteriocin producers among bacterial isolates from 12 different branded “shpek” samples, enabled the selection of 24 strains with inhibitory activity against L. monocytogenes ScottA or E. faecalis ATCC 19433. All selected strains were Gram-positive, catalase-negative and presented rod-shaped morphology, and in fact originated from only two samples. However, after comparing the generated profile obtained from RAPD-PCR analysis with four different primers, it was found that most of the isolates were replicas of the same strain so that only three stains were finally selected (data not shown). Based on the inhibitory analysis and activity exhibited against L. monocytogenes ScottA or E. faecalis ATCC 19433, strain ST8SH was selected for future study.

No significant differences in growth and production of bacteriocin ST8SH were observed when the Lb. plantarum ST8SH was cultured for 24 h in MRS broth at 26, 30 or 37 °C (Fig. 1). At these three different cultivation temperatures, the recorded antimicrobial activity was 25,600 AU/mL against L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433, with a very small variation in reaching the maximal activity.

Fig. 1a–c
figure 1

Growth of Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH in MRS broth (▲), changes in pH () and production of bacteriocin expressed in AU/mL (bars) at different temperatures. a 37 °C, b 30 °C, c 25 °C

The bacteriocin produced by ST8SH was active against food spoilage bacteria and foodborne pathogens as listed in Table 1. Similar results were recorded for the cell-free supernatant and for the semi-purified bacteriocin (60 % iso-propanol fraction).

In the test for identification of genes encoding bacteriocin(s) from total DNA extracted from Lb. plantarum ST8SH, we did not record positive results for any of the tested target genes for plantaricin W, plantaricin S, plantaricin NC8 or nisin. However, when PCR targeting the pediocin PA-1/AcH gene (PedPro and Pedc1041 primers) was performed, an amplicon corresponding in size to that of pediocin PA-1/AcH (not shown) was generated.

Based on the Tricine-SDS-PAGE results from the Coomassie Blue stained gel, and gel overlaid with L. monocytogenes Scott A, the molecular weight of bacteriocin ST8SH was estimated to be around 5 kDa.

Addition of bacteriocin ST8SH (obtained from a 24-h culture of Lb. plantarum ST8SH) to a 3-h culture of L. monocytogenes ScottA (OD600nm ≈ 0.075), Lb. sakei ATCC 15521 (OD600nm ≈ 0.033) and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 (OD600nm ≈ 0.068) inhibited cell growth over a 12 h period (Fig. 2). When bacteriocin ST8SH was added to a 7-h-old test culture, similar inhibition of L. monocytogenes ScottA, Lb. sakei ATCC 15521 and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was observed (data not shown). No viable cells were determined at 10 h or 12 h in cultures of L. monocytogenes ScottA, Lb. sakei ATCC 15521 and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 treated with bacteriocin ST8SH, pointing to the bactericidal mode of action of this bacteriocin.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of bacteriocin ST8SH on exponentially growing a Listeria monocytogenes ScottA, b Lactobacillus sakei ATCC 15521 and c Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433. ♦ Without added bacteriocin, ▲ with added 10 % (v/v) bacteriocin ST8SH

The antagonistic effect of the semi-purified bacteriocin ST8SH (60 % iso-propanol fraction) could be observed as early as within 3 h of incubation, when L. monocytogenes ScottA, Lb. sakei ATCC15521 or E. faecalis ATCC19433 were cultured in MRS broth in the presence of concentrations of bacteriocin ST8SH ranging from 12,800 to 200 AU/mL (Fig. 3). For L. monocytogenes Scott A, this inhibitory effect, presented in percentage of the cell lyses, ranged from 10.33 % to 32.84 %, for Lb. sakei ATCC 15521 from 20.76 % to 39.64 %, and for E. faecalis ATCC 19433 from 31.19 % to 46.44 %, depending on the concentration of bacteriocin (from 200 to 12,800 AU/mL). A better inhibitory effect of bacteriocin ST8SH was observed after 9 and 18 h of incubation (Fig. 3). After 18 h, this inhibitory effect, expressed as percentage of cell lysis, varied from 85.27 % to 97.56 % for L. monocytogenes Scott A, from 86.61 % to 98.65 % for Lb. sakei ATCC 15521, and from 87.95 % to 99.74 % for E. faecalis ATCC 19433.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of different concentrations of bacteriocin ST8SH from Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH on a Listeria monocytogenes ScottA, b Lactobacillus sakei ATCC 15521 and c Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433 recorded at 3, 9 and 18 h. Results are presented as % of lysis of test microorganisms

