Skip to main content

Volume 69 Supplement 1

Microorganisms: Targets and Tools for Biotechnological Processes Contributions from the International Congress of Biochemistry and Microbiology Applied Technologies (BMAT-2017)

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Microbiological analysis and assessment of biotechnological potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tunisian flours

Abstract

This work was carried out to identify lactic acid bacteria (LAB) from baking wheat flours and to evaluate their technological capabilities for potential incorporation in sourdough process. Six samples of wheat flours obtained from different geographical regions of Tunisia were microbiologically analyzed. Several technological features including acidification, antimicrobial, amylolytic, proteolytic, and antioxidant activities of six selected LAB strains were investigated for future in situ applications. Moreover, LAB were investigated for their ability to produce exopolysaccharides. A total of 45 autochthonous LAB were isolated and identified by genetic analysis of 16S–23S rRNA intergenic transcribed spacer (ITS)-generated patterns ITS-PCR. One of each ITS-PCR pattern was subjected to partial 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and strains were identified as Weissella cibaria, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis, Pediococcus pentosaceus, Pediococcus pentoseus, Pediococcus acidilactici, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus casseliflavus, and Enterococcus faecalis. All tested LAB showed good acidifying ability by decreasing significantly (p < 0.05) the pH of flour extract below 4.0 after 24 h and below 3.0 after 72 h. Pediococcus pentoseus and P. acidilactici presented fermentation quotient (FQ, ratio of lactic and acetic acids) close to the optimal range. All LAB isolates demonstrated extracellular proteolytic activity. Weissella cibaria S25 had the highest radical-scavenging activity with 25.57%. Lactobacillus plantarum S28 demonstrated the highest amylolytic activity (1386 U/mL) followed by P. acidilactici S16 (1086 U/mL). Although, L. plantarum S28 showed the highest production of exopolysaccharides (0.97 g/L). Moreover, varying halo of inhibition was detected against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Aspergillus niger, and Penicillium expansum. This study revealed that autochthonous flour LAB had interesting technological features and thus could be used in sourdough production.

Introduction

Cereals are one of the most important food sources worldwide for both humans and animals. They supply a considerable portion of the nutrients required for growth, well-being, and maintenance of health (FAO 2002; 2014). In the past, many populations of several cultures are directly linked to cereals and thus are recognized by the cereals they eat. This is the case of Mediterranean people who are recognized to be “wheat people” (Alfonzo et al. 2013). Tunisia is placed among the largest wheat per capita consumers in the world with a total of 2.8 million metric tons (MT) per year between 2016 and 2017 (USDA 2016). Moreover, wheat bread is the most popular staple food consumed in Tunisia under different forms such as baker’s yeast bread, tabouna, mlawi, and mtabga (Mamhoud et al. 2016).

However, cereal grains, including wheat, are naturally contaminated by microorganisms (yeast, molds, and bacteria) which can occur in the field during growth, harvest, postharvest, and storage (Eglezos 2010).

During milling, a small fraction of microorganisms initially concentrated in the outer layers of kernels contaminated the flour, and thus during storage, the microbial rate could be enhanced (Berghofer et al. 2003). The microflora composition and the relative species ratio on wheat grains are influenced by several factors including temperature, moisture, physical damage caused by molds, and application of pesticides (Karlsson et al. 2014; Fleurat-Lessard 2017). Several works highlight that flour’s wheat are dominated by fungi. Food spoilage by molds and the occurrence of their mycotoxins constitute a potential health hazard (Čonková et al. 2006).

Among the microorganisms associated with flours, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) play an important role in preserving the balance of microbial flora and enhancing the shelf life of final products by controlling and inhibiting spoilage organisms during fermentation, due to their antimicrobial properties (Dalié et al. 2010; Cizeikiene et al. 2013).

LAB are commonly present in various habitats, including milk and dairy products, vegetables, meat, and cereal products, where fermentation can take place (Giraffa 2014) and they constitute the majority of the rate of the commercial starter cultures (Corsetti and Settanni 2007; De Vuyst et al. 2009; Guyot 2010). LAB have been isolated, identified, and characterized from cereals (Mamhoud et al. 2016) or mature sourdoughs (Digaitiene et al. 2012) or fermented dough (Mhir et al. 2007).

However, few studies were focused on the characterization of LAB isolated from wheat flours (Corsetti et al. 2007; Alfonzo et al. 2013). To our knowledge, there are no previous studies focused on the characterization of LAB isolated from Tunisian wheat flours.

Despite the availability of essential nutrients for LAB growth, the investigation of flour’s LAB content remains difficult and critique because of the low water content (Alfonzo et al. 2013). Indeed, within flours, several LAB species are found in a dormant state (Corsetti et al. 2007). Some studies showed that Lactobacillus and Enterococcus were the most abundant in Italian flours (Corsetti et al. 2007; Robert et al. 2009). The aims of this study were to (i) enumerate total mesophilic aerobic microorganisms, yeasts, fungi, and LAB in flour samples; (ii) isolate, identify, and characterize LAB naturally occurring on Tunisian wheat flour; and (iii) evaluate the technological capabilities of LAB by examining their acidifying ability in a flour extract system, proteolytic, amylolytic, antibacterial, and antifungal activities for a further incorporation as starter in sourdough formulation.

