Skip to main content
  • Original Article
  • Published:

In vitro screen of Lactobacillus plantarum as probiotic bacteria and their fermented characteristics in soymilk

Abstract

One hundred and two strains of Lactobacillus plantarum, all isolated from traditional dairy products of minority nationalities, were evaluated for in vitro probiotic properties, including acid and bile tolerance, aggregation activity, and antibacterial activity. Of these, 12 strains with a high tolerance to simulated gastric juice (pH 2.5, 3 h of incubation) were selected, of which eight of these also showed a good tolerance to bile salt. All selected 12 strains showed a high autoaggregation percentage after being incubated at room temperature for 20 h, and nine of these significantly inhibited growth of the five indicator intestinal pathogens. Six L. plantarum strains (IMAU10120, IMAU10156, IMAU40126, IMAU70004, IMAU60042, and IMAU60171) were selected for further evaluation of their fermentation characteristics, sensory quality, and viable counts, both during the fermentation process of soymilk and following a 28-day storage of the soymilk. The six strains had an acid-producing ability at the refrigerated temperature. All of the fermented soymilk samples had a viable count above log 8.45 CFU/ml, and viability in the samples was maintained during storage. Based on both the probiotic properties and fermented characteristics, L. plantarum IMAU10120 was the best potential probiotic strain of those tested for the production of fermented functional soymilk.

Introduction

Probiotics have become a major focus of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) research over the past 10 years, with most attention focusing on the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium (Kailasapathy and Chin 2000). These organisms have been widely reported to exert many beneficial effects, such as activation of the immune system, prevention of cancer cell growth, maintenance of mucosal integrity, and presentation of an antagonistic environment for pathogens (Jin et al. 2011; Kazuhiro and Joseph 2000; Reid et al. 2003; Sanders and Klaenhammer 2001). As a result, the incorporation of these probiotic bacteria into food products with the aim to increase the therapeutic value of these products has become a popular trend (Parvez et al. 2006; Williams 2010).

Interest has been growing in the commercial utilization of Lactobacillus strains isolated from traditional, naturally fermented dairy products, which possess health-promoting effects. Research on lactobacilli isolated from such traditional, naturally fermented dairy products reveals a long history of safe use (Holzapfel et al. 2001). In many cases, lactobacilli are also used as starter cultures in industrial and artisanal food fermentation as they contribute to the conservation, flavor, and texture of the fermented foods. Over 3,432 strains of LAB from traditional, naturally fermented dairy products in China and Mongolia have been isolated, identified by 16S-rDNA analysis, and stored in our laboratory. However, to provide health benefits, Lactobacillus strains, which are mostly delivered in a food system, must overcome physical and chemical barriers in the gastrointestinal tract, especially acid and bile stresses, and have antagonistic activity against bacterial pathogens.

Soymilk, a traditional oriental food beverage, is a water extract of soybean that provides a rich yet inexpensive supply of protein and calories. Soymilk can be used as an economical protein beverage when cow milk is not available or is expensive. However, the consumption of soybean as a raw food material has been hindered due to its unfavorable beany flavor (Arai et al. 1996; Scalabrini et al. 1998), the presence of flatulence factors, and the high contents of indigestible alpha-galactosyl oligosaccharides, such as raffinose and stachyose (Tsangalis and Shah 2004). One possible solution to overcoming the off-flavor associated with soy products, such as soy yogurt, is to use LAB exhibiting reductase activity in the fermentation process. The fermentation of soymilk with various organisms, especially LAB, has been reported to eliminate both the beany flavor and flatulence factors, thereby increasing both the acceptability and the nutritional value of the processed product (Jen-Wan et al. 2000; Osaana et al. 2007; Rekha and Vijayalakshmi 2011). Hepatic lipid accumulation-preventing activity, antioxidative, and antimutagenic activities have also been reported. All of these activities are well associated with the selection of LAB (Hsieh and Chou 2006; Kitawaki et al. 2009; Wang et al. 2006), which has led to attempts to achieve fermentation with various LAB.