Treatment of cells of L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 with bacteriocin ST8SH resulted in leakage of β-galactosidase, DNA, RNA and proteins, detected at 420 nm and 260 nm, respectively (Table 3). Results obtained by DNA, RNA, protein and the β-galactosidase test (Table 3), confirmed that the bactericidal mode of action of bacteriocin ST8SH is via destabilization of cell membrane permeability.

Table 3 Effect of bacteriocin ST8SH on Listeria monocytogenes ScottA and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433 determined by detection of the extracellular levels of DNA, RNA, proteins (at 260 nm) and β-galactosidase (at 420 nm)

Treatment of stationary phase cells of L. monocytogenes ScottA (1010 CFU/mL) and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 (109 CFU/mL) with bacteriocin ST8SH resulted in bacterial killing. After 1 h of contact time, only 102 CFU/mL of viable cells of L. monocytogens ScottA and 101 CFU/mL viable cells of E. faecalis ATCC 19433 were detected (Table 4). No significant changes in cell numbers of L. monocytogenes Scott A and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 were recorded in the untreated (control) sample. Similar results were recorded when bacteriocin ST8SH was added to low concentrations of L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 cultures (data not shown).

Table 4 Effect of bacteriocin ST8SH on stationary cells of Listeria monocytogenes ScottA and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433. Bacteriocin (50 %, v/v) was added to each cell suspension of Listeria monocytogenes ScottA and Enterococcus faeccium ATCC 19433. Viable cell numbers were determined before and after treatment

Bacteriocin ST8SH adsorbed to both sensitive and non-sensitive cells of indicator bacteria (Table 5). Seventy-five percent of the peptide adsorbed to L. innocua 2030C, L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119, L. monocytogenes Scott A and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 when incubated at 37 °C.

Table 5 Effect of temperature, pH and chemicals on adsorption of bacteriocin ST8SH to Listeria innocua 2030C, Listeria ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119, Listeria monocytogenes ScottA and Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433. Values are shown as percent adsorption

Treatment of cells of L. innocua 2030C, L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119, L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 with bacteriocin ST8SH at 4–45 °C and at pH values 3.5, 5.5 and 7.0 led to significant changes in adsorption (Table 5). The highest levels of adsorption of bacteriocin ST8SH to L. innocua 2030C was recorded at pH 5.5 and 7.0 (75 %) and temperatures 15, 30 and 37 °C (75 %). When L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119 was used as the target strain for adsorption of bacteriocin ST8SH, the highest levels of adsorption were recorded at 45 °C (87.5 % adsorption) and pH 5.5 and 7.0 (75 % adsorption). For L. monocytogenes ScottA, 100 % adsorption was recorded at 45 °C and 75 % at pH 7.0. For the test organism E. faecalis ATCC 19433, 75 % adsorption was recorded at pH 7.0 and incubation temperatures of 15, 30, 37 and 45 °C (Table 5).

The presence of ascorbic acid and potassium sorbate did not interfere with the adsorption of bacteriocin ST8SH to L. innocua 2030C. However, NaCl, Tween 20 and Tween 80 reduced adsorption, whereas sodium nitrate increased adsorption to 87.5 % of bacteriocin ST8SH to L. innocua 2030C (Table 5). When L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119 and L. monocytogenes Scott A were used as target strains for adsorption of bacteriocin ST8SH, similar reduction of the interaction was observed in presence of Tween 20, Tween 80 and NaCl. However, ascorbic acid and potassium sorbate reduced the adsorption of bacteriocin ST8SH to L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 19119 and L. monocytogenes Scott A, pointing to the strain-specific importance of this interaction (Table 5). Adsorption of bacteriocin ST8SH to E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was reduced in the presence of Tween 20, Tween 80 and NaCl, as observed with L. innocua 2030C, L. ivanovii subsp. ivanovii ATCC 191198 and L. monocytogenes Scott A, but was not affected in the presence of ascorbic acid, potassium sorbate and sodium nitrate (Table 5).

