Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

High-level tannase production by Penicillium atramentosum KM using agro residues under submerged fermentation

Abstract

A tannase-yielding fungal strain identified as Penicillium atramentosum KM was isolated from tannery effluent collected from a small-scale tannery. The fungal strain produced extracellular tannase under submerged fermentation (SmF) using amla (Phyllanthus emblica), ber (Zyzyphus mauritiana), jamoa (Eugenia cuspidate), jamun (Syzygium cumini) and keekar (Acacia nilotica) powdered leaves. Among the different substrates, amla and keekar leaves resulted in maximal extracellular production of tannase. Various process parameters were studied to optimize the extracellular yield of tannase under SmF. Maximum yield of tannase i.e., 32.8 and 34.7 U/ml was obtained with amla leaves (2% w/v) and keekar leaves (3% w/v), respectively, in selective mineral salt and production media, inoculated with 3 x 106 spores/ml cell suspension by incubating at 30°C for 72 h. The production of enzyme was induced strongly by the presence of maltose (0.2% w/v) as carbon source. Crude enzyme was optimally active at pH 5.5 and pH 7.5 using amla and keekar leaves, respectively. The fungal strain produced yields of tannase about twice as high as the highest reported yield of tannase. Our findings suggest that agro residues in the form of amla and keekar leaves can be one of the best and most cost effective alternatives to the costly pure tannic acid for industrial production of microbial tannase. The novelty in the present investigation is that is that P. atramentosum KM is the first fungal isolate found to produce tannase at high pH (i.e. 7.5) using keekar leaves.

Introduction

Tannin acyl hydrolase (EC 3.1.1.20), commonly called tannase, catalyzes the hydrolysis of ester bonds in hydrolysable tannins such as tannic acid, thereby releasing glucose and gallic acid. Tannins are widespread in the plant kingdom, are found in leaves, fruits, bark and wood, and are often considered nutritionally undesirable because they form complexes with protein, starch and digestive enzymes and cause a reduction in the nutritional value of food (Aguilar et al. 2007). Tannase finds widespread application in the food, feed, and pharmaceutical industries, as well as in leather and beverage processing. At the moment, most commercial applications of tannase are in the manufacturing of instant tea, where it is used to eliminate the water-insoluble precipitates, and in wine, beer and coffee-flavored soft drinks. Another important application of tannase in the food industry is its use as a substrate for the chemical synthesis of pyrogallol or ester gallates, which are used as preservatives (Aguilar et al. 2007). Gallic acid is also used in the enzymatic synthesis of propyl gallate, which is used mainly as an antioxidant in fats and oils, as well as in beverages (Banerjee et al. 2005).

Although tannase is present in plants, animals and microorganisms, it is produced mainly by microorganisms. Filamentous fungi of the Aspergillus genus have been used widely for tannase production (Aguilar et al. 2007). The production of tannase by Aspergillus sp. can occur in the absence of tannic acid, but these fungi tolerate tannic acid concentrations as high as 20% without exhibiting any deleterious effect on either growth or enzyme production. The use of the submerged fermentation (SmF) is advantageous because of the ease of sterilization, and process control is easier to engineer in such systems. Depending on the strain and the culture conditions, the enzyme can be constitutive or inducible, showing different production patterns. Although Penicillium sp. grows well in tan liquors and is known to produce tannase, little information is available on the isolation and production of tannase obtained from this source. There are few reports on tannase production by Penicillium sp. under SmF (Batra and Saxena 2005; Rajkumar and Nandy 1983; Van de Lagemaat and Pyle, 2005). Rajkumar and Nandy (1983) reported tannase production using Czapeck’s Dox medium supplemented with costly pure 2% tannic acid as carbon and tannin source, whereas Batra and Saxena (2005) reported the use of 1% pure tannic acid in the same medium under SmF. Van de Lagemaat and Pyle (2005) reported the development of a mathematical growth model for tannase production by Penicillium glabrum under solid-state fermentation using polyurethane foam cubes, which served only as an inert support for the organism, impregnated with a liquid medium containing tannic acid as the main carbon source. In the present investigation, we report tannase production by Penicillium atramentosum KM under SmF using cheap and locally available agro residues like jamun and keekar leaves as an alternative to tannic acid, which is a costly substrate.