Materials and methods

Sampling and microbiological analyses

Six samples of baking wheat flours were collected from mills situated in different geographical regions of Tunisia (Nabeul, Tunis, Sousse, Djerba, and Sfax), and used for microbiological analysis of total mesophilic aerobic microorganisms, yeasts, molds, and LAB (Table 1). Ten grams of flour was homogenized with 90 mL of sterile peptone water solution (peptone 0.1% and NaCl 0.85%) (Minervini et al. 2015). Total mesophilic aerobic microorganisms, yeasts, and molds were enumerated using the PCA (plate count agar) and SD (Sabouraud dextrose) agar media with chloramphenicol 5%, respectively (Minervini et al. 2015). LAB were enumerated using MRS medium (Man, Rogosa, Sharpe agar) supplemented with 0.01% of cycloheximide (MP Biomedicals) to avoid fungal growth and 0.0025% of bromocresol green (MP Biomedicals). In the presence of acids, the color around the colony changes to yellow.

Table 1 Microflora in flour samples collected from mills located throughout Tunisia (Log CFU/g)

Isolation of lactic acid bacteria

The isolation of lactic acid bacteria was carried by enriching 10 g of each sample into 90 mL of modified-MRS (mMRS) broth (1% maltose, 1% lactose, and 10% yeast extract). Cultures were incubated at 30 °C for 3 days. Then 1 mL of each resulting culture was diluted using decimal dilutions and plated in MRS agar supplemented with 0.0025% of bromocresol green (MP Biomedicals) and 0.01% cycloheximide (MP Biomedicals) and incubated under anaerobic conditions at 30 °C for 48–72 h. Acid-producing bacteria characterized by a yellow zone around each colony were picked and purified on MRS agar. Gram-positive and catalase-negative isolates were restreaked and cultivated into the same agar medium. The pure cultures were maintained in 20% of glycerol (v/v) and conserved at − 80 °C.

DNA extraction, characterization, and molecular identification of lactic acid bacteria

Genomic DNA was extracted according to the method described by Wilson (2001) using CTAB/NaCl method. Bacterial strains were characterized genotypically by profile analysis of the 16S–23S rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region using universal primers (s-d-bact-1494a-20 and s-d-bact-0035-a-15) (Daffonchio et al. 1998). Bacteria strains presenting the same band patterns were clustered in the same ITS-haplotype. One or two representative strains from each cluster have been selected for 16S rDNA gene PCR amplification which was performed using universal primers (s-d-bact-0008-a-S-20 and s-d-bact-1495-a-A20) according to Daffonchio et al. (1998). The two PCR were performed on a thermocycler (BioRad) using this program: 94 °C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 94 °C (45 s), 55 °C (1 min), 72 °C for 2 min, and a final cycle at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR products were separated by electrophoresis through 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 mg/mL).

The 16S rDNA PCR amplicons were purified with Exonuclease-I and Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (Exo-Sap, Fermentas, Life Sciences) based on the manufacturer’s standard protocol. DNA sequencing was performed in an automated capillary DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems 3130XL) using a Big Dye Terminator cycle sequencing Kit V3.1 (Applied Biosystems). Sequence identification to the closet relative taxa of the strains was achieved using BLAST analysis tool (Tamura et al. 2011) in the GenBank DNA database (www.ncbi.nih.gov). Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences was conducted with MEGA-6 software (Tamura et al. 2011). Phylogenetic tree was constructed by using neighbor-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987).

Technological characterization of LAB

Acidification activity

To evaluate the acidification activity of isolated LAB, a sterile flour extract (SFE) was prepared according to the method described by Alfonzo et al. (2013): 200 g of flour was suspended in distilled water (1 L) and sterilized at 121 °C for 20 min. After precipitation, the flour was removed. The supernatant was used as liquid broth in subsequent experiments. Overnight LAB cultures on MRS broth were centrifuged (5000 × gram for 5 min) and washed three times with sterile distilled water. LAB cells were inoculated in 50 mL of the solution SFE with 1% (v/v) of bacterial suspension at 109 CFU/mL and incubated at 30 °C. The pH measurements were taken initially, after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of inoculation.

Strains that rapidly and greatly decreased SFE pH were analyzed for their ability to produce lactic and acetic acids, following 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of fermentation. Each resultant sample of acidified SFE (aSFE) was mixed with 1/10 mixture of ethyl-butyric acid 2 mg mL (internal standard), filtered through 0.2-μm filters, and stored at − 80 °C until analysis. A system composed of a 7020A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA) connected to a mass spectrometry (MS) 5975N detector (Agilent) was used to quantify the short chain fatty acids (SCFA). Data were collected with Enhanced ChemStation G1701DA software (Agilent). One microliter was directly injected into the gas chromatograph equipped with a ZB-WAX capillary column (30-mm length by 250-μm internal diameter, with a 0.25-μm film thickness; Agilent) using H2 as the gas carrier, with a constant flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The temperature of the injector was kept at 220 °C, and the injection was performed in splitless mode. Chromatographic conditions were as follows: an initial oven temperature of 50 °C, 5 °C/min up to 180 °C, 1 min at 180 °C, and 20 °C/min up to 220 °C for cleaning the column. The column was directly connected to the MS detector, and the electron impact energy was set to 70 eV. The data collected were in the range of 25 to 250 amu (3.25 scans/s). The organic acids were identified by comparing their mass spectra with those held in the NSIT MS Data Center and 2HP-Wiley 138 library (Agilent) and by comparing their retention times with those of the corresponding standards (volatile free fatty acid mixture CRM46975) purchased from Sigma. The peaks were quantified as the relative total ionic count abundance with respect to the internal standard. The concentration estimated in millimolar of each acid was calculated using linear regression equations (R2 ≥ 0.99) from the corresponding curves of standards obtained with eight different concentrations.

Proteolytic activity

Extracellular proteolytic activity of LAB strains inoculated for 72 h in SFE was measured according to the method described by Miralles et al. (1996) using Azocasein as substrate. Absorbance was measured at 440 nm against a blank containing only the Azocasein. Proteolytic activity was expressed as ΔDO440 × h−1 × mg−1 dry weight.