Production of bacteriocin ST8SH increased to 51,200 AU/ml when the strain was cultured in the presence of either viable or dead cells of L. monocytogenes. High cell numbers of Lb. plantarum ST8SH and L. monocytogenes ScottA were recorded on MRS plates when co-cultured (Fig. 4). However, results recorded on selective LEB medium showed that the cell numbers of L. monocytogenes ScottA decreased from 1.42 × 104 to 1.02 × 102 CFU/mL within 9 h and to undetectable levels after 36 h (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Growth of a mixed culture of Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH and Listeria monocytogenes ScottA (♦) and Listeria monocytogenes ScottA (■). ▲ Changes in pH, histogram bars production of bacteriocin ST8SH

Discussion

Appropriate identification of LAB stains with potential for application in biopreservation is essential. Presently, 16S rRNA is considered as the gold standard in taxonomy. Strain ST8SH showed high similarity of 99 % to Lb. plantarum from GenBank and was therefore designated to this species. Previously, Lb. plantarum strains were isolated from various habitats, including meat, fish, dairy, plant products and also the GIT and reproductive organs of humans and animals (Todorov and Franco 2010). Some researchers have evaluated the application of different plantaricins to control the growth of the foodborne (opportunistic) pathogens L. monocytogenes and some Enterococcus spp. (Atrih et al. 2001; Powell et al. 2007; Todorov 2008).

Maximal antimicrobial activity of 25,600 AU/mL against L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was recorded when Lb. plantarum ST8SH was cultured for 24 h in MRS broth at 26 °C, 30 or 37 °C. This is in agreement with results recorded for plantaricin ST31 (Todorov et al. 1999) and mundticin ST4SA (Todorov and Dicks 2009). In contrast, several other bacteriocins have been reported to express only at specific temperatures. Furtado et al. (2014) reported on a strain of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, able to express nisin only at 30 °C and not at 37 °C. Perin and Nero (2014) observed that temperature plays an important role in the expression of bacteriocins produced by several Lactococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. with optimum production at 25 °C. Based on the results obtained and the potential future application of Lb. plantarum ST8SH not only as a bacteriocin producer, but both as bioprotective culture and a potential probiotic strain, all further experiments were conducted at 37 °C.

Similar results were recorded with cell-free supernatant and semi-purified bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH. It is important to underline the strong activity of this bacteriocin against Enterococcus spp. and various serological groups of Listeria monocytogenes, yet activity against some Lactobacillus spp. was also observed (Table 1). Inhibition of LAB can be both a positive and negative feature for the bacteriocins produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH, depending on the situation. On the one hand, some LAB can be considered as undesirable because of their role in the spoilage of processed meats, while some strains may cause deterioration of quality during food fermentation processes. On the other hand, LAB used as starter cultures are applied for their beneficial metabolic activities and thus their inhibition may negatively influence the outcome of the conversion process. Activity against L. monocytogenes is frequently addressed as a marker to designate new bacteriocins as class IIa in the classification of bacteriocins (Heng et al. 2007). However, bacteriocins from other groups can also be active against Listeria spp. A classical example are the lantibiotics, in particular nisin—a class I bacteriocin from the same classification system (Heng et al. 2007). In this case, it is most important to perform gene or protein sequencing to confirm the presence of the N-terminal region typical of class IIa bacteriocins containing the conserved YGNGV/L or “pediocin box” motif (Fimland et al. 2005). Frequently, type IIa bacteriocins are referred to as pediocin-like bacteriocins (pediocin PA-1, carnobacteriocin B2, listerocin 743A and ubericin A) (Favaro et al. 2015).