Materials and methods

Raw materials

Amla (Phyllanthus emblica), ber (Zyzyphus mauritiana), jamun (Syzygium cumini), jamoa (Eugenia cuspidate) and keekar (Acacia nilotica) leaves were collected from local orchards. The leaves were first dried at 60°C in an oven and then finely ground to powdered form in a grinder mixer. The powder was stored in a dry place at room temperature and used as source of tannins in SmF. The tannin content was estimated by using the protein precipitation method (Haggerman and Butler 1978). Dried leaves were ground to a fine powder in 70% methanol and kept overnight at 4°C. One milliliter of the extract was placed in a test tube, and 3 ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution (1 mg/ml BSA with 0.17 M NaCl in 0.2 M sodium acetate buffer of pH 5.0) was added. The reaction mixture was kept for 15 min at room temperature. Then, the mixture was centrifuged (5,000 g, 10 min), and the precipitate was dissolved in 3 ml SDS-triethanolamine solution. Absorbance was measured at 530 nm after addition of 1 ml FeCl3 reagent.

Chemicals

All media ingredients and reagent chemicals were of analytical grade and were procured from E-Merck, Hi-Media, SRL, Genex health bio, Qualigens Chemicals (India), and Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Microorganism and inoculum preparation

The fungal strain used in the present investigation was isolated from tannery effluent using routine mycological procedures and screened for tannase enzyme production using tannase screening medium comprising 0.5% tannic acid as the substrate through enrichment technique. The isolated fungal strain was identified as Penicillium atramentosum KM. The fungus was identified by A. Aggarwal, Mycologist, Department of Botany, Kurukshetra University, on the basis of morphological characteristics. The identity of the isolate was confirmed by genetic characterization using ITS4 and ITS5 primers that specifically identify Penicillium by amplifying 600-bp fragment at the genus level, and the species-level specificity of the fungal strain was tested using primer sets ITS4 and ITS5 and PgrisF1-1, PatraR1 (Sugita et al. 2004, Oliveri et al. 2007). A product of approximately 625 bp was amplified by PCR from the tested fungal strain. The fungal culture was maintained on Czapeck’s Dox agar slants at 4°C. For preparation of inoculum, 10 ml sterilized distilled water supplemented with 0.1% Tween-80 was added to 1-week-old fully sporulated agar slant culture.

Production of extracellular tannase by P. atramentosum KM in submerged fermentation

A 100 ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 25 ml production medium (MS I; pH 6.0) containing (g/l) (NH4)2HPO4 (3.0); magnesium sulphate (1.0); K2HPO4 (0.5); calcium chloride (0.3) was used for production of tannase. After optimization of all process parameters we found that a 100-ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 25 ml selective mineral salt medium (g/l) supplemented with KH2PO4 (0.5); (NH4)2HPO4 (3.0); ZnSO4 / copper sulfate (2.0); maltose (0.2% w/v) was used with keekar leaves (3% w/v), which served as a sole tannin source for the fermentation process. On the other hand, selective production medium containing (g/l) KH2PO4 (0.5); NH4Cl (2.0); magnesium sulfate (2.0) was used with amla leaves (2% w/v) that served as sole carbon and tannin source. The culture medium was maintained at pH 5.5 for amla and pH 7.5 for keekar leaves, and was autoclaved at 120°C for 20 min. After cooling, the flasks were inoculated with 0.5 ml P. atramentosum KM (3 x 106 spores/ml) and incubated in an orbital shaker (150 rpm) at 30°C for 72 h. The biomass was separated by filtration through Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The cell-free culture broth was assayed for extracellular tannase activity. All experiments were carried out in triplicate and mean values with standard deviation are reported.

Tannase assay

The qualitative assay of tannase enzyme activity was carried out by culturing the microorganism on Czapeck’s Dox agar plates containing tannic acid (0.3% w/v). A clear hydrolyzing zone around the colonies indicated tannase activity.

