Skip to main content
  • Original paper
  • Published:

Distribution of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes among nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Bulgaria

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of type III effector proteins (ExoS, ExoU, ExoT and ExoY)-encoding genes among clonally unrelated nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains and to analyze their distribution in respect to the infection site and antimicrobial resistance. Polymerase chain reaction-based detection of the genes was performed on 176 non-duplicate P. aeruginosa isolates from three University hospitals in Sofia, previously genotyped by random amplified polymorphic DNA technique. The prevalence of the studied genes was as follows: exoS–61.9%, exoU–32.4%, exoT–100%, and exoY–85.8%. The part of P. aeruginosa strains harboring either the exoS (54.0%) or the exoU (23.8%) gene was higher (P < 0.001) than that of isolates containing both genes (8.5%). The gene dissemination varied according to the infection localization. The exoU gene manifested a higher spread (P < 0.001) among multidrug-resistant (MDR) than in non-MDR strains (42.6 vs 18.7%). In conclusion, the P. aeruginosa type III secretion system is present in nearly all studied isolates but the individual isolates from distinct infection sites differ in their effector genotypes. The ubiquity of type III effector proteins-encoding genes among clinical isolates is consistent with an important role for this system in P. aeruginosa pathogenesis.

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a major cause of hospital-acquired infections and the most significant pulmonary pathogen in cystic fibrosis patients (Pinheiro et al. 2008; Rajan and Saiman 2002). P. aeruginosa is responsible for 10–15% of nosocomial infections worldwide (Blanc et al. 1998). It is not surprising that these illnesses are associated with significant morbidity and mortality due to the organism’s capacity to adapt easily to changes in the environment, to rapidly develop resistance to antibiotics, and to produce an arsenal of virulence factors (Strateva 2008).

To cause such a severe disease, P. aeruginosa utilizes a large number of secreted and cell-associated virulence factors (Van Delden and Iglewski 1998). An important and recently recognized virulence determinant is the complex type III secretion system which injects effector proteins into host cells (Hauser 2009). The genes encoding the secretion, translocation and regulatory machinery of this system are clustered together in the 55-min region of the P. aeruginosa chromosome (http://www.pseudomonas.com).

In contrast to the clustered genes encoding the type III transport machinery, the genes encoding the type III effector proteins appear to be scattered throughout the chromosome (Stover et al. 2000). To date, four effector proteins have been identified: ExoS (exoenzyme S), ExoU (exoenzyme U), ExoT (exoenzyme T) and ExoY (exoenzyme Y) (Engel and Balachandran 2009). ExoS and ExoT are closely related bifunctional proteins with N-terminal GTPase-activating protein activity toward Rho family proteins and C-terminal ADP ribosylase activity toward distinct and non-overlapping set of targets (Goehring et al. 1999; Krall et al. 2000). ExoY is an adenylate cyclase that increases intracellular levels of cAMP (Yahr et al. 1998). Intoxication with ExoS, ExoT and ExoY causes cell rounding and detachment and may contribute to infection by inhibiting or preventing bacterial uptake and phagocytosis (Vallis et al. 1999). ExoU possesses phospholipase A2 and lysophospholipase activities (Phillips et al. 2003; Tamura et al. 2004) that lead to rapid necrotic death in many cell types (Finck-Barbancon et al. 1997; Vallis et al. 1999). It is also associated with accelerated lung injury, and plays a role in the development of septic shock (Allewelt et al. 2000; Kurahashi et al. 1999).

Interestingly, the genes encoding some P. aeruginosa type III effector proteins are found in some isolates but not in others (Feltman et al. 2001). The distribution of these genes amongst clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa remains to be elucidated. Furthermore, the frequency of effector genes in populations of isolates from different disease sites has not been thoroughly examined. For that reason, the aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes among nosocomial P. aeruginosa isolates and to analyze the values in respect to the infection localization and antimicrobial resistance.