When PCR targeting the pediocin PA-1/AcH gene (PedPro and Pedc1041 primers) was performed, an amplicon corresponding in size to that of pediocin PA-1/AcH was generated. The sequences of the generated amplicon showed 96 % similarity to that previously reported for pediocin PA-1/AcH (Marugg et al. 1992). Several pediocins with molecular mass between 2867 and 4685 Da have been reported in the literature and all present strong anti-Listeria activity (Gonzales and Kunka 1987; Bhunia et al. 1988; Daba et al. 1991; Henderson et al. 1992; Motlagh et al. 1994; Diep et al. 1996; Fimland et al. 2002; Bauer et al. 2005). Analysis of the generated nucleotide sequence showed a high similarity to plantaricin 423, a pediocin PA-1 family bacteriocin with possible amino acid differences in the C-terminal part of the molecule. The N-terminal “pediocin box” is intact and this can explain the high activity of bacteriocin ST8SH against Listeria spp. Based on the observed difference between bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH and the previously described pediocin PA-1 and plantaricin 423, we suggest “bacteriocin ST8SH” as a designation for the new bacteriocin. The recorded difference in the genetic sequence can be responsible for changes in a few amino acids. Differences in 1 or 2 amino acids in the structure of bacteriocins have already been used as an argument for a new name of several bacteriocins. Classical examples are the different variants of nisin, indicated by different letters of the alphabet (Perin and Nero 2014). However, presence of gene/s or even an entire operon does not imply that this bacteriocin is expressed. Several examples of the presence of bacteriocin genes have been used as an argument to claim that such bacteriocins were expressed and present in the supernatant, but only a few reports have provided proof of this hypothesis (Todorov et al. 2012).

Van Reenen et al. (1998, 2003) reported that plantaricin 423, belonging to the pediocin PA-1 family, produced by Lb. plantarum 423, is a small heat-stable bacteriocin belonging to class IIa (anti-Listerial antimicrobial peptides). Plantaricin 423 shares high similarity with pediocin PA-1 and coagulin operons, in fact the plaC and plaD genes are identical to pedC and pedD of the pediocin PA-1 operon, as well as coaC and coaD of the coagulin operon (Van Reenen et al. 2003). When we tested the effect of bacteriocin ST5Ha, previously described as a pediocin PA-1-like bacteriocin (Todorov et al. 2010) against a culture of Lb. plantarum ST8SH, no inhibitory effects were observed. This is in agreement with the hypothesis for production of pediocin-like bacteriocins, since immunity genes are located in the same reading frame with the structural gene encoding the mature antimicrobial peptide, and, moreover, Lb. plantarum ST8SH shows auto-immunity to pediocin PA-1-like bacteriocins.

The molecular weight of bacteriocin ST8SH was estimated to be around 5 kDa. This detected molecular size for bacteriocin ST8SH was slightly larger than for most bacteriocins previously described for the genus Lactobacillus (De Vuyst and Vandamme 1994). However, Martinez et al. (2013) reported similar molecular weight of a bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST71KM. Bacteriocins produced by Lb. plantarum ST23LD were estimated to be within approximate sizes of 3.0 and 14.0 kDa (Todorov and Dicks 2005).

Strong antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin produced by Lb. plantarum ST8SH against L. monocytogenes ScottA, Lb. sakei ATCC 15521 or E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was observed. In a similar study, applying an equivalent approach to determining the inhibitory effect of bacteriocin ST5Ha produced by E. faecium ST5Ha isolated from smoked salmon, a similar inhibitory profile of Lb. sakei ATCC 15521 and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 was recorded, with even lower concentrations of bacteriocin applied (Todorov et al. 2010). The stronger antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin ST5Ha (Todorov et al. 2010) should be emphasized when compared with that recorded for bacteriocin ST8SH against Lb. sakei ATCC 15521 and E. faecalis ATCC 19433. Based on the observed inhibitory potential of bacteriocin ST8SH, this antimicrobial protein shows potential for application in the control of listerial or enterococcal food contaminations. It is important to underline that, in the present and other experiments, we tested the efficacy of bacteriocin ST8SH against extremely high numbers (approximately 108 CFU/mL) of the indicator microorganisms. However, in real food systems where the level of contamination is much lower, a stronger effect of bacteriocin ST8SH may be expected. An important conclusion is that bacteriocin ST8SH can be effective at low levels in a similar way as if it were to be applied in different concentrations from 12,800 to 200 AU/mL (Fig. 3).