Tannase activity was estimated by the colorimetric method of Mondal et al. (2001). This method is based on changes in optical density of the substrate tannic acid after enzymatic reaction at 530 nm. The reaction mixture contained 0.3 ml substrate tannic acid (0.5% w/v in 0.2 M sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.5) and 0.1 ml enzyme. This reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C for 1 h. The enzymatic reaction was terminated by addition of 3 ml BSA solution (1 mg/ml), which also precipitated the residual tannic acid. A control was prepared in parallel using heat-denatured enzyme. The tubes were then centrifuged (5,000 g, 10 min) and the precipitate were dissolved in 3 ml SDS-triethanolamine (1% w/v SDS in 5% v/v triethanolamine) solution. One milliliter of FeCl3 reagent (0.01 M FeCl3 in 0.01 N HCl) was added to the tube, which was then kept for 15 min at room temperature for stabilization of the color. Absorbance was read at 530 nm against the blank (i.e., without tannic acid).

The specific extinction co-efficient of tannic acid at 530 nm was found to be 0.577 (Mondal et al. 2001). Using this co-efficient, one unit of tannase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme required to hydrolyze 1 mM tannic acid in 1 min under assay conditions.

Results and discussion

Effect of substrate concentration

Tannase is an inducible enzyme that is produced only in the presence of tannins. The concentration of tannic acid is a crucial factor for growth and tannase induction. Our findings demonstrate that amla and keekar leaves as substrates were the best sole carbon and tannin sources in the case of P. atramentosum KM, yielding 15.9 U/ml and 18.5 U/ml tannase, respectively (Table 1). The organism produced maximum tannase in production medium (MS I; pH 6.0). These results may be due to differences in the nitrogen and metal ion composition of the two media used here. The constituents of MS I favored tannase synthesis by both organisms. The same medium composition was also reported for maximum tannase production by Aureobasidium pullulans DBS66 (Banerjee and Pati 2007) and A. aculeatus DBF9 (Banerjee et al. 2007a). However, negligible growth and enzyme production was observed even after 7 days of incubation when ber, jamun and jamoa leaves were used as sole carbon and tannin source. Hence, amla and keekar were chosen for further experiments. The effect of different concentrations of the selected substrates (1–5%) on enzyme production was also studied. The results revealed that maximum tannase activity was obtained by using 2% (w/v) amla leaves and 3% (w/v) keekar leaves, yielding about 24.4 and 26.5 U/ml tannase, respectively (Fig. 1). The high production of tannase in the case of keekar and amla leaves may be due to some inducing factors, like the presence of sufficient tannins, and carbon sources that accelerate synthesis of the enzyme. The results obtained are in agreement with those of other workers who also reported maximum tannase production with 2% (w/v) Caesalpinia digyna powder (Kar and Banerjee 2000), amla and keekar leaves (Selwal et al. 2010) as sole source of carbon and tannin. Banerjee et al. (2007b) also reported maximum tannase production with 3% (w/v) raw tannins obtained from Cassia siamea plants. Srivastava and Kar (2009) reported optimum tannase production with 4% (w/v) pomegranate rind powder under SmF conditions. The actual mode of tannase induction at a particular concentration of tannin has not yet been explained clearly.

Table 1 Efficiency of agro-residues as substrates for tannase production
Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of concentration of selected solid substrate on tannase production by Penicillium atramentosum KM

Effect of incubation period

The incubation period for harvesting tannase from production medium was optimized. In our study, the time course for enzyme production was monitored up to 120 h. Enzyme production on amla and keekar was started from early growth and reached the highest levels (24.0 and 27.5 U/ml, respectively) after 72 h, thereafter starting to decrease (Table 2). The incubation time generally depends on the micro-organism and medium used. Some authors also reported an incubation period of 72 h for maximum tannase production by different fungi such as Rhizopus oryzae, Aspergillus foetidus (Kar and Banerjee 2000; Mukherjee and Banerjee 2006), Aspergillus aculaetus DBF9 (Banerjee et al. 2007a) and Aspergillus niger ITCC 6514.07 (Srivastava and Kar 2009). Other workers also reported an incubation period of 96 h to be the best for higher tannase production using palm kernel cake (Sabu et al. 2005). The variations in optimal incubation period might be due to differences in fungal strain and medium composition used for tannase production.