In the study reported here, 102 Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated in our laboratory from traditional fermented foods were screened for desirable probiotic traits, such as acid and bile tolerance, aggregation activity, and antibacterial activity. The selected L. plantarum strains were then used as starter culture for soymilk fermentation, and their fermentation characteristics, sensory quality, and viable counts were evaluated after fermentation and following 28 days of soymilk storage.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains

One hundred and two strains of L. plantarum were grown in MRS broth at 37°C for 18 h. All 16S rDNA sequences of these strains were submitted to GenBank and their GenBank accession numbers are listed in Table 1. The indicator strains of antimicrobial activity included Escherichia coli O157 882364, Salmonella typhimurium S50333, Shigella flexneri CMCC(B)51592, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 1448, and Listeria monocytogenes C53-3, which were obtained from our laboratory and cultured in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium, nutrient broth (NB) medium, tryptic soytone broth (TSB), and broth brain–heart infusion agar (BHI), respectively. All strains were subcultured twice prior to being used in the experiments.

Table 1 Origin of the102 strains of Lactobacillus plantarum used in this study

Screening of L. plantarum for potential probiotic properties

Tolerance to the low pH conditions

Cultures of the 102 strains of L. plantarum listed in Table 1 were inoculated at 2% in MRS broth (pH 3.0) and grown overnight. All strains were inoculated into phosphate buffered saline (PBS) buffer (pH 3.0) and incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 72 h according to the method described by Conway et al. (1987). The OD value was determined at 600 nm at 0 and 72 h, and ΔA600nm ≥ 0.500 was chosen as a standard; the viable plate count method of survival rate was used for further assessments.

Transit tolerance of selected strains

Simulated gastrointestinal juice and simulated intestinal juice were prepared according to the method described by Yan et al. (2010). Test cultures (1%) were separately inoculated into simulated gastric juice at pH 2.0 and 2.5, respectively; following mixing for 10 s, the mixtures were incubated anaerobically at 37°C. Gastric transit tolerance was studied by determining total viable counts in gastric juice withdrawn at 0, 1, 2, and 3 h. After 3 h of incubation in gastric juice, 1 ml of culture was inoculated into 9 ml simulated intestinal juice (pH 8.0) and incubated at 37°C anaerobically. The intestinal transit tolerance was studied by determining the total viable counts in intestinal juice withdrawn at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h.

Determination of total viable count and survival rate

Viable counts of L. plantarum were made using a pour plate method and MRS agar after serial dilution in maximum recovery diluent. A pre-prepared test sample (1 ml) of 10-3, 10-4, and/or 10-5 dilution was transferred into a sterile petri dish, in duplicate, and warm (45 ± 1°C) sterile plate count MRS agar (15 ml) was mixed with the inoculum. The plates were incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 48 h, and the colony forming units (CFU) estimated. Survival rate was calculated as: survival rate (%) = (N 1/ N 0) × 100%, Where N 1 represents the total viable count of probiotic strains after treatment by PBS or simulated gastrointestinal juices and N 0 represents the total viable count of probiotic strains before treatment.

Bile tolerance test

The method of Walker and Gilliland (1993) was used to determine the bile tolerance of these tested strains. MRS-THIO broth (MRS supplemented with 0.2% sodium thioglycollate) (Kanto, Japan) was inoculated with 10 CFU/ml from overnight cultures. Test cultures were supplemented with 0.3% oxgall (dehydrated fresh bile; Difco, Detroit, MI). All samples were incubated for 24 h at 37°C in a water bath. Growth in control (no bile) and test cultures (0.3% oxgall) was monitored hourly by measuring absorbance at 620 nm using a U-3900 spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) against the corresponding non-inoculated blank samples. Growth curves were plotted, and the analysis was based on the time required for each culture to reach a difference of 0.3 units between the control and test culture. The growth delay in time (hours) between the culture media was considered to be the lag time.

The maximum concentration of bile salts tolerated by the tested strain was determined. MRS broth supplemented with different concentrations of bile salts (0.3, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8%, w/v; B3426, Sigma, St Louis, MI) were used and inoculated with 1% overnight suspensions of the tested strain, and then incubated anaerobically at 37°C for 24 h. Absorbance (620 nm) was measured at 0 and 12 h.