Materials and methods

Bacterial isolates

A total of 176 nosocomial isolates of P. aeruginosa was used in the present study. They were cultured during 2001–2009 from hospitalized patients (n = 176) of different types of ward in three University hospitals in Sofia and were obtained as follows: from urine (n = 67), tracheal aspirates (n = 26), bronchial lavage (n = 12), sputum (n = 12), pleural fluid (n = 2), surgical wounds or abscesses (n = 29), blood (n = 8), nose (n = 9), throat (n = 8), and bile (n = 3). Bacterial identification was performed using a BBL Enteric/Nonfermenter ID system (Becton Dickinson).

Definition of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates

MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were defined as resistant to one or more representatives of at least three antibiotic classes with antipseudomonal activity (β-lactams, aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones) (Wang et al. 2006; Pagani et al. 2005; Kirikae et al. 2008), using the conventional serial agar dilution method. The minimal inhibitory concentrations were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2007 guide-line (CLSI 2007).

DNA isolation

Bacterial DNA isolation was performed from a single colony on Brucella sheep blood agar using the illustra bacteria genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The DNA concentration range was about 8 μg/ml.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes

The genes were amplified with specific primers (Alpha DNA) listed in Table 1. PCR was carried out with 2 μl template DNA, 0.25 μM of each primer, 0.2 mM deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates, 1× reaction buffer, 2 mM MgCl2 and 1.5 U Prime Taq DNA polymerase (GeNet Bio) in a total volume of 25 μl. The DNA was amplified using the following protocol: initial denaturation (94°C for 5 min), followed by 25–30 cycles of denaturation (94°C for 35–45 s), annealing (58–64°C, from 45 s to 50 s), and extension (72°C, from 45 s to 1 min 30 s), with a single final extension of 7 min at 72°C. PCR products were separated in 1.5% agarose gel for 50–110 min at 130 V, stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/ml) and detected by UV transillumination (wavelength 312 nm). Amplified genes were identified on the basis of fragment size (also shown in Table 1).

Table 1 Primers used for amplification and sequencing of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes

DNA sequencing

Selected exoS (n = 10) and exoU (n = 10) PCR products amplified from different P. aeruginosa isolates were purified by an ExoSAP-IT reagent (Amersham Biosciences). Sequencing reactions were performed using the sequencing primers listed in Table 1 (Strateva 2008), the primers for amplification and a BigDye terminator v3.1 kit (Applera) in an automated sequencer (ABI 310 sequence genetic analyzer; Applied Biosystems). The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences were analyzed with software available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The GenBank accession numbers of the published sequences are: AY029250 (P. aeruginosa exoS gene) and U97065 (P. aeruginosa ExoU operon).

Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis

RAPD was performed with Ready-To-Go RAPD Analysis Beads (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. The amplifications were carried out with 2 μl DNA and 1 μl primer (RAPD-4 5′-AAGAGCCCGT-3′) in a total volume of 25 μl. The following protocol was applied: 1 cycle of 5 min at 95°C, followed by 45 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 95°C, annealing of primers for 1 min at 36°C ,and elongation for 2 min at 72°C. The amplifications products were compared by electrophoresis of 10-μl samples in 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and photographed under UV light. The bends generated were analyzed using Dice coefficient (similarity coefficient, SAB) for every pair of isolates. Isolates with SAB value of >70% are considered to be closely related. Two E. coli strain (BL21 (DE3) and C1a) DNAs were used as controls to assay the ability of the RAPD beads to amplify DNA and identify polymorphisms. The control DNAs were genotyped by both RAPD-4 and RAPD-2 (5′-GTTTCGCTCC-3′) primers.