Table 2 Effect of incubation time, temperature and pH on tannase activity

Effect of incubation temperature

Incubation temperature affects various metabolic processes such as protein denaturation, enzymatic inhibition, promotion or inhibition on production of a particular metabolite, cell death, etc. Thus, the effect of temperature ranging from 20 to 45°C on tannase production was studied. In the present investigation, maximal tannase production was observed on both substrates at 30°C, i.e., 28.4 U/ml in amla and 30.1 U/ml in keekar leaves (Table 2). Further, an increase in temperature beyond the optimum might have caused denaturation of enzyme and made it inactive. Different organisms require different temperatures for enzyme synthesis and utilization of substrate. As in our results, many other workers also reported an optimum temperature of 30°C for maximal tannase production from various fungi such as R. oryzae and A. foetidus (Batra and Saxena 2005; Mukherjee and Banerjee 2006), A. niger (Cruz-Hernández et al. 2006; Sabu et al. 2006; Treviño-Cueto et al. 2007; Cruz-Aldaco et al. 2009), A. aculeatus DBF9 (Banerjee et al. 2007a), Aureobasidium pullulans DBS66 (Banerjee and Pati 2007), A. tamarii (Costa et al. 2008) and Paecilomyces variotii (Battestin and Macedo 2007). Some workers obtained maximum tannase activity at 25–28°C from Aspergillus fumigatus MA (Manjit et al. 2008), and A. niger (Huang et al. 2005) while Kasieczka-Burnecka et al. (2007) reported an optimum temperature of 16°C for maximum tannase production by Verticillium sp. P9.

Effect of pH

The pH of the production medium plays a significant role in the production of metabolites. In the present study, various ranges of pH (5–8) were tested in order to enhance tannase yield. The results revealed that P. atramentosum KM gave maximum tannase production of 28.6 U/ml in amla leaves at pH 5.5 and 30.7 U/ml in keekar leaves at pH 7.5 (Table 2). It may be concluded from the results that tannase from the isolate needs an acidic-to-neutral environment to be active. Similar to our observations, maximum tannase production was observed at pH 7.0 by A. niger in a 20-l fermenter (Pourrat et al. 1982). Recently, we reported maximum tannase production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa IIIB 8914 using amla leaves at pH 7.0 and keekar leaves at pH 5.5 (Selwal et al. 2010). Tannase production from A. niger was higher at pH 5.5 (Cruz-Aldaco et al. 2009; Treviño-Cueto et al. 2007).

Effect of tannic acid supplementation

The effect of tannic acid on tannase yield was studied by adding different concentrations of this substrate (0.2–1% w/v) to the production medium. No inductive effect of different concentrations of tannic acid was observed in either substrate (Fig. 2). One of the most striking observations in this study is that the highest enzyme production by P. atramentosum KM was obtained in medium containing amla (28.2 U/ml) or keekar leaves (29.9 U/ml) as tannin rich substrate as compared to medium supplemented with pure, i.e., 0.4%, tannic acid (15.4 U/ml and 16.0 U/ml). This observation reveals amla and keekar leaves to be superior, as well as cheap, substrates as an alternative to the costly pure tannic acid for industrial production of microbial tannase. This may be due to the fact that higher concentrations of tannin lead to the formation of non-reversible bonds with surface proteins and impair the metabolism as well as the growth of the organism (Selwal et al. 2010). Similarly, some workers also observed an inhibitory effect of tannic acid on tannase synthesis by Lactobacillus sp ASR-S1 (Sabu et al. 2006) and P. aeruginosa IIIB 8914 (Selwal et al. 2010) using agro residues like wheat bran, palm kernel cake, amla and keekar leaves. A concentration of 1% tannic acid was found to be optimal for production of maximum tannase in A. pullulans (Banerjee and Pati 2007), while 2% (w/v) tannic acid was reported to yield maximal enzyme production in R. oryzae and A. japonicus (Bradoo et al. 1997). Some workers reported maximum tannase production with 1% tannic acid from the genera Aspergillus and Penicillium (Banerjee et al. 2007a, 2007b; Batra and Saxena 2005; Costa et al. 2008; Sabu et al. 2005).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effect of various concentrations of tannic acid on tannase production by P. atramentosum KM

