- Original Article
- Published:
Chinese white truffles shape the ectomycorrhizal microbial communities of Corylus avellana
Annals of Microbiology volume 69, pages 553–565 (2019)
Abstract
Here, we investigated the influence of Chinese white truffle (Tuber panzhihuanense) symbioses on the microbial communities associated with Corylus avellana during the early development stage of symbiosis. The microbial communities associated with ectomycorrhizae, and associated with roots without T. panzhihuanense colonization, were determined via high-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes and fungal ITS genes. Microbial community diversity was higher in the communities associated with the ectomycorrhizae than in the control treatment. Further, bacterial and fungal community structures were different in samples containing T. panzhihuanense in association with C. avellana compared to the control samples. In particular, the bacterial genera Rhizobium, Pedomicrobium, and Herbiconiux were more abundant in the ectomycorrhizae, in addition to the fungal genus Monographella. Moreover, there were clear differences in some physicochemical properties among the rhizosphere soils of the two treatments. Statistical analyses indicated that soil properties including exchangeable magnesium and exchangeable calcium prominently influenced microbial community structure. Lastly, inference of bacterial metabolic functions indicated that sugar and protein metabolism functions were significantly more enriched in the communities associated with the ectomycorrhizae from C. avellana mycorrhized with T. panzhihuanense compared to communities from roots of cultivated C. avellana without T. panzhihuanense. Taken together, these results highlight the interactions among ectomycorrhizal fungi, soil properties, and microbial communities that are associated with host plants and further our understanding of the ecology and cultivation of the economically important T. panzhihuanense truffles.
Introduction
Truffles belong to the Tuber genus (Ascomycota, Pezizales) and are ectomycorrhizal fungi that are characterized by hypogeous fruiting bodies (Bonito et al. 2010; Kirk et al. 2008). T. panzhihuanense is one of ten new white truffle species that were discovered in 2010 and 2011 in southwestern China and is closely related, morphologically and phylogenetically, to another white Chinese truffle species, T. latisporum (Li et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2013). T. panzhihuanense is abundant in southwestern China, is edible, and exhibits a strong, pleasant aroma, which all contribute to its high economic value and commercial production potential (Liu et al. 2013; Wan et al. 2015a; Wan and Liu 2014). Truffle value has been increasingly recognized by global consumers leading to a rapidly growing market demand, and consequent stimulation of truffle resource plundering. Thus, there has been a gradual decrease of truffle production in the Panzhihua Province of China (Tang 2005; Wan et al. 2015a). Establishing truffle plantations with artificially synthesized mycorrhizal seedlings is an efficient way to compensate for endangered truffle resources (Lefevre and Hall 2001). Like other ectomycorrhizal fungi, truffles require infection of host plants and the development of a symbiotic relationship with them in order to complete their life cycle (Kües and Martin 2011; Shu-Chao et al. 2017). Truffles can form symbiotic relationships with host trees of several genera including Corylus, Quercus, Abies Pinus, Populus, and Salix (Healy et al. 2016; Wan et al. 2015a; Chen 2002). However, little is known of the mycorrhizal symbioses of Chinese white truffles (Liu et al. 2014). T. panzhihuanense is frequently collected from natural forests of Panisea yunnanensis in between late autumn and winter. In addition, T. panzhihuanense forms symbiotic associations with Castanea mollissima and Pinus armandii under greenhouse conditions (Wan et al. 2015a, 2015b). C. avellana is typically the host plant of T. macrosporum Vittad and T. melanosporum ectomycorrhizae (Benucci et al. 2012; Bradshaw 2005). However, the host association of C. avellana with T. panzhihuanense is rarely reported.
Ectomycorrhizal fungi play important roles in ecosystems. The mutualistic exchange of nutrients between microsymbionts and their host plants is crucial to the success of ectomycorrhizal interactions (Martin et al. 2010). On the one hand, Ectomycorrhizae can promote plant productivity by enhancing plant growth or resistance to abiotic stressors (Dominguez et al. 2012; Lenoir et al. 2016). On the other hand, plants can promote rhizosphere microorganism growth via their root secretions, which may also induce the formation of mycorrhizae (Berendsen et al. 2012). Moreover, plant genetic backgrounds and soil types are also a particularly important drivers of microbial community structural variation. In particular, truffle ectomycorrhizae and fruiting bodies harbor diverse microbial communities consisting of bacteria, yeasts, and filamentous fungi, and the microbial communities that are associated with truffle grounds vary by season, region, and truffle species (Deveau et al. 2016; Li et al. 2017; Mello et al. 2013; Splivallo et al. 2015).