Statistical analysis

The distribution of virulence genes with respect to isolate origin was compared using Student’s t test. A P value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results and discussion

Evaluation of clonal relatedness of the studied P. aeruginosa isolates by RAPD typing

A total of 176 P. aeruginosa nosocomial strains isolated during an 8-year period were analyzed by RAPD typing. RAPD fingerprints demonstrated that most strains were of distinct genotype and determined the presence of 106 RAPD patterns. A large number of bands (with size from 130 to 2,200 bp) were generated by the RAPD-4 primer. Eleven strains revealed unique RAPD profiles. A few strains were closely related (SAB > 70%)-9 nosocomial P. aeruginosa isolates from 4 different clinics of the University hospital No 1 (with SAB value of 82%-Fig. 1), 14 isolates from the Neonatology clinic (86%) and 8 isolates from the Urology clinic (82.6%) of the University hospital No 2. In summary, the RAPD analysis confirmed the significant diversity of the strains included in the present study.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) of P. aeruginosa isolates generated with RAPD-4 primer. Lanes: K1 RAPD profile of the reference strain E. coli BL21 (DE3) generated with RAPD-2 primer, K2 RAPD profile of the reference strain E. coli C1a generated with RAPD-2 primer, M standard size marker (100-bp ladder), 1–17 nosocomial P. aeruginosa isolates. Lanes 2–8, 10 and 11 show the RAPD profiles of nine closely related strains (SAB value of 82%) from four different clinics

Overall prevalence of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes

The frequencies of occurrence of these genes detected by PCR in all studied strains (n = 176) were as follows: exoS–61.9%, exoU–32.4%, exoT–100%, and exoY–85.8%. The sequences of the exoS and exoU genes amplified from different isolates were identical for all examined isolates and 100% identical to the known sequences (AY029250 and U97065, respectively). The prevalence of three genes (exoS, exoU and exoY) was similar to that ascertained by Feltman et al. (2001), respectively 72, 28 and 89%, among clinical P. aeruginosa isolated in USA during 1999–2000. The absolute presence of exoT was not surprising. Several recent studies reported a very high prevalence of this gene among clinical and environmental isolates of P. aeruginosa (Feltman et al. 2001; Lomholt et al. 2001; Winstanley et al. 2005).

The majority of the 176 strains included in our study (47.2%) exhibited a combination of exoS, exoT and exoY; 21% possessed a combination of exoU, exoT and exoY (Table 2). The part of P. aeruginosa strains containing either the exoS (54.0%) or the exoU gene (28.3%) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the part of isolates harboring both genes exoS+exoU (8.5%). Previously, Feltman et al. (2001) reported that of 115 P. aeruginosa clinical and environmental isolates, 82 contained the exoS but not the exoU gene, 31 contained the exoU but not the exoS gene and a single contained both genes. Two recent studies demonstrated a very low frequency of occurrence of P. aeruginosa bloodstream isolates harboring both genes, respectively 2.2 and 1.6% (Berthelot et al. 2003; Garey et al. 2008). Winstanley et al. (2005) established a similar find among P. aeruginosa isolates associated with ulcerative keratitis. In a recent multicenter study conducted by Pirnay et al. (2009), 72.6% of all P. aeruginosa isolates harbored the exoS gene, 23.1% contained the exoU gene and with the exception of three strains, the carriage of exoU and exoS was mutually exclusive. In contrast, Finnan et al. (2004) found 75% dissemination of both genes in clinical and environmental P. aeruginosa isolates.

Table 2 Distribution of the exo gene patterns among nosocomial P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 176)

Prevalence of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes with respect to the infection localization

The distribution of virulence genes encoding the type III effector proteins varied in respect to the infection localization (Table 3).

  1. (1)

    The presence of exoS was the highest among P. aeruginosa isolates from blood (87.5%) and significantly different only with those obtained from in-patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) (53.8%)-P < 0.02.

  2. (2)

    The exoU frequencies were the most expressive in the wound (51.7%) and LRTIs P. aeruginosa isolates (40.4%). They were significantly higher than those of the isolates from urine (19.4%), P < 0.01 and P < 0.02, respectively, and blood (12.5%), P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively.

  3. (3)

    The exoY gene was disseminated among all studied isolates from blood, which was higher than the exoY-distribution in P. aeruginosa isolates from urine (85.1%, P < 0.001), LRTIs (82.7%, P < 0.01) and wound (82.8%, P < 0.02).