Effect of carbon source supplementation

Carbon is an energy source that is essential for the growth of microorganisms. The effect of supplementation of different carbon sources (0.2% w/v) viz. tannic acid, dextrose, glucose, glycerol, maltose, mannitol, lactose and sucrose, on the production of tannase was evaluated. The results showed the stimulatory effect of glucose and maltose on tannase production as carbon source in keekar leaves whereas all the carbon sources inhibited tannase production with amla leaves. The strain P. atramentosum KM produced maximum tannase of 29.4 U/ml in the case of amla leaves, while 31.1 U/ml tannase was produced in the case of keekar leaves supplemented with 0.2% (w/v) maltose as a carbon source (Fig. 3a). This may be due to the fact that amla leaves as a substrate are already rich enough to supply the carbon required for fungal growth and tannase production. Furthermore, when the effect of various concentrations of maltose in keekar leaves was evaluated, an increase in activity was obtained with 0.2% (w/v) of maltose, i.e., 30.9 U/ml (Fig. 3b). This might be due to the fact that the higher concentration of carbon source interrupted sporulation of the fungal isolate by affecting metabolic activities. Similar to our results, Sabu et al. (2006) reported that tannase yield from Lactobacillus sp. was slightly improved by the addition of 1% (w/v) maltose as carbon source in the case of tamarind seed powder. Bradoo et al. (1997) observed that 0.2% (w/v) glucose favored both growth and tannase production, whereas a higher concentration of glucose created an osmotic stress that depressed enzyme synthesis in A. japonicus. A stimulatory effect of a low concentration of glucose on tannase production from P. glabrum (Van de Lagemaat and Pyle 2005) and A. pullulans DBS66 (Banerjee and Pati, 2007) was also reported. Tannase production was also enhanced by the addition of glucose, sucrose, maltose, starch and glycerol (1% w/v each) by A. niger ATCC 16620 using tamarind seed powder (Sabu et al. 2005)

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Effect of various carbon sources on tannase production. b Effect of maltose concentration on tannase production

Effect of nitrogen sources

A suitable nitrogen source is an essential component for growth and enzyme production by microorganisms. Nitrogen sources like ammonium tartrate, oxalate, sulfate, nitrate, chloride, sodium nitrate, urea, peptones, and amino acids stimulate conidia formation. The specificity for tannase production of different nitrogen sources (ammonium chloride, ammonium nitrate, ammonium di-hydrogen orthophosphate, di-hydrogen ammonium phosphate, ammonium sulphate, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate) at 0.2% (w/v) was evaluated. The results showed maximum tannase production by P. atramentosum KM was obtained with ammonium chloride, i.e., 28.9 U/ml using amla and di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate gave 31.9 U/ml using keekar leaves (Fig. 4a). When the effect of concentration of the two nitrogen sources was evaluated, the results showed that 0.2% (w/v) of both nitrogen sources was effective for maximal tannase production with both substrates, i.e., 28.9 U/ml in amla leaves and 31.4 U/ml in keekar leaves (Fig. 4b). In both cases, higher concentration of nitrogen sources might have inhibited the formation of fungal conidia and mycelia growth. Similar to our results, Banerjee and Pati (2005) also observed the highest growth and tannase production by A. pullulans in the presence 0.3% (w/v) di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate [(NH4)2HPO4]. Other workers reported maximum production of tannase in the presence ammonium chloride (Kar et al. 2003), 0.2% (w/v) ammonium sulphate (Manjit et al. 2008; Podrigues et al. 2007), and ammonium nitrate (Selwal et al. 2010). Sabu et al. (2005) reported that 1% (w/v) potassium nitrate was the most effective nitrogen source for maximum production of tannase by A. niger ATCC 16620 using tamarind seed powder.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a Effect of various nitrogen sources on tannase production. b Effect of selected nitrogen source concentration on tannase production