Autoaggregation assays

Autoaggregation abilities were measured as described by Collado et al. (2008) as the autoaggregation percentage. Briefly, cells were washed twice with PBS (130 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2), resuspended in the same buffer, and adjusted to OD660 = 0.25 ± 0.05 in order to standardize the number of bacteria (107–108 CFU/ml). The bacterial suspensions were then incubated at room temperature and monitored at different time intervals (5, 10, 20 h). Autoaggregation percentage was expressed as: A% = (A0 − At)/A0 × 100%, where A0 represents the absorbance (A600nm) at 0 h and At represents the absorbance (A600nm) at 5, 10, and 20 h, respectively.

Coaggregation assays of pathogens with probiotic strains

For the coaggregation test, bacterial suspensions were prepared as described for the autoaggregation assay. Equal volumes of cells (500 μl) of various probiotic and pathogen strains were mixed and incubated at room temperature without agitation. The absorbance (A600 nm) of each probiotic and pathogen mixture and for each bacterial suspension alone was measured during the incubation period. Coaggregating ability was expressed as: [(Apat + Aprobio)/2 − (Amix)]/(Apat + Aprobio)/2 × 100%, where Apat and Aprobio represent the absorbance (A600nm) of each separate bacterial suspension in a control tube, Amix represents the absorbance (A600nm) of each mixed bacterial/probiotic suspension at the different times tested.

Inhibition of pathogens

The methods used for the well diffusion assay of the capacity of the strains to inhibit a representative group of intestinal pathogens were those described by Vinderola et al. (2008) with some modifications. Briefly, 20 μl of MRS agar at 45°C was vigorously mixed with 200 μl overnight culture of the indicator strain and poured into regular microbiological plates. Wells (diameter 8 mm) were punched in the agar layer, and 100 μl of cell-free supernatant, obtained by centrifugation of the cultures at 2,500 g for 10 min and filter-sterilization through a 0.22-μl pore membrane, was placed in each well.

Fermentation characteristics of the screened L. plantarum strains in soymilk

Production of fermented soymilk

Soymilk was prepared and fermented according to the procedures described by Wang et al. (2002). The soymilk was first pasteurized at 95°C for 15 min, then cooled to 40°C and inoculated with the screened strains (2 × 107 CFU/ml). After inoculation, the soymilk was incubated at 42°C until fermentation was complete and the pH fell to 4.5. Samples of the fermented soymilk were stored for 28 days at 4°C. Soymilk samples were assayed prior to fermentation, every 3 h during the 24-h fermentation process, and on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 of storage. The trial was carried out in triplicate.

Fermentation characteristics

The pH values were measured using a pHSJ-3 F pH meter (Leici, Shanghai, China). The titratable acidity (TA) was determined with 0.1 N NaOH using a 0.5% phenolphthalein as indicator. The viable counts of the screened L. plantarum strains were enumerated according to the description of Tharmaraj and Shah (2003).

Sensory evaluation

Descriptive sensory analysis was performed by a panel of ten trained panelists on days 0, 7, 14, and 21 o the storage period. Panel members discussed and agreed upon the definitions and how to qualify the attributes on the chosen scale. Panelists and test rooms of sensory analysis were according to international standards (ISO-8586-1 1993) and (ISO-8589 1988), respectively. A beaker (100 ml) filled with the set-type fermented soymilk was used for evaluation with a tablespoon, and the testers rinsed their mouths with water between consecutive samples. The characteristics evaluated included appearance (soy whey-separation, firmness, shape-maintenance, surface-smoothness), texture (hardness, consistency, flatness), flavor (soy flavor, acid flavor, cooking flavor, and global flavor), taste (soy taste, acid taste, bitter taste, astringency, greasy texture, and global taste) (Buono et al. 1990; Macedo et al. 1999; Salvador and Fiszman 2004). Each subitem was divided into five grades (five scores: 1 = strongly attractive, 5 = strongly unappealing), and item and total scores were calculated and analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS, Chicago, IL) to determine significance.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SAS ver. 7.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The comparisons of differences between the means of the treatments were tested by analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of P < 0.05.

