Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Toxicity evaluation of Aphidicidal crystalliferous toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis strains: a molecular study

Abstract

Purpose

Aphis gossypii and A. punicae are the most damaging pests. The emergence of large populations has created concern among farmers because this pest complex is considered critical as it has a significant effect on major crops around the globe. The lack of new technologies for the control of A. gossypii and A. punicae is also worrying due to the indiscriminate use of chemical insecticides. Besides, this leads to the rapid development of resistance, which strangles their control in the field. Hence, there is a dire need to find the effective biocontrol agent for the management of Aphis gossypii and A. punicae.

Methods

The present investigation emphasizes the isolation and characterization of Aphidicidal Bacillus thuringiensis from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Karnataka, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, and Sikkim soil samples. Phase contrast and scanning electron microscopy analysis used to characterize and identify the crystal morphology. Molecular profiling of Bt cry genes was determined by PCR using aphidicidal cry gene-specific primers, and molecular cloning and sequencing were carried out. Protein profiling by SDS–PAGE analysis was further studied. Finally, a qualitative bioassay of insecticidal activity was carried out against A. gossypii and A. punicae.

Results

A total of 65 Bacillus-like colonies were screened; 15 putative Aphidicidal B. thuringiensis isolates were identified based on morphological as well as through microbiological studies. Spherical and amorphous crystal inclusion was predominantly present in 34.28% of the Bt isolates. Crystal protein profiling of Bt isolates by SDS–PAGE analysis showed the presence 130, 73, 34, 25, and 13 kDa bands, among which 50−66 kDa bands were present abundantly. The detection of the cry gene of these isolates was done by PCR analysis, which indicated that cry1, cry2A, cry3A, and cry11A were on plasmid DNA. All cry genes were 80–100% homologous when aligned on alignment tool NCBI-BLASTn and BLASTp. All isolates of Bt were tested for their insecticidal activity against aphids. Three of the 15 isolates are Aphidicidal toxin specific by PCR analysis which were observed to be toxic to Aphis gossypii and A. punicae at a concentration of 35 μg/mL. The observed physical changes were induced by B. thuringiensis infection; these strains had been re-isolated from the dead aphids, and the presented results fulfilled Koch’s postulates.

Conclusion

The present study brought promising Bt isolates, primarily capable of creating an efficient biocontrol agent for Aphis gossypii and A. punicae and various sucking pests soon.

Introduction

Aphids are small sap-sucking insects belong to the insect order Hemiptera, Aphidoidea superfamily (Latreille 1802). Aphid species are major plagues of agricultural, horticultural, and ornamental plants. Aphids damage the crops and reduce farm yields in several ways (Sorensen 2009). An aphid infests extreme damage to leaves and shoots, additionally causing damage to plant growth. They also act as vectors in the transmission of plant viruses (Whitfield et al. 2015). In recent years, the control of aphids with chemical insecticides has become more difficult because aphids have developed resistance to many insecticides (Rousselin et al. 2017). The development of microbial biocontrol agents for aphid use has been typically limited. Currently, more effective means are needed to control the many sap-sucking pests in general and aphids in particular. Advantageously, it would be such an effective means to use specific biological agents. To date, there are no established chemical/biological agents that can effectively control the spread and invasion of plant viruses by aphids, which is why new methods of controlling virus vectors and virus carriers are desperately required. The bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis is the most successful insect pathogen used to control insects. This is currently representing about 2% of the total market for insecticides. Bt is almost exclusively active toward larval stages of various insect orders and destroys the insect by interrupting the septicemia-accompanied midgut tissue eventually leading to insect death (Raymond et al. 2010). To date, more than 766 cry genes have been characterized and grouped from cry1 to cry78 based on the amino acid sequence variations (Crickmore et al. 2020; http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/toxins2.html). Cry toxins are generally considered to be less toxic to the environment. It can be integrated easily into biologically regulated pest management systems. Out of cry78 groups, only cry2, cry3a, and cry4 reported active against potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Walter and English 1995); cry4aa, cry11aa, and cry3a, reported active against pea aphid (Porcar et al. 2009); Vip1Ae-Vip2Ae reported against cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii (Sattar et al. 2011).

Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) is a polyphagous insect distributed globally. Host range includes those in Cucurbitaceae, Malvaceae, Solanaceae, and Rutaceae as well as some ornamental plants such as chrysanthemum (Ebert and Cartwright 1997). The aphid causes direct physical damage by extracting carbohydrates and amino acids from plant phloem and also spreads a variety of virus diseases, including citrus tristeza virus, watermelon mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus, and several potato viruses, resulting in indirect losses to agricultural production. The pomegranate aphid, Aphis punicae Passerini, is distributed throughout the Mediterranean region, the Middle East, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Japan, and Pakistan (Bhagat 2012; Blackman and Eastop 2000; Öztürk et al. 2005; Sugimoto 2011) and is a serious insect pest for pomegranate (Mani and Krishnamoorthy 1995; Öztürk et al. 2005; Ananda et al. 2010).