Antioxidant activity

The antioxidant activity was measured using DPPH according to the method described by Lin and Chang (2000). LAB were harvested by centrifugation at 4400 × gram for 10 min after culture of 18-h incubation at 37 °C. The test was performed on the intact bacterial cells. Cells were washed three times with phosphate buffer solution (PBS 0.85% NaCl, 2.68 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.76 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.4) and resuspended in the same buffer. The sample (0.8 mL) was reacted with 1 mL DPPH solution (0.2 mM in 0.5% ethanol). The control was prepared by using ultra-pure water. The tubes were incubated for 30 min in the dark. Absorbance was measured by spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO) at 517 nm in triplicate. The results are expressed as a percentage of the antiradical activity:

$$ \mathrm{Antioxidant}\ \mathrm{activity}\ \left(\%\right)=\left[\frac{A_{517\mathrm{control}}-{A}_{517\mathrm{sample}}}{A_{517\ \mathrm{control}}}\right]\times 100 $$

Amylolytic activity

The amylolytic activity of LAB was measured using the starch-iodine method, described by Bartkiene et al. (2013).To evaluate this activity, the SFE was enriched with glucose 0.15% in order to enhance the bacterial growth. The absorbance was measured at 670 nm using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO). One unit of a-amylase activity (1 AU) was defined as an amount of enzyme that catalyzes 1-g soluble starch hydrolysis to dextrins in 10 min at 30 °C temperature.

Antimicrobial activity

The antimicrobial activities of LAB were determined against pathogenic bacterial and fungal strains. Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Escherichia coli DH5α, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 were used as indicator strains. These pathogens were grown in brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth at 37 °C. The inhibitory activity was evaluated with spots method. The colonies of LAB were grown in MRS medium incubated for 24 h at 30 °C. The indicator strains were inoculated at 105 CFU/mL in 5 mL of soft agar (containing 0.75% agar) and poured into petri dishes which were then incubated anaerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. Antimicrobial activity was expressed as inhibition diameter zones in millimeter (mm) against the pathological strains. The zone of inhibition was divided as follows: strong inhibitor (d ≥ 15 mm), medium inhibitor (11 ≤ d < 15 mm), and no significant inhibitory effect (d < 11 mm).

The antifungal activity of LAB was evaluated against two fungi Aspergillus niger and Penicillium expansum according to the method described by Whipps (1987). LAB were inoculated on the modified MRS agar (without ammonium citrate and sodium acetate), 2 cm from the edge line of the petri dish and then grown at 30 °C for 48 h. A piece of fungus was placed in the center of the petri dish and then incubated at 25 °C for 2 to 3 days. Control plates were inoculated with fungi only. The antifungal activity of LAB was expressed according to the following formula:

$$ \mathrm{Antifungal}\ \mathrm{activity}\ \left(\%\right)=\left[\frac{R2-R1}{R1}\right]\times 100 $$

R1 is the radial distance developed by fungi in the direction of antagonism and R2 is the radial distance developed by the fungi.

Production of exopolysaccharides

The measurement of the amount of exopolysaccharides was done by the colorimetric test developed by Dubois et al. (1956).The supernatant (0.4 mL) of an overnight culture of LAB strain was mixed with 0.2 mL of phenol solution (5%) and 0.5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid. After incubation in the dark for 30 min, the absorbance was measured at 490 nm against a blank without LAB strain.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were repeated three times and illustrated as the mean values ± standard deviations. Statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics software version 23.0. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Duncan’s test with the significance level set at p < 0.05 to establish the significance of differences between the samples.

Results and discussion

Microflora of wheat flour

Examination of the microbiological quality of wheat flour samples was performed in order to gain a common view about the hygienic quality and microbiological load. The microbial content of flours is composed of mesophilic aerobic bacteria, yeasts, molds, and lactic acid bacteria. The results of microbiological analysis showed that yeasts constituted the major microbiota of the flour samples (Table 1). Yeast counts ranged from 0.30 to 2.57 Log CFU/g, whereas presumptive LAB counts varied from 0.17 to 1.68 Log CFU/g. The mean mesophilic aerobic bacteria counts in all flour samples studied were 1.53 to 2.11 Log CFU/g. All samples were below the maximum acceptable limits of the Codex Alimentarius (FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation), 1995). According to Minervini et al. (2015), LAB-contaminating flour is strongly affected by the endophytic microbiota of cereals, mainly by the plant organs, the cultivars, and the phenological growth stages. A number of plant-associated microorganisms infect grains, and so flours, touching the whole quality of leavened baked goods (De Vuyst et al. 2009; Gobbetti et al. 2014).

Isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria

LAB were isolated from Tunisian wheat flours collected from six different regions (Table 1). Upon enrichment in MRS broth, 113 LAB isolates were initially selected based on their ability to produce acid by the presence of yellow halo surrounding the colonies on MRS-bromocresol green plates and purified. A total of 45 isolates Gram-positive and catalase-negative rods and cocci were kept on MRS agar for further identification.