Effect of metal ions

Tannase requires the presence of metal ions to express its full catalytic activity. Hence, it is important to know the type of ions and the concentration required to achieve maximal reaction efficiency (Aguilar et al. 2007). Therefore, the effect on tannase production of different di-valent cations (0.2% w/v) such as chlorides of Ca+2, Cu+2, Hg+2 and sulfates of Fe+2, Zn+2, Mn+2 and Mg+2 was assessed. P. atramentosum KM gave higher tannase production with MgSO4·7H2O in case of amla (31.4 U/ml) and copper sulfate / zinc sulfate in case of keekar leaves, i.e., 32.0 U/ml with copper sulfate and 32.0 U/ml with zinc sulfate (Fig. 5). This activation by metal ions might be due to changes in the equilibrium constant of the enzyme reaction or by causing a change in the surface charge of the enzyme protein. Ionic interactions between an enzyme-bound metal and the substrate can help orientate the substrate to facilitate the reaction. The presence of the divalent ion Mg+2 at low concentration might have caused precipitation of the enzyme in the reaction mixture, thus enhancing tannase activity (Aguilar et al. 2007; Kar et al. 2003). Similar to our observations, traces of Fe+2, Zn+2 and Cu+2 have been reported to be stimulatory for the production of tannase by A. niger (Yamada et al. 1968). Likewise, a stimulatory effect of Mg+2 on tannase production was reported in Verticillium sp. P9 (Kasieczka et al. 2007). Mukherjee and Banerjee, (2006) reported that Mg+2 ions enhanced tannase activity produced by a co-culture of R. oryzae and A. foetidus. Kar et al. (2003) reported that Mg+2 or Hg+ ions stimulated tannase activity produced by A. foetidus and R. oryzae. Chhokar et al. (2010) reported that metal ions Mg+2, Mn+2, Ca+2, Na+, and K+ stimulated the tannase activity produced from A. awamori MTCC 9299, while Cu+2, Fe+3, and Co+2 acted as inhibitors of the enzyme. Recently, Selwal et al. (2010) reported maximum tannase production by P. aeruginosa IIIB 8914 in the presence of MgSO4·7H2O with amla leaves and HgCl2 with keekar leaves.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of various metal ions on tannase production by P. atramentosum KM

Effects of additives

Surfactants play a vital role in enzyme production (Kim et al. 1995). We evaluated the effect of different surfactants (0.2% w/v) on tannase production, and observed that all the surfactants tested inhibited tannase production by P. atramentosum KM using amla (27.9 U/ml) and keekar (31.5 U/ml) leaves as compared to the control (Fig. 6). This inhibition may be due to a combination of factors such as a reduction in the hydrophobic interactions that play a crucial role in holding together the tertiary protein structure, and direct interactions with the protein molecule (Kar et al. 2003). Earlier reports on the effect of surfactants showed that all the surfactants and chelators inhibited tannase activity in A. foetidus and R. oryzae (Kar et al. 2003), while Tween 80 enhanced tannase activity. Tween 80 and Tween 20 caused a decrease in tannase activity in P. variotii (Battestin and Macedo 2007) and Verticillium sp. (Kasieczka et al. 2007). Srivastava and Kar (2009) also reported inhibitory effect of surfactants on tannase production.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of various additives on tannase production by P. atramentosum KM

Using optimized production medium, we are able to achieve enzyme production of 32.7 U/ml using amla leaves and 34.7 U/ml using keekar leaves using P. atramentosum KM. We found an increase in tannase activity of approximately 2.0- to 2.5-fold after optimization of certain physical and nutritional parameters during SmF (Table 3). Our isolates produced a high tannase yield as compared to other fungal and bacterial tannase producers under SmF reported in the literature. Rajkumar and Nandy (1983) reported 10.8 U/ml tannase from P. chrysogenum NCIM-722. Batra and Saxena (2005) reported various Penicillii producing approximately 4.8 U/ml tannase from P. charlesii (4.8 U/ml), P. variable (4.7 U/ml), P. crustosum (4.7 U/ml) and P. restrictum (4.4 U/ml). In our previous report (Selwal et al. 2010), we reported maximum yields of tannase, i.e., 13.6 and 12.9 U/ml by P. aeruginosa IIIB 8914 under SmF using 2% (w/v) amla and keekar leaves, respectively. Costa et al. (2008) reported ca. 20.6 U/ml tannase by A. tamarii. Selwal et al. (2011) also reported maximal tannase production of 170. 7 U/g dry solid and 165.5 U/g dry solid by P. atramentosum KM under solid state fermentation using jamun and keekar leaves, respectively.