In addition to the associations described above, the development of mycorrhizal fungi and plant symbiosis can be influenced by rhizosphere bacteria and fungi (Mello et al. 2010). The diversity and functions of microbial communities within ecosystems have recently become an area of intense research interest. Soil microorganisms, particularly rhizosphere microorganisms, play important roles in plant growth and development. Endophytic microorganisms can influence the metabolic processes of the host and produce bioactive compounds that contribute to plant secondary metabolites (Ludwigmüller 2015). In addition, endophytic microorganisms have an impact on host plant yields, but it is unclear how they interact with each other, and how these interactions affect host plants (Esmaeili et al. 2017; Ling and U 2013). Various microorganisms have been isolated from the hyphae of ectomycorrhizal fungi and fruiting bodies (Wan and Liu 2014; Zhou and Wei 2013). However, few studies have investigated the endophytes associated with the ectomycorrhizae of truffle hosts.
In this study, we synthesized ectomycorrhizal relationships by inoculating C. avellana with T. panzhihuanense under greenhouse conditions to explore how T. panzhihuanense influences the endophyte microbial communities associated with the ectomycorrhizae. The endophyte microbial community structures associated with the ectomycorrhizae were determined with next-generation sequencing of community 16S rRNA genes for bacteria and ITS genes for fungi. In addition, the associations of the communities with the physical and chemical properties of rhizosphere soils were analyzed. Concomitantly, we investigated the effects derived from the symbiotic ectomycorrhizal relationships on the diversity of the microbial communities. These data are used to explore the interactions among ectomycorrhizal fungi, soil microorganisms, and host plants.
Materials and methods
Cultivation of C. avellana seedlings
C. avellana seedlings were cultivated in greenhouses according to previously described methods (Li et al. 2017). Briefly, C. avellana seeds that were purchased from a local seed company were surface sterilized with 30% H2O2 for 4 h and washed three times with sterile water. Surface-sterilized seeds were sown in a plastic container (the bottom is a square with a side length of 5.5 cm, and the mouth is a square with a side length of 7.5 cm and a height of 14 cm) filled with substrate materials (vermiculite, perlite, organic soil, and water at a ratio of 1:1:1:0.9, v/v/v/v) that were autoclaved for 90 min at 121 °C (Li et al. 2017). The soil to be sterilized is required to ensure sterility when inoculated with truffle spores; otherwise, other bacteria or fungi may affect the inoculation effect. The organic soil refers to the soil used for cultivating seeds and containing the nutrients required for seed growth. The pH of the homogenized substrate was adjusted to 7.5 by addition of calcium hydroxide. Pre-treated C. avellana seeds were then cultivated in greenhouses for two months and allowed to germinate. C. avellana seedlings without significant differences in plant heights, and of sufficient growth, were selected for experimentation. A total of 30 qualified C. avellana seedlings were selected as experimental materials.
Truffle inoculation experiments
T. panzhihuanense were provided by the Panzhihua Agriculture and Forestry Scientific Research Institute (Fig. 1). Spore powder of T. panzhihuanense was obtained by blending ascocarps that were surface sterilized with 75% alcohol and soaked in sterile water (Li et al. 2017). Blending of ascocarps was conducted to incite the release of spores and germination (Wan et al. 2015a). About 1.5–2 g of spore powder was inoculated into the substrate containing the seedlings (approximately 500 g of substrate in each plastic container). An equal number of non-inoculated C. avellana seedlings were used as controls. The inoculated and non-inoculated seedlings were cultivated for eight months prior to sampling.
Sample sampling and soil analyses
After eight months of cultivation, the C. avellana were removed from the plastic container. They were shook gently with hands and slowly tapped to expose the roots from the bulk soil. Then they were soaked in water for 15–20 min, the roots were gently washed, and they were washed with water 2–3 times until the roots are completely separated from bulk soil. The physical and chemical properties of rhizosphere soils were then measured. Each treatment group included three replicates. Soil properties were analyzed according to previously described methods (Li et al. 2016). Briefly, soil pH was determined using a glass electrode (1:5, soil/water volume ratio), organic matter content was measured using the Tyurin method (Ruma et al. 2014), and total nitrogen content was determined using the Kjeldahl method (Page et al. 1982). Other soil parameters were determined using general methods (Ulery and Drees 2008).