Similar results on detection of leakage of β-galactosidase, DNA, RNA and proteins after treatment of test-organisms with bacteriocin/s were observed previously for plantaricin 423 (Todorov and Dicks 2006), pediocin AcH (Bhunia et al. 1991), mundticin ST4SA (Knoetze et al. 2008) and bacteriocin HV219 (Todorov et al. 2006), using similar methodologies.

In addition, when bacteriocin ST8SH was added to stationary phase cells of L. monocytogenes ScottA and E. faecalis ATCC 19433 cultures, complete bacterial killing was observed. Previously, a similar effect of bacteriocins HA-6111-2 and HA-5692-2, produced by P. acidilactici, on E. faecium HKLHS was reported by Albano et al. (2007).

Bacteriocin ST8SH adsorbed to both sensitive and non-sensitive cells of indicator bacteria at different levels. However, 66 % of the macedonocin ST91KM also adsorbed to sensitive Lb. sakei LMG13558 and non-sensitive strains of E. faecalis (BFE1071 and FAIR-E92) and Streptococcus caprinus (ATCC 700066). Limited or very little adsorption (up to 33 %) of macedocin ST91KM was recorded for other resistant strains (Pieterse et al. 2010).

Yildrim et al. (2002) reported a high percentage adsorption of buchericin LB to resistant strains of Lc. lactis (94 %), Ped. cerevisiae (100 %) and St. aureus (80 %). However, Manca de Nadra et al. (1998) reported weak adsorption of pediocin N5p to resistant strains (13–20 %) and higher adsorption to sensitive strains (30 to 100 %). These data indicate that the bactericidal action of pediocin N5p is dependent on specific receptors on sensitive strains.

Adsorption of bacteriocin ST8SH to test-organisms was shown to be temperature- and pH-dependent. Treatment of cells with macedocin ST91KM at 10–60 °C and at pH 8.0 and 10.0 led to a significant increase in adsorption (Pieterse et al. 2010). Adsorption of the peptide to target cells decreased from 66 % to 33 % below 37 °C, and was completely inhibited at 4 °C (Pieterse et al. 2010).

Addition of inorganic and organic salts reduced adsorption of the macedocin ST91KM and MgCl2, while KI and Na2CO3 salts completely prevented adsorption of the peptide to target cells (Pieterse et al. 2010). SDS, Triton X-100 and Triton X-114 did not affect adsorption of macedocin ST91KM to target cells, while β-mercaptoethanol, 80 % ethanol and methanol reduced adsorption to 33 %. Chloroform had no effect on adsorption (Pieterse et al. 2010).

Production of bacteriocin ST8SH increased to 51,200 AU/mL when the strain was cultured in the presence of either viable or dead cells of L. monocytogenes. The bacteriocin activity recorded represents that of the cell-free peptides and does not represent peptide molecules that may still be bound to the producer cell or test microorganism. Nevertheless, it would seem that bacteriocin ST8SH production is stimulated by the presence of the target organisms, most probably by the protein receptors of their cell wall. High cell numbers of Lb. plantarum ST8SH and L. monocytogenes ScottA were recorded on MRS plates when co-cultured (Fig. 4). However, results recorded on selective LEB medium showed that the cell numbers of L. monocytogenes ScottA decreased from 1.42 × 104 to 1.02 × 102 CFU/mL within 9 h and to undetectable levels after 36 h (Fig. 4). This indicated that the high cell numbers recorded on MRS plates were Lb. plantarum. Inhibition of L. monocytogenes ScottA cannot be ascribed to lactic acid production or a decrease in pH, since a much more drastic decline in cell numbers was recorded after 9 h fermentation with increased production of bacteriocin ST8SH (Fig. 4). Less than 3 % difference was recorded among three repeated experiments. Most probably bacteriocin activity could be higher, as some active peptides remain bound to the cell surface of the target strain. The latter phenomenon has been reported by Yildrim et al. (2002) and Schirru et al. (2012).