Table 3 Comparison of tannase production under unoptimized and optimized conditions

Laboratory scale-transfer of tannase production under SmF conditions

During the scale transfer of tannase production in Erlenmeyer flasks, using keekar and amla leaves, the tannase yield was found to decrease. An enzyme titer of 35.7 U/ml by P. atramentosum KM using keekar leaves and 33.8 U/ml using amla leaves were obtained when the fungal strain was grown in 50 ml selective mineral salt medium and selective production medium, respectively (Table 4). Further increase of the culture medium volume to 100 ml and 200 ml decreased enzyme yield. Reasons for the decrease in enzyme production during the scale transfer could be due to the non-maintenance of nutritional and fermentation conditions required in the scale-up experiments.

Table 4 Effect of laboratory scale transfer on tannase production through submerged fermentation (SmF)

Conclusion

The present investigation suggests that agro residues such as jamun and keekar leaves can be one of the best and most cost-effective alternatives to costly pure tannic acid for industrial production of microbial tannase. The enzyme produced by P. atramentosum KM has interesting characteristics and this fact encourages further studies including its production at industrial scale. The novelty in the present investigation is that this is the first fungal isolate reported to produce tannase at the high pH of 7.5 using keekar leaves. The production of tannase by this isolate should be attempted at higher levels. Optimization of growth parameters in a bioreactor is needed to determine its commercial viability. As the range of applications of this enzyme is very wide there is always a scope for novel tannase with better characteristics, which may be suited to diverse fields of application.

References

  • Aguilar CN, Rodríguez R, Gutiérrez-Sánchez G, Augur C, Favela-Torres E, Prado-Barragan LA, Ramírez-Coronel A, Contreras-Esquivel JC (2007) Microbial tannases: advances and perspective. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76(1):47–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee R, Mukherjee G, Patra KC (2005) Microbial transformation of tannin-rich substrate to gallic acid through co-culture method. Bioresour Technol 96:949–953

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee D, Mondal KC, Pati BR (2007a) Tannase production by Aspergillus aculeatus DBF9 through solid state fermentation. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 54(2):159–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee D, Mahapatra S, Pati BR (2007b) Gallic acid production by submerged fermentation of Aspergillus aculeatus DBF9. Res J Microbiol 2(5):462–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee D, Pati BR (2007) Optimization of tannase production by Aureobasidium pullulans DBS 66. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17(6):1049–1053

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Battestin V, Macedo GA (2007) Effects of temperature, pH and additives on the activity of tannase produced by Paecilomyces variotii. Electron J Biotechnol 10(2):191–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Batra A, Saxena RK (2005) Potential tannase producers from the genera Aspergillus and Penicillium. Process Biochem 40:1553–1557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradoo S, Gupta R, Saxena RK (1997) Parametric optimization and biochemical regulation of extracellular tannase from Aspergillus japonicus. Process Biochem 32:135–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chhokar V, Sangwan M, Beniwal V, Nehra K, Nehra KS (2010) Effect of additives on the activity of tannase from Aspergillus awamori MTCC9299. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 160(8):2256–2264. doi:10.1007/s12010-009-8813-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa AM, Ribeiro WX, Kato E, Monteiro ARG, Peralta RM (2008) Production of tannase by Aspergillus tamarii in submerged cultures. Braz Arch Biol Technol 51(2):399–404

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Aldaco K, Rivas-Martínez E, Rodríguez-Herrera R, Aguilar CN (2009) Immobilization of Aspergillus niger GH1 tannase for the production of the antioxidant gallic acid. Int J Eng Technol 1(4):288–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Hernández M, Augur C, Rodríguez R, Contreras-Esquivel J, Aguilar CN (2006) Evaluation of culture conditions for tannase production by Aspergillus niger GH1. Food Technol Biotechnol 44:541–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerman AE, Butler LG (1978) Protein precipitation method for determination of tannins. J Agric Food Chem 26:809–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Ni J, Borthwick AGL (2005) Biosynthesis of valonia tannin hydrolase and hydrolysis of valonia tannin to ellagic acid by Aspergillus SHL 6.Proc. Biochem 40(3–4):1245–1249