Aphis gossypii Glover and A. punicae Passerini are devastating pests in agriculture, horticulture, and greenhouse plants. Multiple control strategies, viz biological, chemical, and cultural controls, have proven as a remedy toward these notorious pests. However, the development of insecticidal resistance and the potential threat to human and animal health posed by these chemicals favors biological control. Environmental and human health sustainability requires the discovery of effective biological control strategies and eco-friendly solutions and less use of potentially harmful chemicals. Bt-based insecticides are used for controlling lepidopteron (caterpillar), coleopteran (beetle), and dipteran (mosquitoes) insects but are not useful for controlling aphids. Little work were carried out about Bt effect on A. gossypii. There were no information available on Bt effect on A. punicae. Therefore, attempts were made to isolate native aphidicidal Bt strains with the following objectives: isolation of Bt, morphological and microbiological characterization of putative Bt strains, molecular characterization of Bt strains effective against aphids, cloning of aphidicidal cry gene, and bioinformatics research and bioassay against A. gossypii and A. punicae.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media

B. thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki (HD1) was obtained from the Bacillus thuringiensis genetic stock center (BGSC). At the Bio-pesticide Laboratory (BPL), ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, native B. thuringiensis isolates were chosen from the Bt library (Swamy et al. 2011). The Escherichia coli strain 105 was used for maintaining the cloned gene.

Soil sample collection

After gently removing the top debris in the topsoil using a sterile spatula, 100 grams of soil samples are taken from a depth of 5 cm and placed directly inside the sterile polyethylene covers (10 cm × 5 cm). Labels containing the specifics of the date of collection, the place of collection, the name of the collector, and the description of the place of collection where the sampling was performed were written using a permanent marker and placed inside the polyethylene cover and properly secured. Until further use, the soil samples are processed at 4 °C. No commercial formulation of B. thuringiensis was exposed to sampling areas. We tried to collect soil from as different as possible locations.

Isolation of B. thuringiensis strains

The method of B. thuringiensis isolation from various habitats is defined as follows. In a 100-mL conical flask containing 10 mL of Luria Bertani (LB) broth (10 g of tryptone, 5 g of yeast extract, 10 g of NaCl, and 1 L of distilled water), buffered with 0.25 M sodium acetate, 1 g of soil sample was suspended. The suspension of the soil was rotated for 4 h at 30 °C in a rotary shaker at 250 rpm. The soil suspension was subsequently heated in a water bath at 80 °C for 10 min to remove the vegetative form of most gram-positive bacteria and total gram-negative bacteria. Serial dilutions (10−1 to 10−4) in sterile double-distilled water were made after cooling. One hundred microliters of different dilutions were placed on “LB agar” (10 g peptone 140, 5 g yeast extract, 5 g sodium chloride, 12 g agar) and incubated at 30 °C overnight in a bacteriological incubator. For each dilution, there were three replications. After 24 h, flat chalky white or fried egg colonies were picked up and plated on to medium T3 (per liter: 3 g tryptone, 2 g tryptose, 1.5 g yeast extract, 0.05 M phosphate buffer pH 6.8, and 0.005 g of MnCl2) and incubated at 30 °C before lysis. Using single-colony isolation, all selected colonies were purified and spotted on to the master plate.

Strain maintenance

Putative Bt Isolates are inoculated into 50 mL of Nutrient Broth and incubated in an incubator at spinning 250 rpm at room temperature. Every culture was periodically examined by phase contrast microscopy until lysed, releasing spores and crystals from the population. Then, 1 mL of aliquot was moved to a cryogenic vial and 20% of glycerol was applied. The suspensions have been vortexed, labeled, and stored at − 80 °C.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Bt strains were grown at 30 °C for 3 days in the T3 medium until sporulation was complete as examined with an oil-immersion lens by a light microscope. The spores and crystals were collected at 4 °C for 10 min at 12,000×g by centrifugation, and the precipitate was washed with ice-cold sterilized double-distilled water three times. After the specimens were air-dried overnight, the spore-crystal suspensions were mounted on the aluminum mount and fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4). The samples were then coated with gold in an IB-5 ion coater (LEICA, England); following instructions for the device, SEM observation was performed at a voltage of 15 kV (Zhang et al. 2009).

Oligonucleotides and PCR analysis

PCR analysis using universal and gene-specific primers characterized the existence of aphidicidal cry genes in native Bt strains. Aphidicidal PCR primers’ details are given in Table 1. Total DNA was extracted and purified using the Ferrandis et al. (1999) method described. PCR was performed at a final volume of 50 μl for 250 ng of total B. thuringiensis DNA with 2.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase, 200 nM of each dNTP, and 1 mM of each first 3 mM MgCl2. Amplification was performed in the thermal cycler of Applied Biosystems under the following conditions: 5 min of denaturation at 94 °C followed by 25 amplification cycles with 1-min denaturation at 94 ° C, 45 s of annealing at 45 °C, and 2 min of extension at 72 °C. Upon completion of the 30 cycles, an additional extension phase of 10 min at 72 °C was added. Aphidicidal Bt PCR products are analyzed at 6 V/cm in the TAE buffer (45:1) by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/mL).

Table 1 Primers used to screen Aphidicidal cry genes from native B. thuringiensis isolates

Molecular cloning of Aphidicidal Bt cry-type genes

Using the Fermentas DNA ligation kit (Thermo Scientific, USA), Bt aphidicidal cry gene PCR-amplified products were ligated to the TA-cloning vector pTZ57R/T and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5 α cells using standard protocols (Sambrook and Russell 2001). The transformed cells (50 μl) were spread to X-gal (270 μg/mL), IPTG (120 μg/mL), and ampicillin (100 μg/mL) containing LB agar plates. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for blue and white colonies to be screened overnight. Plasmid mobility, colony PCR, and restriction digestion analysis have confirmed cloning. Each cry gene clone was sequenced at least three times, and a consensus sequence was obtained. Registered Cry sequences have been collected from the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s non-redundant protein database (http:/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Bioassay

Collection of aphids and maintenance of stock culture

The A. gossypii samples used in this work were collected from cotton, okra, cucumber, watermelon, and chili pepper cultivated at the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bengaluru, India (N 12° 58′ E 77° 35′) during rabi season 2018–2019, whereas A. punicae were gathered from the leaves of pomegranates. A. gossypii and A. punicae morphological identification was done by Dr.Asokan, IIHR. Live aphids along with the plant material were transferred to the laboratory, where a single adult female apterous parthenogenetic viviparous was used to establish a stock culture of this material in the laboratory and was maintained on respective hosts under glasshouse conditions at 23–25 °C and 15:9 (L to D) photoperiod with 65 ± 5% relative humidity.