The isolates were subjected to ITS-PCR amplification analysis and 16S-PCR sequencing. In fact, diverse studies have previously described the efficiency of ITS for inter- and intra-differentiation at the genus/species level (Gürtler and Stanisich 1996) due to the high variability of these spacers. The ITS-PCR amplification generated different patterns (bands ranging from 50 to 1000 base pairs). Comparing the generated patterns of PCR products obtained from the studied isolates, we distinguished nine ITS fingerprints. One representative of each ITS-PCR pattern was subjected to partial sequencing of the 16S rRNA. LAB isolates were identified at species level by 16S rRNA gene sequencing which is generally regarded as a more reliable solution for the classification and identification of LAB (Ehrmann and Vogel 2005). According to the comparison of 16S rDNA sequences with those available in GenBank, all isolates were related to LAB species with sequence homology > 97%. Phylogenetic tree of LAB isolated from wheat flours was constructed based on the 16S rDNA sequences from evolutionary distances by the neighbor-joining method (Fig. 1). LAB identification showed several consistent recognized species that are affiliated to four lactic genotypic groups (Fig. 1). LAB strains were identified to: Weissella cibaria (five strains), Lactobacillus plantarum (eight strains), Lactobacillus brevis (four strains), Pediococcus pentosaceus (ten strains), Pediococcus pentoseus (four strains), Pediococcus acidilactici (four strains), Enterococcus faecium (five strains), Enterococcus casseliflavus (three strains), and Enterococcus faecalis (two strains).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Dendrogram obtained by comparing 16S rDNA sequences of the isolates from Tunisian wheat flours, based on 16S rDNA partial sequences, using the neighbor-joining method. Bootstrap values for a total of 1000 replicates are shown at the nodes of the tree, using MEGA-6. The scale bar corresponds to 0.01 units of the number of base substitutions per site

In our studies, several LAB species found were reported to be associated with bread production, such as wheat grains and flours (Corsetti et al. 2007). In addition, some of LAB species isolated in our wheat flours are naturally found in mature sourdoughs such as L. plantarum (Corsetti and Settanni 2007; Alfonzo et al. 2013) and W. cibaria (Alfonzo et al. 2013). We noted that Pediococcus genus was presented by P. pentosaceus (followed by P. pentoseus and P. acidilactici) as the most commonly isolated bacterium from wheat flours. Pediococcus acidilactici is emerging as a potential probiotic in animal and human (Guerra et al. 2007).

The dominant species of Lactobacillus found from wheat flours was L. plantarum followed by L. brevis. This finding reinforced the concept that L. plantarum has a strong ecological or metabolic adaptability to different habitats (Alfonzo et al. 2013; Minervini et al. 2015). However, these two Lactobacillus species were reported to dominate raw and fermented vegetables (Rhee et al. 2011). Similar findings were noted for P. pentosaceus (Yang and Chang 2010; Swain et al. 2014). Together with L. plantarum and W. cibaria are generally isolated from plants, wheat grains, and fermented wheat products (sourdough) (Corsetti et al. 2007; Trias et al. 2008; Alfonzo et al. 2013). For Enterococcus genus, En. faecium was the most common species presented followed by En. casseliflavus and En. faecalis. In fact, enterococci are normal inhabitants of gastrointestinal tract (Giraffa 2002). The isolated Enterococcus strains were discarded from further studies to avoid risks for antibiotic resistance and virulence gene dissemination which contribute to the pathogenesis of virulent bacteria (Bortolaia et al. 2016). Weissella genus was represented at low occurrence by only W. cibaria species. Recording to our findings, there was no correlation between LAB species and the geographical location of the wheat flour samples.

Assessment of the technological properties of LAB isolates

Acidification activity

In order to select lactic bacteria with technological characteristics relevant for sourdough process, six selected representative LAB species from wheat flour samples were investigated for the acidification capacity to decrease pH of SFE. The results of the acidification activity are shown in Fig. 2. We note that all tested LAB strains presented good acidifying abilities. They were able to decrease the SFE pH significantly (p < 0.05) below 4.0 after 24 h. At 72 h, almost all tested LAB strains acidified the medium below pH 3.0. Except P. acidilactici S16, the remained strains were fast acidifiers revealing a ∆pH (difference between pH before and after inoculation of SFE by strains) around 2.8 after 24 h and a final pH (after 72 h) ranging between 2.0 and 3.0. The acidifying ability of the majority of the identified LAB strains after 24-h, 48-h, and 72-h incubation was similar. Compared to initial pH of incubated culture, L. plantarum S28 showed the rapid acidification ability ∆pH to decrease pH significantly (p < 0.05) of the flour extract broth at 24 h (4.84 ± 0.2). This finding result concurred with previous studies of Ventimiglia et al. (2015) which reported that L. plantarum is the highest acid-producing species of LAB group. It causes rapid acidification of the raw material through the production of organic acid s, mostly lactic acid . Besides, it is an abundant food-related species reported to be common as well for sourdough environments (Corsetti and Settanni 2007). Accordingly, their fast lowering of the pH ability improves safety and organoleptic properties of fermented food products (Hansen 2002).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kinetics of acidification of wheat flour LAB. Histograms are in the order of increasing pH after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h

The concentration of lactic and acetic acids in SFE was carried out on four strains (P. acidilactici, P. pentoseus, L. plantarum, and L. brevis) that displayed interesting technological properties, after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of fermentation (Fig. 3). Lactic acid concentration increased after 48 h for all LAB strains. It reached 5.73–8.36 mg/g. After 72 h, the content increased significantly (p < 0.05) and reached 7.77 mg/g for P. acidilactici and 7.06 mg/g for P. pentoseus. However, we noted a significant (p < 0.05) decline of lactic acid concentration after 72 h for L. plantarum (6.18 mg/g) and L. brevis (6.79 mg/g). Acetic acid production ranged from 0 to 3.87 mg/g after 24 h, and 3.74 to 5.95 mg/g after 72 h. In fact, acetic acid can occur via the citrate metabolism (Zalán et al. 2010) or the degradation of lactic acid produced (Oude Elferink et al. 2001) which may justify the reduction of lactic acid concentration in SFE extract of L. plantarum and L. brevis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Organic acids content of wheat flour LAB (mg/g) after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h

The strains displayed a fermentation quotient (FQ, molar ratio between lactic and acetic acids) varied from 0.84 to 2.38, which is considered to affect the organoleptic features (aroma and texture) and to prevent ripeness and fungi spoilage of final products and so to guarantee longer shelf life (Gobbetti et al. 2000; Datta and Henry 2006). Pediococcus pentoseus S14 and P. acidilactici S16 presented FQ close to the optimal range of 2.0–2.7 suggested by Hammes and Gänzle (1998).