Results and discussion

Screening of L. plantarum strains with desired potential probiotic properties

The screening results showed that 30 strains of L. plantarum grew well (ΔA600nm ≥ 0.500) at the acidic condition of pH 3.0 (data not shown); this pH was selected for further analysis of transit tolerance. These 30 strains were then screened for a high tolerance to the simulated gastric juice (pH 2.5, 3-h incubation); 12 strains met the criterion of a survival rate >1% (Table 2). Although most of the tested strains could grow in an acidic environment, there was a large variation in growth rate when they were cultured in artificial gastric juice at pH 2.5 for 3 h (Table 2).

Table 2 Survival of 12 strains of L. plantarum in artificial gastrointestinal juice at pH 2.5

Of the 12 L. plantarum strains incubated in the simulated gastric juice (pH 2.0), five (IMAU10120, IMAU20029, IMAU70004, IMAU60171, IMAU60042) exhibited fairly good acid tolerance and were able to survive (range 7.3–3.5 log CFU/ml). Incubation in the simulated intestinal juice up to 24 h also did not significantly affect the viability of these five strains (Table 3). IMAU10156 and IMAU40126 survived with viable counts of about 3.0 log CFU/ml in the simulated intestinal juice for 4 h, but not for 8 h; the remaining five strains did not tolerate incubation in the simulated gastric juice and intestinal transit.

Table 3 Viable count of 12 strains of L. plantarum artificial gastrointestinal juice at pH 2 and artificial intestinal juice at pH 8

The bile tolerance of the 12 screened L. plantarum strains in the form of lag time is given in Table 4, and the tolerance to different concentrations of bile salts is shown in Table 5. According to the standards established by Chateau et al. (1994), IMAU70089, IMAU20029, IMAU30055, IMAU60171, IMAU70004, IMAU10120, and IMAU40126 were assessed as bile-tolerant strains, IMAU70042, IMAU60042, and IMAU10156 as weakly tolerant strains, and IMAU10058 and IMAU40005 as sensitive strains (Table 4). To simulate intestinal conditions, a broader range of bile concentrations was then tested, which involved the adaptation to a series of high concentrations of bile salt (range 0.3–1.8%). The highest tolerance level of IMAU70089, IMAU60171, IMAU70004, IMAU70042, IMAU10156, IMAU40126, IMAU10120, and IMAU60042 to bile salts was 1.8% (Table 5).

Table 4 Bile tolerance, measured as lag time, of 12 strains of L. plantarum to 0.3% bile salt in medium*
Table 5 Bile tolerance, measured as change in absorbance, of 12 of strains of L. plantarum to different concentrations of bile salts

Despite the simplicity of the technique, the results of this experiment scientifically validated the bile tolerance capacity of IMAU70089, IMAU60171, IMAU70004, IMAU10156, IMAU40126, IMAU10120, IMAU60042, and IMAU70042. The other four strains tested were considered to be sensitive to bile (Tables 45).

The results of the autoaggregation assays are shown in Table 6. The highest autoaggregation was observed in IMAU40126, whose aggregation percentage reached 53.2% following incubation at room temperature for 20 h. IMAU10120, IMAU40005, and IMAU10058 also showed a high autoaggregation percentage after incubation, with aggregation percentages of 46.4, 45.8, and 30.5%, respectively. The remaining strains tested also showed a high autoaggregation percentage following incubation, with aggregation percentages of >20%.

Table 6 Autoaggregation activity of 12 strains of L. plantarum

All 12 tested L. plantarum strains showed some coaggregation properties with pathogens (Table 7); however, this property was also strain specific and the degree gradually increased with time. As a result, all 12 of the strains tested in this experiment showed coaggregation abilities with the pathogens tested, but the coaggregation percentages depended on the specific L. plantarum strain, the specific pathogen strain, and the incubation time, similar to the results reported by Collado et al. (2007). All tested strains showed high coaggregation percentages with Staphylococcus aureus, probably due to its morphology. In general, probiotic strains IMAU40005, IMAU40126, and IMAU10120 showed the best coaggregation properties with pathogens.