B. thuringiensis toxin preparation

A single colony was suspended in 1 mL of autoclaved water and heated for 15 min at 70 °C to kill vegetative cells, then inoculated in 10 mL of T3–sporulation liquid medium (per liter: 3 g of tryptone, 2 g of tryptose, 1.5 g of yeast extract, 0.05 M sodium phosphate [pH 6.8], and 0.005 g MnCl). The culture was grown overnight at 30 °C with continuous shaking at 250 rpm. This 10 mL Bt was cultured in 100 mL of T3–sporulation liquid medium and incubated for 3 days at 30 °C with continuous shaking at 250 rpm. To monitor external contamination, a regular inspection was performed. Microscopic observation was also performed to verify the completion of the phase of sporulation. The fully sporulated liquid culture was centrifuged for 10 min at 8000 rpm. Pellets (parasporal crystal proteins and spores) were washed in 20 mL sterile distilled water and centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 30 min. The washing procedure was repeated thrice. The pellets (parasporal crystal protein and spores) were resuspended in 20 mL of sterile distilled water and kept at 4 °C. The protein concentration was estimated using the Bradford method (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) Bradford 1976. Different levels of distilled water have been prepared by diluting. Bt’s spore-crystal combination was then put on a parafilm and coated in a plastic vial with another layer of parafilm where 25 aphids were put (Fig. 1). For either the original toxin-spore suspension or the dilutions, the toxicity of each strain was assessed in triplicate. To avoid physical trauma, the transformation was carefully confirmed to the test cases with a soft brush. Mortality was scored in comparison to parallel control in which aphids fed sterile distilled water instead of bacterial suspension and were used to correct the mortality test.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Setting up of vials for bioassay Bt spore crystal suspension against aphids. Bioassay of aphids and with Bt crystal suspension in the treatment vial and another vial was given normal water instead of Bt crystal suspension as a control for bioassay

Koch’s postulates

A bioassay resulted in the Bt strains being isolated from dead aphids. From each bioassay, five dead aphids were collected at random. The specimens were individually placed in a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube and washed on the surface with 1 mL sterile water. The insects were then placed in a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube and homogenized, submerged in double-distilled water, and incubated for 10 min at 30 °C. A loopful of homogenized insect cells was seeded onto solid nutrient agar (peptic digest of animal tissue 5.0 g, sodium chloride 5.0 g, beef extract 1.5 g, yeast extract 1.5 g, agar 15.0 g, final pH ( at 25 °C) 7.4 ± 0.2) in a petri dish and incubated for 12 h. Three individual colonies were taken at random and grown individually in liquid sporulation medium (T3) for 72 h at 30 °C. On solid NA plates, single colonies were restreaked.

Results

Isolation of Bacillus thuringiensis

The present investigation conducted experiments with the main objective of obtaining novel aphidicidal isolates of B. thuringiensis. It was also intended to understand B. thuringiensis’ distribution and diversity in different parts of the country. One thousand eighty Bacillus-like isolates are isolated from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Karnataka, Assam, Arunachal Pradesh, and Sikkim from various agro-ecological zones. The isolates were obtained using the standard technique of enrichment defined by Travers et al. 1987. A total of 65 Bacillus were screened based on morphological characteristics, and 15 putative B. thuringiensis isolates were described. A large number of B. thuringiensis are isolated from 87% of samples of rhizospheric soil.

The B. thuringiensis index (Bt index) is an important measure of success in isolating B. thuringiensis, describing the ratio of B. thuringiensis isolates at all locations. The average Bt index for all samples was found to be 0.30 but the index varies by sample and source. B. thuringiensis abundance was the highest in all soil samples, with a Karnataka Bt index of 0.66 (Fig. 2, Table 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Putative Bt like colonies isolated from soil samples collected from the Andaman Nicobar Islands. Laboratory control NA plate and Purified Bacillus thuringiensis colony morphology, Bacterial isolate exhibiting the Chalky white with granular periphery a typical Bt morphology

Table 2 Distribution of B. thuringiensis and Bt index based on sample and location

Colony morphology

Putative Bt as colonies is characterized based on bacterial colony color, texture, elevation, and margin (Fig. 2). The morphological characters showed a wide range of differences, including between strains isolated. According to the Benintende et al. (2001) description, the colonies were medium-sized, whitish, and opaque with irregular edges, a morphology characteristic of B. thuringiensis.

Microscopic characterization of Bt isolates based on crystal morphology

The analysis of the crystal shapes of the 15 isolates performed by a light microscope allowed the sample to be divided into two main classes: 10 isolates producing spherical crystals and 5 isolates producing amorphous and spore adhering crystals. Native putative aphidicidal strains of B. thuringiensis develop inclusions of parasporal crystals with different morphologies, sizes, and numbers (Table 3).

Table 3 Colony morphology, vegetative cell type, microscopic studies and crystal shape of native B. thuringiensis isolates.