Proteolytic activity

The proteolytic activity of tested LAB was determined by their inoculation in SFE. The extracellular proteolytic activity assessed by azocasein degradation was detected in all flour LAB strains (Fig. 4). Pediococcus pentoseus S14 and L. brevis S12 exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) the highest proteolytic activity (1.51 ± 0.18 and 1.41 ± 0.14, respectively). The extracellular protease activity is known to improve organoleptic features of leavened baked goods by generating small peptides and free amino acids as precursors for flavor development (Cagno et al. 2002; Rizzello et al. 2014). Moreover, the extracellular protease activity is important for the rheology and staleness of breads (Corsetti et al. 2000). Moreover, proteolysis generated small peptides which are important for rapid microbial growth and acidification during fermentation (Cagno et al. 2002). In addition, certain LAB strains are further known to be able to release bioactive peptides from proteins, which are thought to have a role in promoting health (Leroy et al. 2006). This finding revealed the potential use of these LAB in bread making.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Proteolytic (gray) and amylolytic (black) activities of wheat flour LAB

Antioxidant activity

The DPPH scavenging activity of the six LAB strains from flour samples is shown in Fig. 5. The results showed DPPH scavenging activity ranging between 4.39 and 25.57%. Among the tested strains, W. cibaria S25 had significantly (p < 0.05) the highest radical-scavenging activity with a rate of 25.57%, followed by L. brevis S12 with 24.81% and P. pentosaceus S30 with 21.49%. Several authors have reported that the fermentation by lactic acid bacteria with antioxidant activity is considered as one of the most important tool suitable to enhance the functional and the organoleptic potential of several fermented cereal flours (Coda et al. 2012; Rizzello et al. 2013; Curiel et al. 2015).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Antioxidant activity (%) of wheat flour LAB

Amylolytic activity

The biodiversity of amylolytic lactobacilli, ubiquitously used in cereals processing, is quite limited (Reddy et al. 2008). In this work, the in vitro amylolytic activity of the tested LAB was evaluated by starch-iodine method. According to the results presented in Fig. 4, all tested LAB are characterized by starch hydrolysis. They showed amylase activity ranging from 658 ± 13 to 1386 ± 4 U/mL (for 1 g of starch hydrolyzed (SH)) which are equivalent to 6.58 to 13.86 U/ml (for 0.01 g of SH). Lactobacillus plantarum S28 demonstrated significantly (p < 0.05) the highest amylolytic activity (1386 ± 4 U/mL) followed by P. acidilactici S16 (1086 ± 6 U/mL) and P. pentoseus S14 (1046 ± 9 U/mL). These results obtained for the amylolytic activity are in line with the previous reports (Petrova et al. 2010; Amapu et al. 2016). Production of amylase has been described primordially for L. plantarum (Giraud et al. 1994). Besides, the amylolytic activity recorded for tested LAB strains was equivalent to 8–11.5 U/ml reported for amylolytic strains (Petrova et al. 2010). In fact, high amylolytic activity was reported for L. plantarum, P. acidilactici, and L. brevis which are predominant amylase-producing LAB in wet-milled cereals (Amapu et al. 2016). Besides, Sanni et al. (2002) described amylolytic strains of L. plantarum in several traditional amylaceous fermented foods. The potential LAB strain with amylolytic activity could be used as one of the factors to improve the fermentation rate, reduction of dough viscosity with resultant improvements in the volume and texture of the bread for food industries (making of high-density gruels, baking, brewing) (Fossi and Tavea 2013). Ray and Montet (2016) reported that they are also employed in preparing high-energy-density (ED) cereal-based foods for improving dietary starch utilization in infants and small children. On the basis of their technological potentials, the strains L. plantarum S28, P. acidilactici S16, P. pentoseus S14, W. cibaria S25, and L. brevis S12 isolated from wheat flours retain better starch degradation ability. It may develop into starter cultures (sourdoughs) in the making of fermented cereal foods, including bread, to contribute to the enzymatic pool and yield products with a higher fermentable sugar content (Amapu et al. 2016; Hattingh et al. 2015). The hypothesis that the amylolytic activity of strains studied is cell wall-bound and/or produced in cell-free supernatants needs to be verified.

Exopolysaccharide production

The cell-free supernatants of selected LAB strains were examined for the amounts of exopolysaccharide (EPS) yields using phenol-sulfuric acid method. EPS production of each strain was presented in Fig. 6. EPS amount produced by selected LAB isolates ranged from 0.172 to 0.970 g/L. Figure 6 obviously demonstrates that the strains P. acidilactici S16 and L. plantarum S28 showed significantly (p < 0.05) the highest EPS production (0.97 and 0.636 g/L, respectively). Several health benefits have been attributed to EPS from LAB which are used to improve the textural properties of fermented foods (Crescenzi 1995; Ruas-Madiedo et al. 2008). These strains can be used in sourdough and may have applications in bread making.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Exopolysaccharide production (g/L) of wheat flour LAB