C. avellana roots (the main root length is 2–3 cm, the root tips’ length is 0.5–3 mm, and the root is roughly 0.2–0.4 mm) were rinsed with sterile water prior to morphological and molecular analyses of ectomycorrhizae. The root tips of C. avellana that were mycorrhized with T. panzhihuanense were flushed with sterile water and placed in 2-ml centrifuge tubes using sterilized tweezers. T. panzhihuanense ectomycorrhizae on C. avellana are simple or ramified in a monopodial-pinnate pattern; single ectomycorrhizae tips are straight, fragile, and cylindrical or club shaped with rounded ends. And the mature ectomycorrhizae frequently had a whitish growing tip apex (Fig. 2c, d). Cystidia are the typical of Tuber ectomycorrhizae. They are needle-shaped, simple, or connected at the base, smooth, colorless, and generally mono-septate (Fig. 2b). The outer mantle surface is densely short-spiny, composed by epidermoid cells structured in an uneven regular puzzle-like pattern; cells are variable in shape but less in size (Fig. 1a). For the control plants, the non-inoculated roots were removed and placed in 2-ml centrifuge tubes. As many young roots were chosen as possible. Each group comprised five replicates, and each replicate contained greater than 500 mg of ectomycorrhizae (treatment group) or young root tips (control group). Fresh samples were stored at − 80 °C. Root tips of C. avellana mycorrhized with T. panzhihuanense were designated as “P” and the surrounding soil was designated “P.S.” Roots from the control plants lacking T. panzhihuanense were designated as “CK” and the surrounding soil as “CK.S.”
DNA extraction, PCR amplification, and sequencing
Prior to DNA extraction, the mycorrhizae or control roots of C. avellana were washed with distilled sterile water and surface-disinfected with 75% alcohol. Genomic DNA from the tissues and endophytes was extracted using a hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method (Li et al. 2017). The concentrations of extracted DNA were quantified using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer, and the qualities were assessed by gel electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel.
The 16S rRNA gene amplification primers for bacteria are 515F and 926R (Parada et al. 2016), and the amplification system is 20 μL, including 2 μL of template DNA (1–10 ng); 20 μmol/μL upstream and downstream primers were each 0.4 μL, 10 μL 2 × SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Japan), and 7.4 μL ddH2O. Reaction procedure: 95 °C for 3 min; 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s, 40 cycles. The fungi ITS gene amplification primers are ITS1F and ITS1R (Zhang et al. 2016); the amplification system is 20 μL, including 2 μL of template DNA (1–10 ng), 20 μmol/μL of upstream and downstream primers each 0.4 μL, 10 μL 2 × SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Japan), and 7.4 μL ddH2O. Reaction procedure: 95 °C for 3 min; 95 °C for 20 s, 53 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 20 s, 40 cycles. A high-fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB Q5) was used to ensure efficiency and accuracy of PCR amplification (Langenheder and Székely 2011). Successful PCR amplifications were assessed using gel electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel. PCR amplicons of the right size were excised and purified using an Axygen AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction kit (AP-GX-500). PCR products were quantified using a Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit with a microplate reader (BioTek, FLx800). PCR products were then pooled at equimolar concentrations. An Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA LT Sample Prep Kit (FC-121-4001 or FC-121-4002) was used to construct a library for Illumina sequencing. Final amplicon selection and purification of the library were performed using gel electrophoresis with a 2% agarose gel. Paired-end sequencing (2 × 300 bp) was then conducted on the Illumina MiSeq platform using the V3 MiSeq Reagent Kit over 600 cycles.
Sequence processing and statistical analyses
The QIIME software package v1.8.0 (Caporaso et al. 2010) was used to quality filter the sequencing data. High-quality sequences were obtained after removing chimeric sequences using the USEARCH v5.2.236 algorithm (Edgar 2010). High-quality sequences with ≥ 97% nucleotide similarity were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the UCLUST software, which is a sequence alignment tool implemented in QIIME (Edgar 2010). Representative sequences were chosen for each OTU based on the sequence with the highest abundance in each OTU. OTUs with relative abundances less than 0.001% across all samples were removed (Bokulich and Mills 2013). The taxonomic classifications of bacterial and fungal OTUs were assigned using the RDP 3 classifier and the SILVA and UNITE databases, respectively. Statistical analyses and figures were generated in the R software environment (Team 2009). Shared OTU abundances were visualized using a Venn diagram. Rarefaction curves were calculated in QIIME using four alpha diversity indices including the Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson indices. The distribution of the 50 most abundant genera among samples was visualized using a heatmap and cluster analysis in R. In addition, the beta diversity (shared OTU composition) of the microbial communities was analyzed using a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA). To investigate the relationships between microbial communities and soil properties, canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of the communities and soil properties were conducted in R. In addition, a network analysis of soil OTU distributions and soil properties was performed using the Mothur software (Lozupone and Knight 2005; Yatsunenko et al. 2012). Lastly, the PICRUSt software package was used to predict the metabolic functions of the bacterial communities based on the KEGG microbial function database (Langille et al. 2013).
Data are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) for five biological replicates in each treatment group. Statistical differences were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests in the SPSS 19.0 software package. Least significant difference (LSD) tests were performed to determine if the ANOVA results between different treatments were significant at the P < 0.05 significance level.