Scanning electron microscopy

SEM analyzed the Bt crystals to demonstrate any further variations between the same crystal shapes of each group. Observations of various B. thuringiensis isolates showed clearly the different crystal shapes in the vegetative and lysis phases (Fig. 3). For the B. thuringiensis isolates collected from various environments, the vegetative cells are rod shaped. For all B. thuringiensis isolates, the spore form was identical as well. There was a distinction between the different crystal forms such as triangular, bipyramidal, and amorphous, and spore adhering crystals. In the scanning electron microscopy, the crystal forms found in the light microscope were the same.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Scanning electron micrographs of Bacillus thuringiensis spores and crystals (20000 x). C-Cuboidal; Sp- Spore; C-Amorphous

Plasmid profiling

Five distinct plasmids were observed in the native Bt isolates in the present study. Megaplasmids are present in low numbers of copies while they are generally present in high numbers of copies as small plasmids. Plasmid patterns are useful tools for characterizing the strains of B. thuringiensis. Plasmid patterns are qualitative features, represented by specific plasmid sets, rather than being quantitative features, where differences between patterns can be measured in terms of degrees of similarity.

Analyses of Aphidicidal cry gene content by PCR

Genomic DNA extraction from Bt isolates

PCR analysis will assess insecticidal activity based on the isolates that contain the cry gene. Genomic DNA was successfully extracted from the Bt sample; the kit method generally yielded good amounts of DNA and was verified by the use of electrophoresis of the nanodrop and agarose gel. PCR amplification and sequencing of a validated amplicon showed the efficacy of the process. Evaluation of PCR preliminary was done using Noguera and Ibarra’s (2010) array of primers which suggests that there were 7 native Bt isolates positive for Array I group of primers. A single molecular weight PCR product was provided by each known Set 1 cry gene (Fig. 4). Three indigenous isolates showed similar spore and colony morphology to that of B. thuringiensis, whereas no phase contrast microscope was observed. On the other hand, for 2 of them, 3 isolates were positive for the cry1 genes tested while evaluating PCR. This also refers to the lack of protein-level gene expression. Also, in B. thuringiensis, crystal protein synthesis is regulated at transcriptional, post-transcriptional, or post-translation levels by a variety of mechanisms (Agaisse and Lereclus 1995). No combinations of Set 2 or Set 3 Primer generated any desired amplified PCR products.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The 1.5% ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel showing PCR amplification from the selected native B. thuringiensis stains using SetI primer combinations. Legends: M—Molecular Weight Marker (1.0 kb, Thermo Scientific, USA), Lane1—BNG_Bta1, Lane2—SHVM_Bta2, Lane3—MYS_Bta3, Lane4—VJP_Bta4, Lane5—DVG_Bta5, Lane6—CMR_Bta6, Lane7—GLB_Bta7, Lane8—BID_Bta8, Lane 9—AN_Bta1, Line10—AN_Bta2, Lane 11—AS_Bta1

Using cry1, cry2Ab, cry3A, and cry11A gene primers, these isolates were further subjected to Aphidicidal cry gene analysis. For the cry1 gene, a total of 8 isolates were amplified (Fig. 5), 2 isolates were amplified for cry2Ab, and 3 isolates for cry 3A gene were amplified.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The 1.5% ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel showing PCR amplification from the selected native B. thuringiensis stains using cry1Ab gene primer combinations. Legends: M—Molecular Weight Marker (100 bp, Thermo Scientific, USA), Lane1—BNG_Bta1, Lane2—SHVM_Bta2, Lane3—MYS_Bta3, Lane4—VJP_Bta4, Lane5—no Amplification, Lane6—CMR_Bta6, Lane7—no amplification, Lane8—BID_Bta8, Lane 9—AN_Bta1, Line10—AN_Bta2, Lane1113—no amplification, Lane 14—genomic negative control (without genomic DNA), Lane15—water control (Water served as a template instead of DNA).

Aphidicidal Bt cry genes are cloned and sequenced successfully. The native Bt isolates molecular identification and verifies its identity as B. thuringiensis by cloning and sequencing the Aphidicidal cry genes. No pseudogenes and indels have been identified in analyzed nucleotide sequences; in nucleotide NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool search, they fit with high similarity. The sequences of Bt Aphidicidal cry genes are deposited at the GenBank NCBI. A total of 20 sequences were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database, and accession numbers were obtained. These includes MN101553, MN101554, MN101555, MN101556, MN101557, MN101558, and MN101559 (cry1-like genes); MN101560, MN101561, MN101562, MN101563, MN101564, MN101565, MN101566, and MN101567 (cry1Ab); MN101568, MN101569, and MN101570 (cry3a); and MN101571 and MN101572 (cry2Ab).

Crystal protein profiles of B. thuringiensis isolates

SDS–PAGE is widely used to compare B. thuringiensis isolate protein profiles. SDS–PAGE studied isolates containing Aphidicidal-specific cry genes presenting crystals to estimate the molecular weight of the Cry proteins. Isolates had molecular weight δ-endotoxins between 13 and 130 kDa, but the most typical pattern consisted of molecular weight proteins between 50 and 60 kDa. Isolates showed different bands from 1 to 9 (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Sodium dedocyle sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic pattern of total proteins of sporulated Bt. The lanes from left to right show protein pattern of native Bt aphidicidal Isolates. M—PageRuler™ Unstained Protein Ladder (10 to 200 kDa), Lane1—BNG_Bta1, Lane2—SHVM_Bta2,, Lane3—MYS_Bta3, Lane4—VJP_Bta4, Lane5—DVG_Bta5, Lane6—CMR_Bta6, Lane7—GLB_Bta7, Lane8—BID_Bta8, Lane9—AN_Bta1, Lane10—AN_Bta2, Lane11—AS_Bta1 and Lane12—Sk_Bta2