Table 7 Coaggregation percentage of 12 strains of L. plantarum against five pathogens

The inhibition the 12 tested L. plantarum strains to five food spoilage and pathogenic bacteria is shown in Table 8. The cell-free culture supernatants of IMAU70004, IMAU70042, IMAU40126, IMAU10156, IMAU70089, IMAU60171, IMAU40005 IMAU10120, and IMAU60042 in MRS broth was significantly inhibitory to both Gram-positive (Listeria monocytogenes C53-3, S. aureus ATCC 1448) and Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli O157 882364, Shigella flexneri CMCC(B)51592, Salmonella typhimurium S50333). At the same time, the results indicated that different strains of L. plantarum possessed different degrees of antimicrobial activity, even these high acid-tolerant strains, likely due to the production of bacteriocin in the antimicrobial substances.

Table 8 Antibacterial activity, measured by the well-diffusion assay, of 12 strains of L. plantarum against five pathogensa

Lactobacillus plantarum IMAU70004 demonstrated the highest antagonistic activity against all foodborne pathogens (Table 8), with L. plantarum IMAU70042, IMAU40126, IMAU10156, and IMAU70089 showing a gradual lower degree of antibacterial ability against all five indicator strains. In contrast, L. plantarum IMAU10058 showed no antibacterial activity to all five pathogens. In particular, L. plantarum IMAU20029 had no inhibitory zone against L. monocytogenes C53-3 and IMAU30055 had no inhibitory zone against S. flexneri CMCC(B)51592 and S. aureus ATCC 1448.

Based on the probiotic properties determined in these studies, six strains of L. plantarum, namely, IMAU10120, IMAU10156, IMAU40126, IMAU70004, IMAU60042, and IMAU60171, were selected for the fermentation study in soymilk.

Fermentation and storage characteristics of six strains of L. plantarum in soymilk

The changes in the pH and TA counts of soymilk inoculated with six strains of L. plantarum during fermentation are shown in Fig. 1. Soymilk was found to support the growth of all six of these L. plantarum strains. Significant increases in the TA and decreases in the pH in soymilk during fermentation were observed with all six L. plantarum strains. Strains IMAU10120 and IMAU10156 required 15 and 13.5 h, respectively, to ferment the soymilk to a final pH of 4.5; the other four strains tested required 12 h to reach pH 4.5. The final TA of soymilk reached 49.85 °T and 52.01 °T for IMAU10156 and IMAU10120, respectively, while the TA values of the other four strains ranged from 58.74 to 70.06 °T. After storage for 28 days, the TA values of all samples increased to 80–110 °T, thereby demonstrating that these six L. plantarum strains had acid-producing ability at the refrigerated temperature.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The fermentation characteristics of six strains of Lactobacillus plantarum in soymilk. T1 Time-line of fermentation, T2 time-line of storage. The value of each strain is given in the presence of IMAU10156 (filled square), IMAU10120 (filled circle), IMAU40126 (upright filled triangle), IMAU70004 (inverted filled triangle), IMAU60042 (filled diamond), IMAU60171 (filled inverted arrowhead). a pH value, b titratable acidity (TA), c viscosity (cP), d viable count (log CFU/ml)

The changes in the viscosity of the soymilk during fermentation are shown in Fig. 1c. During the fermentation period, the viscosity of soymilk markedly increased with increasing fermentation time, reaching as high as 1,000–1,400 cP at the end of the fermentation period. However, the change in viscosity during the storage period was not significant.

Gradual increases in the viable counts during fermentation were observed (Fig. 1d), and there was no significant difference in the viable counts among the samples at the end of the fermentation. There were also no dramatic differences in the viable counts of all strains in the fermented soymilk samples during storage (Fig. 1d). There was a general trend towards a slight decrease in the number of viable bacteria between storage day 7 and day 21. The viable count of IMAU10120 increased to log 8.51 CFU/ml at the end of the fermentation period and was maintained at log 8.31 CFU/ml at the end of the storage period. IMAU60171 reached log 9.15 CFU/ml after fermentation and maintained viability at log 8.93 CFU/ml at the end of the storage period, which was the highest recorded count among all strains.