Results
Rhizosphere and ectomycorrhizosphere soil characterization
The physicochemical properties of soils surrounding C. avellana root tips differed between treatments with or without T. panzhihuanense (Table 1). The pH of soil samples in the P group were higher than those of the CK group (P < 0.05), and varied from 8.10 to 8.48 in P.S. There were no significant differences in the organic matter (OM) and total potassium (TK) content among samples of different treatments. The contents of total nitrogen (TN), available nitrogen (AN), and available phosphorus (AP) were all higher in P.S soils compared to those of CK.S. In contrast, other properties including exchangeable calcium, exchangeable magnesium, and available potassium (AK) were all higher in CK.S compared to P.S.
Bacterial alpha diversity in ectomycorrhizae and roots
A total of 65,202–78,161 bacterial 16S rRNA gene reads were obtained per sample after quality filtering. Thirty-six phyla, 95 classes, and 775 bacterial genera were assigned to OTUs, with 1403–1806 OTUs present in the samples. The numbers of observed species were not significantly different between samples of treatments (Table 2). The other two richness indices (Chao1 and ACE) were higher in ectomycorrhizal communities (P) than in those of the control roots (CK). In addition, bacterial communities were more diverse in ectomycorrhizal communities than in the control root communities, based on the Shannon and Simpson indices.
Fungal alpha diversity in ectomycorrhizae and roots
A total of 38,856–513,507 high-quality fungal ITS reads were obtained per sample, which comprised 10 phyla, 58 classes, and 217 fungal genera. Between 518 and 555 fungal OTUs were observed per sample. Fungal richness indices did not significantly differ between ectomycorrhizae (P) and control root (CK) communities (P < 0.05) (Table 2). However, higher fungal diversity was observed in the ectomycorrhizal communities than in those of the control roots (CK), according to the Shannon and Simpson diversity indices.
Taxonomic analyses of bacterial communities
A total of 39 bacterial phyla were observed across all communities, 27 of which were present in all 10 communities (Fig. 3a). Three bacterial phyla, Proteobacteria (46.8–66.4% relative abundance), Actinobacteria (7.1–21.3%), and Firmicutes (0.4–19.5%), were dominant among all samples (Fig. 4a). Proteobacteria were more abundant in the CK group soil communities than in those of the P group (P < 0.05). In contrast, the relative abundances of the Actinobacteria were slightly higher in the P group soil communities than in those of the CK group soils (P < 0.05). In addition, CK group soil communities contained less Firmicutes than those of the P group (P < 0.05).
Among the 109 bacterial classes that were detected, Alphaproteobacteria (22.0–56.2%), Betaproteobacteria (2.1–22.9%), Actinobacteria (3.8%–18.4%), and Gammaproteobacteria (4.4–10.7%) were dominant (Fig. 3b). P group communities contained less Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria than those of the CK group. In contrast, the relative abundances of Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidia, and Bacilli were lower in the CK communities than in the P communities (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4a).
Among the 856 genera that were identified, 225 were observed in all samples (Fig. 5a). The dominant genera were Rhizobium (average relative abundance: 6.7%), Pedomicrobium (4.0%), Streptomyces (2.6%), and Woodsholea (2.0%). Rhizobium was more abundant in the P communities than in the CK communities (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
Taxonomic analyses of fungal communities
Nine fungal phyla were observed among all root communities (Fig. 3c). The Basidiomycota (average relative abundance, 57.6%) and Ascomycota (40.9%) (Fig. 4b) were dominant in all samples. However, the Basidiomycota were significantly more abundant in the CK communities than in the P communities (P < 0.05).
Of the 20 classes detected, Agaricomycetes (average relative abundance, 56.6%), Pezizomycetes (26.0%), and Sordariomycetes (9.5%), dominated the communities (Fig. 3d). The P communities contained more Pezizomycetes and fewer Agaricomycetes than those of the CK group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4b).
A total of 217 fungal genera were observed, 42 of which were detected in all communities (Fig. 5b). The most abundant genera were the Scleroderma (average 51.8%), Tuber (average relative abundance of 47.0% in P), Trechispora (3.2%), and Phaeoacremonium (2.4%). Tuber were predominant in the roots inoculated with T. panzhihuanense. In addition, Scleroderma and Phaeoacremonium were more abundant in CK communities compared to P communities (P < 0.05) (Table 3). Lastly, Ilyonectria and Hymenochaete were not observed in the P group communities.