Bioassay/toxicity of Cry toxins against aphids

All fifteen new/novel Cry-related proteins displayed aphidicidal activity against the Aphis gossypii and A. punicae aphids along with reference strain HD-1 in two different forms: pre-solubilized (spore crystal complex) and solubilized (pro-toxin form). Mortality was higher than 90% with the two concentrations used (10 and 100 μg/mL) in the preliminary bioassays. The screening was performed against adults of Aphis gossypii and A. punicae aphids in a controlled environment of 18 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 10% RH, and 16:8 L to D. The LC50 value was estimated using four concentrations, 100, 200, 300,400, and 500 μg/mL that killed 18% ± 6%, 25% ± 5%, 58% ± 7%, and 85% ± 4%, respectively, of the aphids. The Cry-related protein’s concentration-mortality responses for Aphis gossypii and A. punicae match a line of regression. The interaction between the host population and log [protein dose] was not significant with the protein, exhibiting a median lethal concentration (LC50) of 35 μg/mL. Bioassay studies have shown greater efficacy in the pre-solubilized form (92% mortality) and fewer efficacies in a solubilized form (45%). For 25 aphids per replication, the bioassay repeated three times. All the treated aphids were dead by the end of the toxicity test. All the 25 aphids in controls were found to be safe at the end of bioassay studies. A Tukey test was conducted, and no significant differences between the strains were found (α = 0.005). But a significant difference between strains and untreated aphids has been observed. Three native Bt strains are found to be most toxic compared to the standard reference strain (Table 4) from this study. The untreated adult Aphis gossypii and A. punicae controls remained in steady growth, continued feeding, and during the first 48 h showed no color change, after 60 h (Fig. 7). In adults exposed to spore crystal suspensions in the Aphis gossypii and A. punicae, disease signs were variable with each strain, but the following general pattern of symptoms (Fig. 7) was observed. Amid the initial 24 h, the Aphis gossypii and A. punicae adults were moving and encouraging and did not hint any contamination. After 48 to 60 h, adults of Aphis gossypii and A. punicae exposed to various strains moved slowly during feeding with involuntary movements and abdominal segments started to collapse. The Bt-treated Aphis gossypii and A. punicae adults stopped moving after 60 to 72 h, their color changed to brown, their abdomen increased in size and displayed black spots on the first abdominal segments, and their bodies were dehydrated (Fig. 7). The dark staining extended toward the thorax after 80 h, and the abdomen was packed and dried out completely (Fig. 7).

Table 4 Insecticidal activity of the native B. thuringiensis isolates against A. gossypii and A. punicae adults
Fig. 7
figure 7

Infection signs in A. gossypii caused by native strains of Bacillus thuringiensis

Koch’s postulates

In the present study, Koch's postulates were tested in aphids carcass with native B. thuringiensis strains. The results of Koch’s postulate suggest that Bt strains were responsible for the death of the exposed Aphis gossypii and A. punicae and that the physical changes observed were caused by Bt infection; these strains were re-isolated from the dead insects, and the results reported satisfied Koch’s postulates (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Aphidicidal Bt strains were re-isolated from the dead aphids to fulfil Koch’s postulate. A typical white and opaque and round colony morphology was prominent. Crystal staining of Bt re-isolated from dead A. gossypii and A. punicae

Discussion

Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: Aphididae) harbors a broad range of host plants (Fuller et al. 1999). Under favorable conditions, A. gossypii can produce up to 60 generations/year. Depending on the infestation rate and crop stage, crop production may be reduced by up to 90% by A. gossypii. This aphid can attack from the seedling stage, reproduce through the parthenogenesis of the telitoc, and grow in 5–7 days to adults. These reproductive characteristics favor the rapid selection of resistant individuals when populations are exposed to environmental stress factors like insecticides (Liu et al. 2005). A. punicae Passerini (Homoptera: Aphididae) is one of the key pests in pomegranate. They are well known for their ability to decrease plant vigor, facilitate mold growth on leaves, and therefore reduce crop quality and yield. Both adults and nymphs feed on fruit, leaves, and inflorescences (Moawad and Al-Barty 2011). Extensive use of pesticides to control aphids has led to resistance to the major classes of insecticides, such as organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids (Jansen 2000). As a result, safe alternative strategies for controlling these aphid species are required. The aim of the present study was, therefore, to investigate the pathogenicity of B. thuringiensis against aphids, taking into account the pests and their significances. B. thuringiensis subspecies currently account for approximately 98% of formulated sprayable microbial pesticides (Lacey et al. 2015). However, it still accounts for just 2% of the global pesticide market (Bravo et al. 2011). Since very few but known Bt strains are active against Hemipterans, it is suggested that consideration should be given to the characterization of native Bt isolates for insecticidal activity against aphids. It allows other researchers to concentrate on isolating native strains from different environments. It is very important to find out the novel Bt. Native novel/new Bt strains of greater toxicity, particularly in transgenic Bt crops or bio formulations, to assist and address the issue of insect resistance.