An administered strain of Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult was capable of growing in soymilk with no additives up to a level of 109 CFU/ml. During storage of the fermented soymilk at 10°C for 20 days, viable counts of this strain did not change (Shimakawa et al. 2003). This result is similar to our results of fermented soymilk by L. plantarum.

To be able to exert its health benefits in vivo, probiotics must be able to enter the intestinal tract alive, which requires them to retain their viability in the food during shelf-life and after consumption and to resist the acidic conditions of the stomach as well as the bile salts in the intestine (Kailasapathy and Rybka 1997). Therefore, a viable cell count of >106–107 CFU/g is necessary to ensure that a sufficient “daily dose” of 106–109 viable bacteria are supplied (Lee and Salminen 1995). In our experiment, all of the fermented soymilk samples had a viable count of more than log 8.45 CFU/ml and maintained their viability in the samples during storage.

The sensory evaluations of taste were made during the storage period at 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days (Fig. 2). The scores of L. plantarum IMAU10156 and IMAU10120 were better than those of the other four strains, especially at 28 days of storage, in terms of stable taste and flavor. Although the fermented characteristics of soymilk by L. plantarum IMAU10120 were not the best, the taste and flavor scores were favorable, possibly because of the objectionable beany flavor and taste in the other fermented soymilks (low scores). According to Chun et al. (2008), the most important factor for soy yoghurt quality is taste (about 71% of respondents); as such, L. plantarum IMAU10120 can be considered to be the most suitable strain for soy yoghurt production.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sensory evaluation of soymilk after fermentation and during storage. Columns with different lowercase letters are significantly different at P < 0.05

Conclusions

Of the 102 different strains tested, L. plantarum IMAU10120 was the most suitable potential probiotic strain for novel health-promoting fermented products after both the evaluation of in vitro probiotic properties and fermented characteristics. Therefore, these strains will be used in further in vivo probiotic studies in our laboratory to develop probiotic fermented soymilk products.

References

  • Arai S, Suzuky H, Fujimake M, Sakurai Y (1996) Studies on flavour components in soybean. Part 2. Phenolic acids in defatted soybean flour. Agric Biol Chem 30:364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buono MA, Setser C, Erickson LE, Fung DYC (1990) Soymilk yoghurt: sensory evaluation and chemical measurement. J Food Sci 55:528–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chateau N, Deschamps AM, Sassi AH (1994) Heterogeneity of bile salts resistance in the Lactobacillus isolates of a probiotic consortium. Lett Appl Microbiol 18:2–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun J, Kwon DY, Kim JS, Kim JH (2008) Sensory properties of soy yoghurts prepared from yellow and black soymilk using Streptococcus infantarius 12 and Weisellia sp. 4. J Sci Food Agric 88:1845–1849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S (2007) Measurement of aggregation properties between probiotics and pathogens: In vitro evaluation of different methods. J Microbiol Methods 71:71–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S (2008) Adhesion and aggregation properties of probiotic and pathogen strains. Eur Food Res Technol 226:1065–1073

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conway PL, Gorbach SL, Goldin BR (1987) Survival of lactic acid bacteria in the human stomach and adhesion to intestinal cells. J Dairy Sci 70:1–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holzapfel WH, Haberer P, Geisen R, Björkroth J, Schillinger U (2001) Taxonomy and important features of probiotic microorganisms in food and nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 73:365–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh ML, Chou CC (2006) Mutagenicity and antimutagenic effect of soymilk fermented with lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 111:43–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jen-Wan H, Roch-Chui Y, Cheng-Chun C (2000) Changes in some components of soymilk during fermentation with bifidobacteria. Food Res Int 33:393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin L, Hyun SY, Kyu WC, Sejong O, Sae HK, Taehoon C, Bongjoon K, Kwang YW (2011) Evaluation of probiotic characteristics of newly isolated Lactobacillus spp.: Immune modulation and longevity. Int J Food Microbiol 148:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kailasapathy K, Chin J (2000) Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunol. Cell Biol 78:80–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kailasapathy K, Rybka S (1997) Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. – their therapeutic potential and survival in yogurt. Aust J Dairy Tech 52:28–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazuhiro H, Joseph R (2000) The role of probiotic bacteria in cancer prevention. Microbes Infection 2:681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitawaki R, Nishimura Y, Takagi N, Iwasaki M, Tsuzuki K, Fukuda M (2009) Effects of Lactobacillus fermented soymilk and soy yogurt on hepatic lipid accumulation in rats fed a cholesterol-free diet. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 73:1484–1488