Antibacterial activity

In order to select bacterial strains with antibacterial activity, selected LAB were assessed against four pathogens (Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus) as indicator strains. Table 2 gives the results for antibacterial activity of the LAB isolates in terms of inhibition diameter around the spot. All of LAB strains presented aptitude to inhibit the growth of tested pathogens with different percentages. The antibacterial activity was recorded as strong growth inhibition against P. aeruginosa for L. brevis S12 (15 mm), P. pentoseus S14 (16 mm), W. cibaria S25 (17 mm), and mostly for P. pentosaceus S30 (18 mm). Except P. acidilactici S16, the entire tested LAB showed a significant (p < 0.05) moderate antagonistic activity towards E. coli and S. aureus. Lactobacillus brevis S12 and P. pentoseus S14 presented high values of diameter of growth inhibition against S. aureus (14.5 mm) and E. coli (12 mm), respectively. Only L. brevis S12 and P. pentosaceus S30 presented significantly (p < 0.05) a medium growth inhibition activity against E. faecalis with an average of 11 mm. In our case, we observe that the inhibition of microbial growth by the six LAB is due to pH variation on culture media and might be a result of fermentative compounds accumulation. LAB are known to produce a range of metabolic end compounds that are able of interfering with the growth of certain undesirable microbes in food systems (Vandenbergh 1993; Alvarado et al. 2006). In fact, most of the inhibitory activity exhibited by LAB strains was attributed to pH reduction by organic acids. Besides, it is suggested that acid products interfere with permeability of plasmic membrane and raise its diffusion leading to stop metabolic activities and so to the inhibition effect of sensitive microorganisms (Piard and Desmazeaud 1991). So, these findings led to suggest that sourdough and bread produced with these tested LAB strains, showing consistent ability to retard the growth of both pathogen molds and bacteria species, thus have the potential to improve the shelf life of wheat bread.

Table 2 Inhibitory diameter (mm) of neutralized cell-free supernatant of six selected LAB flour isolates

Antifungal activity

All the studied lactic acid bacteria strains, isolated from different wheat flour samples, were assessed for inhibitory activity against two common postharvest fungus Aspergillus niger and Penicillium expansum using a dual culture method. Varying degrees of inhibition were detected against the two molds in vitro (Fig.  7 ). All LAB strains exhibited significant (p < 0.05) inhibitory effects towards the tested fungi. The growth of P. expansum was strongly inhibited by P. pentoseus S14 with an inhibitory rate of 84%. While growth of A. niger was moderately (p < 0.05) inhibited by all the tested LAB isolates from 16.7 to 36.1% of inhibition. Almost all strains, especially L. plantarum S28 and P. acidilactici S16, showed radial (p < 0.05) growth reductions against P. expansum and A. niger by an average of 36% and 25%, respectively. Penicillium expansum was the most sensitive strain in dual culture method. Dal Bello et al. (2007) and Djossou et al. (2011) reported that L. plantarum isolated from sourdough and plant materials is known by its antifungal activity. This study revealed that Tunisian wheat flours included autochthonous and selected LAB of interesting technological features relevant to sourdough production. In fact, the obtained results might be helpful to use a mixed starter culture including L. plantarum, L. brevis, P. acidilactici, and P. pentoseus for producing sourdough bread.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Antifungal inhibition (%) of wheat flour LAB against Aspergillus niger and Penicillium expansum

References

  • Alfonzo A, Ventimiglia G, Corona O, Di Gerlando R, Gaglio R, Francesca N, Moschetti G, Settanni L (2013) Diversity and technological potential of lactic acid bacteria of wheat flours. Food Microbiol 36(2):343–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado C, García Almendárez BE, Martin SE, Regalado C (2006) Food-associated lactic acid bacteria with antimicrobial potential from traditional Mexican foods. Rev Latinoam Microbiol 48(3–4):260–268

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amapu TY, Ameh JB, Ado SA, Abdullahi IO, Dapiya HS (2016) Amylolytic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wet milled cereals, cassava flour and fruits. British Microbiology Research Journal 13(2):1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2016/24509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartkiene E, Jakobsone I, Juodeikiene G, Vidmantiene D, Pugajeva I, Bartkevics V (2013) Study on the reduction of acrylamide in mixed rye bread by fermentation with bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances producing lactic acid bacteria in combination with Aspergillus niger glucoamylase. Food Control 30:35–40

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berghofer LK, Hocking AD, Miskelly D, Jansson E (2003) Microbiology of wheat and flour milling in Australia. Int J Food Microbiol 85(1):137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00507-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolaia V, Espinosa-Gongora C, Guardabassi L (2016) Human health risks associated with antimicrobial-resistant enterococci and Staphylococcus aureus on poultry meat. Clin Microbiol Infect 22(2):130–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cagno RD, Angelis MD, Lavermicocca P, Vincenzi MD, Giovannini C, Faccia M, Gobbetti M (2002) Proteolysis by sourdough lactic acid bacteria: effects on wheat flour protein fractions and gliadin peptides involved in human cereal intolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 68(2):623–633