Table 3 Prevalence (as percentage) of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes in nosocomial P. aeruginosa isolates, in respect to the infection site

The prevalence of the exoS among our LRTIs-isolates (53.8%) was lower than that in LRTIs P. aeruginosa isolates from the studies mentioned above (Lanotte et al. 2004, 80%; Feltman et al. 2001, 75%). ExoS is responsible for direct tissue destruction in lung infection and may be important for bacterial dissemination (Nicas et al. 1985a; b).

In this study, the distribution of the exoU gene was very heterogeneous. The gene was found predominantly in P. aeruginosa isolates from LRTIs and wounds. Its prevalence in our wound isolates (51.7%) was similar to that ascertained by Feltman et al. (2001) in the USA (40.0%). In contrast, Lomholt et al. (2001) reported an absence of the exoU in a small series of 11 wound isolates of P. aeruginosa (Lomholt et al. 2001). Our urine isolates showed a low percentage of exoU carriers (19.4%), while Lomholt et al. did not find urine isolates harboring the exoU gene.

It is known that 90% of ExoU-producing P. aeruginosa strains are associated with severe infections (Hauser et al. 2002). Of the type III secretion proteins, ExoU is the most cytotoxic. Its secretion is a marker for highly virulent P. aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (Schulert et al. 2003).

Prevalence of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes with respect to the antimicrobial resistance

Of the 176 nosocomial P. aeruginosa isolates, 101 (57.4%) were MDR. One of the genes, exoU manifested a significantly higher spread (P < 0.001) among MDR than in non-MDR strains of P. aeruginosa (42.6 vs 18.7%) (Fig. 2). Twelve isolates contained the four studied genes (Table 2), moreover 8 of them were MDR.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prevalence (as percentages) of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes among MDR and non-MDR P. aeruginosa isolates from non-cystic fibrosis patients. MDR multidrug-resisrant, exoS exoenzyme S-encoding gene, exoU exoenzyme U-encoding gene, exoT exoenzyme T-encoding gene, exoY exoenzyme Y-encoding gene

In a recent accomplished study, Garey et al. (2008) determined the prevalence of exoU and exoS from bloodstream isolates of hospitalized patients with P. aeruginosa bacteremia and ascertained that the isolates containing the exoU gene were significantly more resistant (P < 0.05) to different classes of antimicrobials: β-lactams (piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, carbapenems), fluoroquinolones, and aminoglycosides (gentamicin). Other research suggested that the multidrug resistance in ocular P. aeruginosa was more commonly associated with strains having cytotoxicity and exoU gene, and belonging to serotype E (Zhu et al. 2006). Recently, Zaborina et al. (2006) screened consecutively isolated MDR P. aeruginosa clinical strains for their ability to disrupt the integrity of human cultured intestinal epithelial cells (Caco-2) and correlated these findings to related virulence phenotypes such as adhesiveness, motility, biofilm formation and cytotoxicity. These strains were characterized and found to harbor the exoU gene and to display high swimming motility and adhesiveness.

Recently, it was reported the worldwide spread and persistence of MDR clone comprising P. aeruginosa O12 isolates which exhibited the exoS +/exoU genotype (Pirnay et al. 2009). Moreover, most MDR clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa reveal either O11 or O12 serotype (Sekiguchi et al. 2007; Pirnay et al. 2009). Evaluation of the spread of these serotypes among Bulgarian nosocomial MDR P. aeruginosa strains, as well as their corresponding effector genotypes, should be objectives of our future investigations.

Whether MDR P. aeruginosa strains necessarily express a more virulent phenotype continues to remain a controversial issue (Di Martino et al. 2002).

In conclusion, our results suggest that type III secretion genes are found in nearly all investigated P. aeruginosa but that individual isolates from distinct infection sites differ in their effector genotypes. Our data confirm that the exoU and exoS genes are almost mutually exclusive. Nosocomial isolates of P. aeruginosa harboring the exoU gene were more likely to be resistant to multiple antibiotics. The ubiquity of type III effector proteins-encoding genes among clinical isolates is consistent with an important role for this system in human disease. Future studies to determine the prevalence of clinical isolates capable of secreting specific effector proteins and whether secretion correlates with infection prognosis are necessary for evaluation of the type III secretion system in P. aeruginosa pathogenesis.