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first report on some aspects of the bacteriocinogenic mode of action of a strain of Lb. plantarum isolated from “Shpek”. Lb. plantarum ST8SH produces a bacteriocin active against several strains of genera Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Listeria and Streptococcus, including food-borne pathogens. Based on the physiological characteristics of Lb. plantarum and the physico-chemical and biological properties of bacteriocin ST8SH, the strain and bacteriocin may be used in the preservation of foods. Taking into consideration the difference in the amino-acid structure, Lb. plantarum ST8SH produces a new bacteriocin (bacteriocin ST8SH) within the pediocin PA-1 family. Further investigation of the technological properties of Lb. plantarum ST8SH and additional experiments demonstrating the safety of the strain and its bacteriocin should be conducted.

References

  • Albano H, Todorov SD, van Reenen CA, Hogg T, Dicks LMT, Teixeira P (2007) Characterization of a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus acidilactici isolated from “Alheira”, a fermented sausage traditionally produced in Portugal. Int J Food Microbiol 116:239–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Atrih A, Rekhif N, Moir AJG, Lebrihi A, Lefebvre G (2001) Mode of action, purification and amino acid sequence of plantaricin C19, an anti-Listeria bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum C19. Int J Food Microbiol 68:93–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer R, Chikindas ML, Dicks LMT (2005) Purification, partial amino acid sequence and mode of action of pediocin PD-1, a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus damnosus NCFB 1832. Int J Food Microbiol 101:17–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhunia AK, Kim WJ, Johnson MS, Ray B (1988) Purification, characterization and antimicrobial spectrum of a bacteriocin produced by Pediococcus acidilactici. J Appl Bacteriol 65:261–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bhunia AK, Johnson MC, Ray B, Kalchayanand N (1991) Mode of action of pediocin AcH from Pedicoccus acidilactici H on sensitive bacterial strains. J Appl Bacteriol 70:25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bredholt S, Nesbakken T, Holck A (2001) Industrial application of an antilisterial strain of Lactobacillus sakei as a protective culture and its effect on the sensory acceptability of cooked, sliced, vacuum-packed meats. Int J Food Microbiol 66:191–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castellano P, Holzapfel WH, Vignolo G (2004) The control of Listeria innocua and Lactobacillus sakei in broth and meat slurry with the bacteriocinogenic strain Lactobacillus casei CRL705. Food Microbiol 21:291–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter PD, Hill C, Ross RP (2005) Bacteriocins: developing innate immunity for food. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:777–788

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Daba H, Panadian S, Gosselin S, Simard JF, Huang R, Lacroix C (1991) Detection and activity of a bacteriocin produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:3450–3455

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Vuyst L, Vandamme EJ (1994) Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria, 1st edn. Blackie, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diep DB, Godager L, Brede D, Nes IF (1996) Data mining and characterization of a novel pediocin-like bacteriocin system from the genome of Pediococcus pentosaceus ATCC 25745. Microbiol-SGM 152:1649–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favaro L, Penna ALB, Todorov SD (2015) Bacteriocinogenic LAB from cheeses—application in biopreservation? Trends Food Sci Technol 41:37–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Felske A, Rheims H, Wokerink A, Stackebrandt E, Akkermans ADL (1997) Ribosome analysis reveals prominent activity of an uncultured member of the class Actinobacteria in grassland soils. Microbiology 143:2983–2989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fimland G, Sletten K, Nissen-Meyer J (2002) The complete amino acid sequence of the pediocin-like antimicrobial peptide leucocin C. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 295:826–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fimland G, Nissen-Meyer J, Johnsen L (2005) The C-terminal domain of pediocin-like antimicrobial peptides (class IIa bacteriocins) is involved in specific recognition of the C-terminal part of cognate immunity proteins and in determining the antimicrobial spectrum. J Biol Chem 280(10):9243–9250. doi:10.1074/jbc.M412712200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furtado DN, Todorov SD, Landgraf M, Destro MT, Franco BDGM (2014) Bacteriocinogenic Lactococcus lactis subsp lactis DF04Mi isolated from goat milk: characterization of the bacteriocin. Braz J Microbiol 45:1541–1550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales CF, Kunka BS (1987) Plasmid associated bacteriocin production and sucrose fermentation in Pediococcus acidilactici. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2534–2538