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cizeikiene D, Juodeikiene G, Paskevicius A, Bartkiene E (2013) Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria against pathogenic and spoilage microorganism isolated from food and their control in wheat bread. Food Control 31(2):539–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.12.004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coda R, Rizzello CG, Pinto D, Gobbetti M (2012) Selected lactic acid bacteria synthesize antioxidant peptides during sourdough fermentation of cereal flours. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(4):1087–1096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Čonková E, Laciaková A, ŠtyriakI CL, Wilczinska G (2006) Fungal contamination and the levels of mycotoxins (DON and OTA) in cereal samples from Poland and East Slovakia. Czech J Food Sci 24:33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti A, Gobbetti M, De Marco B, Balestrieri F, Paoletti F, Russi L, Rossi J (2000) Combined effect of sourdough lactic acid bacteria and additives on bread firmness and staling. J Agric Food Chem 48(7):3044–3051. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf990853e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti A, Settanni L (2007) Lactobacilli in sourdough fermentation. Food Res Int 40(5):539–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2006.11.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corsetti A, Settanni L, Chaves López C, Felis GE, Mastrangelo M, Suzzi G (2007) A taxonomic survey of lactic acid bacteria isolated from wheat (Triticum durum) kernels and non-conventional flours. Syst Appl Microbiol 30(7):561–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2007.07.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi V (1995) Microbial polysaccharides of applied interest: ongoing research activities in Europe. Biotechnol Prog 11(3):251–259. https://doi.org/10.1021/bp00033a002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curiel JA, Pinto D, Marzani B, Filannino P, Farris GA, Gobbetti M, Rizzello CG (2015) Lactic acid fermentation as a tool to enhance the antioxidant properties of Myrtus communis berries. Microb Cell Factories 7(14):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0250-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daffonchio D, Borin S, Frova G, Manachini PL, Sorlini C (1998) PCR fingerprinting of whole genomes: the spacers between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes and of intergenic tRNA gene regions reveal a different intraspecific genomic variability of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus licheniformis. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48:107–116. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-48-1-107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dal Bello F, Clarke CI, Ryan LAM et al (2007) Improvement of the quality and shelf life of wheat bread by fermentation with the antifungal strain Lactobacillus plantarum FST 1.7. J Cereal Sci 45:309–318. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6120110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dalié DKD, Deschamps AM, Richard-Forget F (2010) Lactic acid bacteria – potential for control of mould growth and mycotoxins: a review. Food Control 21:370–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2009.07.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Datta R, Henry M (2006) Lactic acid: recent advances in products, processes and technologies — a review. J Chem Technol Biotech 81(7):1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Vuyst L, Vrancken G, Ravyts F, Rimaux T, Weckx S (2009) Biodiversity, ecological determinants, and metabolic exploitation of sourdough microbiota. Food Microbiol 26(7):666–675

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Digaitiene A, Ås H, Juodeikiene G, Eidukonyte D, Josephsen J (2012) Lactic acid bacteria isolated from rye sourdoughs produce bacteriocin-like inhibitory substances active against Bacillus subtilis and fungi. J Appl Microbiol 112(4):732–742. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05249.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Djossou O, Perraud-Gaime I, Mirleau FL, Rodriguez-Serrano G, Karou G, Niamke S, Ouzari I, Boudabous A, Roussos S (2011) Robusta coffee beans post-harvest microflora: Lactobacillus plantarum sp. as potential antagonist of Aspergillus carbonarius. Anaerobe 17(6):267–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PT, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28(3):350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eglezos S (2010) Microbiological quality of wheat grain and flour from two mills in Queensland, Australia. J Food Prot 73(8):1533–1536. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-73.8.1533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrmann MA, Vogel RF (2005) Molecular taxonomy and genetics of sourdough lactic acid bacteria. Trends Food Sci Technol 16(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02955-13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation) (1995b) Norme codex pour la semoule et la farine de blé dur, CODEX STAN 178–1991, −Rév. 1–1995 : p. 4

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation) (2002) World agriculture: towards 2015/2030. Summary Report. FAO, Rome

  • FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation) (2014) Statistical book. www.fao.org/economic

  • Fleurat-Lessard F (2017) Integrated management of the risks of stored grain spoilage by seedborne fungi and contamination by storage mould mycotoxins – an update. J Stored Prod Res 71:22–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossi BT, Tavea F (2013) Application of amylolytic Lactobacillus fermentum 04BBA19 in fermentation for simultaneous production of thermostable alpha-amylase and lactic acid. R and D for food, health and livestock Purposes, chapter 27. https://doi.org/10.5772/50456

  • Giraffa G (2002) Enterococci from foods. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:163–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giraffa G (2014) Overview of the ecology and biodiversity of the LAB. In: Holzapfel WH and Wood BJB Lactic acid bacteria – biodiversity and taxonomy. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. pp. 45–54

  • Giraud E, Champailler A, Raimbault M (1994) Degradation of raw starch by a wild amylolytic strain of Lactobacillus plantarum. J Appl Environ Microbiol 60(12):4319–4323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gobbetti M, Lavermicocca P, Minervini F, De Angelis M, Corsetti A (2000) Arabinose fermentation by Lactobacillus plantarum in sourdough with added pentosans and alphaalpha-L-arabinofuranosidase: a tool to increase the production of acetic acid. J Appl Microbiol 88(2):317–324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gobbetti M, Rizzello CG, Di Cagno R, De Angelis M (2014) How the sourdough may affect the functional features of leavened baked goods. Food Microbiol 37:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.04.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guerra NP, Agrasar AT, Macías CL, Bernárdez PF, Castro LP (2007) Dynamic mathematical models to describe the growth and nisin production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis CECT 539 in both batch and re-alkalized fed-batch cultures. J Food Eng 82(2):103–113. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/290286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gürtler V, Stanisich VA (1996) New approaches to typing and identification of bacteria using the 16S-23S rDNA spacer region. Microbiology (Reading, England) 142:3–16. https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-142-1-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guyot JP (2010) Fermented cereal products. In: Tamang JP, Kailasapathy K (eds) Fermented foods and beverages of the world. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, New York, pp 247–261

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hammes WP and Gänzle MG (1998) Sourdough breads and related products. In: Wood BJB (ed) Microbiology of fermented foods Blackie Academic and Professional (London), pp 199–216

  • Hansen EB (2002) Commercial bacterial starter cultures for fermented foods of the future. Int J Food Microbiol 78(1):119–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hattingh M, Alexander A, Meijering I, Van Reenan CA, Dicks LMT (2015) Amylolytic strains of Lactobacillus plantarum isolated from barley. Afr J Biotechnol 14(4):310–318. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2014.14149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson I, Friberg H, Steinberg C, Persson P (2014) Fungicide effects on fungal community composition in the wheat phyllosphere. PLoS One 9(11):e111786