References

  • Allewelt M, Coleman FT, Grout M, Priebe GP, Pier GB (2000) Acquisition of expression of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU cytotoxin leads to increased bacterial virulence in a murine model of acute pneumonia and systemic spread. Infect Immun 68:3998–4004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berthelot P, Attree I, Plésiat P, Chabert J, de Bentzmann S, Pozzetto B, Grattard F, the Groupe d’Etudes des Septicémies à Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2003) Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of type III secretion system in a cohort of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia isolates: evidence for a possible association between O serotypes and exo genes. J Infect Dis 188:512–518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanc DS, Petignat C, Janin B, Bille J, Francioli P (1998) Frequency and molecular diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa upon admission and during hospitalization: a prospective epidemiologic study. Clin Microbiol Infect 4:242–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • CLSI (2007) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 17th informational supplement, M100-S17. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino P, Gagniere H, Berry H, Bret L (2002) Antibiotic resistance and virulence properties of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from mechanically ventilated patients with pneumonia in intensive care units: comparison with imipenem-resistant extra-respiratory tract isolates from uninfected patients. Microbes Infect 4:613–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel J, Balachandran P (2009) Role of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III effectors in disease. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:61–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feltman H, Schulert G, Khan S, Jain M, Peterson L, Hauser AR (2001) Prevalence of type III secretion genes in clinical and environmental isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiology 147:2659–2669

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finck-Barbancon V, Goranson J, Zhu L, Sawa T, Wiener-Kronish JP, Fleiszig SM, Wu C, Mende-Mueller L, Frank DW (1997) ExoU expression by Pseudomonas aeruginosa correlates with acute cytotoxicity and epithelial injury. Mol Microbiol 25:547–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finnan S, Morrissey JP, O’Gara F, Boyd EF (2004) Genome diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients and the hospital environment. J Clin Microbiol 42:5783–5792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garey KW, Vo QP, Larocco MT, Gentry LO, Tam VH (2008) Prevalence of type III secretion protein exoenzymes and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from bloodstream isolates of patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia. J Chemother 20:714–720

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goehring UM, Schmidt G, Pedersen KJ, Aktories K, Barbieri JT (1999) The N-terminal domain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa exoenzyme S is a GTPase-activating protein for Rho GTPases. J Biol Chem 274:36369–36372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser A (2009) The type III secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: infection by injection. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:654–665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser AR, Cobb E, Bodi M, Mariscal D, Valles J, Engel JN, Rello J (2002) Type III protein secretion is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Crit Care Med 30:521–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirikae T, Mizuguchi Y, Arakawa Y (2008) Investigation of isolation rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with and without multidrug resistance in medical facilities and clinical laboratories in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:612–615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krall R, Schmidt G, Aktories K, Barbieri JT (2000) Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoT is a Rho GTPase-activating protein. Infect Immun 68:6066–6068

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurahashi K, Kajikawa O, Sawa T, Ohara M, Gropper MA, Frank DW, Martin TR, Wiener-Kronish JP (1999) Pathogenesis of septic shock in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. J Clin Invest 104:743–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lanotte P, Watt S, Mereghetti L, Dartiguelongue N, Rastegar-Lari A, Goudeau A, Quentin R (2004) Genetic feature of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients compared with those of isolates from other origins. J Med Microbiol 53:73–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lomholt JA, Poulsen K, Kilian M (2001) Epidemic population structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for a clone that is pathogenic to the eye and that has a distinct combination of virulence factors. Infect Immun 69:6284–6295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicas TI, Bradley J, Lochner JE, Iglewski BH (1985a) The role of exoenzyme S in infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Infect Dis 152:716–721