Prediction of bacterial metabolic functions
The metabolic functions of bacterial populations are of particular importance in the study of microbial ecology. Thus, we predicted the metabolic functional potential of the bacterial communities using the KEGG Pathway Database, as implemented in the PICRUSt software. The metabolic potentials of the bacterial communities in the P and CK communities were mainly involved in energy metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and amino acid metabolism. In contrast, carbohydrate metabolism and amino acid metabolism pathways were more abundant in the P communities than in those of the CK group. Other pathways in low abundance in both the P and CK communities were involved in the metabolisms of cofactors and vitamins, xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism, lipid metabolism, biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites, glycan biosynthesis and metabolism, and metabolism of other amino acids (Fig. 6).
Principle coordinate analysis of community differences
Differences of the bacterial and fungal communities among samples (based on weighted UniFrac distances) are shown in a PCoA ordination (Fig. 7). Bacterial and fungal communities in the ectomycorrhizae (C. avellana mycorrhized with T. panzhihuanense, P) were differentiated from the non-inoculated root communities of C. avellana (CK).
Microbial community associations with soil properties
CCA was used to determine the relationships between the microbial communities of the root tips and soil properties (e.g., TP, AK, AP, exchangeable Mg, exchangeable Ca, AN, TN, pH) (Fig. 8). Exchangeable Mg, TP, and AK were significantly associated with differences in bacterial community compositions within the root tips (Fig. 8a). Exchangeable Mg, TP, and AK concentrations were positively associated with CK bacterial communities, but negatively associated with P community compositions. In addition, exchangeable Ca, AN, TN, AP, and pH were significantly correlated with fungal microbial community compositions within the root tips. AN, TN, AP, and pH were all negatively correlated with exchangeable Ca (Fig. 8b). Lastly, the CK fungal community compositions were positively associated with exchangeable Ca.
Discussion
Analysis of soil physical and chemical properties indicated that mycorrhizal synthesis influenced soil properties, which is consistent with previous studies (Garcíamontero et al. 2006). Some soil properties including TN, AN, and AP content, in addition to pH, were higher in ectomycorrhizosphere soils during symbiosis than in the CK.S soils. The differences in soil properties were significant and they may contribute to the initiation of truffle ectomycorrhizae (Alonso et al. 2014; Garcíamontero et al. 2009; Salerni et al. 2014). Further, some soil properties were significantly correlated with bacterial and fungal diversity patterns in root tips. In particular, exchangeable Mg and exchangeable Ca were the most significant factors related to microbial community compositional differences. Moreover, soil properties including TP, AK, and AN, among others, also had important roles in the growth and reproduction of plants based on CCA. These results illustrate the interactive network that exists among ectomycorrhizal fungi, soil properties, microbial communities, and host plants.
We investigated the effects of T. panzhihuanense ectomycorrhizal associations on the microbial communities of C. avellana during the early symbiosis development stage. The diversity of ectomycorrhizal-associated bacteria was higher compared to roots without mycorrhization, indicating that the truffle mycelia exert specific effects on the surrounding microbial communities. In addition, PCoA ordination indicated that T. panzhihuanense directly, or indirectly, affected the composition of the microbial communities associated with them. The colonizing populations must have originated from the surrounding environment, such as the air or water, and were ultimately significantly differentiated from those of the control soils. Alphaproteobacteria were more abundant in the ectomycorrhizae compared to the CK group roots, indicating a close relationship with the presence of truffle mycorrhizae. Further, these associations indicate that the Alphaproteobacteria may have played a role in ectomycorrhizal synthesis. A previous study (Barbieri et al. 2007) observed that Alphaproteobacteria affiliated with Sinorhizobium, Rhizobium, and Bradyrhizobium spp., in addition to Gammaproteobacteria that mostly comprised fluorescent pseudomonads, were the predominant populations of truffle bacterial communities. We observed higher abundances of Rhizobium and Pedomicrobium populations in ectomycorrhizal communities compared with those of the CK group, indicating that these genera are closely associated with the presence of tuber mycelia and may also play an important role in the growth and mycorrhizal synthesis of truffles.
Community diversity indices indicated that microbial communities were more diverse in the P treatment soils than in those of the CK treatment. Some bacterial genera including Rhizobium and Pedomicrobium were enriched in ectomycorrhizae compared to the CK group roots, in addition to the fungal genus Monographella. Previous studies have demonstrated that the combination of Pseudomonas fluorescens and T. melanosporum improve the establishment and functioning of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis (Dominguez et al. 2012). Further, the dominance of truffle mycelia reduces the composition of pathogenic endophytic fungi, such as Trechispora, Phaeoacremonium, Hymenochaete, and Podospora, and other mycorrhizal fungi, including Cryptococcus and Ilyonectria. These observations support the hypothesis that ectomycorrhizal fungi have a protective effect on the growth of plant hosts (Kennedy 2010; Wang et al. 2015) by reducing the infection of plants by pathogens. In addition, from the richness indexes Chao1 and ACE and the diversity indexes Shannon and Simpson. The abundance and diversity of bacteria are greater than fungi both in P treatment and in CK treatment. This result is consistent with the previous study (Li et al. 2017). The previous study indicated that T. melanosporum ascocarps selected specific bacterial communities from the surrounding soil which may contribute to the development, maturation, and even aroma of the truffle (Vahdatzadeh et al. 2015; Deveau et al. 2016). Similarly, the results described here suggest that T. panzhihuanense have similar behavior with T. melanosporum. T. panzhihuanense will select specific bacterial communities from the surrounding soil during the colonization of C. avellana, even at the symbiotic stage. This may be the reason for the proportion of bacteria in the ectomycorrhizal microbial community structure is higher than fungi and among fungi yeasts are less represented.