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy F, Verluyten J, De Vuyst L (2006) Functional meat starter cultures for improved sausage fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 106(3):270–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin MY, Chang FJ (2000) Antioxidative effect of intestinal bacteria Bifidobacterium longum ATCC 15708 and Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356. Dig Dis Sci 45(8):1617–1622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mamhoud A, Nionelli L, Bouzaine T, Hamdi M, Gobbetti M, Rizzello CG (2016) Selection of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tunisian cereals and exploitation of the use as starters for sourdough fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 225(Supplement C):9–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mhir S, Mejri M, Hamdi M (2007) Microflora distribution and species ratio of Tunisian fermented doughs for bakery industry. Afr J Biotechnol 6(18):2122. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2007.000-2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minervini F, Celano G, Lattanzi A, Tedone L, De Mastro G, Gobbetti M, De Angelis M (2015) Lactic acid bacteria in durum wheat flour are endophytic components of the plant during its entire life cycle. Appl Environ Microbiol 81(19):6736–6748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Miralles MC, Flores J, Perez-Martinez G (1996) Biochemical tests for the selection of Staphylococcus strains as potential meat starter cultures. Food Microbiol 13(3):227–236. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1996.0028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oude Elferink SJ, Krooneman J, Gottschal JC, Spoelstra SF, Faber F, Driehuis F (2001) Anaerobic conversion of lactic acid to acetic acid and 1, 2-propanediol by Lactobacillus buchneri. Appl Environ Microbiol 67(1):125–132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Piard JC, Desmazeaud M (1991) Inhibiting factors produced by lactic acid bacteria. 1. Oxygen metabolites and catabolism end-products. Lait 71(5):525–541. https://doi.org/10.1051/lait:1991541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrova P, Emanuilova M, Petrov K (2010) Amylolytic Lactobacillus strains from Bulgarian fermented beverage boza. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 65(3–4):218–224. https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2010-3-409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray RC, and Montet D (2016) Amylolytic lactic acid Bacteria: microbiology and technological interventions in food fermentations. In: Fermented foods. CRC Press. Part I, pp 142–159

  • Reddy G, Md A, Naveena BJ, Venkateshwar M, Vijay KE (2008) Amylolytic bacterial lactic acid fermentation: a review. Biotechnol Adv 26:22–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.07.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee SJ, Lee JE, Lee CH (2011) Importance of lactic acid bacteria in Asian fermented foods. Microb Cell Factories 10(Suppl 1):S5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello CG, Coda R, Macías DS, Pinto D, Marzani B, Filannino P, Giuliani G, Paradiso VM, Di Cagno R, Gobbetti M (2013) Lactic acid fermentation as a tool to enhance the functional features of Echinacea spp. Microb Cell Factories 4:12–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzello CG, Curiel JA, Nionelli L, Vincentini O, Di Cagno R, Silano M, Gobbetti M, Coda R (2014) Use of fungal proteases and selected sourdough lactic acid bacteria for making wheat bread with an intermediate content of gluten. Food Microbiol 37:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2013.06.017

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robert H, Gabriel V, Fontagné-Faucher C (2009) Biodiversity of lactic acid bacteria in French wheat sourdough as determined by molecular characterization using species-specific PCR. Int J Food Microbiol 135(1):53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.07.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruas-Madiedo P, Abraham A, Mozzi F, de los Reyes-Gavilán CG (2008) Functionality of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. In: Mayo B, Ĺopez P, Pérez-Martínez G (eds) Molecular aspects of lactic acid bacteria for traditional and new applications. Research Signpost, Kerala, India, pp 137–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4(4):406–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanni AI, Morlon-Guyot J, Guyot JP (2002) New efficient amylase-producing strains of Lactobacillus plantarum and L fermentum isolated from different Nigerian traditional fermented foods. Int J Food Microbiol 72(1):53–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swain MR, Anandharaj M, Ray R, Parveen Rani R (2014) Fermented fruits and vegetables of Asia: a potential source of probiotics. Biotechnol Res Int 2014:19. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/250424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28(10):2731–2739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Trias R, Bañeras L, Montesinos E, Badosa E (2008) Lactic acid bacteria from fresh fruit and vegetables as biocontrol agents of phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Int Microbiol 11(4):231–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2016) Tunisia: Grain and Feed Annual. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. GAIN Report Number: TS1604. https://www.fas.usda.gov/data/tunisia-grain-and-feed-annual 

  • Vandenbergh PA (1993) Lactic acid bacteria, their metabolic products and interference with microbial growth. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12(1):221–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.1993.tb00020.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ventimiglia G, Alfonzo A, Galluzzo P, Corona O, Francesca N, Caracappa S, Moschetti G, Settanni L (2015) Codominance of Lactobacillus plantarum and obligate heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria during sourdough fermentation. Food Microbiol 51(Supplement C):57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2015.04.011

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whipps JM (1987) Effect of media on growth and interactions between a range of soil-borne glasshouse pathogens and antagonistic fungi. New Phytol 107(1):127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K (2001) Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. Curr Protoc Mol Biol, Chapter 2: Unit 2.4. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142727.mb0204s56

  • Yang EJ, Chang HC (2010) Purification antifungal compound of a new produced by Lactobacillus plantarum AF1 isolated from kimchi. Int J Food Microbiol 139(1):56–63

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zalán Z, Hudáček J, Štětina J, Chumchalová J, Halász A (2010) Production of organic acids by Lactobacillus strains in three different media. Eur Food Res Technol 230(3):395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Aurelie sauvager (CORINT, UMR CNRS ISCR 6226, UFR Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université Rennes 1, France) is acknowledged for her technical help.

Funding

This work was supported by the Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (LR10CBBC02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hadda-Imene Ouzari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Statement of informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nachi, I., Fhoula, I., Smida, I. et al. Microbiological analysis and assessment of biotechnological potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Tunisian flours. Ann Microbiol 69, 29–40 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1365-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1365-8

Keywords