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee YK, Salminen S (1995) The coming of age of probiotics. Trends Food Sci Technol 6:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macedo RF, Freitas RJ, Pandey A, Soccol CR (1999) Production and shelf-life studies of low cost beverage with soymilk, buffalo cheese whey and cow milk fermented by mixed cultures of Lactobacillus casei ssp. shirota and Bifidobacteriumadolescentis. J Basic Microbiol 39:243–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osaana ND, Henriksson A, Vasiljevic T, Shah NP (2007) α-Galactosidase and proteolytic activities of selected probiotic and dairy cultures in fermented soymilk. Food Chem 104:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez S, Malik KA, Kang SA, Kim HY (2006) Probiotics and their fermented food products are beneficial for health. J Appl Microbiol 100:1171–1185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reid G, Sanders ME, Gaskins HR, Gibson GR, Mercenier A, Rastall RA, Roberfroid MB, Rowland I, Cherbut C, Klaenhammer TR (2003) New scientific paradigms for probiotics and prebiotics. J Clin Gastroenterol 37:105–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rekha CR, Vijayalakshmi G (2011) Isoflavone phytoestrogens in soymilk fermented with β-glucosidase producing probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Sci Nutr 62:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador A, Fiszman SM (2004) Textural and sensory characteristics of whole and skimmed flavored set-type yogurt during long storage. J Dairy Sci 87:4033–4041

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders ME, Klaenhammer TR (2001) Invited Review: The scientific basis of Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM functionality as a probiotic. J Dairy Sci 84:319–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scalabrini P, Rossi M, Spettoli P, Matteuzzi D (1998) Characterization of Bifidobacterium strains for use in soymilk fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 39:213–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shimakawa Y, Matsubara S, Yuki N, Ikeda M, Ishikawa F (2003) Evaluation of Bifidobacterium breve strain Yakult-fermented soymilk as a probiotic food. Int J Food Microbiol 81:131–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tharmaraj N, Shah NP (2003) Selective enumeration of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Propionibacteria. J Dairy Sci 86:2288–2296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsangalis D, Shah NP (2004) Metabolism of oligosaccharides and aldehydes and production of organic acids in soymilk by probiotic bifidobacteria. Int J Food Sci Technol 39:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinderola G, Capellini B, Villarreal F, Suárez V, Quiberoni A, Reinheimer J (2008) Usefulness of a set of simple in vitro tests for the screening and identification of probiotic candidate strains for dairy use. LWT–Food Sci Technol 41:1678–1688

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker DK, Gilliland SE (1993) Relationship among bile tolerance, bile salt deconjugation, and assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Dairy Sci 76:956–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YC, Yu RC, Chou CC (2002) Growth and survival of bifidobacteria and lactic acid bacteria during the fermentation and storage of cultured soymilk drink. Food Microbiol 19:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YC, Yu RC, Chou CC (2006) Antioxidative activities of soymilk fermented with lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria. Food Microbiol 23:128–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams NT (2010) Probiotics. Am J Health Syst Pharm 67:449–458

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yan B, Yanchao Z, Yong Z, Yong L, Shuiquan W, Ximei D, Yanyan W, Heping Z (2010) Screening of potential probiotic properties of Lactobacillus fermentum isolated from traditional dairy products. Food Control 21:695–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Planning) (Grant 2007AA10Z353), Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System of China and National Key Technology R and D Program (No.2009BADC1B01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tiansong Sun or Heping Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bao, Y., Zhang, Y., Li, H. et al. In vitro screen of Lactobacillus plantarum as probiotic bacteria and their fermented characteristics in soymilk. Ann Microbiol 62, 1311–1320 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0377-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-011-0377-4

Keywords