The mycelia of T. panzhihuanense were dominant (41.3–59.5%) among ectomycorrhizal fungal communities, although these abundances were lower than those of previous studies. In another investigation, T. magnatum ectomycorrhizae were apparently absent, or very rare, when its ascomata formed, and other mycorrhizal fungi were co-localized in the same root tips (Bonito et al. 2011; Lefevre 2012). This discrepancy may be due to differing survival strategies of tubers at different growth periods. Therefore, we can speculate that in the early stages of truffle growth, truffles may compete with other mycorrhizal fungi for nutrition from the host tree and consequently become dominant in a variety of ways. In contrast, when truffles are forming ascocarps, its niche may be occupied by other mycorrhizal fungi because of its inability to produce mycelium. This mechanism may help the ascocarpous produce truffles, since it cannot be excluded that truffles form other types of symbiosis. For example, orchid-like mycorrhizae (Bonito et al. 2011) have been observed for other truffle species or other mycorrhizal fungi that play a certain role in truffle ascocarpous production.
Analysis of the mycorrhizal associations on bacterial metabolic functions indicated that bacterial communities in the P and CK treatments were enriched in functions related to energy, sugar, and protein metabolism, while bacterial communities in the P treatment were significantly enriched in functions related to sugar and protein metabolism compared to those of the CK treatments. Both of these functions are closely related to the growth and development of plants. Consequently, we speculate that the symbiosis between truffles and plants alters the bacterial community structure of plant roots. These community shifts then promote the growth and activity of bacteria with metabolisms associated with sugar and protein metabolism, thereby promoting plant growth and development.
Ectomycorrhizal synthesis is the first step in artificial cultivation of truffles which is extremely important towards subsequent production (Belfiori et al. 2016; Marozzi et al. 2017; Wan et al. 2015a). Other studies have identified factors closely associated with mycelium synthesis including the age of the plantation, the host species, plant productivity, the surrounding environment, and crop management (Bonito et al. 2011). Consequently, it is difficult to compare the differences in microbial communities associated with truffles and observe changes in community structure at different time periods (Streiblová et al. 2012). The development and adoption of high-throughput sequencing methodologies have allowed the in-depth analysis of microbial community structures associated with ectomycorrhizal fungi and interpretation of their role in mycorrhizal growth. Further studies are needed to understand the interactions between truffles and other organisms in the rhizosphere, including mycorrhization helper bacteria (MHB) that are promising targets for enabling the establishment of truffle plantations.
References
Alonso PR, Ágreda T, Águeda B, Aldea J, Martínez-Peña F, Modrego MP (2014) Soil physical properties influence "black truffle" fructification in plantations. Mycorrhiza 24(S1):S55–S64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-014-0558-7
Barbieri E, Guidi C, Bertaux J, Freyklett P, Garbaye J, Ceccaroli P, Saltarelli R, Zambonelli A, Stocchi V (2007) Occurrence and diversity of bacterial communities in Tuber magnatum during truffle maturation. Environ Microbiol 9(9):2234–2246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01338.x
Belfiori B, Riccioni C, Paolocci F, Rubini A (2016) Characterization of the reproductive mode and life cycle of the whitish truffle T. borchii. Mycorrhiza 26(6):515–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0689-0
Benucci GM, Gógán CA, Falini LB, Bencivenga M, Massimo GD, Donnini D (2012) Mycorrhization of Quercus robur L., Quercus cerris L. and Corylus avellana L. seedlings with Tuber macrosporum Vittad. Mycorrhiza 22(8):639–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-012-0441-3
Berendsen RL, Pieterse CM, Bakker PA (2012) The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17(8):478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001
Bokulich NA, Mills DA (2013) Improved selection of internal transcribed spacer-specific primers enables quantitative, ultra-high-throughput profiling of fungal communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(8):2519–2526. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03870-12
Bonito GM, Gryganskyi AP, Trappe JM, Vilgalys R (2010) A global meta-analysis of Tuber ITS rDNA sequences: species diversity, host associations and long-distance dispersal. Mol Ecol 19(22):4994–5008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04855.x
Bonito G, Brenneman T, Vilgalys R (2011) Ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity in orchards of cultivated pecan (Carya illinoinensis; Juglandaceae). Mycorrhiza 21(7):601–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-011-0368-0