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson JT, Chopko AL, Van Wassenaar PD (1992) Purification and primary structure of pediocin PA-1 produced by Pediococcus acidilactici PAC-10. Arch Biochem Biophys 295:5–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heng NCK, Wescombre PA, Burton JP, Jack RW, Tagg JR (2007) In: Riley MA, Chavan MA (eds) The diversity of bacteriocins in gram-positive bacteria bacteriocins: ecology and evolution. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Holo H, Jeknic Z, Daeschel M, Stevanovic S, Nes IF (2001) Plantaricin W from Lactobacillus plantarum belongs to a new family of two-peptide lantibiotics. Microbiology 147:643–651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jack RW, Tagg JR, Ray B (1995) Bactericoins of gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol Rev 59:171–200

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kim WS, Hall RJ, Dunn NW (1997) The effect of nisin concentration and nutrient depletion on nisin production of Lactococcus lactis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50:429–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoetze H, Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2008) A class IIa peptide from Enterococcus mundtii inhibits bacteria associated with otitis media. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31:228–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krier F, Revol-Junelles AM, Germain P (1998) Influence of temperature and pH on production of two bacteriocins by Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides FR52 during batch fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50:359–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger MF, Barbosa MDS, Miranda A, Landgraf M, Destro MT, Todorov SD, Franco BDGM (2013) Isolation of bacteriocinogenic strain of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis from rocket salad (Eruca sativa Mill.) and evidences of production of a variant of nisin with modification in the leader-peptide. Food Control 33:467–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado A, Ruiz-Barba JL, Jiménez-Díaz R (2003) Purification and genetic characterization of plantaricin NC8, a novel coculture-inducible two-peptide bacteriocin from Lactobacillus plantarum NC8. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:383–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Manca de Nadra MC, Sandino de Lamellas D, Strasser de Saad AM (1998) Pediocin N5p from Pediococcus pentosaceus, adsorption on bacterial strains. Int J Food Microbiol 39:79–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez RRC, Wachsman M, Torres NI, LeBlanc JG, Todorov SD, Franco BDGM (2013) Biochemical, antimicrobial and molecular characterization of a noncytotoxic bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST71KS. Food Microbiol 34:376–381

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marugg JD, Gonzalez CF, Kunka BS, Ledeboer AM, Pucci MJ, Toonen MY, Walker SA, Zoetmudler LCM, Vandenbergh PA (1992) Cloning, expression, and nucleotide sequence of genes involved in the production of pediocin PA-1, a bacteriocin from Pediococcus acidilactici PAC1.0. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:2360–2367

