Skip to main content

Table 3 Catalytic efficiency of GH 43 β-xylosidases from different bacteria on pNPX

From: Screening and identification of an Enterobacter ludwigii strain expressing an active β-xylosidase

Species

KM (mM)

kcat (s −1)

Catalytic efficiency (kcat /KM, s −1 × mM−1)

Reference

Enterobacter ludwigii LY-62

1.55a

2.80b

8.51a

6.94b

5.49a

2.48b

This report

Lactobacillus brevis ATCC 367

6.93

73.40

10.60

(Jordan et al. 2012)

Thermobifida fusca YX

0.55

6.72

12

(Moraïs et al. 2012)

Bacillus halodurans C-125

4.40

12.10

2.75

(Sinnott 1990)

Geobacillus thermoleovorans IT-08

0.066

0.00032

0.0048

(Ratnadewi et al. 2013)

Geobacillus stearothermophillus T-6

17

57

3.35

(Shallom et al. 2005)[48]

Selenomonas ruminantium

0.39

11.80

30.26

(Jordan and Braker 2011)

Bacillus pumilus IPO

3.90

76

19.49

(Xu et al. 1991)

Bacillus pumilus 12

1.50

7.60

5.07

(Van Doorslaer et al. 1985)

Geobacillus thermoleovorans IT-08

0.55

0.18

0.33

(Wagschal et al. 2009)

Enterobacter sp.

2.92

1.32

0.45

(Campos et al. 2013)

Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12

15.60

60.60

3.88

(Viborg et al. 2013)

Bacteroides ovatus

4.57

7.82

1.71

(Jordan et al. 2017)

Weissella sp. strain 92

7.40

258

34.90

(Falck et al. 2015)

Lactobacillus brevis DSM 20054

11

46

4.18

(Michlmayr et al. 2013)

  1. aHis-Xyl62
  2. bXyl62-His