Bradshaw BP (2005) Physiological aspects of Corylus avellana associated with the French black truffle fungus Tuber melanosporum and the consequence for commercial production of black truffles in Western Australia. Dissertation, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology Murdoch University
Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, Fierer N, Peña AG, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI (2010) QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335–336
Chen YL (2002) Cultivation techniques for European truffles (Tuber spp.). Edible Fungi of China
Deveau A, Antony-Babu S, Le TF, Robin C, Frey-Klett P, Uroz S (2016) Temporal changes of bacterial communities in the Tuber melanosporum ectomycorrhizosphere during ascocarp development. Mycorrhiza 26(5):389–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-015-0679-7
Dominguez JA, Martin A, Anriquez A, Albanesi A (2012) The combined effects of Pseudomonas fluorescens and Tuber melanosporum on the quality of Pinus halepensis seedlings. Mycorrhiza 22(6):429–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-011-0420-0
Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26(2460–1):2460–2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
Esmaeili TA, Chatterton S, Gossen B, Mclaren D (2017) Metagenomic analysis of oomycete communities from the rhizosphere of field pea on the Canadian prairies. Can J Microbiol 63:758–768. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2017-0099
Garcíamontero LG, Casermeiro MA, Hernando J, Hernando I (2006) Soil factors that influence the fruiting of Tuber melanosporum (black truffle). Aust J Soil Res 44(8):731–738. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR06046
Garcíamontero LG, Quintana A, Valverdeasenjo I, Díaz P (2009) Calcareous amendments in truffle culture: a soil nutrition hypothesis. Soil Biol Biochem 41(6):1227–1232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.003
Healy RA, Zurier H, Bonito G, Smith ME, Pfister DH (2016) Mycorrhizal detection of native and non-native truffles in a historic arboretum and the discovery of a new North American species, Tuber arnoldianum sp. nov. Mycorrhiza 26(7):781–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0713-4
Kennedy P (2010) Ectomycorrhizal fungi and interspecific competition: species interactions, community structure, coexistence mechanisms, and future research directions. New Phytol 187(4):895–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03399.x
Kirk P, Cannon P, Minter D, Stalpers J (2008) Dictionary of the Fungi. Commonwealth Mycol Inst 106:507–508
Kües U, Martin F (2011) On the road to understanding truffles in the underground. Fungal Genet Biol 48(6):555–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2011.02.002
Langenheder S, Székely AJ (2011) Species sorting and neutral processes are both important during the initial assembly of bacterial communities. IMSE J 5(7):1086–1094. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.207
Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, Mcdonald D, Dan K, Reyes JA, Clemente JC, Burkepile DE, Thurber RLV, Knight R (2013) Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31:814–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2676
Lefevre C (2012) Native and cultivated truffles of North America. Springer Berl Heid 34:209–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33823-6_12
Lefevre C, Hall I (2001) The status of truffle cultivation: a global perspective. Acta Hortic 556(556):513–520. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.556.75
Lenoir I, Fontaine J, Lounès-Hadj SA (2016) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal responses to abiotic stresses: a review. Phytochemistry 123:4–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.01.002
Li Q, Li X, Chen C, Li S, Huang W, Xiong C, Jin X, Zheng L (2016) Analysis of bacterial diversity and communities associated with Tricholoma matsutake fruiting bodies by barcoded pyrosequencing in Sichuan Province, Southwest China. J Microbiol Biotechnol 26(1):89–98. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1505.05008
Li Q, Zhao J, Xiong C, Li X, Chen Z, Li P, Huang W (2017) Tuber indicum shapes the microbial communities of ectomycorhizosphere soil and ectomycorrhizae of an indigenous tree (Pinus armandii). PLoS One 12(4):e0175720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175720
Ling L, U X (2013) Endophytes research progress and application prospect. Journal of Anhui agricultural sciences
Liu P, Liu G, Cheng Y, Wang Y, Deng JX (2013) A new white truffle species, Tuber panzhihuanense from China. Mycol Prog 12(3):557–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11557-012-0862-6
Liu CY, Yang M, Tang P, Li XL, Xiao YJ, Xiao LY, Zheng, and Wang Y (2014) Research on mycorrhizal seedling cultivation and microstructure of Tuber panzhihuanense. Edible Fungi of China
Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(12):8228–8235. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005
Ludwigmüller J (2015) Plants and endophytes: equal partners in secondary metabolite production? Biotechnol Lett 37(7):1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-015-1814-4