Bt diversity is being sought worldwide by researchers, giving more bio-insecticidal choices and alternatives to address insect resistance. Bt has been isolated from various ecologies since its first Ishiwata isolation in 1902 and has been widely studied. Despite this exploration around the world, research on this bacterium is still incomplete (Melo et al. 2016). The bacterial concentration mainly depends on the type of environmental sample. The soil is the primary source of Bt isolates (Delucca et al. 1982). As it was collected from 70% of the soil samples in the world (Martin and Travers 1989), the current research disclosed that the soil is indeed the best habitat for the isolation of B. thuringiensis regardless of geographical places; the isolates were acquired, indicating they are widespread. When used for confinement, some of the soils witnessed no Bt in them. The first level of grouping was done by colony morphology (Fig. 2 and Table 2). The colonies of putative Bt isolates were medium-sized, whitish, and opaque with irregular edges, a morphology characteristic of B. thuringiensis, as Benintende et al. (2001) describes it. The next qualitative analysis of Bt isolates was done by light microscopy. Ten isolates produce spherical crystals, and five isolates show amorphous and spore adhering crystals. This was contrary to the usual environmental sample of Bt screenings, where most produce bipyramidal crystals (Meadows et al. 1992; Bernhard et al. 1997). Scanning electron microscopy was used in this work not only to confirm the shape of the crystal but also to further magnify and differentiate between the shapes of the spherical crystal. Although there were previous reports of different types of spherical crystals (Noguera and Ibarra 2010), it was rarely used as a tool for classifying large Bt collections (Djenane et al. 2017). From SEM images, it was found that there are four kinds of spherical forms in the collection among the spherical crystals. This illustrates the wide diversity between the Bt strains.

Parasporal crystals are encoded by plasmid genes, with an equal number of plasmid patterns expected. But, contrary to the published work and theories on Bt parasporal crystals (Aptosoglou et al. 1997; Reyes-Ramírez and Ibarra 2008; Fagundes et al. 2011), among the collection isolates, only five plasmid patterns were identified. PCR amplifications were carried out with universal and aphidicidal gene-specific primers, to predict their insecticidal activity. The majority of 8 isolates were amplified for cry1 gene, 2 isolates amplified for cry2Ab, and 3 isolates amplified for cry 3A gene. Aphidicidal cry gene amplification, cloning, sequencing, and comparison with published strains from the NCBI database confirmed the identity of the isolates as Bt strains. All of the isolates belong to the Bt family. Bt isolates harbor cry1, cry3a, and cry2Ab genes. PCR is a highly sensitive and relatively rapid technique and is especially suitable for fast, large scale, first-tier screening of Bt isolates. Bt strains harboring novel cry genes and also, the less frequently observed cry genes, have been identified by PCR, using specially designed primers corresponding to the highly conserved regions (Bravo et al. 1998; Kim et al. 1998, Porcar and Juarez-Perez 2003; Wang et al. 2003). In the present investigation, Aphidicidal cry genes were successfully cloned and sequenced. By cloning and sequencing the Aphidicidal cry genes, the native Bt isolates molecular identification confirmed its identity as B. thuringiensis. No pseudogenes and indels were found in analyzed nucleotide sequences; they match with high similarity in nucleotide NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool search. The Bt Aphidicidal cry genes sequences were deposited at NCBI GenBank.

SDS–PAGE assessment of crystal protein profiling of Bt isolates showed the existence of bands 130, 73, 34, 25, and 13 kDa, among which there were abundantly 50–66 kDa bands. Even the protein in pre-solubilized and solubilized form varying from 13 to 130 KDa has been discovered to be toxic to Aphis gossypii and A. punicae, insects requiring further investigation. The Bt strain protein profiles were differentiated by Haggag and Yousef (2010) into three primary groups, group I (28–58 KDa), group II (60–80 KDa), and group II (125–150 KDa). The majority of indigenous isolates included the three groups as a whole.

Wellman-Desbiens and Côté (2004) reported the toxicity of B. thuringiensis against sucker insects in an experiment performed on stinkbug nymphs Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae), treated with B. thuringiensis grown on artificial diet. After 7 days of the assay, the strains tested reached about 98% mortality against L. hesperus. Melatti et al. (2010) established a methodology for selective bioassay of B. thuringiensis against A. gossypii. The bioassay with four hundred strains of B. thuringiensis showed that the strains S29, S40, S616, S1168, and S1576 had the highest toxicity to A. gossypii, causing mortality rates above 50% on average and exhibiting the highest potential for pest control. Among them were the most efficient strains S29 and S1168, which caused deaths of 76 and 73%, respectively, against A. gossypii. Sap-sucking insect pests (aphids, whiteflies, and bugs of plants) showed very low susceptibility to certain Cry proteins (Chougule et al. 2012) with the lowest reported LC50 values ranging from 70 to 100 μg/mL for Cry4Aa and higher than 500 μg/mL for Cry3A and Cry11Aa against the pea aphid Acyrtoshiphon pisum (Harris) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) (Porcar et al., 2009). Multiple variables may be responsible for the low toxicity of Cry proteins against hemipteran pests with lepidopteran pests, the most significant being the intestinal pH that is acidic in aphids and alkaline in lepidopterans and the abundance and formation of proteolytic enzymes, cysteine proteases in aphids, and primarily serine proteases (trypsin and chymotrypsin) in lepidopterans. This explains the higher toxicity of trypsin-pre-activated Cry3A, Cry4A, and Cry11A against A. pisum (Porcar et al., 2009). Palma et al. (2014) successfully identified novel cry-related genes from Bt strain H1.5, cloned and expressed in E. coli. The insecticidal activity of the purified recombinant protein was tested in bioassays against several lepidopteran pest species and the green-peach aphid M. persicae. This novel Cry-related protein showed the lowest LC50 value (32.7 μg/mL) reported to date for a Cry protein against a hemipteran pest. The toxicity assessment of Bt on Aphis gossypii and A. punicae was studied in this research, showing that the native Bt isolates were toxic. According to our results, three of the B. thuringiensis strains tested were able to cause death to Aphis gossypii and A. punicae. The mortality rate observed in the control treatment was always 0%, allowing to infer that the mortality observed was due to the strains of B. thuringiensis and indicating that the method is reliable for the initial strain selection. The thorough bioassay against distinct species of aphids with distinct levels and diverse circumstances should be carried out in the future.