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nicas TI, Frank DW, Stenzel P, Lile JD, Iglewski BH (1985b) Role of exoenzyme S in chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol 4:175–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pagani L, Colinon C, Migliavacca R, Labonia M, Docquier JD, Nucleo E, Spalla M, Li Bergoli M, Rossolini GM (2005) Nosocomial outbreak caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa producing IMP-13 metallo-β-lactamase. J Clin Microbiol 43:3824–3828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips RM, Six DA, Dennis EA, Ghosh P (2003) In vivo phospholipase activity of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa cytotoxin ExoU and protection of mammalian cells with phospholipase A2 inhibitors. J Biol Chem 278:41326–41332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro MRS, Lacerda HR, Melo RGL, Maciel MA (2008) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: factors relating to mortality with emphasis on resistance pattern and antimicrobial treatment. Braz J Infect Dis 12:509–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pirnay J-P, Bilocq F, Pot B, Cornelis P, Zizi M, Van Eldere J, Deschaght P, Vaneechoutte M, Jennes S, Pitt T, De Voss D (2009) Pseudomonas aeruginosa population structure revisited. PLoS ONE 4:e7740. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan S, Saiman L (2002) Pulmonary infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Semin Respir Infect 17:47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulert GS, Feltman H, Rabin SD, Martin CG, Battle SE, Rello J, Hauser AR (2003) Secretion of the toxin ExoU is a marker for highly virulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia. J Infect Dis 188:1695–1706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sekiguchi J, Asagi T, Miyoshi-Akiyama T, Kasai A, Mizuguchi Y, Araake M, Fujino T, Kikuchi H, Sasaki S, Watari H, Kojima T, Miki H, Kanemitsu K, Kunishima H, Kikuchi Y, Kaku M, Yoshikura H, Kuratsuji T, Kirikae T (2007) Outbreaks of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in community hospitals in Japan. J Clin Microbiol 45:979–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stover CK, Pham XQ, Erwin AL et al (2000) Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen. Nature 406:959–964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strateva T (2008) Microbiological and molecular-genetic investigations on resistance mechanisms and virulence factors in clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PhD dissertation, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria

  • Tamura M, Ajayi T, Allmond LR, Moriyama K, Wiener-Kronish JP, Sawa T (2004) Lysophospholipase A activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secretory toxin ExoU. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 316:323–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vallis AJ, Fink-Barbacon V, Yahr TL, Frank DW (1999) Biological effects of Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III-secreted proteins on CHO cells. Infect Immun 67:2040–2044

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Delden C, Iglewski BH (1998) Cell-to-cell signaling and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Emerg Infect Dis 4:551–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CY, Jerng JS, Cheng KY, Lee LN, Yu CJ, Hsueh PR, Yang PC (2006) Pandrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa among hospitalised patients: clinical features, risk-factors and outcomes. Clin Microbiol Infect 12:63–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley C, Kaye SB, Neal TJ, Chilton HJ, Miksch S, Hart CA, Microbiology Ophthalmic Group (2005) Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates associated with ulcerative keratitis. J Med Microbiol 54:519–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yahr TL, Vallis AJ, Hancock MK, Barbieri JT, Frank DW (1998) ExoY, an adenylate cyclase secreted by the Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:13899–13904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaborina O, Kohler JE, Wang Y, Bethel C, Shevchenko O, Wu L, Turner JR, Alverdy JC (2006) Identification of multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates that are highly disruptive to the intestinal epithelial barrier. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5:14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Conibear TCR, Bandara R, Aliwarga Y, Stapleton F, Willcox MDP (2006) Type III secretion system-associated toxins, proteases, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates associated with keratitis. Curr Eye Res 31:297–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a grant from the Medical University of Sofia (Council of Medical Science, project no. 4/2009, grant no. 20/2009).

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanya Strateva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strateva, T., Markova, B., Ivanova, D. et al. Distribution of the type III effector proteins-encoding genes among nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Bulgaria. Ann Microbiol 60, 503–509 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0079-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-010-0079-3

Keywords