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kar B, Banerjee R (2000) Biosynthesis of tannin acyl hydrolase from tannin-rich forest residue under fermentation conditions. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 25:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kar B, Banerjee R, Bhattacharyya BC (2003) Effect of additives on the behavioural properties of tannin acyl hydrolase. Process Biochem 38(9):1395–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasieczka BM, Kuk K, Kalinowska K, Turkiewicz M (2007) Purification and characterization of two cold-adapted extracellular tannin acyl hydrolases from an Antarctic strain Verticillium sp. P9. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TU, Gu JY, Jeong JY, Bum SM, Shin YC (1995) Purification and characterization of a maltotetraose forming alkaline a-amylase from an alkalophilic Bacillus strain GM8901. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3105–3112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manjit, Yadav A, Aggarwal NK, Kumar K, Kumar A (2008) Tannase production by Aspergillus fumigatus MA under solid-state fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:3023–3030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal KC, Banerjee D, Jana M, Pati BR (2001) Colorimetric assay for determination of Tannin Acyl Hydrolase (E.C. 3.1.1.20) activity. Anal Biochem 295:168–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee G, Banerjee R (2006) Effects of temperature, pH and additives on the activity of tannase produced by a co-culture of Rhizopus oryzae and Aspergillus foetidus. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:207–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveri C, Campisano A, Catara A, Cirvilleri G (2007) Characterization and faflp genotyping of Penicillium strains from postharvest samples and packinghouse environments. J Plant Pathol 89(1):29–40

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Podrigues THS, Dantas MAA, Pinto GAS, Gonçalves LRB (2007) Tannase production by solid state fermentation of cashew apple bagasse. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 136–140:675–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourrat H, Regerat F, Pourrat A, Jean D (1982) Production of tannase (Tannin Acyl Hydrolase E.C. 3.1.1.20) by a strain of Aspergillus niger. Biotechnol Lett 4:583–588

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajkumar GS, Nandy SC (1983) Isolation purification and some properties of Penicillium chrysogenum tannase. Appl Environ Microbiol 46:525–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabu A, Pandey A, Daud MJ, Szakacs G (2005) Tamarind seed powder and Palm kernel cake: Two novel agro residues for the production of tannase under solid state fermentation by Aspergillus niger ATCC 16620. Bioresour Technol 96(11):1223–1228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabu A, Augur C, Swati C, Pandey A (2006) Tannase production by Lactobacillus sp. ASR-S1 under solid-state fermentation. Process Biochem 41:575–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selwal MK, Yadav A, Selwal KK, Aggarwal NK, Gupta R, Gautam SK (2010) Optimization of cultural conditions for tannase production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa IIIB 8914 under submerged fermentation. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 26:599–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Selwal MK, Yadav A, Selwal KK, Aggarwal NK (2011) Tannase production by Penicillium atramentosum KM under SSF and its applications in wine clarification and tea cream solubilization. Braz J Microbiol 42:374–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava A, Kar R (2009) Characterization and application of tannase produced by Aspergillus niger ITCC 6514.07 on pomegranate rind. Braz J Microbiol 40:782–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugita C, Makimura K, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H, Nagai A (2004) PCR identification system for the genus Aspergillus and three major pathogenic species: Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus niger. Med Mycol 42:433–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño-Cueto B, Luis M, Contreras-Esquivel JC, Rodríguez R, Aguilera A, Aguilar CN (2007) Gallic acid and tannase accumulation during fungal solid state culture of a tannin-rich desert plant (Larrea tridentata Cov.). Bioresour Technol 98:721–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van De Lagemaat J, Pyle DL (2005) Modeling the uptake and growth kinetics of Penicillium glabrum in a tannic acid-containing solid-state fermentation for tannase production. Process Biochem 40(5):1773–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada HO, Adachi M, Watanabe M, Sato N (1968) Studies on fungal tannase, Part I: Formation, purification and catalytic properties of tannase of Aspergillus flavus. Agric Biol Chem 32(9):1070–1078

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The award of a senior research fellowship under Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship scheme (University Grant Commission) sponsored by the Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Govt. of India to the first author is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjit K. Selwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selwal, M.K., Selwal, K.K. High-level tannase production by Penicillium atramentosum KM using agro residues under submerged fermentation. Ann Microbiol 62, 139–148 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0238-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0238-1

Keywords