Conclusion

This study isolates and characterizes the active Aphidicidal cry genes from native Bt isolates. The genetic characterization of the collection offers the possibility of selecting the strain to be tested against sucking pests in general and especially aphids and other agricultural insect pests in bioassays. In quantitative data, the effectiveness of B. thuringiensis Cry proteins against A. punicae is practically unavailable. Current research has focused on the development of a sound insect sucking pest management scheme with a strong focus on Aphis gossypii and A. punicae aphids. Bioassay results suggest that the Bt toxins were responsible for the mortality of the exposed aphids, and the observed physical changes were induced by B. thuringiensis infection; these strains had been re-isolated from the dead aphids, and the presented results fulfilled Koch’s postulates. Accordingly, indigenous Bt strains can provide high aphid mortality and can be used as an essential component of integrated pest management. Additional studies are needed to screen and develop a bioinsecticide that can be used systemically to control A. gossypii and A. punicae.

References

  • Agaisse H, Lereclus D (1995) How does Bacillus thuringiensis produce so much insecticidal crystal protein? J Bacteriol 177:6027–6032. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.177.21.6027-6032.1995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ananda N, Kotikal YK (2010) Balikai RA. Management practices for major sucking pests of pomegranate Karnataka J Agric Sci 22:790–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Aptosoglou SG, Sivropoulou A, Koliais SI (1997) Distribution and characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis in the environment of the olive in Greece. New Microbiologica 20:69–76

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benintende G, Glen A, Ibarra J, Bravo A, Espinosa A (2001) Bacillus thuringiensis e Bacillus sphaericus. Aislamiento, crecimento y conservacion de estas bactérias. In: Bravo, A., G. Arrieta, G. Benintende, M. Real, A. M. Espinoza, J. Ibarra, R. Monnerat, S. Orduz & M. Soberón. In: Metodologias utilizadas em investigación sobre bacterias entomopatógenas. México, D.F.,UNAM

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhard K, Jarrett P, Meadows M, Butt J, Ellis J, Roberts GM et al (1997) Natural isolates of Bacillus thuringiensis: worldwide distribution, characterization and activity against insect pests. J Invertebr Pathol 70:59–68. https://doi.org/10.1006/jipa.1997.4669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat RC (2012) Aphids (Insecta) of agricultural importance in J&K state, India: a checklist and biodiversity. Int J Food Agric Vet Sci 2:116–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman RL, Eastop VF (2000) Aphids on the World’s Crops—An Identification and Information Guide. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Hoboken, NJ, USA; The Natural History Museum: New York, NY, USA.

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo A, Likitvivatanavong S, Gill SS, Soberón M (2011) Bacillus thuringiensis: a story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 41(7):423–431 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.02.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo A, Sarabia S, Lopez H, Ontiveros C, Abarca A, Ortiz M et al (1998) Characterization of cry genes in a Mexican Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4965–4972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chougule NP, Bonning BC (2012) Toxins for transgenic resistance to hemipteran pests. Toxins 4(6):405–429. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins4060405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Crickmore N, Baum J, Bravo A, Lereclus D, Narva K, Sampson K, Schnepf E, Sun M, Zeigler DR, (2020) "Bacillus thuringiensis toxin nomenclature".http://www.btnomenclature.info/

  • Delucca AJ, Palmgren MS Ciegler A (1982) Bacillus thuringiensis in grain elevator dusts. Can J Microbiol 28:452–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djenane Z, Nateche F, Amziane M, Gomis-cebolla J (2017) Assessment of the antimicrobial activity and the entomocidal potential of Bacillus thuringiensis. Toxins 9:139. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins9040139

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert TA, Cartwright B (1997) Biology and ecology of Aphis gossypii Glover (Homoptera: aphididae). Southwestern Entomol 22:116–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagundes R, Picoli E, Lana U, Valicente F (2011) Plasmid patterns of efficient and ineffecient strains of Bacillus thruingiensis against Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 40:600–606. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2011000500012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrandis MD, Juarez -Perez VM, Frutos R (1999) Distribution of cryI, cryII and cryV genes within Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from Spain. Syst Appl Microbiol 22:179–185 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(99)80064-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller SJ, Chavigny P, Lapchin L, Vanlerberghe- Masutti F (1999) Variation in clonal diversity in greenhouse infestations of the aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover in Southern France. Mol Eco 8:1867–1877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haggag KH, Abou Yousef HM (2010) Differentiation among Egyptian Bacillus thuringiensis strains at sporulation by whole cellular protein profiles. World J Agricul Sci 6:224–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JP (2000) A three-year field study on the short-term effects of insecticides used to control cereal aphids on plant-dwelling aphid predators in winter wheat. Pest Manag Sci 56:533–539

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jouzani GS, Valijanian E, Sharafi R (2017) Bacillus thuringiensis: a successful insecticide with new environmental features and tidings. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 101:2691–2711

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HS, Lee DW, Woo SD, Yu YM, Kang SK (1998) Seasonal distribution and characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolated from sericultural environments in Korea. J Gen Appl Microbiol 44:133–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Frutos R, Brownbridge M, Goettel MS (2015) Insect pathogens as biological control agents: back to the future. J Invertebr Pathol 132:1–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Latreille PA, (1802) Histoire naturelle générale et particulière des crustacés et des insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite à l'histoire naturelle générale et paticulière, composé par Leclerc de Buffon, rédigée par C. S. Sonnini. Familles naturelles des genres. Tome troisième. - pp. 3-467, [1]. Paris. (Dufart).