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mataragas M, Drosinos EH, Metaxopoulos J (2003) Antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria against Listeria monocytogenes in sliced cooked cured pork shoulder stored under vacuum or modified atmosphere at 4 ± 2 °C. Food Microbiol 20:259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motlagh A, Bukhtiyarova M, Ray B (1994) Complete nucleotide sequence of PSMB-74, a plasmid encoiding the production of pedicoin AcH in Pediococcus acidilactici. Lett Appl Microbiol 18:305–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perin LM, Nero LA (2014) Antagonistic lactic acid bacteria isolated from goat milk and identification of a novel nisin variant Lactococcus lactis. BMC Microbiol 14:36–45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse R, Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2010) Mode of action and in vitro susceptibility of mastitis pathogens to macedocin ST91KM and preparation of a teat seal containing the bacteriocin. Braz J Microbiol 41:133–145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Powell JE, Witthuhn RC, Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2007) Characterization of bacteriocin ST8KF produced by a kefir isolate Lactobacillus plantarum ST8KF. Int Dairy J 17:190–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schägger H, Van Jagow G (1987) Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of protein in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem 166:368–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schirru S, Todorov SD, Favaro L, Mangia NP, Basaglia M, Casella S, Comunian R, Franco BDGM, Deiana P (2012) Sardinian goat’s milk as source of bacteriocinogenic potential protective cultures. Food Control 25:309–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SK, Floriano B, Cathcart DP, Bayley SA, Witt VF, Jiménez-Díaz R, Warner PJ, Ruiz-Barba JL (1998) Molecular analysis of the locus responsible for production of plantaricin S, a two-peptide bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum LPCO10. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:1871–1877

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD (2008) Bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum AMA-K isolated from Amasi, a Zimbabwean fermented milk product and study of adsorption of bacteriocin AMA-K to Listeria spp. Braz J Microbiol 38:178–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD (2009) Bacteriocins from Lactobacillus plantarum—production, genetic organization and mode of action. A review. Braz J Microbiol 40:209–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2005) Characterization of bacteriocins produced by lactic acid bacteria isolated from spoiled black olives. J Basic Microbiol 45:312–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2006) Parameters affecting the adsorption of plantaricin 423, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum 423 isolated from sorghum beer. Biotechnol J 1:405–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Dicks LMT (2009) Effect of modified MRS medium on production and purification of antimicrobial peptide ST4SA produced by Enterococcus mundtii. Anaerobe 15:65–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Franco BDGM (2010) Lactobacillus plantarum: characterization of the species and application in food production. A review. Food Rev Int 26:205–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov S, Onno B, Sorokine O, Chobert JM, Ivanova I, Dousset X (1999) Detection and characterization of a novel antibacterial substance produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST31 isolated from sourdough. Int J Food Microbiol 48:167–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov S, Gotcheva B, Dousset X, Onno B, Ivanova I (2000) Influence of growth medium on bacteriocin production in Lactobacillus plantarum ST31. J Biotechnol Biotechnol Eq 14:50–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Danova ST, Van Reenen CA, Meincken M, Dinkova G, Ivanova IV, Dicks LMT (2006) Characterization of bacteriocin HV219, produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis HV219 isolated from human vaginal secretions. J Basic Microbiol 46:226–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Wachsman M, Tomé E, Dousset X, Destro MT, Dicks LMT, Franco BDGM, Vaz-Velho M, Drider D (2010) Characterisation of an antiviral pediocin-like bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecium. Food Microbiol 27:869–879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov SD, Kruger MF, Martinez RCR, LeBlanc JG, Franco BDGM (2012) Targeting bacteriocin genes in lactic acid bacteria—what we need to know. In: Urbano KV (ed) Advances in genetics research, vol 7. Nova, New York, pp 61–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Reenen CA, Dicks LMT, Chikindas ML (1998) Isolation, purification and partial characterization of plantaricin 423, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum. J Appl Microbiol 84:1131–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Reenen CA, van Zyl WH, Chikindas ML, Dicks LMT (2003) Characterization and heterologous expression of a class IIa bacteriocin, plantaricin 423, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int J Food Microbiol 81:29–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang R, Johnson M, Ray B (1992) Novel method to extract large amounts of bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:3355–3359

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yildrim Z, Avşar YK, Yildrim M (2002) Factors affecting the adsorption of buchnericin LB, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus buchneri. Microbiol Res 157:103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Todorov was supported by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), Belo Horizonte and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brasilia, Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svetoslav Dimitrov Todorov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Todorov, S.D., Holzapfel, W. & Nero, L.A. Characterization of a novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST8SH and some aspects of its mode of action. Ann Microbiol 66, 949–962 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-015-1180-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-015-1180-4

Keywords