Marozzi G, Sánchez S, Benucci GMN, Bonito G, Falini LB, Albertini E, Donnini D (2017) Mycorrhization of pecan (Carya illinoinensis) with black truffles: Tuber melanosporum and Tuber brumale. Mycorrhiza 27(3):303–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0743-y
Martin F, Kohler A, Murat C, Balestrini R, Coutinho PM, Jaillon O, Montanini B, Morin E, Noel B, Percudani R (2010) Périgord black truffle genome uncovers evolutionary origins and mechanisms of symbiosis. Nature 464(7291):1033–1038. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08867
Mello A, Miozzi L, Vizzini A, Napoli C, Kowalchuk G, Bonfante P (2010) Bacterial and fungal communities associated with Tuber magnatumâ-productive niches. G Bot Ital 144:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/11263500903374724
Mello A, Ding GC, Piceno YM, Napoli C, Tom LM, Desantis TZ, Andersen GL, Smalla K, Bonfante P (2013) Truffle brûlés have an impact on the diversity of soil bacterial communities. PLoS One 8(4):e61945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061945
Page AL, Miller RH, Dennis RK (1982) Methods of soil analysis. Catena 15:99–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869702
Parada AE, Needham DM, Fuhrman JA (2016) Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ Microbiol 18(5):1403–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13023
Ruma K, Sunil K, Prakash HS (2014) Bioactive potential of endophytic Myrothecium sp. isolate M1-CA-102, associated with Calophyllum apetalum. Pharm Biol 52(6):665–676. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2013.863950
Salerni E, Iotti M, Leonardi P, Gardin L, Aguanno MD, Perini C, Pacioni P, Zambonelli A (2014) Effects of soil tillage on Tuber magnatum development in natural truffières. Mycorrhiza 24(S1):S79–S87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-013-0543-6
Shu-Chao LI, Qiao P, Liu S S, Chen J, Guo S X (2017) Research progress in the molecular systematics and symbiotic mechanism of Tuber (Tuberaceae, Ascomycota. Mycosystema
Splivallo R, Deveau A, Valdez N, Kirchhoff N, Frey Klett P, Karlovsky P (2015) Bacteria associated with truffle-fruiting bodies contribute to truffle aroma. Environ Microbiol 17(8):2647–2660. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12521
Streiblová E, Gryndlerová H, Gryndler M (2012) Truffle brûlé: an efficient fungal life strategy. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01283.x
Tang, P (2005) A study of truffle resources and optimal Nichesin Panzhihua region. J Sichuan For Sci Technol
Team, R D C, (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, v 1, p. 12–21
Ulery AL, Drees LR (2008) Methods of soil analysis. Catena 15(1):99–100
Vahdatzadeh M, Deveau A, Splivallo R (2015) The role of the microbiome of truffles in aroma formation: a meta-analysis approach. Appl Environ Microbiol 81(20):6946–6952. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01098-15
Wan SP, Liu PG (2014) Diversity of culturable bacteria associated with Ascocarps of a Chinese white truffle, Tuber panzhihuanense (Ascomycota). Plant Divers Res 36:29–36
Wan SP, Yu FQ, Tang L, Wang R, Wang Y, Liu PG, Wang XH, Zheng Y (2015a) Ectomycorrhizae of Tuber huidongense and T. liyuanum with Castanea mollissima and Pinus armandii. Mycorrhiza 26(3):249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-015-0663-2
Wan SP, Zheng Y, Tang L, Wang R, Liu PG, Yu FQ (2015b) Diversity of culturable bacteria associated with Tuber panzhihuanense-Pinus armandii Ectomycorrhizosphere soil. Plant Divers Res 37(06):861–870
Wang YA, Zhao XS, Yin BZ, Zhen WC, Guo JT (2015) Biochemical defenses induced by mycorrhizae fungi Glomus Mosseae in controlling strawberry Fusarium wilt. Open Biomed Eng J 9(1):301–304. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874120701509010301
Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP (2012) Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 486:222–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11053
Zhang L, Kang M, Huang Y, Yang L (2016) Fungal communities from the calcareous deep-sea sediments in the Southwest India ridge revealed by Illumina sequencing technology. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32(5):78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2030-7
Zhou J, Wei H (2013) rDNA-ITS sequence analysis identify truffle-associated Fungi. J Xinyang Normal Univ
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for providing linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Support Project in Sichuan Province (2016NYZ0040) and the Sichuan Mushroom Innovation Team.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This research does not involve human participants and/or animals.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, M., Zou, J., Liu, C. et al. Chinese white truffles shape the ectomycorrhizal microbial communities of Corylus avellana. Ann Microbiol 69, 553–565 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-019-1445-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-019-1445-4