  • Liu XD, Zhai BP, Zhang XX, Zong JM (2005) Impact of transgenic cotton plants on a non-target pest, Aphis gossypii Glover. Ecol Entomol 30:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahadeva Swamy HM, Asokan R, Mahmood R, Nagesha SN (2013) Molecular characterization and genetic diversity of insecticidal crystal protein genes in native Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Curr Microbiol 66:323–330

  • Mahadeva Swamy HM, Asokan R, Nagesha SN, Arora DK, Birah A, Mahmood R (2011) Cloning, characterization and diversity of insecticidal crystal protein genes of Bacillus thuringiensis native isolates from soils of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Curr Microbiol 63(5):420–425

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mani M, Krishnamoorthy A (1995) Outbreak of Aphis punicae and record of its natural enemies on pomegranate in India. Indian J Plant Prot 23:89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin PA, Travers RS (1989) Worldwide abundance and distribution of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol 55(10):2437–2442

  • Meadows MP, Ellis DJ, Butt J, Jarrett P, Burges HD (1992) Distribution, frequency, and diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis in an animal feed mill. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1344–1350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Melatti VM, Praça LB, Martins ES, Sujii E, Berry C (2010) Monnerat RG, (2010) Selection of Bacillus thuringiensis strains toxic against cotton aphid Aphis gossypii, Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae). BioAssay 5(2):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Melo AL, de A, Soccol VT, Soccol CR (2016) Bacillus thuringiensis: mechanism of action, resistance, and new applications: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol 36:317–326. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.960793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moawad SS, Al-Barty AMF (2011) Evaluation of some medicinal and ornamental plant extracts toward pomegranate aphid, Aphis punicae (Passerini) under laboratory conditions. African J Agri Res 6:2425–2429

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguera PA, Ibarra JE (2010) Detection of new cry genes of Bacillus thuringiensis by use of a novel PCR primer system. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(18):6150–6155. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00797-10 Epub 2010 Jul 23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk N, Ulusoy MR (2005) Bayhan E. Pest and Natural enemy species determined in pomegranate orchards in the Eastern Mediterranean Region, Turkey (Türkiye)

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma L, Muñoz D, Berry C, Murillo J, Ruiz de Escudero I, Caballero P (2014) Molecular and insecticidal characterization of a novel Cry-related protein from Bacillus thuringiensis toxic against Myzus persicae. Toxins 6:3144–3156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porcar M, Juarez-Perez V (2003) PCR-based identification of Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal crystal genes FEMS Microbiol Rev, 26:419–432.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Porcar M, Grenier AM, Federici B et al (2009) Effects of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins on the pea aphid (Acyrthosiphon pisum). Appl Environ Microbiol 75(14):4897–4900. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00686-09 Epub 2009 May 15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond B, Johnston PR, Nielsen-LeRoux C, Lereclus D, Crickmore N (2010) Bacillus thuringiensis: an impotent pathogen? Trends Microbiol 18:189–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Ramírez A, Ibarra JE (2008) Plasmid patterns of Bacillus thuringiensis type strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02133-07

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rousselin A, Bevacqua D, Sauge M et al (2017) Harnessing the aphid life cycle to reduce insecticide reliance in apple and peach orchards. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 37:38 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0444-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, third ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

  • Sattar S, Maiti MK (2011) Molecular characterization of a novel vegetative insecticidal protein from Bacillus thuringiensis effective against sap-sucking insect pest. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21:937–946. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1105.05030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seifinejad A, Jouzani GRS, Hosseinzadeh A, Abdmishani C (2008) Characterization of Lepidoptera-active cry and vip genes in Iranian Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection. Biol Control 44:216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.09.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson J, (2009) “Aphids,” in Encyclopedia of Insects, 2nd Edn, eds V. Resh and R. Carde (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 27–30.

  • Sugimoto S (2011) The taxonomic identity of Aphis punicae Shinji, 1922 (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Entomol Sci 14:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travers RS, Martin PAW, Reicheldereer CF, (1987) Selective process for efficient isolation of soil Bacillus spp.. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1263-1266

  • Walters FS, English LH (1995) Toxicity of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-endotoxins toward the potato aphid in an artificial diet bioassay. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 77:211–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1995.tb02003.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Boets A, van Rie J, Ren G (2003) Characterization of cry1, cry2 and cry9 genes in Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from China. J Inverteb Pathol 82:63–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman-Desbiens E, Côté J (2004) Screening of the insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis strains against Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera: Miridae) nymphal population. J Econ Entomol 97:251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield AE, Falk BW (2015) Rotenberg D, (2015) Insect vector-mediated transmission of plant viruses. Virology 479–480:278–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Cheng H, Gao Y et al (2009) Mutation of an aminopeptidase N gene is associated with Helicoverpa armigera resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac toxin. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 39:421–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.04.003 Epub 2009 Apr 17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Director of the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR) for the encouragement and provision of the technical support to carry out the research. The authors are also thankful to Mr. Revanna H, Skilled Assistant, Bio-Pesticide Laboratory, Division of Biotechnology, ICAR-IIHR, for the technical help rendered in the insect collection, maintenance, rearing, and bioassay studies.

Funding

This research work is funded under National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Microorganisms (NBAIM) through AMMAS project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MSHM and MS designed the experiments and carried out all experiments. MSHM and AR wrote and revised this manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Asokan Ramasamy or Mahadeva Swamy Hanchipura Mallesh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies performed with animals, and no human testing was involved.

Competing interests

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramasamy, A., Suresh, M. & Mallesh, M.S.H. Toxicity evaluation of Aphidicidal crystalliferous toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis strains: a molecular study. Ann Microbiol 70, 52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-020-01594-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-020-01594-5

Keywords